专利摘要:
The invention concerns a new product that includes a mortar base where part of the aggregate or all of the aggregate has been replaced by crushed polyurethane foamed waste. It also relates to a method for preparing lightened mortars but with structural properties comprising the steps of kneading and dosing the different components and the addition of an aqueous solution comprising 0.5% of at least one surfactant that is introduced into the mixture. Of the fresh conglomerate at the time of kneading. (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
公开号:ES2598902A1
申请号:ES201531132
申请日:2015-07-30
公开日:2017-01-30
发明作者:Verónica Calderón Carpintero;Carlos Junco Petrement;Ángel Rodríguez Sáiz;Sara Gutiérrez González;Jesús GADEA SÁINZ;Raquel ARROYO SANZ
申请人:Universidad de Burgos;
IPC主号:
专利说明:

image 1
image2


Lightened and low porosity structural mortar made of polyurethane residues. 5

OBJECT OF THE INVENTION:
The invention concerns a new product that includes a mortar base where part of the aggregate or all of the aggregate has been replaced by crushed foamed polyurethane residue. It also refers to a method for preparing lightened mortars but with 10 structural properties comprising the kneading and dosing steps of the different components and the addition of an aqueous solution comprising 0.5% of at least one surfactant that is introduced into the mixture of the fresh conglomerate at the time of kneading.
 fifteen MOTIVATING CAUSES OF THE INVENTION:
The present invention relates to the field of construction products lightened with rigid or semi-rigid polyurethane foam residue, where this residue is used as part of the aggregate that is added to the final conglomerate. The incorporation of light aggregates (of the expanded perlite or vermiculite type) in mortars is well known and, 20 usually provides several advantages, such as lightness and thermal insulation of building materials. Although, on the other hand, the mechanical resistance decreases significantly, due to the air that is concentrated inside the aggregates. Therefore, the novelty proposed by this invention patent is based on obtaining recycled mortars with light polymer residues, but with improved mechanical strengths compared to traditional mortars. This is achieved by adding surfactants, in varying amounts between 0.5 and 15% with respect to the weight of the cement, which decrease the internal porosity obtained during the manufacture of the mortar in order to avoid penetration and absorption of liquid surface compounds or solid. These surfactants disperse the polymer in aqueous solution, whereby mixing and distribution of materials are easily achieved without flocculation.
The present invention also relates to a method of preparing the part described above, which comprises the steps:
- Dosing and mixing, depending on the final requirements or technical specifications needed for the material, which includes cement, aggregate, crushed polyurethane, water and surfactant.
- Introduction of fresh material in the prefabricated mold or in its 5 direct application on site.
- Removal of the mold after setting the mortar, if applicable.
PREVIOUS TECHNIQUE:
Traditional techniques to lighten a mortar or concrete include the addition of 10 light loads, such as fillers or substitutes for part of the aggregates in the mixture. Among these types of compounds, light aggregates of natural origin are found, such as pumice, volcanic slags, fly ash and volcanic tuff, or synthesis, such as expanded clay, perlite, and vermiculite. In addition, it has been tested with other newer recycled elements or waste products from industry 15 such as cork, treated glass or recycled paper. These light loads are often referred to as light aggregates, understood as light aggregate when the actual density of the grain is less than 2g / cm³. In any case, the inclusion of this type of commercial (or more experimental) products always results in a decrease in the mechanical strength of the final products, a direct consequence of lightening the material.
The search for durable and sustainable building materials applied to the world of construction is one of the reasons why the synergy between the combination of classic building materials and recycled polymers is sought, in this case polyurethane. In this invention, in addition to including as a light aggregate a crushed polyurethane that comes from industrial wastes, different surfactants have been added that provide and contribute to obtaining materials with high mechanical strengths, which gives a novel and very important added value both for the purposes of executing the product of the invention as its manufacturing process.
 30



ADVANTAGES REGARDING THE PREVIOUS TECHNIQUE:
The invention offers the following advantages:
• Density decreases but mechanical strength increases or is maintained by replacing traditional aggregate with recycled polyurethane with respect to traditional construction materials manufactured with commercial light aggregates.
• the total porosity decreases, so that the durability against external agents of the final products will be greater (ice-thaw, salt crystallization, efflorescence, etc.), by reducing the capacity of water absorption by capillarity.
• The presence of surfactants contributes to a uniform distribution of materials, 10 with a good dispersion and no flocculation of the polyurethane, of very low density with respect to the rest of the mortar components (cement, aggregate, water).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION:
Concepts 15
The term "mortar" means a mixture of hydraulic binder (for example, cement), aggregates (fine aggregate or sand), water, and optionally, mineral additives or additions.
The term "mortar" according to this invention designates either the fresh mortar or the hardened mortar. twenty
The term "lightened mortar" is used for materials whose bulk density is lower than that of traditional products. A light mortar itself has an apparent density in a hardened state of less than 1300 kg / m3, while a traditional mortar covers the approximate range between 1800 kg / m3 and 2300 kg / m3. The material is considered “lightened” when the density is greater than 1300 kg / m3 but does not reach 25 1800 kg / m3, and lightweight with density values below 1300 kg / m3.
The term "hydraulic binder" means, according to the present invention, mainly CEM I, CEM II, CEM III, CEM IV and CEM V type cements in accordance with European standards EN 197-1 and EN 197-2 or the type of cement of masonry, plaster and plastering according to EN 998-1 and EN 998-2. 30
The term "aggregate" means, according to the present invention, gravel, gravel and / or sand, that is, an aggregate of siliceous or limestone nature, fine or coarse according to specific requirements.
The term "mineral additions" means, according to the present invention, a finely divided inorganic material used to improve certain properties or to confer special properties on it. Examples of mineral additives are fly ash (as defined in EN 450), silica smoke (as defined in EN 13263), limestone additions and siliceous additions.
The term "surfactant" or "surfactant" means, according to the present invention, a compound that decreases the surface tension of a liquid and / or that reduces the interfacial tension between two liquids, or between a liquid and a solid.
The term "prefabricated mold" within the field of construction includes, according to the present invention, any component of a building, for example, a wall, a load wall, a pillar, a partition, roof elements, beam, a flooring, lining material, a block, a pole, a cornice, a plasterboard, an insulating element (acoustic and / or thermal).
The expression of "porosity" of a material means according to the present invention, the pores that communicate with each other inside the material or with the outside of the material. Within porosity, "open porosity" means the gaps that can theoretically be filled with a fluid from outside the material.

Detailed description
The present invention also relates to the composition described above, which comprises an aqueous solution that includes at least 1% surfactant, although preferably with at least 5% surfactant, and predominantly at least 10% surfactant (per example 15% surfactant).
The composition will normally include less than 50% surfactant in aqueous proportion.
Preferably the composition will not include oils. 30
The surfactant may be an electrically neutral composition.
The hydrophilic / lipophilic ratio of a surfactant can be expressed with the HLB value or hydrophilic-lipophilic balance, which is determined according to the Griffin method described in the
document "Calculation of HLB Values of Non-Ionic Surfactants" Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 5 (1954): 259.
This HLB ratio of a nonionic surfactant molecule is given by the following relationship:
HLB = Mh / M x 20,
where M is the mass of the surfactant molecule and Mh is the mass of the hydrophilic part of the surfactant molecule.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the surfactant has a hydro-lipophilic ratio of less than or equal to 16, preferably less than 11, and predominantly less than or equal to 8.
Examples of surfactants adapted to the embodiment of the composition according to this invention are chain-based alkoxy derivatives, for example:
- fatty, linear or branched, unsaturated or polyunsaturated alcohols (for example lauryl alcohol polyglycol ether 8 EO, tridecyl alcohol polyglycol ether 5 EO, oleic alcohol 15 polyglycol ether 10 EO and C10 alcohol from Guerber polyglycol ether 87 EO).
- fatty acids, linear or branched, saturated or polyunsaturated, comprising from 6 to 32 carbon atoms (for example oleic acid polyglycol ether 6 EO).
- the diesters of fatty acids of polyglycol ether (for example polyethylene glycol dioleate 600). twenty
- aromatic derivatives, such as tristyryl phenol, phenol and alkylaryl phenols (for example, tristyryl phenol 10 EO, nonylphenol 8 EO, octylphenol 7 EO).
- sugar esters and sugar derivatives (for example, sorbitan polyglycol ether 20 EO monooleate and sorbitan polyglycol ether 20 EO trioleate).
- polypropylene glycols and polybutylene glycols (for example block polymers EO-25 PO-EO and polymers PO-EO).
- polyamines and fatty amines (for example oleoamine polyglycol ether 12 EO).
- fatty amides (for example coconut nut polyglylamide 7 EO).
- triglycerides (for example, ethoxy 40 EO castor oil).
In the previous examples, the symbol EO means ethylene oxide and the symbol PO 30 means propylene oxide.
All families and products may incorporate an alkyl group or a propylene oxide group or a butylene oxide group on the terminal hydroxyl group (for example: C12-14 alcohol polyglycol ether (8EO) tert-butyl ether)
The final composition may incorporate a mixture of at least two different surfactants.
Advantageously, the surfactant can be an ethoxylated fatty alcohol or a mixture of ethoxylated fatty alcohols. Said fatty alcohol can concentrate a lipophilic part with between 6 and 32 carbon atoms, preferably from 8 to 22 carbon atoms and predominantly from 8 to 18 carbon atoms. The ethoxylated fatty alcohol may include a hydrophilic part comprising between 1 and 100 ethoxy groups, preferably 3 to 30 ethoxy groups and predominantly 4 to 20 ethoxy groups. The composition may also comprise one or more compounds selected from a stabilizer, a dispersant, a preservative, a thickener and a thixotropic agent.
The cementitious matrix may comprise cement, sand and polyurethane. The 15 quantities are variable and the particle diameter dimensions vary according to the specific requirements in each case, not normally exceeding 5 mm. A superplasticizer generally dissolved in the mixing water can be added.

MODE OF MANUFACTURE OF THE INVENTION: 20
The present invention also relates to the process of preparing materials as described above, and comprises the following steps, all at room temperature:
- First: the mixture, on the one hand, of all the cement, all the aggregate and a part of water (about half) 25
- Second: on the other hand, the polymer mixture, the surfactant and the other part of the water
- Third: the mixture of both previous parts, proceeding to a kneading in a habitual way.
The dosages include all the possibilities of cement / aggregate ratio, the 30 most common being 1/4, 1/6 and 1/8, considering the aggregate as the sum of sand plus the polymer residue. Sand substitutions for polyurethane are made between 25% and 100%.
The amount of water added must be sufficient to achieve good consistency and adequate workability. In any case, the additives included in the invention reduce the surface tension and consequently the need for water that this type of polymer waste usually requires when added to different binders due to its small size and large specific surface area.
Likewise, this product of the invention can be mass-produced in the form of dry, semi-dry or wet mortar, although the most common form is the design of an "industrial dry mortar", of plastic consistency and a minimum strength of 5 N / mm2.
 10
It can also be a mortar:
- designed: whose composition and manufacturing system are chosen by the manufacturer to obtain the specified properties (concept of performance) and are submitted to the corresponding tests by the manufacturer.
- prescribed: manufactured from the primary components in predetermined proportions whose properties depend on the characteristics of their components and their dosage, so that in their manufacture additives and additives that are part of a recipe are used.

DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLES OF EMBODIMENT 20
Within the examples of realization, the following commercial products and materials are used, which comply with the corresponding regulations in force.
 Normative Material
 (one)  Common cements (CEM I, CEM II, CEM III, CEM IV, CEM V) EN 197-1
 (2)  Cements resistant to sulfates UNE 80303-1
 (3)  Cements resistant to seawater UNE 80303-2
 (4)  Low heat hydration cements UNE 80303-3
 (5)  Cements for special uses UNE 80307
 (6)  Masonry cements EN 998-1
 (7)  Standardized sand EN 196-1
 (8)  Commercial silica sand or limestone for mortars EN 13139


Method of preparation of mortars lightened with recycled polyurethane and with high resistance:
The mixture is kneaded at about 20 ° C. The preparation method comprises the following 5 steps:
• At T = 0 seconds: all the cement is mixed in a container, all the aggregate if there is one and some of the necessary water and kneaded for about 5 minutes.
• At T = 5 minutes: on the other hand, the other half of water is mixed with the crushed residue and with the surfactant in the recommended amounts for 6 minutes. 10
• At T = 12 minutes: both previously mixed parts are joined separately, and mixing is carried out for 8 minutes.
• From T = 15 minutes: the mortar is poured horizontally on the molds provided for that purpose, or applied vertically on a wall for coating.
 fifteen
Consistency determination: is the amount of water to be added to each mixture to obtain mortars of plastic consistencies that obtain a value of 175 ± 10 mm on the shaking table according to the procedure indicated in EN 1015-3. A good workability is achieved with plastic consistencies, where the aggregates are surrounded by a film of binder paste, which allows 20 to slide over each other easily and with no tensions caused by the friction of their edges, and without losing the cohesion as a whole.

Determination of porosity by the method of mercury inclusion porosimetry (IPM): mortar porosity is one of the most important properties from the point of view of the penetration of aggressive agents. Porosity determination by MIP analyzes micropores. The operative procedure begins by performing the vacuum on the sample, to subsequently apply a hydrostatic pressure with mercury to the chamber containing the sample. The mercury intrusion pressure is inversely proportional to the pore opening size, the pressure values applied and the accumulated volume of mercury entering. The result results in graphic representations of the filling process, representing the cumulative, differential volumes and the estimated porosity estimated from the equation of
Washburn that supposes a cylindrical model of pores. This equation describes the balance between the internal and external forces of a three-phase solid-liquid-vapor system, based on three parameters: surface tension, contact angle and geometry of the solid-liquid-vapor-contact line. 5
The fundamental parameters obtained from the IPM are three: the total porosity, the pore diameter and the distribution of the porous structure. The total porosity is the volume of pores with respect to the total volume, where only the pores that are connected are taken into account, according to the following expression:
 10

where:
Pt is the total porosity (%)
Vp is the pore volume (mm3)
Vm is the volume of material (mm3) 15

The average pore diameter is the corresponding diameter assuming an equivalent cylindrical distribution, and is determined according to the following equation:

where: 20
ф is the average pore diameter (mm)
 V is the pore volume (mm3)
 A is the surface of the material (mm2)

In addition, the porosity ranges that are differentiated by this technique are:
 d> 1,000 nm: air from the pores
 <d <100 nm: large capillaries, with greater effect on transport processes, and less effect on Clinker hydration.
 100 <d <10 nm: medium capillaries that affect permeability
 d <10 nm: small capillaries that affect workability

Density determination: according to EN 1015-10 Methods of test for mortar for masonry. Determination of bulk density of hardened mortar. Hardened density at 7 days 5 and at 28 days were measured at a temperature of 20 ± 1 ºC and a relative humidity of 50 ± 1%. For the measurement, prismatic specimens are used regularly of dimensions 160 mm x 40 mm x 40 mm that are dried in an oven to constant weight. Subsequently they are saturated at constant weight and immersed in water to determine their apparent volume by hydrostatic weighing. The bulk density is calculated by dividing the mass of the dried specimen by the volume it occupies when it is immersed in water in a saturated state. The final value is the result of the arithmetic mean of the individual values.

Calculation of mechanical strengths: the mechanical flexural and compressive strengths of these materials with structural properties have been calculated according to the provisions of EN 1015-11. Mortar specimens are tested at different ages of cure (7 days, 28 days and 90 days). The specimens are prismatic with dimensions of (40x40x160) mm3. To determine the flexural strength a load is applied centered in the center of the specimens until they are broken. The separation between support axes is 100 mm. The two fragments resulting from the flexural fracture are tested at compression 20 on a surface of (40 x40) mm2.

The following illustrative examples are not intended to be limiting and describe different types of super resistant mortar made with very specific components. The manufacturing combinations are very wide and depend on the type of cement used, the available polyurethane, the additives that are added and the water requirement required for each dosage that maintains a consistency and workability suitable for subsequent installation. , as well as suitable properties that determine good durability over time.
 30



EXAMPLE OF EMBODIMENT 1
Obtaining mortar M-6 with a density of 800 kg / m3 and mechanical resistance to compression at 28 days greater than or equal to 6 MPa.
Test specimens are manufactured according to the preparation method described above. For this mortar M-6 the most common dosages include cement / aggregate ratios preferably between 1/8 and 1/10, considering the aggregate as the crushed polymer residue. Sand substitutions for polyurethane are made 100%. The surfactant chosen from those described above is added in a percentage preferably between 5% and 15% with respect to the total amount of cement. 10
The amount of water that is added will be that necessary to achieve a good consistency. The molds on which the final product is poured are kept for 24 hours in a humid chamber. Subsequently, the mortar is demoulded and then it is kept in curing conditions at 20ºC and 98% relative humidity. Each test piece that is manufactured for testing has dimensions of 160 mm long, 15 40 mm high and 40 mm thick. Density, porosity and mechanical strengths have been measured according to the methods described above. The results of all embodiments are shown in Table 1.

EXAMPLE OF EMBODIMENT 2 20
Obtaining mortar M-8 of density 1000 kg / m3 and mechanical resistance to compression at 28 days greater than or equal to 8 MPa.
Obtaining this mortar is preferably achieved with a cement / aggregate ratio 1/8 and 1/10 considering the aggregate as the sum of the sand and the crushed polymer residue. Sand substitutions for polyurethane are made between 75% and 25%. Any of the surfactants described above are added in a percentage between 5% and 10% with respect to the final amount of binder.

EXAMPLE OF EMBODIMENT 3
Obtaining mortar M-10 of density 1200 kg / m3 and mechanical resistance to compression 30 to 28 days greater than or equal to 10 MPa.
The preparation of this product is preferably carried out with a cement / aggregate ratio between 1/6 and 1/10 considering the aggregate as the sum of the sand and the
polyurethane residue Sand substitutions for polyurethane are between 75% and 100%. Surfactant is added in a percentage between 1% and 5% with respect to the total cement in the mixture.
 5
EXAMPLE OF EMBODIMENT 4
Obtaining mortar M-15 with a density of 1400 kg / m3 and mechanical resistance to compression at 28 days greater than or equal to 15 MPa.
Obtaining this mortar is preferably achieved with a cement / aggregate ratio 1/4 and 1/6 considering the aggregate as the sum of the sand and polyurethane. 10 The replacement of aggregate with polyurethane is carried out between 50% and 100%. Additive is added in a percentage between 1% and 5% with respect to the total amount of cement.

EXAMPLE OF EMBODIMENT 5
Obtaining mortar M-25 density 1600 kg / m3 and mechanical resistance to compression 15 to 28 days greater than or equal to 25 MPa.
To achieve the mortar of these characteristics, cement / aggregate 1/3 and 1/4 ratios are preferably used considering the aggregate as the sum of the sand and the crushed polymer residue. Sand substitutions for polyurethane are made between 50% and 100%. Surfactant is added in a percentage preferably between 1% 20 and 5% with respect to the total amount of cement.

EXAMPLE OF EMBODIMENT 6
Obtaining mortar M-30 with a density of 1800 kg / m3 and mechanical resistance to compression at 28 days greater than or equal to 30 MPa. 25
In this case to obtain the material, the quantities include cement / aggregate 1/3 and 1/4 ratios considering the aggregate as the sum of the sand and the crushed polymer residue. Sand substitutions for polyurethane are made between 25% and 100%. Surfactant is added in a proportion between 1% and 5% with respect to the total binder existing in the mortar. 30


EXAMPLE OF EMBODIMENT 7
Obtaining of mortar M-35 of density 2000 kg / m3 and mechanical resistance to compression to 28 days greater than or equal to 35 MPa.
For this M-35 mortar, the most common dosages include 1/3 cement / aggregate ratios, considering the aggregate as the sum of the sand and the crushed polymer residue. Sand substitutions for polyurethane are made between 25% and 100%. Surfactant is added in a percentage between 1% and 5% with respect to the total amount of cement.
 10
 Mortar  Density at 28 days (kg / m3) Flex at 7 days (MPa) Flex at 28 days (MPa) Compression at 7 days (MPa) Compression at 28 days (MPa) Micro MIP porosity (%) Macro air porosity occluded (%)
 M6  800 0.5 1 2 6 30-40 2-3.5
 M8  1000 1 2 2 8 25-35 2-4
 M10  1200 1 2 5 10 20-35 3-6
 M15  1400 2 3 10 15 20-30 6-8
 M25  1600 2 4 15 25 20-25 7-10
 M30  1900 3 5 20 30 18-22 10-15
 M35  2000 3 5 20 35 14-18 12-20
 Table 1. Minimum values of mechanical resistance at different ages for different dosages, MIP microporosity and macroporosity calculated from occluded air

Although the inclusion of waste generates a greater porosity in the samples, it has been proven that the microporosity determined by mercury intrusion porosimetry, obtained with the addition of surfactant is less than that obtained for test specimens in which it is not Use additive. This means that these materials will have a lower open porosity and absorb smaller amounts of liquid both by capillarity and total absorption.


 twenty

APPLICATIONS OF THE INVENTION
The invention can be applied as lightened or light cement mortars for masonry with partial or total replacement of the sand by residues of rigid polyurethane foam, and with mechanical properties far superior to those usual in this type of 5 materials.
Likewise, the products derived from this patent can be used as mortars in places with high mechanical resistance needs, such as flooring in buildings, interior and exterior walls, brick factories, filling of structures, walls with bearing capacities, etc., with the added advantage of having much lighter materials than those that are frequently used, which has a very positive impact on the reduction of the load that is added to the structure on which one works or the foundation of a building.
权利要求:
Claims (11)
[1]

1. Lightened mortar with structural properties characterized in that it comprises the cement mixture, the substitution of the sand for crushed polyurethane residues between 25% and 100% by volume of sand and one or more surfactants between 0.5% and 50 % of cement weight.

[2]
2. Lightened mortar with structural properties, according to claim, characterized in that the surfactant is an electrically neutral compound.

[3]
3. Lightened mortar with structural properties, according to claims 1 and 2, characterized in that the surfactant has a hydrolipophilic radius of less than or equal to 16. 15

[4]
4. Lightened mortar with structural properties according to claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the cement used can be common cement according to European standards EN 197-1 and EN-197-2, or of the type of masonry, plaster and plastering cements according to EN 998-1 and EN 998-2. twenty

[5]
5. Lightened mortar with structural properties, according to claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the compressive strength of the material varies depending on the density, and that it can reach a maximum value between 35 MPa and 50 MPa after 28 days. 25

[6]
6. Lightened mortar with structural properties, according to claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the flexural strength of the material can reach a maximum value between 5 MPa and 7 MPa after 28 days.
 30
[7]
7. Lightened mortar with structural properties, according to claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the porosity varies between 14% and 45%.

[8]
8. Lightened mortar with structural properties, according to claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the amount of occluded air comprises a range between 35% and 20%.

[9]
9. Lightened mortar with structural properties, according to claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the density comprises a range between 800 kg / m3 and 2000 kg / m3. 5

[10]
10. Lightened mortar with structural properties, according to claims 1 to 9, characterized in that the necessary kneading water in the fresh state is less than or equal to 0.55.
 10
[11]
11. Procedure for obtaining lightened mortar with structural properties, according to claims 1 to 10, characterized in that it comprises the following steps:
a) The mixture of at least half of the part of water, cement and aggregate. fifteen
b) The mixture of the remaining water, the polymer and at least one surfactant.
c) The mixture of both previous phases a) and b), then kneading.
类似技术:
公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
Cong et al.2015|Properties of a foamed concrete with soil as filler
Jitchaiyaphum et al.2011|Cellular lightweight concrete containing pozzolan materials
Mousa et al.2015|Self-curing concrete types; water retention and durability
KR101311700B1|2013-09-26|Cement mortar composite having improved adiabatic capacity and durability, manufacturing method of panel and manufacturing method block using the composite
KR100917117B1|2009-09-11|Filler for Iron reinforcing rod joint and construction method for filling-up of iron reinforcing rod joint using the same
ES2718809B9|2021-03-29|MULTI-LAYER AND INSULATING CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM OF A BUILDING, UNITED ALBANILERIA ELEMENTS, DRY COMPOSITION FOR SAID SYSTEM, KIT AND MANUFACTURING PROCEDURE OF THE CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM.
Koksal et al.2020|Influence of expanded vermiculite powder and silica fume on properties of foam concretes
Ferrándiz-Mas et al.2012|Physical and mechanical characterization of Portland cement mortars made with expanded polystyrene particles addition |
Tittarelli2013|Effect of low dosages of waste GRP dust on fresh and hardened properties of mortars: Part 2
Sudin et al.2014|Effect of specimen shape and size on the compressive strength of foamed concrete
AU2015239093B2|2018-11-29|Method for producing an insulating composite building block
Hu et al.2016|Research on properties of foamed concrete reinforced with small sized glazed hollow beads
ES2598902B2|2017-09-14|Lightened and low porosity structural mortar made of polyurethane residues
RU2555683C1|2015-07-10|Peat-polymer mix to manufacture construction products
Ducman et al.2014|Water vapour permeability of lightweight concrete prepared with different types of lightweight aggregates
ES2807188T3|2021-02-22|Castable material based on a cementitious binder with resistance to shrinkage
JP6295085B2|2018-03-14|Cement composition
Lee et al.2019|Development of Shrinkage Reducing Agent for 3D Printing Concrete
Mydin et al.2014|Determining the compressive, flexural and splitting tensile strength of silica fume reinforced lightweight foamed concrete
MohaMMadi et al.2015|The effect of silica fume on the properties of self-compacted lightweight concrete
Zhao et al.2018|Models for strength prediction of high-porosity cast-in-situ foamed concrete
RU2554613C1|2015-06-27|Method for producing items of aerated concrete of autoclave hardening
Mukharjee et al.2014|Characteristics of mortars containing colloidal nano-silica
Zemanova et al.2019|Hygric properties of cement-lime plasters with incorporated lightweight mineral admixture
Al Bakri Abdullah et al.2014|Fly Ash Based Lightweight Geopolymer Concrete Using Foaming Agent Technology
同族专利:
公开号 | 公开日
WO2017017308A1|2017-02-02|
ES2598902B2|2017-09-14|
引用文献:
公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
ES2128843T3|1995-03-24|1999-05-16|Wilfried Blocken|INSULATING MORTAR.|WO2018178419A1|2017-03-31|2018-10-04|Universidad De Sevilla|Method for producing mortars with plastic waste and use thereof in a beam fill piece for one-way slab floors|JPH0121115B2|1983-12-19|1989-04-19|Ube Kosan Kk|
KR101447181B1|2014-03-10|2014-10-07|주식회사 대호알씨|Mortar with high selp leveling using expanded polyurethane and aggregate|
KR101447182B1|2014-03-10|2014-10-07|주식회사 대호알씨|Mortar with high selp leveling using expanded polyurethane|
法律状态:
2017-09-14| FG2A| Definitive protection|Ref document number: 2598902 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: B2 Effective date: 20170914 |
优先权:
申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
ES201531132A|ES2598902B2|2015-07-30|2015-07-30|Lightened and low porosity structural mortar made of polyurethane residues|ES201531132A| ES2598902B2|2015-07-30|2015-07-30|Lightened and low porosity structural mortar made of polyurethane residues|
PCT/ES2016/070582| WO2017017308A1|2015-07-30|2016-07-29|Structural lightweight mortar with low porosity produced with polyurethane residues|
[返回顶部]