METHOD FOR PROCESSING LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS

专利摘要:
method for processing lignocellulosic biomass the present invention relates to a method for processing biomass which comprises: - providing soft lignocellulosic biomass feedstock, - pre-treating the feedstock at pH within the range of 3.5 to 9.0 in a single stage pressurized hydrothermal pretreatment at log ro 3.75 severity or less to produce a pretreated biomass slurry in which the undissolved solids comprise at least 5.0% by weight of xylan, and hydrolyzing the pre-treated biomass with or without the addition of supplemental water content using enzymatic hydrolysis for at least 24 hours catalyzed by an enzyme mixture comprising endoglucanase, exoglucanase, beta-glucosidase, endoxylanase and beta- xylosidase at activity levels in nkat/g endoglucanase glucan of at least 1,100, exoglucanase of at least 280, beta-glycosidase of at least 3,000, endoxylanase of at least 1,400 and ? -xylosidase of at least 75, so as to produce a hydrolyzate in which the yield of c5 monomers is at least 55% of the original xylose and arabinose content of the raw material before pretreatment.
公开号:BR112016001975B1
申请号:R112016001975-0
申请日:2014-02-05
公开日:2021-09-14
发明作者:Jan Larsen；Martin Dan Jeppesen；Kit Kellebjerg Mogensen；Niels Nielsen Poulsen
申请人:Inbicon A/S；
IPC主号:

专利说明:

FIELD
[001] The invention relates, in general, to methods for processing lignocellulosic biomass into fermentable sugars and, in particular, to methods that are based on hydrothermal pretreatment. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[002] Historical reliance on oil and other fossil fuels has been associated with dramatic and alarming increases in atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases. International efforts are underway to mitigate the accumulation of greenhouse gases, supported by formal policy guidelines in many countries. A central focus of these mitigation efforts has been the development of processes and technologies for using renewable plant biomass to replace petroleum as a source of precursors for fuels and other chemicals. The annual growth of plant-derived biomass on land is estimated to be approximately 1 x 1011 metric tons per year in dry weight. See Lieth and Whittaker (1975). The use of biomass is thus an ultimate goal in the development of a sustainable economy.
[003] Fuel ethanol produced from sugar and starch-based plant materials, such as sugarcane, root and grain crops, is already in wide use, with global production currently surpassing 73 billion liters per annum. Ethanol has always been considered an acceptable alternative to fossil fuels, being easily usable as an additive in fuel blends or even directly as a fuel for personal cars. However, the use of ethanol produced by these "first generation" bioethanol technologies does not actually achieve a dramatic reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. The net savings are only about 13% compared to oil when the total fossil fuel inputs to the final ethanol outputs are all considered. See Farrell et al. (2006). In addition, both economic and moral objections have been raised towards the “first generation” bioethanol market. It effectively places the demand for crops as human food in direct competition with the demand for personal automobiles. And, in fact, the demand for fuel ethanol has been associated with high grain prices that have proven to be problematic for poor grain-importing countries.
[004] There has been great interest in developing biomass conversion systems that do not consume food crops - so-called "second generation" biorefining, whereby bioethanol and other products can be produced from lignocellulosic biomass, such as crop refuse (stems, ears, cores, trunks, carcasses, bark, etc...), grasses, straw, wood chips, waste paper and the like. In "second generation" technology, fermentable 6 carbon (C6) sugars derived primarily from cellulose and fermentable 5 carbon (C5) sugars derived from hemicellulose are released from biomass polysaccharide polymer chains by enzymatic hydrolysis or, in some cases, by pure chemical hydrolysis. Fermentable sugars obtained from the conversion of biomass in a "second generation" biorefinery can be used to produce fuel ethanol or alternatively other fuels such as butanol, or lactic acid monomers for use in bioplastics, or many other products .
[005] The total yield of both C5 and C6 sugars is a central consideration in the commercialization of lignocellulosic biomass processing. In the case of ethanol production, as well as the production of lactate or other chemical substances, it may be advantageous to combine both the C5 and C6 sugar process streams in one sugar solution. Modified fermenting organisms are now available that can efficiently consume both C5 and C6 sugars in ethanol production. See, for example, Madhavan et al. (2012); Dumon et al. (2012); Hu et al. (2011); Kuhad et al. (2011); Ghosh et al. (2011); Kurian et al. (2010); Jojima et al. (2010); Sanchez et al. (2010); Bettiga et al. (2009); Matsushika et al. (2009).
[006] Due to the limitations of its physical structure, lignocellulosic biomass cannot be efficiently converted into fermentable sugars by enzymatic hydrolysis without some pre-treatment process. A wide variety of different pretreatment regimens have been reported, each offering different advantages and disadvantages. For analysis, see Agbor et al. (2011); Girio et al. (2010); Alvira et al. (2010); Taherzadeh and Karimi (2008). From an environmental and "renewability" perspective, hydrothermal pretreatments are especially attractive. These use hot water in steam/liquid pressurized at temperatures in the order of 160 to 230 °C to smoothly fuse the hydrophobic lignin which is complexly associated with cellulose filaments, to solubilize a major component of hemicellulose, rich in C5 sugars and to break the cellulose filaments in order to improve accessibility to productive enzymatic binding. Hydrothermal pretreatments can be conveniently integrated with existing coal-fired and biomass-fired electrical power generation facilities to effectively utilize turbine steam and "excess" power generation capacity.
[007] In the case of hydrothermal processes, it is well known in the art and it has been widely discussed that pretreatment needs to be optimized between conflicting purposes. On the other hand, the pre-treatment should ideally preserve the sugar content of the hemicellulose, so as to maximize the final yield of sugars derived from monomeric hemicellulose. Yet, at the same time, the pretreatment must sufficiently expose and precondition the cellulose chains to the susceptibility to enzymatic hydrolysis so that reasonable yields of monomeric cellulose-derived sugars can be obtained with minimal enzyme consumption. Enzyme consumption is also a central consideration in the commercialization of biomass processing, which fluctuates at the margin of “economic profitability” in the context of “global market economies” as they are currently defined. Despite drastic improvements in recent years, the high cost of commercially available enzyme preparations remains one of the highest operating costs in biomass conversion.
[008] As the hydrothermal pretreatment temperatures and residence times in the reactor are increased, a greater proportion of C5 sugars derived from hemicellulose is irretrievably lost due to chemical transformation into other substances, including furfural and products of condensation reactions. Even higher temperatures and residence times are required in order to properly condition the cellulose fibers for effective enzymatic hydrolysis to 6-carbon monomeric glucose.
[009] In the prior art, a frequently used parameter of "severity" of hydrothermal pretreatment is "Ro," which is typically referred to as a log value. Ro reflects a composite measure of pretreatment temperature and reactor residence time according to the equation: Ro= tEXP[T-100/14.75], where t is the residence time in minutes and T is a reaction temperature in degrees centigrade.
[010] Optimizing pretreatment conditions for any given biomass feedstock inherently requires some compromise between demands for high yields of monomeric C5 sugar from hemicellulose (low stringency) and demands for high yields of monomeric C6 sugar from cellulose (high severity).
[011] A variety of different hydrothermal pretreatment strategies have been reported to maximize sugar yields from both hemicellulose and cellulose and to minimize xylo-oligomer inhibition of cellulase catalysis. In some cases, exogenous acids or bases are added in order to catalyze hemicellulose degradation (acid; pH < 3.5) or lignin solubilization (base; pH > 9.0). In other cases, the hydrothermal pretreatment is conducted using only very mild acetic acid from lignocellulose itself (pH 3.5 to 9.0). Hydrothermal pretreatments under these mild pH conditions have been called “auto-hydrolysis” processes, due to the fact that acetic acid released from the hemicellulose esters themselves additionally catalyzes the hydrolysis of hemicellulose.
[012] Acid-catalyzed hydrothermal pretreatments, known as "diluted acid" or "acid impregnation" treatments, typically provide high yields of C5 sugars, as comparable hemicellulose solubilization can occur at lower temperatures in the presence of acid catalyst. The total yields of C5 sugar after pretreatment with dilute acid followed by enzymatic hydrolysis are typically on the order of 75% or more than could theoretically be released from any given biomass feedstock. See, for example, Baboukaniu et al. (2012); Won et al. (2012); Lu et al. (2009); Jeong et al. (2010); Lee et al. (2008); Sassner et al. (2008); Thomsen et al. (2006); Chung et al. (2005).
[013] Auto-hydrolysis hydrothermal pretreatments, in contrast, typically provide much lower yields of C5 sugars, as higher temperature pretreatment is required in the absence of an acid catalyst. With the exception of autohydrolysis pretreatment conducted at commercially unrealistic dry matter content, autohydrolysis treatments typically provide C5 sugar yields <40% theoretical recovery. See, for example, Diaz et al. (2010); Dogaris et al. (2009). Yields of C5 from autohydrolysis as high as 53% have been reported in cases where commercially unrealistic reaction times and extreme high enzyme doses have been used. However, even these very high C5 yields remain well below the levels normally obtained using dilute acid pretreatment. See, for example, Lee et al. (2009); Ohgren et al. (2007).
[014] As a consequence of lower C5 yields obtained with autohydrolysis, most reports referring to hydrothermal pretreatment in commercial biomass conversion systems have focused on dilute acid process. Yields of C5 sugar derived from hemicellulose on the order of 85% have been achieved through the use of so-called “two-stage” dilute acid pretreatments. In two-stage pretreatments, a lower starting temperature is used to solubilize the hemicellulose, then the C5-rich liquid fraction is separated. In the second stage, a higher temperature is used to condition the cellulose chains. See, for example, Mesa et al. (2011); Kim et al. (2011); Chen et al. (2010); Jin et al. (2010); Monavari et al. (2009); Soderstrom et al. (2005); Soderstrom et al. (2004); Soderstrom et al. (2003); Kim et al. (2001); Lee et al. (1997); Paptheophanous et al. (1995). An elaborate “two-stage” dilute acid pretreatment system reported by the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) claims to have achieved C5 yields on the order of 90% using corn husk as a raw material. See Humbird et al. (2011).
[015] Despite the lower yields of C5 it provides, autohydrolysis continues to offer competitive advantages over pre-treatments with dilute acid on a commercial scale.
[016] The most notable among the advantages of autohydrolysis processes is that residual unhydrolyzed lignin has highly enhanced market value compared to lignin recovered from dilute acid processes. First, the sulfuric acid typically used in dilute acid pretreatment imparts a residual sulfur content. This makes the resulting lignin unattractive to commercial power plants that might otherwise be inclined to consume sulfur-free lignin fuel pellets obtained from autohydrolysis as a “green” alternative to coal. Second, the sulphonation of lignin that occurs during hydrothermal pretreatments catalyzed by sulfuric acid makes it comparatively hydrophilic, thus increasing its water-holding capacity. This hydrophilicity both increases the cost of drying lignin for commercial use and also makes it unsuitable for external storage, given its propensity to absorb hydration. The so-called "techno-economic models" of the NREL process for converting lignocellulosic biomass, with pre-treatment with dilute acid, do not even consider lignin as a salable consumable product - only as an internal source of fuel for process steam. See Humbird et al. (2011). In contrast, the “profitability” of process schemes that are based on autohydrolysis includes a significant contribution from the robust sale of clean, dry lignin pellets. This is especially significant given the fact that typical soft lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks comprise a large proportion of lignin, between 10 and 40% dry matter content. Thus, even in cases where the process sugar yields of autohydrolysis systems may be decreased relative to dilute acid systems, the overall "profitability" may remain equivalent or even better.
[017] Autohydrolysis processes also avoid other well-known disadvantages of dilute acid. The requirement for sulfuric acid diverges from a physiological orientation that favors “green” processing, introduces a substantial operating cost for acid as a process input, and creates a need for designing wastewater treatment systems as well as costly anti-corrosive equipment.
[018] Autohydrolysis is also advantageously scalable to modest processing scenarios. The dilute acid process described by NREL is so complex and elaborate that it cannot realistically be established on a smaller scale - just on a gigantic scale on the order of 100 tonnes of biomass feedstock per hour. Such a scale is only appropriate in hypercentralized biomass processing scenarios. See Humbird et al. (2011). Hypercentralized biomass processing of corn husks may be well suited in the US, which has an abundance of genetically modified corn grown in chemically enhanced hyperproduction. However, such a system is less relevant in other parts of the world. Such a system is inappropriate for modest biomass processing scenarios, for example, on-site processing in sugarcane or oil palm or sorghum fields, or regional processing of wheat straw, which typically produces much less biomass per hectare than corn, even with genetic modification and chemical enhancements.
[019] Auto-hydrolysis systems, in contrast to dilute acid, are legitimately “green”, easily scalable and devoid of the requirements of elaborate wastewater treatment systems. It is correspondingly advantageous to provide improved autohydrolysis systems, even in cases where they may not obviously be advantageous over dilute acid systems in terms of sugar yields alone.
[020] The problem of insufficient C5 monomer yields with autohydrolysis has generally led suppliers of lignocellulosic biomass processing technology to seek other approaches. Some “two-stage” pretreatment systems, designed to provide improved C5 yields, have been reported with autohydrolysis pretreatments. See documents WO2010/113129; US2010/0279361; WO 2009/108773; US2009/0308383; US 8,057,639; US20130029406. In these "two-stage" pretreatment schemes, part of the liquid C5 rich fraction is removed by solid/liquid separation after a low temperature pretreatment followed by a higher temperature pretreatment of the solid fraction. Most of these published patent applications did not actually report experimental results. In this two-stage anthohydrolytic pretreatment description in WO2010/113129, Chemtex Italia reports a total of 26 experimental samples using wheat straw with an average C5 sugar recovery of 52%. These C5 recovery values do not distinguish between C5 recovery per se and yields of monomeric sugar, which is the substrate actually consumed in fermentation to ethanol and other useful products.
[021] The introduction of a second pre-treatment stage in a scheme to process lignocellulosic biomass introduces additional complexities and costs. It is correspondingly advantageous to substantially achieve the advantages of two-stage pretreatment with the use of a single-stage autohydrolysis system.
[022] It is concluded that, in cases where single-stage autohydrolysis pretreatment is conducted at very low severity, it is possible to achieve high final C5 monomer yields of 55% theoretical yield and higher while it even achieves reasonable glucose yields. In cases where biomass feedstocks are pretreated to such a low severity that the undissolved solids content of the pretreated material maintains a residual xylan content of at least 5.0% by weight, the loss of C5 during pretreatment is minimized. Yet contrary to expectations, this very high residual xylan content can be enzyme hydrolyzed to monomeric xylose, with high recovery, while sacrificing only a very small percentage of cellulose to glucose conversion, provided that sufficiently high xylanase and xylosidase activities are employed during enzymatic hydrolysis.
[023] At these very low severity levels, the production of soluble by-products that affect cellulase activity or fermenting organisms is kept so low that the pretreated material can be used directly in enzymatic hydrolysis, and subsequent fermentation, typically with no requirement for any washing or other detoxification step. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[024] Figure 1 shows the xylan number as a function of pretreatment severity factor for soft lignocellulosic biomass raw materials subjected to pretreatment by autohydrolysis.
[025] Figure 2 shows the percentage by weight of xylan in undissolved solids as a function of xylan number for pretreated raw materials.
[026] Figure 3 shows the recovery of C5 in soluble and insoluble form as a function of xylan number for soft lignocellulosic biomass raw materials subjected to pretreatment by autohydrolysis.
[027] Figure 4 shows the recovery of total C5 as a function of xylan number for soft lignocellulosic biomass raw materials subjected to pretreatment by autohydrolysis.
[028] Figure 5 shows the production of acetic acid, furfural and 5-HMF as a function of xylan number for raw materials from soft lignocellulosic biomass subjected to pretreatment by autohydrolysis.
[029] Figure 6 shows the effect of dissolved solids removal on the conversion of cellulose to soft lignocellulosic biomass raw materials subjected to pretreatment by very low severity autohydrolysis.
[030] Figure 7 shows the characterization by HPLC of liquid fraction from raw materials of soft lignocellulosic biomass subjected to pretreatment by autohydrolysis of very low severity.
[031] Figure 8 shows the recovery of C5 sugar as a function of time in which the solid fraction is subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis followed by introduction of liquid fraction for post-hydrolysis.
[032] Figure 9 shows the fermentation profile of ethanol fermentation by a modified yeast strain using wheat straw that was pretreated by very low severity autohydrolysis, enzyme hydrolyzed and used as a liquid fraction and combined solid without detox to remove fermentation inhibitors.
[033] Figure 10 shows a process scheme for a modality.
[034] Figure 11 shows the cellulose conversion as a function of time - C5 deviation.
[035] Figure 12 shows the xylan conversion as a function of time - C5 deviation.
[036] Figure 13 shows the cellulose conversion as a function of time - whole slurry.
[037] Figure 14 shows the xylan conversion as a function of time - whole slurry.
[038] Figure 15 shows the recovery of total C6 and C5 after pretreatment and hydrolysis as a function of hydrolysis time - whole slurry. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF MODALITIES
[039] In some embodiments, the invention provides methods for processing lignocellulosic biomass comprising: - pre-treating the raw material at pH within the range of 3.5 to 9.0 in a single-stage pressurized hydrothermal pretreatment in severity in log Ro 3.75 or less in order to produce a slurry of pretreated biomass in which the undissolved solids comprise at least 5.0% by weight of xylan, and hydrolyze the pretreated biomass with or without the addition of supplemental water content using enzymatic hydrolysis for at least 24 hours catalyzed by an enzyme mixture comprising endoglucanase, exoglucanase, β-glucosidase, endoxylanase and β-xylosidase activities at activity levels in nkat/g of endoglucanase glucan of at least 1,100, exoglucanase of at least 280, β-glycosidase of at least 3,000, endoxylanase of at least 1,400 and β-xylosidase of at least 75, so as to produce a hydrolyzate in which the yield of C5 monomers is by M less than 55% of the original xylose and arabinose content of the raw material before pre-treatment.
[040] In some embodiments, the pretreated biomass is hydrolyzed as a whole slurry comprising both solid and liquid fractions.
[041] As used herein, the following terms have the following meanings:
[042] “About”, as used herein in reference to a quantitative number or range, refers to +/- 10% in relative terms of the referenced number or range.
[043] "Autohydrolysis" refers to a pretreatment process in which the acetic acid released by hydrolysis of hemicellulose during pretreatment further catalyzes the hydrolysis of hemicellulose, and applies to any hydrothermal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass conducted at pH between 3.5 and 9.0.
[044] "Commercially available cellulase preparation optimized for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass" refers to a commercially available mixture of enzyme activities that is sufficient to provide enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass and comprising endocellulase (endoglucanase) activities , exocellulase (exoglucanase), endoxylanase, xylosidase and B-glycosidase. The term "optimized for lignocellulosic biomass conversion" refers to a product development process in which enzyme mixtures have been selected and/or modified for the specific purpose of improving hydrolysis yields and/or reducing enzyme consumption in hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass into fermentable sugars.
[045] Conduct pretreatment “at” a dry matter level refers to the dry matter content of the raw material at the start of pressurized hydrothermal pretreatment. The pretreatment is conducted "at" a pH where the pH of the aqueous content of the biomass is that pH at the start of the pressurized hydrothermal pretreatment.
[046] “Dry matter”, also appearing as DM, refers to total solids, both soluble and insoluble, and effectively means “non-water content”. The dry matter content is measured by drying at 105 °C until a constant weight is reached.
[047] The “fiber structure” is maintained to the extent that the average fiber fragment size after pretreatment is >750 µm.
[048] "Glucan", as used herein, refers to cellulose as well as other gluco-oligomers.
[049] "Hydrothermal pretreatment" refers to the use of water, either as a hot liquid, vaporized steam or pressurized steam comprising steam or liquid at high temperature or both, to "cook" biomass, at temperatures of 120° C or higher, both with and without the addition of acids and other chemicals.
[050] "Single-stage pressurized hydrothermal pretreatment" refers to a pretreatment in which the biomass is subjected to pressurized hydrothermal pretreatment in a single reactor configured to heat the biomass in a single pass and where none Additional pressurized hydrothermal pretreatment is applied after the solid/liquid separation step to remove the liquid fraction of the raw material subjected to pressurized hydrothermal pretreatment.
[051] "Solid/liquid separation" refers to an active mechanical process whereby liquid is separated from the solid by application of force through pressing, centrifugation or other force.
[052] “Soft lignocellulosic biomass” refers to plant biomass other than wood that comprises cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin.
[053] “Solid fraction” and “liquid fraction” refer to the fractionation of pre-treated biomass in solid/liquid separation. The separated liquid is residual which comprises considerable insoluble solid content is referred to as "solid fraction". A "solid fraction" will have a dry matter content and will typically also comprise a considerable residual "liquid fraction".
[054] "Theoretical yield" refers to the molar equivalent mass of pure monomeric sugars obtained from polymeric cellulose or from polymeric hemicellulose structures, wherein the constituent monomeric sugars may also be esterified or otherwise substituted. “Yields of C5 monomer” as a percentage of theoretical yield are determined as follows: Prior to pretreatment, the biomass feedstock is analyzed for carbohydrates using the strong acid hydrolysis method of Sluiter et al. (2008) using an HPLC column and an elution system in which galactose and mannose co-elute with xylose. Examples of such systems include a REZEX ™ Monosaccharide H+ column from Phenomenex and an AMINEX HPX 87C ™ column from Biorad. During strong acid hydrolysis, acid labile esters and substitutions are removed. Unless otherwise specified, the total amount of "Xylose" + Arabinose determined in the unpretreated biomass is considered as 100% theoretical C5 monomer recovery, which can collectively be called ”C5 monomer recovery”. Monomeric sugar determinations are performed using HPLC characterization based on standard curves with purified external standards. Actual C5 monomer recovery is determined by HPLC characterization of samples for direct measurement of C5 monomers, which are then expressed as a percentage of theoretical yield.
[055] "Xylane number" refers to a characterization of pretreated biomass determined as follows:
[056] Pretreated biomass is obtained at about 30% total solids, typically after a solid/liquid separation to provide a solid fraction and a liquid fraction. This pretreated biomass, which has about 30% total solids, is then partially washed by mixing with water at 70 °C in the ratio of total solids (DM) to water of 1:3 weight:weight. The pretreated biomass washed in this way is then pressed to about 30% total solids. The xylan content of pretreated biomass washed in this way and pressed to about 30% total solids is determined using the method of A. Sluiter, et al., "Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass", US National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) published April 25, 2008, as described in Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42618, revised April 2008. An HPLC column and a system elution are used where galactose and mannose co-elute with xylose. Examples of such systems include a REZEX ™ Monosaccharide H+ column from Phenomenex and an AMINEX HPX 87C ™ column from Biorad. This xylan content measurement as described will include some contribution of soluble material from the residual liquid fraction that is not washed away from the solid fraction under these conditions. Correspondingly, the “xylan number” provides a “weighted combination” measurement of residual xylan content within insoluble solids and soluble xylose and xylo-oligomer content within the “liquid fraction”.
[057] The xylan content of undissolved solids is determined by taking a representative sample of pretreated biomass and subjecting it to solid/liquid separation to provide a solid fraction that has at least 30% total solids. That pretreated biomass that has at least 30% total solids is then partially washed by mixing with water at 70 °C in the ratio of total solids (DM) to water of 1:3 weight:weight. The pretreated biomass washed in this way is then pressed to at least 30% total solids and again washed by mixing with water at 70°C in the ratio of total solids (DM) to water of 1:3 weight:weight. This washed material is then re-pressed to at least 30% total solids and again washed by mixing with water at 70°C in the ratio of total solids (DM) to water of 1:3 weight:weight. This washed material is then re-compressed to at least 30% total solids and used as the undissolved solids sample to be analyzed. The xylan content of the undissolved solids sample is then determined as described in the explanation above in relation to xylan number determination and expressed as a percentage by weight of the total solids content of the sample.
[058] Any suitable soft lignocellulosic biomass can be used, including biomass such as at least wheat straw, corn husks, corn cobs, empty fruit bunches, rice straw, oat straw, barley straw, canola straw , rye straw, sorghum, sweet sorghum, soybean straw, yellow millet, Bermuda grass and other grasses, bagasse, beet pulp, corn fiber or any combination thereof. The lignocellulosic biomass can comprise other lignocellulosic materials such as paper, newsprint, cardboard or other municipal or office waste. Lignocellulosic biomass can be used as a mixture of materials that originate from different raw materials, can be fresh, partially dried, completely dried or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the methods of the invention are practiced using at least about 10 kg of biomass feedstock, or at least 100 kg, or at least 500 kg.
[059] Lignocellulosic biomass comprises crystalline cellulose fibrils interspersed within a loosely organized matrix of hemicellulose and sealed within an environment rich in hydrophobic lignin. Although cellulose itself comprises long normal chain polymers of D-glucose, hemicellulose is a heterogeneous mixture of short branched chain carbohydrates that include monomers of all five-carbon aldopentoses (C5 sugars) as well as some 6-carbon sugars (C6 ), including glucose and mannose. Lignin is a highly heterogeneous polymer lacking any particular primary structure and comprising hydrophobic phenylpropanoid monomers.
[060] Suitable lignocellulosic biomass typically comprises cellulose in amounts between 20 and 50% dry weight before pretreatment, lignin in amounts between 10 and 40% dry weight before pretreatment, and hemicellulose in amounts between 15 and 40 %.
[061] In some embodiments, biomass raw materials can be subjected to particle size reduction and/or other mechanical processing, such as crushing, milling, shredding, cutting or other processes before hydrothermal pretreatment. In some embodiments, biomass feedstocks can be washed and/or leached of valuable salts prior to pressurized pretreatment, as described in Knudsen et al. (1998). In some embodiments, raw materials can be soaked prior to pressurized pretreatment at temperatures up to 99°C.
[062] In some embodiments, the raw material is first soaked in an aqueous solution prior to hydrothermal pretreatment. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to soak the raw material in a liquid containing acetic acid obtained from a subsequent step in pretreatments, as described in US 8,123,864. It is advantageous to conduct the treatment at the highest possible dry matter content, as described in US 12/935,587. Conducting the pre-treatment at a high dry matter content avoids wasting process energy in unnecessary water heating. However, some water content is needed to achieve optimal eventual sugar yields from enzymatic hydrolysis. Typically, it is advantageous to pre-treat biomass feedstocks at or near their inherent water holding capacity. This is the level of water content a given raw material will reach after soaking in excess water followed by pressing to the mechanical limits of an ordinary commercial screw press - typically between 30 and 45% DM. In some embodiments, the hydrothermal pretreatment is conducted at a DM content of at least 35%. It will be readily understood by one of skill in the art that the DM content may decrease during hydrothermal pretreatment as some water content is added during heating. In some embodiments, raw materials are pretreated to a DM content of at least 20%, or at least 25%, or at least 30%, or at least 40%, or 40% or less, or 35% or less or 30% or less.
[063] In some embodiments, soaking/wetting with an aqueous solution can serve to adjust the pH before pretreatment to the range between 3.5 and 9.0, which is typically advantageous for autohydrolysis. It will be readily understood that the pH can change during pretreatment, typically to more acidic levels as acetic acid is released from the solubilized hemicellulose.
[064] In some embodiments, the hydrothermal pretreatment is conducted without supplemental oxygen as required for wet oxidation pretreatments, or without the addition of organic solvent as required for organsolvent pretreatment, or without the use of heating by microwave as required for microwave pretreatments. In some embodiments, the hydrothermal pretreatment is conducted at temperatures of 140 °C or higher, or at 150 °C or more, or at 160 °C or more, or between 160 and 200 °C, or between 170 and 190 °C, or 180 °C or less, or 170 °C or less.
[065] In some embodiments, some content of C5 can be removed by a soaking step prior to pressurized pretreatment. In some embodiments, the single reactor can be configured to heat biomass to a single target temperature. Alternatively, the single reactor can be configured to affect a temperature gradient within the reactor such that biomass is exposed, during a single pass, to more than one temperature region. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to partially remove some solubilized biomass components from within the pressurized reactor during the course of the pretreatment.
[066] Suitable hydrothermal pretreatment reactors typically include most pulping reactors known from the pulp and paper industry. In some embodiments, the hydrothermal pretreatment is administered by steam inside a pressurized reactor at 1 MPa (10 bar) or less, or at 1.2 MPa (12 bar) or less, or at 0.4 MPa (4 bar ) or more, or 0.8 MPa (8 bar) or more, or between 0.8 and 1.8 MPa (8 and 18 bar) or between 1.8 and 2 MPa (18 and 20 bar). In some embodiments, the pretreatment reactor is configured for a continuous input stream of raw material.
[067] In some modalities, the moistened biomass is conducted through the reactor, under pressure, for a certain duration or “residence time”. Residence time is advantageously kept short to facilitate higher biomass yields. However, the severity of pretreatment obtained is determined by both temperature and residence time. The temperature during hydrothermal pretreatment is advantageously kept lower, not only due to the fact that the methods of the invention seek to obtain a very low pretreatment severity, but also due to the fact that temperatures can be achieved with the use of lower vapor pressures. To the extent that the pretreatment temperature can be at levels of 180 °C or less and correspondingly saturated vapor pressures maintained at 1 MPa (10 bar) or less, less tendency to corrosion is experienced in equipment. Much lower grade pressure and steel compositions can be used, which reduces installation capital costs. In some embodiments, the reactor is configured to heat the biomass to a single target temperature between 160 and 200 °C, or between 170 and 190 °C. Residence times, in some sports, are less than 60, or less than 30, or less than 20, or less than 15, or less than 14, or less than 13, or less than 12, or less than 10, or less than 8 or less than 5 minutes.
[068] Biomass feedstocks can be loaded from atmospheric pressure into a pressurized reactor by a variety of means. In some embodiments, a dam-type "particle pump" system can be used to charge the biomass feedstocks, such as the system described in US 13/062,522. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to charge a pretreatment reactor using a so-called "screw connector" feeder.
[069] Pretreated biomass can be discharged from a pressurized reactor by a variety of means. In some embodiments, the pretreated biomass is discharged in such a way as to preserve the fiber structure of the material. Preserving the fiber structure of the pretreated biomass is advantageous due to the fact that it allows the solid fraction of the pretreated material to be pressed during solid/liquid separation to comparatively high dry matter levels using press equipment thread and thus avoiding the additional cost and complexity of membrane filter setting systems.
[070] The fiber structure can be maintained by removing the raw material from the pressurized reactor in a manner that is non-explosive. In some embodiments, non-explosive removal can be accomplished and the fiber structure thus maintained using a dam-type system such as that described in US 13/043,486. In some embodiments, non-explosive removal can be accomplished and the fiber structure so maintained with the use of a hydrocyclone removal system, such as those described in US 12/996392.
[071] In some embodiments, pretreated biomass can be removed from a pressurized pretreatment reactor with the use of "steam explosion", which involves explosive release of the pretreated material. Steam-blasted pre-treated biomass does not maintain its fiber structure and correspondingly requires more elaborate solid/liquid separation systems in order to achieve a dry matter content comparable to that which can be achieved with the use of dry matter systems. Ordinary screw press with pretreated biomass that maintains its fiber structure.
[072] Biomass feedstock is pretreated to very low severity log Ro 3.75 or less. This will typically result in the pretreated biomass having a xylan number of 10% or more. The "xylan number" parameter refers to a composite measurement that reflects a weighted combination of both the residual xylan content within the insoluble solids as well as the concentration of soluble xylose and xylo-oligomers within the liquid fraction. At lower Ro severity, the xylan number is higher. Thus, the highest xylan number refers to the lowest pretreatment severity. The xylan number provides a negative linear correlation with conventional log Ro severity measurement even at very low severity where the residual xylan content within the undissolved solids is highest. The relationship between the log Ro pretreatment severity and the xylan number of the resulting pretreated biomass for a variety of different feedstocks is shown in Figure 1, which is explained in detail in Example 1.
[073] The xylan number is particularly useful as a measure of pretreatment severity in that different pretreated biomass feedstocks that have equivalent xylan number exhibit equivalent C5 monomer recovery. In contrast, conventional Ro severity is simply an empirical description of pretreatment conditions, which does not provide a rational basis for comparisons between different biomass feedstocks. For example, as shown in Figure 1, single-stage autohydrolysis at log Ro=3.75 severity yields pretreated sugarcane bagasse and cornhusks that have a xylan number between 6 to 7% , while with typical wheat straw strains, the resulting xylan number of pre-treated raw material is about 10%.
[074] One skilled in the art can easily determine an appropriate log Ro pretreatment severity for any given feedstock to produce a pretreated biomass that has the desired xylan number. In some embodiments, biomass feedstock is pretreated to very low severity log Ro 3.75 or less, or 3.74 or less, or 3.73 or less, or 3.72 or less, or 3, 71 or less, or 3.70 or less, or 3.69 or less, or 3.68 or less, or 3.67 or less, or 3.66 or less, or 3.65 or less, or 3.64 or less, or 3.63 or less, or 3.62 or less, or 3.61 or less, or 3.60 or less, or 3.59 or less, or 3.58 or less, or 3.57 or less, or 3.56 or less, or 3.55 or less, or 3.54 or less, or 3.53 or less, or 3.52 or less, or 3.51 or less, or 3.50 or less, or 3.45 or less, or 3.40 or less. In some embodiments, the biomass is pretreated to a low log Ro severity in order to produce a pretreated biomass that has a xylan number of 11% or greater, or 12% or greater, or 13% or greater, or 14% or greater, or 15% or greater, or 16% or greater, or 17% or greater.
[075] The xylan number is useful as a practical measure in production scale biomass processing due to the fact that it can be easily measured in-line based on simple measurements such as are provided by near infrared spectroscopic monitors. The xylan number can also be used as an endpoint measure for pretreatment control, as described in WO2013/120492.
[076] As an alternative to xylan number, which reflects a composite measure of both soluble xylan content as well as residual xylan content in undissolved solids, the pretreatment effect can be expressed in terms of residual xylan content in undissolved solids. The relationship between residual xylan content in undissolved solids and xylan number is shown in Figure 2, which is explained in Example 1. A person skilled in the art can easily determine an appropriate log Ro pretreatment severity for any given raw material to produce a pretreated biomass that has the desired residual xylan content in undissolved solids. For example, as shown in Figure 2, single-stage autohydrolysis to a sufficient severity to produce pretreated biomass that has a xylan number of 10% will typically produce pretreated biomass that has a residual xylan solids content. about 5.0% undissolved by weight for lignocellulosic raw materials, including, but not limited to, wheat straw, sugarcane bagasse, empty fruit bunches and corn husks. In some embodiments, the biomass feedstock is pretreated to the appropriate log Ro severity to produce a pretreated biomass in which the residual xylan content of undissolved solids is at least 5.0% by weight, or at least 5.1%, or at least 5.2%, or at least 5.3%, or at least 5.4%, or at least 5.5%, or at least 5.6%, or at least 5, 7%, or at least 5.8%, or at least 5.9%, or at least 6.0%, or at least 6.1%, or at least 6.2%, or at least 6.3% , or at least 6.4%, or at least 6.5%, or at least 6.6%, or at least 6.7%, or at least 6.8%, or at least 6.9%, or at least 7.0%, or at least 7.1%, or at least 7.2%, or at least 7.3% or at least 7.4%, or at least 7.5%, or at least 7 .6%, or at least 7.7%, or at least 7.8%, or at least 7.9% or at least 8.0%, or at least 8.1%, or at least 8.2% , or at least 8.3%, or at least 8.4%, or at least 8.5%.
[077] It is advantageous that biomass feedstocks are pretreated to very low severity, where the xylan number of the pretreated feedstock is 10% or more, or where the residual xylan content of solids undissolved in the pretreated raw material is at least 5.0% or more. This very low severity level corresponds to a process where the total hemicellulose content of the raw material before pre-treatment that is either solubilized or irretrievably lost during pre-treatment is minimized. It was unexpectedly revealed that very high final C5 monomer yields of at least theoretical 55% can be obtained without noticeable loss of C6 monomer yields with typical strains of wheat straw, sugarcane bagasse, sweet sorghum bagasse, straw of corn and empty fruit bunches after enzymatic hydrolysis of raw materials pretreated to very low stringency by single stage autohydrolysis, provided that sufficiently high xylanase and xylosidase activities are employed during enzymatic hydrolysis. At very low severity levels, a large fraction of the hemicellulose content of the raw material remains within the solid fraction after pretreatment, where it can subsequently be hydrolyzed to C5 monomers with high recovery using enzymatic hydrolysis, where sufficient xylanase and xylosidase activities are used.
[078] It should be noted that reports relating to “xylose recovery” are often expressed in terms that are not comparable to the xylose recoveries reported here. For example, Ohgren et al. (2007) and Lee et al. (2009) report high xylose recoveries. But these values refer only to the recovery of xylose from pretreated biomass, not expressed as a percentage of the original hemicellulose content of the raw material before pretreatment. Or, for example, WO2010/113129 refers to hemicellulose recovery as a percentage of hemicellulose content of the raw material before pre-treatment, but does not specify the monomer yield, which is invariably lower than the recovery of total hemicellulose. In some embodiments, theoretical C5 monomer yields of at least 56% can be obtained in hydrolyzate after enzymatic hydrolysis, or at least 57%, or at least 58%, or at least 59%, or at least 60%, or at least at least 61%, or at least 62%, or at least 63%, or at least 64%, or at least 65%.
[079] Enzymatic hydrolysis can be conducted in a variety of different ways. In some embodiments, the pretreated biomass is hydrolyzed as a whole slurry, meaning that substantially all of the solids in the pretreated biomass are subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis in a reaction mixture comprising both dissolved and undissolved solids. As used herein, the term "whole slurry" refers to an enzymatic hydrolysis reaction mixture in which the weight ratio of undissolved to dissolved solids at the start of enzymatic hydrolysis is less than 2.2:1.
[080] The content of undissolved solids" and "dissolved solids" of the pretreated biomass slurry is determined as follows:
[081] The content of “total solids” and “total filtered solids” is determined according to the procedure described in Weiss et al. (2009). From these values, the content of "undissolved solids" and "dissolved solids" can be calculated according to the following formulas:[Undissolved solids] (weight-%) = ([Total solids] (weight-%) - [Total filtered solids] (wt-%))/(1 - [Total filtered solids] (wt-%)) [Dissolved solids] (wt-%) = [Total solids] (wt-%) - [undissolved solids ] (Weight-%)
[082] In some embodiments, prior to enzymatic hydrolysis, the pretreated biomass is subjected to a solid/liquid separation step to produce a separate solid fraction and liquid fraction. Such separation is generally advantageous in that some component of the dissolved solids in the pretreated biomass typically acts to inhibit the activities of one or more enzymes used in enzymatic hydrolysis. For example, the removal of dissolved solids content from the entire slurry of pretreated biomass clearly improves the cellulose conversion achieved with pretreated raw materials as described here that have been subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis at high dry matter content with the use of commercially available cellulase preparations for converting lignocellulosic biomass supplied either from GENENCOR ™ under the tradename ACCELLERASE TRIO ™ or from NOVOZYMES ™ under the tradename CELLIC CTEC3 ™ as shown in Figure 6 and as explained in Example 4 .
[083] Surprisingly, however, in cases where the pretreated biomass slurry is sufficiently diluted to the lowest dry matter content, the concentrations of the inhibitory substances present in the pretreated biomass slurry are sufficiently diluted so that equivalent conversion yields can be obtained in whole slurry hydrolysis, and even at lower enzyme dose levels, as explained in Example 10.
[084] In embodiments employing a solid/liquid separation step prior to enzymatic hydrolysis, where enzymatic hydrolysis is desired to be conducted at high dry matter content, it is advantageous to achieve the highest practicable levels of dry matter content in the solid fraction or, alternatively, to remove the highest practicable amount of dissolved solids from the solid fraction. In some embodiments, the solid/liquid separation achieves a solid fraction that has a DM content of at least 40% by weight, or at least 45%, or at least 50%, or at least 55%. Solid/liquid separation using ordinary screw press systems can typically achieve DM levels as high as 50% in the solid fraction, provided the biomass feedstock has been pretreated in such a way that the structure of fiber is maintained. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to generate higher installation capital expenditures in order to achieve more efficient solid/liquid separation, for example, with the use of a membrane filter press system. In some embodiments, dissolved solids can be removed from a solid fraction by serial washing and pressing or by displacement washing techniques known in the pulp and paper field. In some embodiments, whether by solid/liquid separation directly or by some combination of washing and solid/liquid separation, the dissolved solids content of the solid fraction is reduced by at least 50%, or at least 55%, or at least 60%, or at least 65%, or at least 70%, or at least 75%.
[085] The liquid fraction obtained from such solid/liquid separation can then be kept separate from the solid fraction during enzymatic hydrolysis of the solid fraction. This temporary separation is called “C5 bypass”. The C5-rich "bypass" material can then be added back to the hydrolysis mixture after the enzymatic hydrolysis of the solid fraction has achieved a desired degree of glucan conversion. This is referred to as "post-hydrolysis" of the "C5 bypass" material. In this way, interference that could otherwise be caused by enzyme-inhibiting dissolved solids present in the pretreated biomass slurry is minimized, without loss of C5 monomer yield. The liquid fraction obtained from soft lignocellulosic biomass raw materials, such as typical strains of wheat straw, sugarcane bagasse, sweet sorghum bagasse, corn straw and self-pretreated empty fruit bunches -single-stage hydrolysis at very low stringency so as to provide pretreated material which has a xylan number of 10% or greater, or which has an undissolved solids xylan content of 5.0% or greater, typically comprises a small component of C6 monomers (1x), mainly glucose with some other sugars; a larger component of soluble C6 oligomers (about 2x to 7x); a major component of C5 monomers (4x to 8x wax), mainly xylose and arabinose and other sugars; and a much larger component of soluble xylo-oligomers (about 18x to 30x). Soluble xylo-oligomers typically include primarily xyloexose, xylopentose, xylotetraose, xylotriosis and xylobiose with some higher chain oligomers. These xylose oligomers (or xylo-oligomers) are typically enzyme hydrolyzed during "post-hydrolysis" by enzymatic activities used in enzymatic solid fraction hydrolysis. Or, in other words, by mixing the separated liquid fraction and the hydrolyzed solid fraction, the xylo-oligomers in the liquid fraction are degraded to xylose monomers by the action of enzymatic activities remaining within the hydrolyzed solid fraction.
[086] Alternatively, in some embodiments, the separated liquid fraction can be used for other purposes. In some embodiments, the separated liquid fraction can be blended with fine vinasse after ethanol recovery from hydrolyzate fermentation. The blended liquid fraction and fine vinasse can then be used as a biomethane substrate. Or, alternatively, the fine vinasse and liquid fractions can be used as a separate biomethane substrate. Surprisingly, the biomethane potential of fine vinasse and also of the liquid fraction is increased after very low severity pretreatment that produces pretreated biomass that has 10% or greater xylan number. Consequently, in some embodiments, it is advantageous to conduct the C6 fermentation at very low stringency, in that increased biomethane yields can somehow compensate for the decreased ethanol yields. In some embodiments, a biomethane yield of at least 75 NM3 methane/tonne biomass feedstock, or at least 78, or at least 80, or at least 82, or at least 85, or at least 87, or at least minus 90, or at least 92, or at least 95 can be produced from a biomethane substrate comprising liquid fraction and fine vinasse combined, where the raw material has been pretreated to low log Ro severity in order to produce a pretreated biomass which has at least 10% xylan number, or wherein the undissolved solids comprise at least 5.0% by weight of xylan. In some embodiments, the whole slurry hydrolyzate itself is used as a biomethane substrate.
[087] In some embodiments, the invention provides methods for processing lignocellulosic biomass comprising:- providing soft lignocellulosic biomass feedstock,- preheating the feedstock to pH within the range of 3.5 to 9.0 in a single stage pressurized hydrothermal pretreatment to very low severity so that the pretreated biomass is characterized by having a xylan number of 10% or higher,- separate the pretreated biomass into a solid fraction and a fraction liquid, - hydrolyze the solid fraction with or without the addition of supplemental water content using enzymatic hydrolysis catalyzed by an enzyme mixture comprising endoglucanase, exoglucanase, B-glycosidase, endoxylanase and xylosidase activities, and - subsequently mix the separated liquid fraction and the hydrolyzed solid fraction, whereby the xylo-oligomers in the liquid fraction are degraded to xylose monomers by the action of enzymatic activities remaining within the sol fraction. hydrolyzed acid.
[088] In some embodiments, the enzymatic hydrolyzate, either from a separated solid fraction or from a hydrolyzed solid fraction to which the separated liquid fraction has been added for post-hydrolysis, or from an entire slurry, is subsequently subjected to fermentation to produce ethanol.
[089] In some embodiments, the fine vinasse recovered after the fermentation of a hydrolyzate is used as a substrate for the production of biomethane. In some embodiments, the separated liquid fraction is blended with fine vinasse recovered after fermentation to a hydrolyzate and used as a combined biomethane substrate.
[090] It will be readily understood that the "solid fraction" and the "liquid fraction" can be further subdivided or processed. In some embodiments, biomass can be removed from a pretreatment reactor concurrently with solid/liquid separation. In some embodiments, the pretreated biomass is subjected to a solid/liquid separation step after it has been discharged from the reactor, typically using a simple, low-cost screw press system to generate a solid and fractional fraction. a liquid fraction.
[091] As is well known in the art, enzymatic hydrolysis using cellulase activity is more effective in cases where hydrolysis is conducted at lower dry matter content. The higher solids concentration effectively inhibits cellulase catalysis, although the exact reasons for this well-known effect are not fully understood. See, for example, Kristensen et al. (2009). Although the prevailing view in the art is that hydrolysis at the highest practical dry matter content is advantageous, it is necessarily associated with increased enzyme consumption. The same enzymatic hydrolysis effects can be achieved using the same enzymatic preparations at lower dry matter content with enzyme cost savings.
[092] One of skill in the art will readily determine, through routine experimentation, a level of DM at which to conduct enzymatic hydrolysis that is appropriate to achieve objective process data, for any given biomass feedstock and enzyme preparation. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to conduct hydrolysis at very high DM > 20%, notwithstanding some resulting increase in enzyme consumption. It is generally considered advantageous to conduct hydrolysis at the highest practicable dry matter level, for a variety of reasons including minimizing water consumption and saving energy costs in ethanol distillation, where higher sugar concentrations are produced. by enzymatic hydrolysis at higher dry matter levels result in higher ethanol concentrations, which in turn reduces distillation costs. In some embodiments, enzymatic hydrolysis of a separated solid fraction or whole slurry can be conducted at 8% DM or more, or 9% DM or more, or 10% DM or more, or 11% of DM or more, or 12% of DM or more, or 13% of DM or more, or 14% of DM or more, or 15% of DM or more, or 16% of DM or more, or 17% DM or more, or 18% DM or more, or 19% DM or more, or 20% DM or more, or 21% DM or more, or 22% DM or more, or at 23% DM or more, or at 25% DM or more, or at 30% DM or more, or at 35% DM or more.
[093] In some embodiments, the solid fraction is recovered from solid/liquid separation of biomass pretreated to 40% DM or more, but additional water content is added so that enzymatic hydrolysis can be conducted in lower DM levels. It will be readily understood that the water content can be added in the form of fresh water, condensate or other process solutions with or without additives such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) of any molecular weight or surfactants, salts, pH adjustment chemicals , such as ammonia, ammonium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide, antibacterial agents or antifungal agents or other materials.
[094] In order to achieve yields of C5 monomer in hydrolyzate of at least 55% or more, according to the methods of the invention, enzymatic hydrolysis is conducted using a variety of enzymatic activities. The enzyme mixture used in enzymatic hydrolysis must comprise at least the following endoglucanase, exoglucanase, β-glucosidase, endoxylanase and β-xylosidase activities. It will be readily understood by one of skill in the art that several different enzyme dose levels can be applied, depending on the dry matter content under which the hydrolysis is conducted, the desired glucan conversion yields as process objectives and the hydrolysis times desired as process objectives. Thus, an enzyme dose level suitable for rapid hydrolysis with higher dry matter content can be greatly reduced and used in a longer hydrolysis time period with lower dry matter content.
[095] As a general rule, yields of C5 monomer in hydrolyzate of at least 55% or more can be achieved relatively quickly, typically in time periods as low as 24 hours, and generally within the range of 18 hours to 60 hours. It is advantageous to achieve these very high C5 monomer recoveries as quickly as possible, due to the fact that once the xylan content is substantially removed from undissolved solids, endo and exoglucanases are comparatively less blocked in approaching productive binding. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to supplement an enzyme mixture with excess endo and exoglucanase activity after C5 monomer yields are reached. The hydrolysis time periods during which such high C5 monomer yields can typically be achieved are indicated, for example, in Figure 11, and as explained in Example 10, which shows the conversion of xylan to whole slurry hydrolysis at 12 % DM, in cases where the recovery of total C5 after pretreatment was about 77%. As shown, even at very low enzyme dose levels, C5 monomer yields of at least 55% can be achieved within 40 hours.
[096] Appropriate levels of the various enzyme activities suitable for practicing the methods of the invention in order to tint C5 monomer yields of 55% or more are typically as follows:
[097] Endoglucanase refers to 4-(1,3;1,4)-β-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase, also known as β-1,4-glucanase (EC 3.2.1.4). For purposes of defining limiting values, endoglucanase activities are determined using the method of Ghose (1987) using hydroxyl-ethyl cellulose (HEC) as substrate and expressed in nkat/g of enzyme preparation. Typically, endoglucanase levels should be at least 1100 nkat/g glucan at the start of enzymatic hydrolysis. Depending on process objectives such as hydrolysis rate, degree of conversion and dry matter content, endoglucanase activity levels can vary within the range of 1100 to 30,000 nkat/g glucan. In some modalities, the range can be between 1,100 to 2,832, or between 1,130 to 1,529, or between 2,317 to 3,852, or between 3,000 to 5,120, or between 4,000 to 8,000, or between 7,000 to 10,000, or between 11,000 to 20,000.
[098] Exoglucanase refers to 4-β-D-glucan cellobiohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.91). For purposes of defining limiting values, exoglucanase activities are determined using the method of Bailey and Tahtiharju (2003) using 4-methyl-umbelliferyl-β-D-lactoside as substrate and expressed in nkat/g of enzyme preparation. Typically, exoglucanase levels should be at least 280 nkat/g glucan at the start of enzymatic hydrolysis. Depending on process objectives such as hydrolysis rate, degree of conversion and dry matter content, activity levels can vary within the range of 280 to 20,000 nkat/g glucan. In some modalities, the range can be between 280 to 690, or between 370 to 560, or between 400 to 932, or between 700 to 1,240, or between 1200 to 2,000, or between 3,000 to 5,000.
[099] β-glycosidase refers to β-D-glycoside glycohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.21). For purposes of defining limiting values, β-glycosidase activities are determined using the method of Berghem and Pettersson (1974) using 4-nitrophenyl-β-D-glycopyranoside as substrate and expressed in nkat/g of enzyme preparation. Typically, β-glucosidase levels should be at least 3000 nkat/g glucan at the start of enzymatic hydrolysis. Depending on process objectives such as hydrolysis rate, degree of conversion and dry matter content, activity levels can vary within the range of 30,000 to 50,000 nkat/g glucan. In some sports, the range can be between 3,000 to 7,500, or between 4,000 to 6,010, or between 5,000 to 1,000, or between 7,000 to 14,000, or between 15,000 to 25,000.
[0100] Endoxylanase refers to 4-β-D-xylan xylanoidrolase (EC 3.2.1.8). For purposes of defining limiting values, endoxylanase activities are determined using the method of Bailey et al. (1992) using birch xylan as substrate and expressed as nkat/g of enzyme preparation. Citrate buffer can be used to adjust the pH to an appropriate level for the activity being tested. Typically, endoxylanase levels should be at least 1400 nkat/g glucan at the start of enzymatic hydrolysis. Depending on process objectives such as hydrolysis rate, degree of conversion and dry matter content, activity levels can vary within the range of 14,000 to 70,000 nkat/g glucan. In some modalities, the range can be between 1,400 to 3,800, or between 4,000 to 5,000, or between 6,000 to 7,000, or between 7,000 to 8,000, or between 9,000 to 12,000, or between 11,000 to 15,000, or between 15,000 to 20,000, or between 18,000 to 30,000.
[0101] β-xylosidase refers to 4-β-D-xylan xyloidrolase (EC 3.2.1.37). For purposes of defining limiting values, β-xylosidase activities are determined using the method of Poutanen and Puls (1988) using para-nitrophenyl-β-D-xylanopyranoside as substrate and expressed in nkat/g of enzyme preparation. Typically, β-xylosidase levels should be at least 75 nkat/g glucan at the start of enzymatic hydrolysis. Depending on process objectives such as hydrolysis rate, degree of conversion and dry matter content, activity levels can vary within the range of 75 to 124, or between 100 to 300, or between 250 to 500, or between 400 at 800, or between 700 to 20,000 nkat/g glucan. In some modalities, the range can be between 700 to 900, or between 800 to 1,400, or between 1,100 to 1,700, or between 1,500 to 2,500, or between 2,000 to 3,500, or between 3,000 to 5,000, or between 4,000 to 10,000, or between 8,000 to 20,000.
[0102] Any of the assays listed above to be used for activity determinations may be modified in appropriate ways, including that samples may be adjusted to the appropriate dilution for measurement purposes. The assay can be adapted for measurements on representative samples taken from a hydrolysis mixture by comparison with standard curves in cases where known activities are added to samples with similar background dry matter content.
[0103] As will be readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, the composition of enzyme mixtures for practicing the methods of the invention can vary within comparatively wide limits. Suitable enzyme preparations include commercially available preparations optimized for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Selection and modification of enzyme mixtures during optimization may include genetic modification techniques, for example, such as those described by Zhang et al. (2006) or by other methods known in the art. Commercially available cellulase preparations optimized for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass are typically identified by the manufacturer and/or supplier as such. These are typically distinct from commercially available cellulase preparations for general use or optimized for use in the production of animal ledger, food, textile detergents or in the paper industry. In some embodiments, a commercially available cellulase preparation optimized for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass is used which is supplied by GENENCOR™ and which comprises exoglucanases, endoglucanases, endoxylanases, xylosidases, and beta glycosidases isolated from genetically modified Trichoderma reesei fermentations such as, for example, the commercial cellulase preparation sold under the trade name ACCELLERASE TRIO™. In some embodiments, a commercially available cellulase preparation optimized for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass is used which is supplied by NOVOZYMES™ and which comprises exoglucanases, endoglucanases, endoxylanases, xylosidases and beta glycosidases, such as, for example, commercially sold cellulase preparations under any of the trade names CELLIC CTEC2 ™ or CELLIC CTEC3 ™.
[0104] The enzyme activities represented in three commercially available cellulase preparations optimized for lignocellulosic biomass conversion were analyzed in detail. For each of these commercial cellulase preparations, the levels of twelve different enzyme activities were characterized and expressed per gram of protein. Experimental details are provided in Example 8. The results are shown in Table 1. It should be noted that the test methods used in this example are not the same as those based on activity determinations in this document. These results provide only generalized and qualitative comparison and should not be viewed as limiting the claims to the methods of the invention.
[0105] Table 1. Selected activity measurements in commercial cellulase preparations optimized for lignocellulosic biomass conversion.



[0106] Enzyme mixtures that are effective to hydrolyze lignocellulosic biomass can alternatively be obtained by methods well known in the art from a variety of microorganisms including, aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, white rot fungi, rot fungi mole and anaerobic fungi. See, for example, Singhania et al. (2010). Organisms that produce cellulases typically secrete a mixture of different enzymes in appropriate proportions so as to be suitable for the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Preferred sources of cellulase preparations useful for converting lignocellulosic biomass include fungi such as Trichoderma, Penicillium, Fusarium, Humicola, Aspergillus and Phanerochaete species.
[0107] One particular fungus species, Trichoderma reesei, has been extensively studied. Wild-type Trichoderma reesei secretes a mixture of enzymes comprising two exocellulases (cellobiohydrolases) with their specificities for the purpose of reducing and non-reducing cellulose chains, at least five different endocellulases that have different cellulose recognition sites, two B -glycosidases as well as a variety of endoxylanases and exoxylosidases. See Rouvinen, J., et al. (nineteen ninety); Divne, C., et al. (1994); Martinez, D., et al. (2008). Commercial cellulose preparations typically also include alpha-arabinofuranosidase and acetyl xylan esterase activities. See, for example, Vinzant, T., et al. (2001).
[0108] An optimized mixture of enzyme activities in relative proportions that differ from the proportions presented in mixtures naturally secreted by wild-type organisms have previously been shown to produce higher sugar yields. See, Rosgaard et al. (2007). In fact, it has been suggested that optimizations of enzyme blends that include as much as 16 different enzyme proteins can be advantageously determined separately for any given biomass feedstock subjected to any given pretreatment. See Billard, H., et al. (2012); Banerjee, G., et al. (2010). As a commercial practicality, however, commercial enzyme suppliers typically seek to produce the fewest practicable number of different enzyme blends, so that economies of scale can be obtained in large-scale production.
[0109] In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to supplement a commercially available cellulase preparation optimized for lignocellulosic biomass conversion with one or more additional or supplemental enzyme activities. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to simply increase the relative proportion of one or more component enzymes present in the commercial preparation. In some modalities it may be beneficial to introduce additional specialized activities. For example, in practicing the methods of the invention using any given biomass feedstock, particular non-hydrolyzed carbohydrate bonds can be identified that could be advantageously hydrolyzed through the use of one or more supplementary enzyme activities. Such non-hydrolyzed bonds can be identified through characterization of oligomeric carbohydrates, using methods well known in the art, in soluble hydrolysates or in insoluble non-hydrolyzed residue. Unhydrolyzed bonds can also be identified through comprehensive microarray polymer profiling, with the use of monoclonal antibodies directed against specific carbohydrate bonds, as described by Nguema-Ona et al. (2012). In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to supplement a commercially available cellulase preparation optimized for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass with the use of any one or more of endoxylanase, B-glycosidase, mannanase, glucouronidase, xylan esterase, amylase, xylosidase, glucouranyl esterase, or arabinofuransidase additional.
[0110] In some embodiments, it may alternatively be advantageous to produce enzymes on site in a lignocellulosic biomass processing facility, as described by Humbird et al. (2011). In some embodiments, a commercially available cellulase preparation optimized for lignocellulosic biomass conversion can be produced on site, with or without custom supplementation of specific enzyme activities appropriate for a particular biomass feedstock.
[0111] In some embodiments, the enzyme mixture may further include any one or more of the activities of mannosidases (EC 3.2.1.25), aD-galactosidases (EC 3.2.1.22), aL-arabinofuranosidases (EC 3.2.1.55) , aD-glucuronidases (EC 3.2.1.139), cinnamoyl esterases (EC 3.1.1.), or feruloyl esterases (EC 3.1.1.73), acetyl xylan esterases (EC 3.1.1.72); B-1,3 xylosidase (EC 3.2.1.72); alpha 1,3 and/or alpha 1, 5 arabinofuranosidase activity (EC 3.2.1.23); or other activities.
[0112] Another striking feature of biomass that has been pretreated by single-stage autohydrolysis at very low levels of severity is that concentrations of pretreatment by-products that serve as inhibitors of fermenting organisms are kept at very low levels. As a consequence, it is typically possible to use hydrolyzed biomass obtained by methods of the invention directly in fermentations, without requiring any washing or other detoxification step.
[0113] As is well known in the art, hydrothermal pretreatment of antho-hydrolysis typically produces a variety of soluble by-products that act as "fermentation inhibitors" in that these inhibit the proliferation and/or metabolism of organisms fermenters. Different fermentation inhibitors are produced in different amounts depending on the properties of the lignocellulosic raw material and the severity of the pretreatment. See Klinke et al. (2004). At least three categories of fermentation inhibitors are typically formed during autohydrolysis pretreatment: (1) furans, primarily 2-furfural and 5-HMF (5 hydroxymethylfurfural) which are degradation products of mono or oligosaccharides; (2) monomeric phenols, which are degradation products of the lignin structure; and (3) small organic acids, primarily acetic acid, which originate from acetyl groups on hemicelluloses, and lignin. The mixture of different inhibitors has been shown to act synergistically in bioethanol fermentation using yeast strains, see, for example, Palmquist et al. (1999), and also with the use of ethanolic Escherichia coli, see, for example, Zaldivar et al. (1999). In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to subject the pretreated biomass to flash evaporation, using methods well known in the art, in order to reduce the levels of volatile inhibitors, most notably furfural. With the use of auto-hydrolysis with typical strains of biomass raw materials, such as wheat straw, sweet sorghum bagasse, sugar cane bagasse, corn straw and empty fruit bunches, pre-treated until number of xylan 10% or higher, from experience only acetic acid and furfural levels are potentially inhibitory to fermenting organisms. In cases where biomass feedstocks are pretreated at 35% DM or more to xylan number 10% or more, and in cases where the solid fraction is subsequently enzyme-hydrolyzed at 25% or less DM, with water added to adjust the DM, but no wash steps, furfural levels in the hydrolyzate can typically be kept under 3 g/kg and acetic acid levels below 9 g/kg. These levels are typically acceptable for yeast fermentations using specialized strains. During enzymatic hydrolysis, part of the additional acetic acid is released from the degradation of hemicellulose in the solid fraction. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to remove part of the acetic acid content from the liquid fraction and/or the hydrolyzed solid fraction using electrodialysis or other methods known in the art.
[0114] Different feedstocks can be pretreated using single stage autohydrolysis at low enough log Ro severity to produce pretreated biomass that has 10% or greater xylan number using a variety of different combinations of reactor residence times and temperatures. One skilled in the art will easily determine through routine experimentation an appropriate pretreatment routine for application with any given raw material, with the use of any given reactor, and with any given system of reactor loading and biomass reactor unloading . In cases where raw materials are pre-treated using a continuous reactor, loaded by a dam system or a screw connector feeder, and discharged by either a "particle pump" dam system or a hydrocyclone system, very low severity 10% or higher xylan number can be achieved using typical wheat straw strains or empty fruit bunches for a temperature of 180 °C and a reactor residence time of 24 minutes , or temperatures within the range of 175 °C to 185 °C for residence times within the range of 18 to 35 minutes, or temperatures within the range of 170 °C to 190 °C for residence times within the range of 13 to 40 minutes. For typical strains of corn husk, sugarcane bagasse and sweet sorghum bagasse, a very low severity of 10% or higher xylan number can typically be achieved with use within the range of 175 °C to 185 °C for residence times within the range of 8 to 25 minutes, or temperatures within the range of 170 °C to 190 °C for residence times within the range of 6 to 35 minutes. It will be readily understood by one of skill in the art that residence times and temperatures can be adjusted to achieve comparable levels of Ro severity.
[0115] Enzymatic hydrolysis of raw materials pretreated at 10% or higher xylan number can typically be conducted at high DM > 20% with commercially reasonable enzyme consumption, without requiring specific washing or detoxification steps, in the cases where the solid fraction is pressed to at least 40% DM, or where the dissolved solids content of the solid fraction is reduced by at least 50%.
[0116] In some embodiments, the enzyme mixture can further include any one or more of the activities of mannosidases (EC 3.2.1.25), aD-galactosidases (EC 3.2.1.22), aL-arabinofuranosidases (EC 3.2.1.55) , aD-glucuronidases (EC 3.2.1.139), cinnamoyl esterases (EC 3.1.1.), or feruloyl esterases (EC 3.1.1.73), acetyl xylan esterases (EC 3.1.1.72); B-1,3 xylosidase (EC 3.2.1.72); alpha 1,3 and/or alpha 1, 5 arabinofuranosidase activity (EC 3.2.1.23); or other activities.
[0117] One of skill in the art will readily determine an appropriate dose level of any given enzyme preparation for application, and appropriate pH and temperature conditions as well as an appropriate duration for enzymatic hydrolysis. As mentioned earlier, the duration of hydrolysis may vary depending on process objectives. Longer hydrolysis leads to better final glucose conversion yields, but imposes higher capital and operating costs at production scale. The duration of hydrolysis, in some modalities, is at least 24 hours, or at least 36 hours, or at least 48 hours, or at least 64 hours, or at least 72 hours, or at least 96 hours, or for a time between 24 and 150 hours. It is generally advantageous to keep enzyme dose levels lower in order to minimize enzyme costs. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to use a high dose of enzyme. In practicing the methods of the invention, one skilled in the art can determine an economic enzyme dose optimization by considering relevant factors including local biomass costs, market prices for product streams, total installation capital costs and amortization schemes, and others factors. In modalities where a commercially available cellulase preparation optimized for lignocellulosic biomass conversion is used, an overall dose range provided by manufacturers can be used to determine the overall range within which to optimize.
[0118] In some embodiments, after a separated solid fraction has been hydrolyzed by enzyme to a desired degree of conversion, the liquid fraction, which has been kept in C5 shift, is mixed with the hydrolyzate mixture for post-hydrolysis. In some embodiments, all of the recovered liquid fraction can be added at once, while in other embodiments, part of the liquid fraction component can be removed and/or the liquid fraction can be added in increments. In some embodiments, prior to mixing with the liquid fraction, the solid fraction is hydrolyzed to at least 50%, or at least 55%, or at least 60% cellulose conversion, meaning that at least the specified theoretical yield of cellulose monomers glucose is obtained from the hydrolyzate. A substantial portion of the xylo-oligomers present in the liquid fraction can typically be hydrolyzed to xylose monomers by the action of xylanase and other enzymes that remain active within the hydrolyzate mixture. In some embodiments, post-hydrolysis is conducted for at least 6 hours, or for a time between 15 and 50 hours, or for at least 24 hours. In some embodiments, at least 60%, or at least 65%, or at least 70%, or at least 75%, or at least 80%, or at least 85%, or at least 90% by weight of the xylo-oligomers present in the liquid fraction are hydrolyzed into xylose monomers during post-hydrolysis by the action of xylanase and other enzymes that remain active within the hydrolyzate mixture. In some modalities, the liquid fraction is mixed with hydrolyzate directly, without further addition of chemical additives. In some embodiments, some components of the liquid fraction, such as acetic acid, furfural or phenols, can be removed from the liquid fraction prior to mixing with the hydrolyzate.
[0119] In some embodiments, enzymatic hydrolysis of the solid fraction and/or post-hydrolysis of the liquid fraction can be conducted as a process of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF). As is well known in the art, when SSF can be conducted at the same temperature as that which is ideal for enzymatic hydrolysis, enzyme consumption can be minimized due to the fact that a fermenting organism introduced during the course of enzymatic hydrolysis consumes the monomers of glucose and xylose and thus reduces the product inhibition of enzyme-catalyzed reactions. In some embodiments, post-hydrolysis is only conducted after the fiber fraction has been hydrolyzed, without the addition of fermenting organism, to at least 60% cellulose conversion. In some embodiments, SSF can be conducted after an initial period of enzymatic hydrolysis, which is a fermenting organism added after an initial period of enzymatic hydrolysis, and both fermentation and hydrolysis continue, optionally at a temperature that is not ideal for enzymatic hydrolysis.
[0120] In cases where biomass raw materials such as typical strains of wheat straw, sugarcane bagasse, sweet sorghum bagasse, corn husk or empty fruit bunches are pre-treated at 35 % or more of DM by single-stage autohydrolysis to sufficiently low log Ro severity so as to produce pretreated biomass that has 10% or greater xylan number, in cases where the solid fraction of the pretreated biomass is obtained having at least 40% DM or having at least 50% dissolved solids removal, in cases where the solid fraction is subsequently subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis to between 15 and 27% DM using an optimized commercially available cellulase preparation for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass, in cases where enzymatic hydrolysis is conducted for at least 48 hours, in cases where the liquid fraction is added to the solid fraction hydrolyzate after at least 50% glucose conversion has been obtained, and in cases where the added liquid fraction is subjected to post-hydrolysis for a period of at least 6 hours, it is typically possible to achieve C5 monomer concentrations in the combined C5/C6 hydrolyzate that correspond to C5 monomer yields of 60% or more of the maximum C5 monomer yield theoretical.
[0121] In some embodiments, a combined C5/C6 hydrolyzate can be directly fermented to ethanol using one or more modified yeast strains.
[0122] Figure 9 shows a process scheme for a modality. As shown, soft lignocellulosic biomass is soaked, washed or moistened to DM 35% or more. Biomass is pretreated at pH within the range of 3.5 to 9.0 using pressurized steam in single stage autohydrolysis at a severity characterized by 10% or greater xylan number. The pretreated biomass is subjected to solid/liquid separation, producing a liquid fraction and a solid fraction that has a DM content of 40% or greater. The solid fraction is adjusted to an appropriate DM content, then subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis at 15% or greater DM content at a cellulose conversion degree of 60% or greater. The separated liquid fraction is subsequently mixed with the hydrolyzed solid fraction and subjected to post-hydrolysis, whereby a substantial amount of xylo-oligomers present in the liquid fraction is hydrolyzed to monomeric xylose. After completion of hydrolysis and post-hydrolysis as described, the yield of C5 monomer is typically at least 60%, while the cellulose conversion is similarly at least 60%.
[0123] In alternative modalities, the pretreated biomass is subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis as a whole slurry. In still other embodiments, a liquid fraction is separated and a solid fraction subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis and subsequent fermentation. In some embodiments, after ethanol recovery from such a fermentation, the remaining fine vinasse can be blended with the separated liquid fraction and used as a biomethane substrate. EXAMPLES:
[0124] Example 1. Characterization of “xylan number” of solid fraction as a measure of pretreatment severity.
[0125] Wheat straw (WS), corn straw (CS), sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and empty fruit bunches (EFB) were soaked with 0 to 10 g of acetic acid/kg of dry matter of biomass, pH > 4.0, before pretreatment at 35 to 50% dry matter about 60 kg DM/h of biomass were pretreated at temperatures from 170 to 200 °C with a residence time of 12 to 18 minutes. The biomass was loaded into the reactor using a dam system and the pretreated material discharged using a dam system. The pressure inside the pressurized pretreatment reactor corresponded to the saturated vapor pressure at the temperature used. The pretreated biomass was subjected to solid/liquid separation using a screw press, producing a liquid fraction and a solid fraction that is about 30% dry matter. The solid fraction was washed with about 3 kg of water/kg of dry biomass and pressed to about 30% dry matter again. Details regarding the pretreatment process and reactor are further described in Petersen et al. (2009).
[0126] The raw materials were analyzed for carbohydrates according to the methods described in Sluiter et al. (2005) and Sluiter et al. (2008) using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system with a Phenomenex Rezex Monosaccharide H+ column. The liquid fraction and solid fraction samples were collected after three hours of continuous pretreatment and samples were collected three times over three hours to ensure that a sample was obtained from steady state pretreatment. Solid fractions were analyzed for carbohydrates according to the methods described in Sluiter et al. (2008) with a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system equipped with a Rezex Monosaccharide H+ column. The liquid fractions were analyzed for carbohydrates and degradation products according to the methods described in Sluiter et al. (2006) with a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system equipped with a Rezex Monosaccharide H+ column. Degradation products in the solid fraction were analyzed by suspending the solid fraction in water with 5 mM sulfuric acid at a ratio of 1:4 and then analyzed according to the methods described in Sluiter et al. (2006) with a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system equipped with a Rezex Monosaccharide H+ column. The dry matter content and the amount of suspended solids were analyzed according to the methods described in Weiss et al. (2009). Mass balances were configured as described in Petersen et al. (2009) and the cellulose and hemicellulose recoveries were determined. The amount of sugars that were degraded to 5-HMF or furfural and the amount of acetate released from hemicellulose during pretreatment per kg of biomass dry matter was also quantified, although furfural loss due to vaporization is not considered .
[0127] The severity of a pretreatment process is commonly described by a severity factor, first developed by Overend et al. (1987). The severity factor is typically expressed as a log value such that log(R0)=t*eksp((T-Tref)/14.75), where R0 is the severity factor, t is the residence time in minutes, T is the temperature and Tref is the reference temperature, typically 100 °C. The severity factor is based on hemicellulose solubilization kinetics as described by Belkecemi et al. (1991), Jacobsen and Wyman (2000) or Lloyd et al. (2003). The severity of a pretreatment is thus related to the residual hemicellulose content remaining in the solid fraction after the pretreatment.
[0128] The solid fractions prepared and washed as described were analyzed for C5 content according to the methods described by Sluiter et al. (2008) with a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system with a Phenomenex Rezex Monosaccharide H+ column. The xylan content in the solid fraction produced and washed as described above is linearly dependent on the severity factor for soft lignocellulosic biomasses such as, for example, wheat straw, EFB corn husks when pretreated by hydrothermal autohydrolysis. The definition of severity as the xylan content in a solid fraction prepared and washed as described above is transferable between pretreatment settings. The xylan number is the xylan content measured in the washed solid fractions, which includes some contribution of soluble material. The dependence of xylan number on log(Ro) pretreatment severity is shown in Figure 1 for wheat straw, corn husks, sugarcane bagasse and empty fruit bunches from oil palm processing.
[0129] As shown, there is a clear negative correlation between xylan number and pretreatment severity for each of the tested biomass feedstocks pretreated by single-stage autohydrolysis.
[0130] The xylan content of undissolved solids in the experiments was also calculated as the total xylan content in fiber fraction from which the xylan content dissolved in the liquid between the fibers (oligomers and monomers) is subtracted.
[0131] [Solid xylan in fibers] (weight-%) =[Total xylan in fiber fraction] (weight-%) - [Xylane dissolved in fiber fraction] (weight-%)
[0132] Dissolved xylan content is calculated by [(dissolved solids/total solids) as % by weight in fiber fraction] x [concentration of dissolved xylan in liquid fraction].
[0133] The calculated xylan content of undissolved solids in % by weight is shown as a function of xylan number in Figure 2 for wheat straw (PWS), corn husk (PCS), sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and pre-treated empty palm fruit bunches (PEFB).
[0134] Example 2. Recovery of C5 as a function of pretreatment severity.
[0135] The biomass raw materials were pretreated and the samples characterized as described in example 1. Figure 3 shows the recoveries of C5 (xylose + arabinose) as a function of the number of xylan for experiments in which straw of wheat was pretreated by single-stage autohydrolysis. C5 recoveries are shown as water insoluble solids (WIS), water soluble solids (WSS) and total recovery. As shown, recovery of C5 as both water-insoluble and water-soluble solids increases as the number of xylan increases. As the xylan number increases above 10%, the recovery of C5 as water-soluble solids decreases while the recovery of C5 as water-insoluble solids continues to increase.
[0136] The typical strains of wheat straw tested contained about 27% hemicellulose on dry matter basis before pretreatment. Figure 4 shows the recovery of total C5 after pretreatment as a function of xylan number for wheat straw, corn husk, sugarcane bagasse and EFB pretreated by autohydrolysis. Typical strains of corn straw, sugarcane bagasse and EFB tested contained approximately 25%, 19% and 23%, respectively, of C5 content on dry matter basis before pre-treatment. As shown, for all raw materials, the recovery of total C5 after pretreatment is dependent on the severity of pretreatment as defined by the number of xylan of pretreated biomass. As shown, in cases where 90% of the C5 content recovered after pretreatment can be completely hydrolyzed to C5 monomer, at least 60% final C5 monomer yield after enzymatic hydrolysis can typically be expected in cases where the Pretreatment severity is characterized by production of a xylan number of 10% or higher.
[0137] Example 3. Production of degradation products that inhibit enzymes and yeast proliferation as a function of pretreatment severity.
[0138] The biomass raw materials were pre-treated and the samples characterized as described in example 1. Figure 5 shows the dependence of release and production of furfural acetic acid and 5-hydroxy-methyl-fufural (5-HMF) ) as a function of xylan number for experiments in which wheat straw was pretreated by single-stage autohydrolysis. As shown, the production of these degradation products, which are well known to inhibit fermenting yeast and which, in some cases, also inhibit cellulase enzymes, exhibits a potential increase in xylan number of less than 10%. In xylan number 10% and higher, furfural and acetic acid levels are within ranges that allow the fermentation of pretreated biomass without requiring detoxification steps. In the case of acetic acid, levels are further increased during enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomass to 10% xylan number and higher, although typically to levels that are well tolerated by yeast modified to consume both C5 and C6 sugars.
[0139] Example 4. Inhibition of cellulase enzymes by material remaining in solid fraction as a function of % solid fraction DM.
[0140] The experiments were conducted in a 6-chamber free-fall reactor that works, in principle, like the 6-chamber reactor described and used in WO2006/056838. The 6-chamber hydrolysis reactor was designed to perform experiments with liquefaction and hydrolysis at solid concentrations above 20% DM. The reactor consists of a horizontally positioned drum divided into 6 separate chambers, each 24 cm wide and 50 cm high. A horizontal rotating rod mounted with three blades in each chamber is used for mixing/shaking. A 1.1 kW motor is used as the drive and the rotational speed is adjustable within the range of 2.5 and 16.5 rpm. The direction of rotation is programmed to change every second minute between clockwise and counterclockwise. A water-filled heating jacket on the outside enables temperature control up to 80 °C.
[0141] The experiments used wheat straw, pretreated by single-stage autohydrolysis using the system described in example 1. The biomass was moistened to a DM of > 35% and pretreated at pH > 4, 0 per steam to log Ro severity of approximately 3.7, producing pretreated material that has 10.5% xylan number. Pre-treatment was conducted at the Inbicon pilot facility in Skarbak, Denmark. The biomass was loaded into the pretreatment reactor using a dam system and the pretreated biomass removed from the reactor using a dam system. The pretreated biomass was, in some cases, subjected to solid/liquid separation using a screw press, producing a liquid fraction and a solid fraction. The solid fraction had a DM content of about 30%, contained most of the starting cellulose and lignin, some of the hemicellulose and a total of about 25% of the dissolved solids.
[0142] The 6-chamber reactor chambers were filled with either total pretreated biomass comprising all dissolved and undissolved solids or pressed solid fraction comprising about 25% of total dissolved solids. Dry matter content was adjusted to 19% DM. The pretreated biomass was then hydrolyzed at 50 °C and pH 5.0 to 5.3 using 0.08 ml of Novozymes CTec2™ / g glucan or 0.2 to 0.3 ml of Accellerase TRIO ™ from Dupont, Genencor / g of glucan. These dose levels of these commercially available cellulase preparations optimized for lignocellulosic biomass conversion were also within the range suggested by the manufacturers. The enzymatic hydrolysis experiments were carried out for 96 hours at a mixing speed of 6 rpm.
[0143] It can be shown that the enzyme activities in the Accellerase TRIO experiment as measured as described herein were initially within the range of exoglucanase at 280 to 5,000 nkat/g glucan, endoglucanase at 1,100 to 20,000 nkat/g glucan , β-glycosidase 3,000 to 25,000 nkat/g glucan, endoxylanase 1,400 to 30,000 nkat/g glucan, β-xylosidase at 75 to 25,000 nkat/g glucan.
[0144] Figure 6 shows the conversion of cellulose after enzymatic hydrolysis under these conditions as a function of % dissolved solids removed before enzymatic hydrolysis. As shown, removing 75% dissolved solids at these enzyme dose levels improves cellulose conversion by 10 to 20% in absolute terms. Thus, in cases where enzymatic hydrolysis must be conducted using a separate solid fraction, it is advantageous to compress the solid fraction to a DM content of at least 40% or otherwise reduce the dissolved solids content by at least 50 % before enzymatic hydrolysis as this will typically provide improved enzyme performance.
[0145] Example 5. Sugar content and hydrolysis of the liquid fraction of the pretreated biomass for xylan number > 10%.
[0146] Wheat straw, corn husk and sugarcane bagasse were pretreated to log Ro 3.63 severity, producing a pretreated wheat straw (WS) which has 11.5% xylan number , up to log Ro 3.51 producing pretreated sugarcane bagasse (SCB) which has a 12.3% xylan number and up to log Ro 3.35, producing pretreated corn husk (CS) which has xylan number 15.5%. The pretreated raw materials were subjected to solid/liquid separation to produce a liquid fraction and a solid fraction, as described in example 4. The liquid fractions were analyzed for carbohydrates and degradation products according to the methods described with the use of (Sluiter, Hames et al. 2005) a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system equipped with a Rezex Monosaccharide column. Table 2 shows the sugar content of the liquid fractions expressed as a percentage of the DM content broken down into oligomeric and monomeric glucose/glucan, xylose/xylan and arabinose/arabinane categories. As shown, although some glucose content is present in both monomeric and oligomeric form, most of the sugar content is oligomeric xylan. The predominance of xylan oligomers in the liquid fraction obtained using autohydrolysis is in contrast noted with the liquid fraction obtained using dilute acid pretreatment. In biomass pretreated by hydrothermal pretreatment with dilute acid, the liquid fraction is typically hydrolyzed to monomeric constituents by the action of the acid catalyst.
[0147] Table 2. Sugar content of liquid fractions in pretreated biomass for xylan number > 10%.

[0148] The liquid fraction of the pretreated wheat straw was further characterized by HPLC analysis using a Thermo Scientific Dionex CarboPacTM PA200 column using a modular Dionex ICS-5000 chromatographic system. The analytes were separated using NaOH/NaOAc gradient conditions and measured by pulsed integrated amperometric detection (IPAD) using a gold electrode. Figure 7 shows an HPLC chromatogram in which the elution profile of the standards for xylobiose (X2), xylotriose (X3), xylotetraose (X4), xylopentaose (X5) and xyloexaose (X6) is superimposed as the top trace over the trace bottom, which depicts the elution profile of the liquid fraction. As shown, the liquid fraction of the autohydrolyzed biomass contains a mixture comprising a small amount of xylose monomer and comparatively larger amounts of xylobiose (X2), xylotriose (X3), xylotetraose (X4), xylopentaose (X5) and xylohexaose ( X6), together with other materials.
[0149] Example 6. Enzymatic hydrolysis of the solid fraction and addition of the liquid fraction after fiber hydrolysis of pretreated biomass to xylan number > 10% and pressed to > 40% DM followed by post-hydrolysis.
[0150] The experiments were conducted in a 6-chamber free-fall reactor as described in example 4.
[0151] The experiments used wheat straw, corn husk or sugarcane bagasse pretreated by single stage autohydrolysis to log Ro severity between about 3.19 and 3.73 to produce the pre biomass. -treated which has xylan numbers in the range of 11.5 to 15.6%. The biomass was cut and moistened to a DM of > 35% and pretreated by steam at 170 to 190 °C for 12 min. Pre-treatment was conducted at the Inbicon pilot factory in Skarbak, Denmark. The pretreated biomass was subjected to solid/liquid separation using a screw press to produce a solid fraction that has > 40% DM. The liquid fraction was saved (C5 deviation) in order to be subsequently added to the hydrolyzate (post-hydrolysis).
[0152] The 6-chamber reactor chambers were loaded with about 10 kg of pressed pretreated biomass solid fraction and adjusted by adding water to 19 to 22% DM. The pretreated solid fraction was hydrolyzed at 50 °C and pH 5.0 to 5.3 using ACCELLERASE TRIO ™ together with GENENCOR-DuPONT. The mixing speed was 6 rpm. The hydrolysis experiments were carried out for 96 hours and, later, the stored liquid fraction (C5 deviation) was added and the post-hydrolysis was carried out for 48 hours at 50 °C and pH 5.0 to 5.3.
[0153] The HPLC samples were taken from hemicellulose and analyzed for glucose, xylose and arabinose using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system equipped with a Rezex Monosaccharide column with quantification through the use of the external standard.
[0154] Figure 8 shows hydrolysis data for the conversion of hemicellulose with addition of the liquid fraction after 96 hours of hydrolysis of the solid fraction using pretreated sugarcane bagasse up to 12.3% xylan number and hydrolyzed using 0.3 ml of Accellerase Trio™ (Genencor) per g of glucan. A typical hydrolysis profile is shown. The recovery of C5 monomer is expressed as a percentage of the theoretical yield of the material present in the hydrolysis reaction. Most of the hemicellulose within the solid fraction was converted to monomeric sugars within the first 24 hours upon hydrolysis of the solid fraction. The addition of the liquid fraction after 96 hours increases the theoretical potential yield, which explains the drop in C5 conversion observed soon after the liquid fraction is added. Within the first 24 hours, most of the C5 in the liquid fraction is converted to monomers. Compared to the conversion of C5 just before the liquid fraction is added with the end point of hydrolysis, it is possible to calculate the conversion of C5 to the liquid fraction as 90% when using sugarcane bagasse under these conditions.
[0155] Table 3 shows hydrolysis data for different biomasses pretreated under different circumstances and hydrolyzed using different dose levels of a commercially available cellulase preparation optimized for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass, Accellerase Trio ™ (Genencor ). All enzyme dose levels used were within the manufacturer's suggested range. As shown, with the use of single-stage auto-hydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis with C5-shift and post-hydrolysis, C5 monomer yields of 60% or more can be achieved using doses recommended by manufacturers of C5-shift preparations. commercially available cellulase optimized for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass while still achieving a cellulose conversion of 60% or more.
[0156] It can be shown that the enzyme activities in the experiments referenced in Table 3 with Accellerase TRIO measured as described herein were initially within the range exoglucanase at 280 to 5,000 nkat/g glucan, endoglucanase at 1,100 to 20,000 nkat/g of glucan, β-glucosidase at 3,000 to 25,000 nkat/g glucan, endoxylanase at 1,400 to 30,000 nkat/g glucan, β-xylosidase at 75 to 25,000 nkat/g glucan nkat/g glucan.
[0157] Table 3. Hydrolysis yields using very low severity single stage autohydrolysis with C5 shift and post-hydrolysis.



[0158] Example 7. Cofermentation in ethanol of C5 and C6 sugars in combined hydrolyzate by modified yeast.
[0159] As an example of the use of a hydrolyzate produced from soft lignocellulosic biomass (in this case wheat straw) prepared by single-stage autohydrolysis pretreatment to a xylan number > 10%, Figure 9 shows data for fermentation performed without detoxification or any other process steps prior to fermentation with GMO yeast which has the ability to convert C5 and C6 sugars (V1 strain together with TERRANOL™). The solid fraction of the pretreated wheat straw separated as described in example 4 was hydrolyzed using Cellic Ctec2™ together with Novozymes and then combined with the saved liquid fraction and used without any detoxification to remove fermentation inhibitors.
[0160] The hydrolyzate was adjusted to pH 5.5 with KOH pellets before fermentation and supplemented with 3 g/l of urea. Fermentation was conducted as a batch fermentation. The initial cell concentration in the reactor was 0.75 g dw/l. Fermentations were controlled at pH 5.5 using the automatic addition of 10% NH3. The temperature was maintained at 30°C and the agitation rate was 300 rpm. As shown, glucose and xylose are readily consumed and ethanol readily produced, despite the presence of acetic acid, furfural, and other compounds that would typically prove inhibitory at higher levels of pretreatment severity.
[0161] Example 8. Experimental determination of activity levels in commercial cellulase preparations.
[0162] The commercial preparations of ACCELLERASE TRIO TM from GENENCOR ™ and CELLIC CTEC2 ™ and CELLIC CTEC3 ™ from NOVOZYMES ™ were diluted so that the enzyme preparations were of equivalent density, meaning that the equivalent sized aliquots were of equivalent mass. Equivalent volumes of diluted enzyme preparations were added and assay determinations made in duplicate or triplicate.
[0163] The assay of the activity of CBHI (exocellulase) was conducted in NaOAC buffer at 50 mM at pH 5, 25° C, for 25 minutes. The activity was determined in triplicate by the following continuous rate of release of 4-Methylumbelliferone (Abs: 347 nm) from the model substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-cellobioside. The unit of activity was 1 umol MeUmb equivalent/minute. The enzyme preparation concentrations were 0.16, 0.14, 0.17 mg/ml respectively for the CTEC3, ACTrio and CTEC2 assays. The substrate concentration was 0.5 mg/ml.
[0164] The assay of the activity of Endo-1,4-β-glucanase was conducted in NaOAC buffer at 50 mM, pH 5, 50° C, for 60 minutes. The activity was determined in triplicate by the following absorbance change associated with the generation of reducing ends of the substrate model Avicel PH-101. The unit of activity was 1 µmol glucose equivalent/min. The enzyme preparation concentrations were 0.80, 0.67, 0.79 mg/ml respectively for the CTEC3, ACTrio and CTEC2 assays. The substrate concentration was 80 mg/ml.
[0165] The assay of β-glucosidase activity was conducted in NaOAC buffer at 50 mM, pH 5, 50° C, for 20 minutes. Activity was determined in triplicate by the following absorbance change associated with glucose release from the cellobiose model substrate. The unit of activity was 2 µmole glucose/min. Enzyme preparation concentrations were 0.1, 0.12, 0.12 mg/ml respectively for the CTEC3, ACTrio and CTEC2 assays. The substrate concentration was 1.7 mg/ml.
[0166] The assay of Endo-1,4-β-xylanase activity was conducted in NaOAC buffer at 50 mM, pH 5, 50° C, for 60 minutes. Activity was determined in triplicate by the following absorbance change associated with the generation of reducing ends of the water-extractable model substrate arabinoxylan. The unit of activity was 1 µmol glucose equivalent/min. The enzyme preparation concentrations were 1.12, 0.97, 1.12 mg/ml respectively for the CTEC3, ACTrio and CTEC2 assays. The substrate concentration was 10 mg/ml.
[0167] The assay of β-xylosidase activity was conducted in NaOAC buffer at 50 mM, pH 5, 50° C, for 60 minutes. The activity was determined in duplicate by the subsequent release of xylose associated with hydrolysis of the water-extractable arabionxylan model substrate. The unit of activity was 1 µmol xylose/min. The enzyme preparation concentrations were 1.12, 0.97, 1.12 mg/ml respectively for the CTEC3, ACTrio and CTEC2 assays. The substrate concentration was 10 mg/ml.
[0168] The assay of β-L-arabinofuranosidase activity was conducted in NaOAC buffer at 50 mM, pH 5, 50° C, for 60 minutes. The activity was determined in triplicate by the following release of arabinoase associated with hydrolysis of the water-extractable arabionxylan model substrate. The unit of activity was 1 µmol arabinose/min. The enzyme preparation concentrations were 1.12, 0.97, 1.12 mg/ml respectively for the CTEC3, ACTrio and CTEC2 assays. The substrate concentration was 10 mg/ml.
[0169] The assay of the activity of Amyloglycosidase (AMG) was conducted in NaOAC buffer at 50 mM, pH 5, 50° C, for 80 minutes. Activity was determined in triplicate by the following absorbance change associated with glucose release from the soluble cornstarch model substrate. The unit of activity was 1 µmole glucose/min. The enzyme preparation concentrations were 1.12, 0.97, 1.12 mg/ml respectively for the CTEC3, ACTrio and CTEC2 assays. The substrate concentration was 10 mg/ml.
[0170] The α-amylase activity assay was conducted in 50 mM NaOAC buffer, pH 5, 50° C, for 60 minutes. Activity was determined in triplicate by the following absorbance change associated with the generation of reducing ends of the model substrate soluble cornstarch. The unit of activity was 1 µmol glucose equivalent/min. The enzyme preparation concentrations were 1.12, 0.97, 1.12 mg/ml respectively for the CTEC3, ACTrio and CTEC2 assays. The substrate concentration was 10 mg/ml.
[0171] The assay of acetyl xylan esterase activity was conducted in Succinate buffer at 100 mM, pH 5, 25° C, for 25 minutes. The activity was determined in triplicate by the following continuous rate of release of 4-Nitrophenyl (Abs: 410 nm) from the model substrate 4-Nitrophenyl acetate. The unit of activity was 1 µmol pNP equivalent/min. The enzyme preparation concentrations were 0.48, 0.42, 0.51mg/ml respectively for the CTEC3, ACTrio and CTEC2 assays. The substrate concentration was 10 mg/ml.
[0172] The results of the activity determinations are shown in Table 1.
[0173] These results provide a qualitative comparison between enzyme preparations, but are not, in most cases, conducted in accordance with the methods used to determine nkat values for enzyme activities for the purposes of the claims in this document .
[0174] Example 9. Identification of enzyme activities important to achieve high C5 monomer yield in the enzymatic hydrolysis of feedstock pretreated by low stringency single stage autohydrolysis.
[0175] Wheat straw was pretreated as described in example 4 to log Ro severity 3.52 (183°C for a dwell time of 12 minutes) to produce a pretreated biomass that has a xylan number of 13 .5%, with approximately 7.8% by weight of xylan remaining in the undissolved solids, as estimated from Figure 2. The pretreatment glucan recovery was 100%. The pretreatment xylan recovery was 77%.
[0176] Cellulase activity measurements in Paper Filter Units (FPU) were determined for three separate commercially available enzyme preparations ACCELLERASE TRIO TM from GENENCOR ™, CELLIC CTEC3 ™ from NOVOZYMES ™ and a mixture of CELLUCLAST and NOVOZYME 188 with NOVOZYMES ™ mixed in a 1:0.2 weight ratio, respectively. FPU activities were determined by the method of Ghose (1987) and revealed to be 179 FPU/g enzyme preparation for CTEC3 and 60 FPU/g enzyme preparation for CELLUCLCAST/188.
[0177] The hydrolysis experiments were conducted essentially as described in example 6, except that the initial dry matter content was 22% DM, 1% by weight polyethylene glycol (PEG) was added, the initial hydrolysis of the solid fraction was conducted for 94 hours, post-hydrolysis with added liquid fraction (C5 deviation) was conducted for 50 hours and the enzyme used was CTEC3, ACTRIO or CELLUCLAST/188 applied at an equivalent dose in FPU/g glucan of 14.3 FPU/g glucan.
[0178] The actual dose of applied enzymes was CTEC3 at 0.08 g/g of glucan, AcTRIO at 0.24 g/g of glucan, CELLUCLAST/188 at 0.22 g/g of glucan.
[0179] The enzyme activities in nkat/g of glucan, to be measured as described herein, that were used in the experiment were estimated to be as follows:
+ based on the values reported by Juhasz et al. (2005)a measured using 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-cellobioside as substrateb based on the ACCELLERASE TRIO product information sheet which reports a minimal endoglucanase value using carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) as the substrate and assuming that the corresponding value for hydroxyethylcellulose will be approximately 0.35 times the CMC value as reported for example by Dori et al. (1995) and based on the ACCELLERASE TRIO product information sheet which reports minimum d values based on the alternatively measured ratio of xylosidase activity compared to Trio:Celluclast of 3.86:1 per g of enzyme preparation. based on alternatively measured ratio of endoglucanase activity compared to CTEC3:TRIO of 3.12:1 per g of enzyme preparation.d based on alternatively measured ratio of beta-glucosidase activity compared to CTEC3:TRIO of 3.76 :1 per g of enzyme preparation.
[0180] It can be shown that the enzyme activities in these experiments measured as described herein were initially within the range exoglucanase at 280 to 1,240 nkat/g glucan, endoglucanase at 1,100 to 8,000 nkat/g glucan, β-glucosidase at 3,000 to 15,000 nkat/g glucan, endoxylanase 9,000 to 30,000nkat/g glucan, β-xylosidase 75 to 1,400 nkat/g glucan nkat/g glucan.
[0181] Figure 11 shows the conversion of cellulose as a function of time in the various reaction chambers. Cellulose conversion is determined as the glucose concentration divided by the theoretical glucose potential at the time the sample was taken. When the C5 shift is added, the glucose potential changes as the shift contains a small amount of glucose oligomers that are not digested resulting in a decrease in overall conversion. As shown, cellulose conversion askinetics are equivalent for the CTEC and TRIO chambers, but not for the CELLUCLAST/188 chamber. This is attributed to appreciably lower levels of xylanase and xylosidase activity.
[0182] Figure 12 shows the corresponding xylan conversion as a function of time. The xylan conversion is calculated in the same way as for the cellulose conversion, but as the C5 shift contains a large amount of xylose oligomers, the conversion drops initially and dramatically when the C5 shift is added to the hydrolyzate. As shown, the xylan conversion kinetics are equivalent for the CTEC and TRIO chambers, but not for the CELLUCLAST/188 chamber. This is again attributed to appreciably lower levels of xylanase and xylosidase activity.
[0183] When the pretreatment xylan recovery was 77%, the xylan recoveries shown in Figure 12 correspond to a very high final C5 monomer recovery in the hydrolyzate, eg 80% conversion in Figure 12 corresponds to (0.80 )*(0.77)= 61.6% recovery of C5 monomer.
[0184] The glucan and xylan contents are determined as described in Sluiter, A., B. Hames, et al. (2005). Determination of Sugars, Byproducts, and Degradation Products in Liquid Fraction Process Samples, NREL-Biomass Program and in Sluiter, A., B. Hames, et al.(2006). Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Ligninin Biomass, NREL- Biomass Program.
[0185] Example 10. Lower dry matter dilution allows for conversion yields equivalent to a lower enzyme dose using the entire slurry.
[0186] In the experiments described in example 9, two chambers of the 6-chamber hydrolysis reactor were used to compare the hydrolysis of the entire slurry, in which the liquid fraction separated from the solid fraction after pretreatment was not saved as the deviation to be later added to the hydrolyzate, but instead it was mixed back in with the solid fraction and hydrolyzed at the same time. The entire slurry was diluted to 12% DM, which gives the concentration of inhibitory dissolved substances to be approximately equivalent to that achieved in the reactions described in example 9, in which the dissolved solids were removed and kept separate (C5 deviation) from the hydrolysis of the solid fraction at 22% of DM. CTEC3 and ACTRIO were used as the enzyme preparation and applied at a lower dose of 10.7 FPU/g glucan.
[0187] The enzyme activities in nkat/g of glucan, to be measured as described herein, that were used in the experiment were estimated (based on the values given in example 9) to be as follows:

[0188] It can be shown that the enzyme activities in these experiments measured as described herein were initially within the range exoglucanase at 280 to 1,240 nkat/g glucan, endoglucanase at 1100 to 8,000 nkat/g glucan, β-glucosidase a 3,000 to 15,000 nkat/g glucan, endoxylanase 9,000 to 30,000 nkat/g glucan, β-xylosidase at 75 to 1,400 nkat/g glucan nkat/g glucan.
[0189] Figure 13 shows the cellulose conversion as a function of time for both whole slurry hydrolysis samples. Cellulose conversion is determined as in example 9. As shown, the cellulose conversion kinetics are equivalent for the CTEC and TRIO chambers. Furthermore, despite the lower enzyme dose, the conversion levels are equivalent to those achieved with C5 shift and post-hydrolysis, as described in example 9.
[0190] Figure 14 shows the corresponding xylan conversion as a function of time for both whole slurry hydrolysis samples. As shown, the xylan conversion kinetics are approximately equivalent for the CTEC and TRIO chambers. When the xylan recovery from the pretreatment was 77%, the xylan recoveries shown in Figure 14 correspond to a very high final C5 monomer recovery in the hydrolyzate, eg 80% conversion in Figure 12 corresponds to (0.80 )*(0.77)= 61.6% recovery of C5 monomer. As shown, in whole slurry hydrolysis, very high C5 monomer recoveries of at least 55%, which correspond to 71% xylan conversion in Figure 14, are achieved within 41 hours of hydrolysis under these conditions.
[0191] The various pretreatment, hydrolysis and recovery parameters for the experiments described in examples 9 and 10 are shown in Table 4.Table 4 Hydrolysis yields using very low severity single stage autohydrolysis.


[0192] Example 11. Hydrolysis of whole slurry from pretreated sugarcane bagasse.
[0193] Sugarcane bagasse was pretreated as described in example 4 to log Ro severity 3.43 (180°C for a dwell time of 12 minutes) to produce a pretreated biomass that has a xylan number 12.0%, with approximately 6.8% by weight xylan remaining in the undissolved solids, as estimated from Figure 2. The pretreatment xylan recovery was 83%. After leaving the reactor, the slurry was pressed to a fiber fraction of approximately 57% and a liquid fraction. The pretreated material, the fiber fraction as well as the liquid fraction, was collected and analyzed. Dry matter and sample composition were determined as described in the previous samples.
[0194] The experiments were conducted in the 6-chamber reactor described in example 6. The pretreated bagasse was used as the whole slurry mixture, in which the fiber fraction was mixed with the liquid fraction prior to addition of enzyme. The dry matter content was adjusted with water to 18% by weight of DM. The hydrolysis was carried out at 50°C with a pH adjusted between 4.7 and 5.3 using 20% by weight of calcium hydroxide solution (Ca(OH)2). Accellerase Trio was used as the enzyme at a concentration of 0.16 ml/g glucan (9.5 FPU/g glucan). Each day, a sample was taken and analyzed for sugar content. After 118 h the hydrolysis was stopped. The experiments were carried out in double determination.
[0195] The enzyme activities in nkat/g of glucan, to be measured as described herein, that were used in the experiment were estimated (based on the values given in example 9) to be initially as follows:Beta- Exogluc endgluc xylanase xylosidaseglucTrio 478 1973 5591 8387 186
[0196] It can be shown that the enzyme activities in these experiments measured as described herein were initially within the range nkat/g glucan exoglucanase, nkat/g glucan endoglucanase, nkat/g glucan β-glucosidase, nkat/g endoxylanase g glucan, β-xylosidase nkat/g glucan nkat/g glucan.
[0197] The various pretreatment, hydrolysis and recovery parameters for the experiments described in these examples 11 are shown in Table 5.Table 5. Hydrolysis yields using very low severity single stage autohydrolysis.


[0198] Figure 15 shows the recovery of total C5 and C6 monomer in the hydrolyzate as a function of the hydrolysis time for the hydrolysis of whole bagasse slurry. As shown, total C5 monomer recovery of at least 55% is achieved within 24 hours under these conditions.
[0199] Example 12. The improved biomethane potential of the fine vinasse remaining after the fermentation of C6 ethanol from the raw material hydrolyzate pretreated by low-severity autohydrolysis.
[0200] Wheat straw was pretreated as described in example 4 to three different severities in order to produce the pretreated biomass that has xylan number 3.0%, 9.1% and 13.2%, which has respective and approximately 2.0%, 4.3% and 7.8% by weight of xylan remaining in the undissolved solids, as estimated from Figure 2.
[0201] The pretreated material was subjected to solid/liquid separation to produce a fiber fraction, which was subsequently used in enzymatic hydrolysis experiments, as well as a liquid fraction, which was kept separate from the hydrolysis. The solid fractions were hydrolyzed using CTEC3 at the respective doses 0.052 g/g glucan for the 3.0% xylan number sample, 0.056 g/g glucan for the 9.1% and 0.075 xylan number sample g/g glucan for xylan number sample 13.2%.
[0202] It can be shown that the enzyme activities in these experiments measured as described herein were initially within the range nkat/g glucan exoglucanase, nkat/g glucan endoglucanase, nkat/g glucan β-glucosidase, nkat/g endoxylanase g glucan, β-xylosidase nkat/g glucan nkat/g glucan.
[0203] Hydrolysis was conducted at 22% DM for 144 hours at 50°C with the pH adjusted to 5.0. After 144 hours the common bread yeast (C6 fermentation) was added to the hydrolyzate, the temperature reduced to 37°C and the fermentation/hydrolysis continued for a further 60 hours. At the end of the hydrolysis/fermentation, the ethanol concentrations were approximately equivalent between the different groups, between 61.77 to 63.68 g/kg of ethanol.
[0204] Biomethane production from the fermented hydrolysates and from the corresponding separated liquid fraction was determined in duplicate batch trials, using the inoculum at Fredericia Spildevand, Fredericia, Denmark, at an inoculum/substrate ratio between 5 to 6.5 (on a volatile solids basis).
[0205] The mass balances for each of the pretreatments were carefully determined and used to estimate the remaining fine vinasse methane potential from the C6 ethanol fermentation of each of the hydrolysates of each of three different severity levels. By subtracting the known contribution of ethanol from the observed biomethane potentials, the estimated methane production of 1 ton of wheat straw dry matter was determined. The results are shown in Table 6.
[0206] Table 6. Methane production from fine vinasse and liquid fraction derived from 1 ton of straw dry matter, depending on the severity of the pre-treatment.

[0207] The modalities and examples are descriptive only and are not intended to limit the scope of the claims.REFERENCES Agbor, V., et al. “Biomass pretreatment: Fundamentals toward application”, Biotechnology Advances (2011) 29:675Alvira, P., et al. “Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review”, Bioresource Technology (2010) 101:4.851Baboukani, B., et al. “Optimization of dilute-acid pretreatment conditions for sugar recovery enhancement and enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw”, Biosystems Engineering III (2012) 166 Bailey, M. et al., “Interlaboratory testing of methods for assay of xylanase activity”, Journal of Biotechology ( 1992), 23:257. Bailey, M. and Tahtiharju, J., "Efficient cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei in continuous cultivation on lactose medium with a computer-controlled feeding strategy", Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2003) 62:156.Banerjee, G., Car, S., Scott-Craig, J., Borrusch, M., and Walton, D., "Rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment/biomass feedstock combinations" , Biotechnology for Biofuels (2010), 3:22. Belkacemi, K., Abatzoglou, N., Overend, RP, Chornet, E., “Phenomenological Kinetics of Complex Systems: Mechanistic Considerations in the Solubilization of Hemicelluloses following Aqueous/Steam Treatmens .” Ind. Eng. Chem. res., (1991) 30, 2416 to 2425. Berghem, L. and Pettersson, L., "The mechanism of enzymatic cellulose degradation," Eur. J. Biochem, (1974) 46:295Bettiga, M., et al. “Arabinose and xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a fungal pentose utilization pathway”, Microbial Cell Factories (2009) 8:40Billard, H., Faraj,. A., Ferreira, N., Menir, S. and Heiss-Blanquet, S., “Optimization of a synthetic mixture composed of major Trichoderma ressei enzymes for the hydrolysis of steam-exploded wheat straw”, Biotechnology for Biofuels (2012), 5:9. Chen, Y., et al. “Xylose and cellulose fractionation from corncob with three different strategies and separate fermentation of them to bioethanol”, Bioresource Technology (2010) 101:6.994Chung, Y., et al. "Enzymatic Saccharification and Fermentation of Xylose-Optimized Dilute Acid-Treated Lignocellulosics", Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2005) 121 to 124:947Diaz, M., et al. “Hydrothermal pretreatment of rapeseed straw”, Bioresource Technology (2010) 101:2.428Divne, C., et al., “The 3-dimensional crystal-structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase-I from Trichoderma reesei”, Science (1994) , 265:524. Dogaris, I., et al. “Hydrothermal processing and enzymatic hydrolysis of sorghum bagasse for fermentable carbohydrates production”, Bioresource Technology (2009) 100:6.543Dori, S., et al., “Cell wall degrading enzymes produced by Gaeumannomyces var. tritici in vitro and in vivo”, Physiology and Molecular Plant Pathology (1995), 46:189. Dumon, C., et al. “Progress and future prospects for pentose-specific biocatalysts in biorefining,” Process Biochemistry (2012) 47:346Farrell, E et al., “Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals,” Science (2006), 311:506.Ghose, T. "Measurement of cellulase activities," Pure & Appl. Chem. (1987) 59(2):257. Ghosh, A., et al. “Genome-Scale Consequences of Cofactor Balancing in Engineered Pentose Utilization Pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae”, PLoS ONE (2011) 6:11Girio, F., et al., “Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: A review”, Bioresource Technology (2010), 101:4,775Hu, C., et al. “Simultaneous utilization of glucose and xylose for lipid production by Trichosporon cutaneum”, Biotechnology and Biofuels (2011) 4:25Humbird, D., et al. “Process Design and Economic for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol: Dilute-Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover” Technical Report NREL/TP-5100-47764 May 2011 Humbird, D., et al., “Economic Impact of TotalSolids Loading on Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Dilute Acid Pretreated Corn Stover”, Biotechnology Progress (2010) 26:1.245Jacobsen, S., et al. “Xylose Monomer and OligomerYields for Uncatalyzed Hydrolysis of Sugarcane Bagasse Hemicellulose at Varying Solids Concentration”, Ind. Eng.Chem. Res. (2002) 41:1.454Jacobsen, S.E., Wyman, C.E., Cellulose and Hemicellulose Hydrolysis Models for Application to Current and Novel Pretreatment Processes. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2000), 84 to 86, 81 to 96. Jeong, T., et al. “Optimizing Dilute-AcidPretreatment of Rapeseed Straw for Extraction of Hemicellulose”, Appl Biochem Biotechnol (2010) 161:22Jin, M., et al. “Two-step SSCF to convert AFEX-treated switchgrass to ethanol using commercial enzymes and Saccharomyces cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST)”, Bioresource Technology (2010) 101:8.171Jojima, T., et al. “Sugar transporters in efficient utilization of mixed sugar substrates: current and outlook”, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2010) 85:471Juhasz, T., et al., "Characterization of cellulases and hemicellases produced by Trichoderma reesei on various carbon sources" , Process Biochemistry (2005), 40:3.519. Kabel, M., et al., "Standard assays for not predicting the efficiency of commercial cellulase preparations towards plant materials", Biotechnol. and Bioengineering (2006), 93(1):56 Kim, J., et al. "Two-stage pretreatment of rice straw using aqueous ammonia and dilute acid", Bioresource Technology (2011) 102:8.992Kim, K. et al. “Continuous Countercurrent Extraction of Hemicellulose from Pretreated Wood Residues”, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2001) 91 a 93:253Klinke, H., et al., "Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pretreatment of biomass" , Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2004) 66:10. Knudsen, N., et al., "Possibilities and evaluation of straw pretreatment," 10th European conference on biomass in Würzburg 1998, Biomass for Energy and Industry, pages 224 to 228. Kothari, U. and Lee, Y., "Inhibition effects of pre-hydrolysate dilute acid of corn stover on enzymatic hydrolysis of solka floc", Applied. Biochem. Biotechnol. (2011) 165:1.391Kristensen, J., Felby, C., and J0rgensen, H., “Determining yields in high solids enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass”, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnology. (2009), 156:557. Kuhad, R., et al. “Bioethanol production from pentose sugars: Current status and future prospects”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2011) 15:4.950Kurian, J., et al. “BIOCONVERSION OF HEMICELLULOSE HYDROLYSATE OF SWEET SORGHUM BERRIES TO ETHANOL BY USING PICHIA STIPITIS NCIM 3497 AND DEBARYOMYCES HANSENII SP.”, Bioresources (2010) 5:2.404Larsen, J., et al. “The IBUS Process - Lignocellulosic Bioethanol Close to a Commercial Reality”, Chem. Eng. Technol. (2008) 5:765Lee, J., et al. “Autohydrolysis pretreatment of Coastal Bermuda grass for increased enzyme hydrolysis”, Bioresource Technology (2009) 100:6.434Lee, J., et al. “Recent developments of key technologies on cellulosic ethanol production”, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research (2008) 67:865Lee, J. et al. "Review article Biological conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol", Journal of Biotechnology (1997) 56:1Leith, H and Whittaker, R, Primary productivity of the biosphere. Springer, Berlin. 1975. Pages 205 to 206. Lloyd, T. and Wyman, C. "Application of a Depolymerization Model for Predicting Thermochemical Hydrolysis of Hemicellulose". Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2003), 105 to 108, 53 to 67.Lu, X., et al. “Optimization of H2SO4-catalyzed hydrothermal pretreatment of rapeseed straw for bioconversion to ethanol: Focusing on pretreatment at high solids content”, Bioresource Technology (2009) 100:3.048Madhavan, A., et al. “Bioconversion of lignocellulose-derived sugars to ethanol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae”, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology (2012) 32:22Martinez, D., et al., “Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei”, Nature Biotechnology (2008), 26:553.Matsushika, A., et al. “Ethanol production from xylose in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: current state and perspectives”, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2009) 84:37Mesa, L. et al. “Comparison of process configurations for ethanol production from two-step pretreated sugarcane bagasse“, Chemical Engineering Journal (2011) 175:185 Monavari, S., et al. “The influence of solid/liquid separation techniques on the sugar yield in two-step dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood followed by enzymatic hydrolysis”, Biotechnology for Biofuels (2009) 2:6Nguema-Ona, E., Moore, J., Fagerstrom, A., Fangel, J., Willats, W., Hugo, A. and Vivier, M., “Profiling the main cell wall polysaccharides of tobacco leaves using high-throughput and fractionation techniques“, Carbohydrate Polymers (2012), 88: 939Ohgren, K., et al. "Effect of hemicellulose and lignin removal on enzymatic hydrolysis of steam pretreated corn stover", Bioresource Technology (2007) 98:2.503 Overend, R.P., Chornet, E., "Fractionation of lignocellulosics by steam aqueous pretreatments" Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A (1987), 321, 523 to 536. Palmquist E, H Grage, NQ Meinander and B Hahn-Hagerdal “Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and phydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts”. Biotechnol. Bioeng. (1999) 63: 46 to 55 Paptheophanous, M., et al. “TWO-STAGE ACID-CATALYZED FRACTIONATION OF LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS IN AQUEOUS ETHANOL SYSTEMS AT LOW TEMPERATURES”, Bioresource Technology (1995) 54:305Petersen, M., et al. “Optimization of hydrothermal pretreatment of wheat straw for production of bioethanol at low water consumption without addition of chemicals”, Biomass and Bioenergy (2009) 33:834Poutanen, K. and Puls, J., "Characteristics of Trichoderma reesei B-xylosidase and it use in the hydrolysis of solubilized xylans", Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (1988), 28:425. Quing, Q., Yang, B., Wyman, C., "Xylo-oligomers are strong inhibitors of cellulose hydrolysis by enzymes", Bioresource Technology (2010) 101:9.624Qing, Q. and Wyman, E., “Hydrolysis of different chain length xylo-oligomers by cellulase and hemicellase enzymes”, Bioresource Technology (2011) 102:1.359Rosgaard, L., et al., “Evaluation of minimal Trichoderma reesei cellulase mixtures on differently pretreated barley straw substrates”, Biotechnol. Program (2007), 23:1,270 Rouvinen, J., et al., "3-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase -II from Trichoderma reesei", Science (1990), 249:380Saha, B., et al. "Hemicellulose bioconversion", Microbiol Biotechnol (2003) 30:279Sanchez, R., et al. “Improved xylose and arabinose engineering by an industrial recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain using evolutionary”, Biotechnology for Biofuels (2010) 3:13Shen, F., et al. “Evaluation of hemicellulose removal by xylanase and delignification on SHF and SSF for bioethanol production with steam-pretreated substrates”, Bioresource Technology (2011) 102:8.945Singhania, R., et al., “Advancement and comparative profiles in the production technologies using technologies solid-state and submerged fermentation for microbial cellulases”, Enzyme and Microbial Technology (2010), 46:541Sluiter, A., et al., “Determination of Extractives in Biomass”, US National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) published date July 17, 2005, NREL/TP-510-42619, revised January 2008 Sluiter, A., et al., "Determination of Sugars, Byproducts, and Degradation Products in Liquid Fraction Process Samples" , US National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) published December 8, 2006, NREL/TP-510-42623, revised January 2008 Sluiter, A., et al., “Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass,” US National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) published April 25, 2008, NREL/TP-510-42618, revised April 2008 Soderstrom, J., et al. "Two-step steam pretreatment of softwood by dilute H2SO4 impregnation for ethanol production", Biomass and Bioenergy (2003) 24:475Soderstrom, J., et al. “Effect of Washing on Yield in One- and Two-Step Steam Pretreatment of Softwood for Production of Ethanol”, Biotechnol. Program (2004) 20:744Soderstrom, J., et al. “Separate versus Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Two-Step Steam Pretreated Softwood for Ethanol Production”, Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology (2005) 25:187Taherzadeh, M., et al. “Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Wastes to Improve Ethanol and Biogas Production: A Review” International Journal Molecular Science (2008) 9:1,621 Thomsen, M., et al. "Preliminary Results on Optimization of Pilot Scale Pretreatment of Wheat Straw Used in Coproduction of Bioethanol and Electricity", Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2006) 129 at 132:448Vinzant, T., et al., "Fingerprinting Trichoderma reesei hydrolases in a commercial cellulase preparation”, Applied Biochem. and Biotechnol. (2001), 91 to 93:99Weiss, ND, et al., “A simplified Method for the Measurement of Insoluble Solids in Pretreated BiomassSlurries.” Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. (2009), 975 to 987:162 (4)Won , K., et al., “Fraction of barley straw with dilute sulfuric acid for improving hemicellulose recovery,” Korean Journal Chemical Engineering (2012) 29:614Ximenes, E., et al., “Inhibition of cellulases by phenols,” Enzyme and Microbial. Tecnol. (2010) 46:170Zaldivar J, A Martinez and LO Ingram “Effects of selected aldehydes on the growth and fermentation of ethanologenic Escherichia 25 co//.” Biotechnol. Bioeng. (1999) 65. 24 to 33Zhang, P., et al., "Outlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies", Biotechnology Advances (2006), 24:452

权利要求:
Claims (17)
[0001]
1. METHOD FOR PROCESSING LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS, characterized in that it comprises:- providing raw material from soft lignocellulosic biomass,- pre-treating the raw material at pH within the range of 3.5 to 9.0 in a pressurized hydrothermal pre-treatment single-stage at a temperature of at least 140°C for less than 60 minutes at severity at log Ro 3.75 or less so as to produce a pretreated biomass slurry wherein the undissolved solids comprise at least 5, 0% xylan by weight, and hydrolyze the pretreated biomass as a whole slurry with or without the addition of supplemental water content using enzymatic hydrolysis for at least 24 hours catalyzed by an enzyme mixture comprising endoglucanase activities , exoglucanase, β-glycosidase, endoxylanase and β-xylosidase at activity levels in nkat/g glucan endoglucanase of at least 1,100, exoglucanase of at least 280, β-glucosidase of at least 3,000, endoxylanase of at least 1,400 and β-xylosidase of at least 75, so as to produce a hydrolyzate in which the yield of C5 monomers is at least 55% of the original xylose and arabinose content of the raw material before pretreatment.
[0002]
2. METHOD according to claim 1, characterized in that the hydrothermal pre-treatment is conducted as an auto-hydrolysis, in which the acetic acid released by the hydrolysis of hemicellulose during the pre-treatment further catalyzes the hydrolysis of hemicellulose.
[0003]
3. METHOD, according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the raw material is subjected to pressurized pre-treatment at a dry matter content of at least 35% or at a temperature between 160 and 200 °C.
[0004]
4. METHOD according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the whole slurry hydrolyzate is used as a biomethane substrate.
[0005]
5. METHOD, according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that enzymatic hydrolysis is conducted in dry matter content between 8 and 19%.
[0006]
6. METHOD, according to claim 4, characterized in that the enzymatic hydrolysis is conducted at a dry matter content of 20% or more.
[0007]
7. METHOD, according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the endoglucanase activity is within the range of 1,100 to 30,000 nkat/g of glucan, the exoglucanase activity is within the range of 280 to 20,000 nkat/g of glucan, the β-glycosidase activity is within the range of 3,000 to 50,000 nkat/g glucan, the endoxylanase activity is within the range of 1,400 to 70,000 nkat/g glucan, and/or the β-xylosidase activity is within the range from 75 to 20,000 nkat/g glucan.
[0008]
8. METHOD, according to claim 7, characterized in that the β-glucosidase activity is within the range of 4,000 to 50,000 nkat/g of glucan, the endoxylanase activity is within the range of 4,000 to 70,000 nkat/g of glucan and /or the β-xylosidase activity is within the range of 250 to 20,000 nkat/g glucan.
[0009]
9. METHOD, according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the pretreated biomass is discharged from the pressurized hydrothermal pretreatment in such a way as to preserve the fiber structure of the material.
[0010]
10. METHOD, according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the biomass raw material is subjected to particle size reduction and/or other mechanical processing before hydrothermal pretreatment.
[0011]
11. METHOD according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the pretreated biomass is subjected to a solid/liquid separation step to produce a liquid fraction and a solid fraction that has a dry matter content of at least 40 % by weight and the solid fraction is hydrolyzed.
[0012]
12. METHOD, according to claim 4, characterized in that the separated liquid fraction is added back to the hydrolysis mixture, after the enzymatic hydrolysis of the solid fraction has reached a desired degree of glucan conversion.
[0013]
13. METHOD, according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the raw material is wheat straw, corn straw, sugarcane bagasse, sweet sorghum bagasse or empty fruit bunches.
[0014]
14. METHOD according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the pressurized pre-treatment is conducted at a pressure of 1 MPa (10 bar) or less.
[0015]
15. METHOD, according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the raw material is removed from the pressurized pre-treatment reactor with the use of a hydrocyclone system.
[0016]
16. METHOD, according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the enzymatic hydrolysis is conducted for at least 96 hours.
[0017]
17. METHOD, according to claim 1 or 2, further characterized in that a combined C5/C6 hydrolyzate is directly fermented into ethanol using one or more modified yeast strains.

类似技术:

---

公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题

---

US20210348202A1|2021-11-11|Methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass using single-stage autohydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis with c5 bypass and post-hydrolysis

---

Chen et al.2016|Industrial technologies for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass

---

Uppugundla et al.2014|A comparative study of ethanol production using dilute acid, ionic liquid and AFEX™ pretreated corn stover

---

US9920345B2|2018-03-20|Methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass using single-stage autohydrolysis pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis

---

Huang et al.2011|Bioconversion of lignocellulose into bioethanol: process intensification and mechanism research

---

Manzanares et al.2011|Different process configurations for bioethanol production from pretreated olive pruning biomass

---

Jäger et al.2012|Biocatalytic conversion of lignocellulose to platform chemicals

---

Romaní et al.2014|Integrated approach for effective bioethanol production using whole slurry from autohydrolyzed Eucalyptus globulus wood at high-solid loadings

---

Mesa et al.2010|An approach to optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis from sugarcane bagasse based on organosolv pretreatment

---

US8815561B2|2014-08-26|Metal compounds to eliminate nonproductive enzyme adsorption and enhance enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulose

---

US20100159521A1|2010-06-24|Ozone treatment of biomass to enhance enzymatic saccharification

---

Montiel et al.2016|Enhanced bioethanol production from blue agave bagasse in a combined extrusion–saccharification process

---

Christopher et al.2017|A biorefinery-based approach for the production of ethanol from enzymatically hydrolysed cotton stalks

---

Manzanares et al.2012|Biological conversion of forage sorghum biomass to ethanol by steam explosion pretreatment and simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation at high solid content

---

Kelbert et al.2016|Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of hydrothermal pretreated lignocellulosic biomass: evaluation of process performance under multiple stress conditions

---

Lee et al.2011|Evaluation of ethanol production from corncob using Scheffersomyces | stipitis CBS 6054 by volumetric scale-up

---

Najafpour2013|Comparative studies on effect of pretreatment of rice husk for enzymatic digestibility and bioethanol production

---

Sharma et al.2016|A review on current technological advancement of lignocellulosic bioethanol production

---

Axelsson2011|Separate hydrolysis and fermentation of pretreated Spruce

---

Bhatia et al.2018|Biotechnological advances in lignocellulosic ethanol production

---

Romero et al.2015|Ethanol production from rape straw by a two-stage pretreatment under mild conditions

---

KR20160041953A|2016-04-18|Methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass using single-stage autohydrolysis pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis

---

Moraes Rocha et al.2014|Scale-up Pretreatment Studies on Sugarcane Bagasse and Straw for Second-Generation Ethanol Production

---

Zhu et al.2012|Bioconversion of different paper sludge to ethanol by yeast using separate hydrolysis and fermentation

---

OA17197A|2016-04-05|Methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass using single-stage autohydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis with C5 bypass and posthydrolysis.

同族专利:

---

公开号 | 公开日

---

CL2015000225A1|2015-05-29|

---

CN104540956A|2015-04-22|

---

AU2013299022B2|2016-09-01|

---

MX2016001366A|2016-09-06|

---

EA026271B9|2017-07-31|

---

MX2015001484A|2015-04-08|

---

AU2014299013B2|2017-04-13|

---

HUE039816T2|2019-02-28|

---

US11118203B2|2021-09-14|

---

GT201500023A|2017-01-16|

---

JP2015529456A|2015-10-08|

---

AP3964A|2016-12-24|

---

BR112016001975A2|2017-08-01|

---

IN2015DN00118A|2015-05-29|

---

JP2016529890A|2016-09-29|

---

WO2014019589A1|2014-02-06|

---

CN105492615A|2016-04-13|

---

AP2014008176A0|2014-12-31|

---

CO7180197A2|2015-02-09|

---

EP2880172A1|2015-06-10|

---

ES2687688T3|2018-10-26|

---

US20150191758A1|2015-07-09|

---

PL2880172T3|2018-12-31|

---

EP2880172B1|2018-06-27|

---

PH12015500080A1|2015-03-02|

---

EA201590298A1|2015-08-31|

---

HRP20181428T1|2018-10-19|

---

AP2016008979A0|2016-01-31|

---

US20210348202A1|2021-11-11|

---

BR112015001868B1|2021-08-31|

---

CN104540956B|2017-07-28|

---

MY178574A|2020-10-16|

---

CA2877769A1|2014-02-06|

---

CA2919521A1|2015-02-05|

---

KR20150041796A|2015-04-17|

---

DK2880172T3|2018-10-01|

---

AU2014299013A1|2016-02-25|

---

EA026271B1|2017-03-31|

---

BR112015001868A2|2017-07-04|

---

ZA201501344B|2016-07-27|

---

AU2013299022A1|2015-02-19|

引用文献:

---

公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题

---

---

US7842490B2|2004-11-29|2010-11-30|Inbicon A/S|Enzymatic hydrolysis of biomasses having a high dry matter content|

---

US8318461B2|2006-06-22|2012-11-27|Iogen Energy Corporation|Enzyme compositions for the improved enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and methods of using same|

---

US8058041B2|2007-07-04|2011-11-15|Alex Berlin|Concurrent saccharification and fermentation of fibrous biomass|

---

CA2726443C|2008-06-04|2017-08-01|Inbicon A/S|Devices and methods for discharging pretreated biomass from higher to lower pressure regions|

---

EP2169074A1|2008-09-30|2010-03-31|Sekab E-Technology AB|Fermentation process starting from cellulosic biomass and involving the recirculation of detoxified stillage into the process|

---

TW201040279A|2009-03-31|2010-11-16|Chemtex Italia S R L|Improved biomass pretreatment process|

---

JP5633839B2|2009-05-22|2014-12-03|独立行政法人農業・食品産業技術総合研究機構|Method for converting lignocellulosic biomass|

---

DK2470295T3|2009-08-27|2014-10-13|Inbicon As|PARTICLE PUMP PROCEDURES AND DEVICES|

---

WO2011125056A1|2010-04-08|2011-10-13|Inbicon A/S|Rapid and low cost enzymatic full conversion of lignocellulosic biomass|

---

US9434961B2|2010-11-09|2016-09-06|Greenfield Specialty Alcohols Inc.|Continuous process for the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass|

---

BR112014008049A2|2011-10-06|2017-04-11|Inbicon As|method of processing lignocellulosic biomass|

---

US9758843B2|2012-02-15|2017-09-12|Inbicon A/S|Method of processing lignocellulosic biomass using feedback control of hydrothermal pretreatment|

---

MX2015001484A|2012-08-01|2015-04-08|Inbicon As|Methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass using single-stage autohydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis with c5 bypass and post-hydrolysis.|US10689678B2|2008-11-04|2020-06-23|The Quaker Oats Company|Method and composition comprising hydrolyzed starch|

---

US10980244B2|2008-11-04|2021-04-20|The Quaker Oats Company|Whole grain composition comprising hydrolyzed starch|

---

EP2688421B1|2011-03-21|2015-12-30|PepsiCo, Inc.|Method for preparing high acid rtd whole grain beverages|

---

CN103796523B|2011-07-12|2016-01-27|百事可乐公司|Preparation is containing the method for oats milk beverage|

---

EP3027757A1|2013-08-01|2016-06-08|Inbicon A/S|Methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass using single-stage autohydrolysis pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis|

---

MX2015001484A|2012-08-01|2015-04-08|Inbicon As|Methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass using single-stage autohydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis with c5 bypass and post-hydrolysis.|

---

US9765411B2|2013-05-07|2017-09-19|Tyton Biosciences, Llc|Green process to hydrolyze carbohydrates from tobacco biomass using subcritical water|

---

US20150275252A1|2014-03-27|2015-10-01|Api Intellectual Property Holdings, Llc|Production of fermentable biomass sugars using high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis|

---

US20150184260A1|2013-12-27|2015-07-02|Api Intellectual Property Holdings, Llc|Production of fermentable c5 and c6 sugars from lignocellulosic biomass|

---

FI127716B|2014-03-31|2018-12-31|Upm Kymmene Corp|A method for producing fibrillated cellulose|

---

US9902982B2|2014-09-03|2018-02-27|Api Intellectual Property Holdings, Llc|Continuous countercurrent enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomass at high solids concentrations|

---

CN104256086B|2014-09-15|2017-05-17|中国科学院青岛生物能源与过程研究所|Technology for preparing docosahexaenoic acid -rich feed additive by grain dreg raw material through fermentation|

---

CN104187174A|2014-09-15|2014-12-10|中国科学院青岛生物能源与过程研究所|Process for producing livestock feed additive from reside and dreg materials|

---

EP3054050B1|2015-02-09|2018-01-24|BETA RENEWABLES S.p.A.|Pretreatment process of a ligno-cellulosic feedstock|

---

JP6218085B2|2015-05-18|2017-10-25|国立大学法人信州大学|Method for producing modified xylopolysaccharide|

---

AU2016275704B2|2015-06-12|2019-05-16|Lantmännen Ek För|Enzymatic-assisted hydrothermal extraction of hemicelluloses|

---

CA3006226A1|2015-11-24|2017-06-01|Inbicon A/S|Bitumen compositions comprising lignin|

---

WO2017108055A1|2015-12-21|2017-06-29|Inbicon A/S|Fluid composition comprising lignin and vinasse|

---

US11172695B2|2016-03-22|2021-11-16|The Quaker Oats Company|Method, apparatus, and product providing hydrolyzed starch and fiber|

---

US20170275662A1|2016-03-22|2017-09-28|The Quaker Oats Company|Method and Apparatus for Controlled Hydrolysis|

---

LT3241907T|2016-05-03|2019-05-27|Versalis S.P.A.|Process for producing a bio-product|

---

BR112019009111A2|2016-11-04|2019-10-15|Inbicon As|Method for the preparation of fermentable sugars from lignocellulosic biomass|

---

CN107988127B|2017-11-02|2021-09-03|南京农业大学|Application of trichoderma reesei lignocellulose enzyme genetic engineering lactobacillus combination in preparation of high-quality alfalfa silage|

---

US11242549B2|2019-04-17|2022-02-08|Indian Oil Corporation Limited|Bio-refinery waste utilization for enzyme production using novel penicillium funiculosum MRJ-16 fungal strain|

法律状态:
2019-10-08| B06U| Preliminary requirement: requests with searches performed by other patent offices: procedure suspended [chapter 6.21 patent gazette]|

---

2021-07-27| B09A| Decision: intention to grant [chapter 9.1 patent gazette]|

---

2021-09-14| B16A| Patent or certificate of addition of invention granted [chapter 16.1 patent gazette]|Free format text: PRAZO DE VALIDADE: 20 (VINTE) ANOS CONTADOS A PARTIR DE 05/02/2014, OBSERVADAS AS CONDICOES LEGAIS. |

优先权:

---

申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题

---

DKPA201270461|2012-08-01|

---

PCT/DK2013/050256|WO2014019589A1|2012-08-01|2013-08-01|Methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass using single-stage autohydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis with c5 bypass and post-hydrolysis.|

---

DKPCT/DK2013/050256|2013-08-01|

---

PCT/DK2014/050030|WO2015014364A1|2013-08-01|2014-02-05|Methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass using single-stage autohydrolysis pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis|

---