microorganism culture methods under non-axenic myxotrophic conditions

专利摘要:
  MICRO-ALGAE CULTURE METHODS IN NON-AXENIC MIXOTROPHIC CONDITIONS.The present invention relates to methods of growing microorganisms under non-axenic conditions. A method for cultivating microalgae in a mixotrophic manner and controlling bacterial contamination with an acetic acid / pH auxostat system is specifically described. The methods to grow microalgae in a mixotrophic manner with increased productivity through an increase in the transfer of oxygen to the culture, and to control bacterial contamination with an oxidizing agent.
公开号:BR112015009828A2
申请号:R112015009828-2
申请日:2013-11-08
公开日:2020-10-27
发明作者:Eneko Ganuza；Jason D. LICAMELE；Anna Lee Tonkovich
申请人:Heliae Development, Llc；
IPC主号:

专利说明:

[001] [001] This application claims the benefit of North American Provisional Application No. 61 / 724,710, filed on November 9, 2012, entitled Methods of Culturing Microorganisms in Mixotrophic Conditions (Methods of Culturing Microorganisms in Mixotrophic Conditions); US Provisional Patent Application No. 61 / 798,969, filed on March 15, 2013, entitled Mixotrophy Systems and Methods (Mixotrophy Systems and Methods); Provisional US Patent Application No. 61 / 799,151, filed on March 2013, entitled Mixotrophy Technology (Mixotrophy Technology); and US Provisional Patent Application No. 61 / 877,894, filed September 13, 2013, entitled Methods of Culturing Microorganisms in Non-Axen Mixotrophic Conditions (Methods of Culturing Microorganisms in Non-Axenic Mixotrophic Conditions), whose Total content is incorporated into this document for reference. HISTORIC
[002] [002] Microorganisms, such as, but not limited to, micro-algae and cyanobacteria, have gained attention as a viable source of food, fuel, fertilizers, cosmetics, chemicals and pharmaceutical compositions due to their ability to grow quickly and in a variety of conditions, such as sewer piping. Each species of microalgae and cyanobacteria has a different protein, mineral, and fatty acid profile, which makes some species better sources for certain products than other species. Different species of microalgae and cyanobacteria can use different sources of energy and carbon. SA2 phototrophic microorganisms use light energy, as well as inorganic carbon (for example, carbon dioxide), to carry out metabolic activity. Heterotrophic microorganisms do not use light as a source of energy and instead use a source of organic carbon for energy and carbon to carry out metabolic activity. Mixotrophic microorganisms can use a mixture of energy and carbon sources, including light, inorganic carbon (for example, carbon dioxide) and organic carbon. The versatility of mixotrophic microorganisms, which are capable of using a variety of energy and carbon sources, provides the potential to succeed in challenging conditions to coerce phototrophs or heterotrophs, and to reduce the effects of biomass loss through respiration of cellular materials. In addition, the growth of myxotrophic microorganisms that can be attributed to the proportion of phototrophic and heterotrophic metabolism results in different nutrients that limit the growth of microorganisms than in a pure phototrophic or heterotrophic culture.
[003] [003] Even with the versatility of mixotrophic microorganisms in using different sources of energy and carbon, mixotrophic cultures face their own set of challenges. Heterotrophic cultures that use a carbon source are kept under axenic and sterile conditions to prevent contamination with bacteria, fungi or other unwanted species that use the carbon source as a food source. These heterotrophic microorganism cultures generally comprise sealed, closed autoclave bioreactor systems, which result in greater cost and complexity than simple open bioreactor systems. Cultures of phototrophic microorganisms can grow outdoors under non-axenic conditions by exposure to natural light at a lower cost than the closed heterotrophic bioreactor system, and do not use a source of organic carbon (which can provide a source of food for contaminating bacteria).
[004] [004] A culture of myxotrophic microorganism uses light and can be grown on the outside in an open bioreactor system for access to natural light, but it also includes a carbon source that creates the increased potential for contamination by bacteria and other contaminating organisms in the culture due to the ability of bacteria and fungi to use the source of organic carbon to grow at a faster rate than mixotrophic micro-algae or cyanobacteria. Alternatively, a culture of myxotrophic microorganism can be grown indoors in the presence of ambient light or increased light from artificial light sources, such as light emitting diodes (LED) and fluorescent light, but still may experience a similar potential for contamination due to the presence of an organic carbon source.
[005] [005] In addition, contaminating bacteria can affect the product formation of the microorganism (for example, lipids, pigments, proteins) and growth. The fraction of microorganism growth attributed to heterotrophic metabolism can also be dictated by the microorganisms present in the culture. The proliferation of contaminating bacteria and other contaminating organisms in a culture of myxotrophic microorganism proved to be detrimental to the production of microalgae and cyanobacteria if the population of contaminating bacteria is not controlled and the resources required by the microalgae are allowed to be consumed. and cyanobacteria. Thus, there is a need in the art for a method of growing microalgae and cyanobacteria efficiently under non-axenic myxotrophic conditions that control contamination and keep crop nutrients at levels to maximize microalgae growth and cyanobacteria.
[006] [006] In one embodiment, the present invention describes a method for the myxotrophic growth of microorganisms in non-axenic conditions that use an acetic acid / pH auxostat to provide a source of organic carbon and control the pH level of the culture. The additional modalities describe alternative methods with different carbon sources and also operate under non-axenic conditions. The invention reveals in details not taught in the prior art that allow this method to be carried out under non-axenic conditions, such as open water reservoirs, while maintaining control over bacterial contaminants.
[007] [007] In the prior art, the pH auxostat culture system was first reported by two different research groups in 1960 (Bungay, 1972; Watson 1969) and a detailed development was presented by Martin and Hempfling (1976). While this research comprised cultures of bacteria and yeasts, Ratledge and his research colleagues (2001) reported an acetic acid based on microalgae / pH auxostat under heterotrophic conditions. Crypthecodinium cohnii cultivated heterotrophically by Ratledge using acetic acid as the source of organic carbon showed an improvement in heterotrophic growth and lipid accumulation with an acetic acid / pH aid culture method. Although Ratledge used acetic acid / pH auxostat to grow microalgae, the system was limited to heterotrophic species in a closed fermentation system, which does not face the same challenges with regard to contamination control as a mixotrophic system. Open. Cultures of mixotrophic monoalgae in open water reservoirs have been reported with sources of organic carbon other than acetic acid, however, the bacterial population of the culture has not been controlled or targeted. The international application WO 2012/109375 A2 describes the use of glucose as the source of organic carbon in a Chlorella culture that grew in a mixotrophic manner in an open water reservoir at low density before harvesting the biomass for the production of lipid in a heterotrophic system. Due to the short time in the mixotrophic stage, the culture does not experience the same contamination challenges as a purely mixotrophic culture that produces high-density biomass and lipids for a longer period of time.
[008] [008] In addition, the role of acetic acid as a bactericide is known in the art (Huang et al., 2011; Roe et al., 2002), but until now it has not been applied to the control of bacterial populations in cultures large-scale mixotrophic microalgae. The use of acetic acid in cultures of myxotrophic microalgae was generally used in laboratory scale experiments, where standard laboratory conditions assume axenic operation and the bacterial population of the culture was not targeted (Yeh et al., 2011). In North American Patent 3,444,647 Takashi reveals mixotrophic cultures of Chlorella in glass cultures containing the different carbon sources and the lowest observed bacterial levels associated with the culture comprising acetic acid, however CO, was used to control the pH level within glass cultures and not acetic acid. More importantly, the US Patent
[009] [009] The modalities described in this document generally refer to systems and methods for cultivating microorganisms in a mixotrophic manner under non-axenic conditions. In particular, the modalities described in this document optimize growth and control contamination in a culture with a source of organic carbon, oxidizing agents, and gas transfer.
[0010] [0010] In some embodiments of the invention, a method of culturing microorganisms in non-axenic myxotrophic conditions, comprises: inoculating an aqueous culture medium with a culture of microorganisms that comprise at least some contaminating bacteria in a container of culture; supply the culture of microorganisms with at least some light; supplying the microorganism culture with an organic carbon source comprising an organic acid; and where the micro-organism culture maintains a level of contaminating bacteria below 25% of a total culture cell count and a micro-organism yield of at least 50 g / m per day.
[0011] [0011] In some modalities, the microorganism comprises at least one microorganism of the genus selected from the group consisting of: Chlorella, Anacystis, Synechococcus, Syneococystis, Neospongiococcum, Chlorococcum, Phaeodactylum, Spirulina, Micractinium , Haematococcus, Nannochloropsis, and Brachiomonas. In some embodiments, the contaminating bacterium comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of: Achromobacter sp., Acidovorax sp., Aeromonas sp., Agrobacterium sp., Alteromonas sp., Aquaspirilum sp., Azospirilum sp., Azotobacter sp., Bergeyella sp., Brochothrix sp., Brumimicrobium sp., Burkholderia sp., Caulobacter sp., Cellulomonas sp., Chryseobacterium sp., Curtobacterium sp., Delphia sp., Empedobacter sp., Enterobacter sp., Escherichia sp., Flavobacterium sp., Marinobacter sp., Microbacterium sp., Myroides sp.,
[0012] [0012] In some embodiments, the organic acid from the organic carbon source comprises 0.5-50% acetic acid. In some embodiments, the culture of microorganisms maintains a level of contaminating bacteria below 20%, 10%, or 5% of a total cell count in the culture. In some embodiments, organic acid is combined with at least one other nutrient and supplied to the culture medium in combination, the other nutrient comprising at least one selected from the group consisting of: nitrates, phosphates, iron , cobalt, copper, sodium, molybdenum, manganese, zinc, salts, and silica. In some modalities, the method also comprises supplying at least one oxidizing agent to the culture of the microorganism, the at least one oxidizing agent comprising at least one selected from the group consisting of: ozone, hydrogen peroxide , chlorine, chloride, chlorate, hypochlorite, nitric acid, chromium, permanganate, silver oxide, and bromine.
[0013] [0013] In some modalities, the source of organic carbon is supplied to the culture by a pH auxiliary system when a measured pH level of the culture reaches a limit level. In some modes, the limit pH level is 7.5. In some embodiments, the pH auxostat system maintains a substantially constant pH level in the microorganism culture. In some embodiments, the pH auxostat maintains a pH level within a defined range of histories that inhibits the proliferation of contaminating bacteria in the microorganism culture. In some embodiments, the organic carbon source is supplied to the culture until an oxygen level dissolved from the culture reaches a critical level below 2 mg O7z / L.
[0014] [0014] In some embodiments, the aqueous culture medium comprises an initial concentration of sodium acetate, sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide between 0.1 and 6 g / L. In some modalities, at least some light is provided to the microorganism culture for a photoperiod of 10-16, less than 15, or more than 15 hours a day. In some modalities, at least some light is natural light, artificial light or a combination of them. In some embodiments, at least some light comprises at least a wavelength spectrum from the group consisting of: violet (about 380-450 nm), blue (about 450-495 nm), green (about 495-570 nm), yellow (about 570-590 nm), orange (about 590-620 nm), red (about 620-750 nm), and long-red (about 700-800 nm) . In some embodiments, the culture vessel is an open vessel disposed on the outside.
[0015] [0015] In some embodiments of the invention, a method of controlling bacterial contamination in a mixotrophic culture of microorganisms in non-axenic conditions, comprises: inoculating an aqueous culture medium with a culture of microorganisms comprising at least some contaminating bacteria in a culture vessel; supply the culture of microorganisms with at least some light; supply the culture of microorganisms with a source of organic carbon; supply the culture of microorganisms with an oxidizing agent; and where the micro-organism culture maintains a level of contaminating bacteria below 25% of the total cell count of the micro-organism culture. In some embodiments, the oxidizing agent comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of: ozone, hydrogen peroxide, chlorine, chlorite, chlorate, hypochlorite, nitric acid, chromium, permanganate, silver oxide and bromine.
[0016] [0016] In some modalities, ozone is supplied in concentrations
[0017] [0017] In some modalities, the source of organic carbon comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of: acetate, acetic acid, ammonium linoleate, arabinose, arginine, aspartic acid, butyric acid, cellulose, citric acid , ethanol, fructose, fatty acids, galactose, glucose, glycerol, glycine, lactic acid, lactose, maleic acid, maltose, mannose, methanol, molasses, peptone, plant-based hydrolyzate, proline, propionic acid, ribose, sucrose , complete or partial hydrolysates of starch, sucrose, tartaric, organic acids of the TCA cycle, place for fine deposit, urea, solutions for industrial residues, and yeast extract.
[0018] [0018] In some embodiments of the invention, a method of culturing microorganisms in non-axenic myxotrophic conditions,
[0019] [0019] In some modalities, the gas is supplied to the culture of microorganisms by at least one selected from the group consisting of a gas injector, porous diffuser, micro-pore diffuser, gas permeable membrane, gas generator microbubbles, venturi injection device, and fluid microbubble oscillator. In some embodiments, the source of organic carbon comprises acetic acid and the aqueous culture medium comprises an initial concentration and supply for the first 1-5 days of sodium acetate, sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide.
[0020] [0020] In some embodiments of the invention, a method for cultivating microorganisms in a mixotrophic manner comprises: providing a culture of microorganisms in an aqueous culture medium in a culture vessel, the microorganisms being able to use use light and organic carbon as energy sources; supply at least some light to the culture of microorganisms; and supplying a source of organic carbon that comprises acetic acid and an oxaloacetate promoter to the culture of microorganisms. In some embodiments, organic acid comprises at least one from the group consisting of acetic acid, acetate, and acetic anhydride. In some fashion-
[0021] [0021] FIG. 1 is a comparative graph showing cell dry weight and lipid productivity as a percentage of dry cell weight between photoautotrophic and mixotrophic cultures.
[0022] [0022] FIG. 2 is a comparative graph showing cell dry weight and lipid productivity as a percentage of dry cell weight between photoautotrophic and mixotrophic cultures.
[0023] [0023] FIG. 3 is a comparative graph showing NaNO3 uptake between photoautotrophic and mixotrophic cultures and acetate uptake for a mixotrophic culture.
[0024] [0024] FIG. 4 is a comparative graph showing NaNO uptake; between photoautotrophic and mixotrophic cultures, and the capture of acetate for a mixotrophic culture.
[0025] [0025] FIG. 5 is a comparative graph showing residual acetate for the two mixotrophic cultures.
[0026] [0026] FIG. 6 is a comparative graph showing productivity in dry cell weight for photoautrophic and myxotrophic cultures with 24 and 14 hour photoperiods.
[0027] [0027] FIG. 7 is a comparative graph that shows nitrate uptake for photoautotrophic and myxotrophic cultures with 24 and 14 hour photoperiods.
[0028] [0028] FIG. 8 is a comparative graph showing acetate uptake for mixotrophic cultures with 24 and 14 hour photoperiods.
[0029] [0029] FIG. 9 is a comparative graph that shows the dissolved oxygen level for photoautotrophic and mixotrophic cultures with 24 and 14 hour photoperiods.
[0030] [0030] FIG. 10 is a comparative graph that shows the productivity in dry cell weight free of ash for photoautotrophic and myxotrophic cultures with 24 and 0 hour photoperiods and dissolved oxygen concentration.
[0031] [0031] FIG. 11 is a comparative graph showing the addition of acetic acid for mixotrophic and heterotrophic cultures.
[0032] [0032] FIG. 12 is a comparative graph showing NaNO uptake; for photoautotrophic and mixotrophic cultures with 24 and 0 hour photoperiods.
[0033] [0033] FIG. 13 is a comparative graph that shows the dry cell weight productivity for the two mixotrophic cultures.
[0034] [0034] FIG. 14 is a comparative graph showing the level of dissolved oxygen and maximum temperature for the two myxotrophic cultures.
[0035] [0035] FIG. 15 is a comparative graph showing productivity in dry cell weight, NaNO; residual and dissolved oxygen level for a mixotrophic culture.
[0036] [0036] FIG. 16 is a comparative graph showing productivity in dry cell weight, NaNO; residual and dissolved oxygen level for a mixotrophic culture.
[0037] [0037] FIG. 17 is a comparative graph that shows bacterial counts and temperature for the two mixotrophic cultures.
[0038] [0038] FIG. 18 is a comparative graph that shows the productivity in dry cell weight free of ash from a culture that has changed from myxotrophic to photoautotrophic.
[0039] [0039] FIG. 19 is a comparative graph that shows the productivity in dry cell weight free of ash for the mixotrophic and photoautotrophic cultures of initial sodium acetate concentrations of 26 O g / L.
[0040] [0040] FIG. 20 is a comparative graph showing the addition of acetic acid to myxotrophic cultures with initial sodium acetate concentrations of 2 and 0 g / L.
[0041] [0041] FIG. 21 is a comparative graph showing the effects of HO applications, in media containing glucose and acetate.
[0042] [0042] FIG. 22 is a comparative graph showing the effects of HO applications, in media containing glucose and acetate.
[0043] [0043] FIG. 23 is a comparative graph showing the dry ash free productivity for the two mixotrophic cultures.
[0044] [0044] FIG. 24 is a comparative graph showing the yield in g / mº per day for the two mixotrophic cultures.
[0045] [0045] FIG. 25 is a comparative graph showing the volumetric growth rate for the two mixotrophic cultures.
[0046] [0046] FIG. 26 is a comparative graph showing productivity in g / m per day and consumption of acetic acid for the two mixotrophic cultures.
[0047] [0047] FIG. 27 is a comparative graph showing nitrate consumption for the two mixotrophic cultures.
[0048] [0048] FIG. 28 is a comparative graph that shows the percentage of bacteria for Chlorella for the two mixotrophic cultures.
[0049] [0049] FIG. 29 is a comparative graph that shows the oxygen concentration for the two mixotrophic cultures.
[0050] [0050] FIG. 30 is a comparative graph that shows the oxygen concentration for a mixotrophic culture.
[0051] [0051] FIG. 31 is a comparative graph showing the bacterial and live microalgae cell concentration of a microalgae culture treated by sonication.
[0052] [0052] FIG. 32 is a graph showing a concentration of myxotrophic microalgae culture and volumetric growth rate (g / L) over time.
[0053] [0053] FIG. 33 is a graph that shows a sandy growth rate of myxotrophic microalgae culture (g / m ) Over time.
[0054] [0054] FIG. 34 is a graph showing a volumetric growth rate of culture of myxotrophic microalgae (g / L / Day) correlated to concentration.
[0055] [0055] FIG. 35 is a graph showing a beach growth rate of myxotrophic microalgae culture (g / m ) Correlated to concentration.
[0056] [0056] FIG. 36 is a graph that shows a temperature of cultivation of myxotrophic microalgae over time.
[0057] [0057] FIG. 37 is a graph showing the pH of myxotrophic microalgae culture over time.
[0058] [0058] FIG. 38 is a graph showing a concentration of dissolved oxygen in the culture of myxotrophic microalgae over time.
[0059] [0059] FIG. 39 is a graph showing a culture of myxotrophic microalgae that provided photosynthetic active radiation over time.
[0060] [0060] FIG. 40 is a graph showing a concentration of nitrate in the culture of mixotrophic microalgae over time.
[0061] [0061] FIG. 41 is a graph showing the cell dry weight productivity of mixotrophic microalgae cultures supplied with different sources of organic carbon over time. DETAILED DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION
[0062] [0062] The term "microorganism" refers to microscopic organisms such as microalgae and cyanobacteria. Microalgae include microscopic multicellular plants (for example, a floating plant), photosynthetic microorganisms, heterotrophic microorganisms, diatoms, dinoflagellates and unicellular algae.
[0063] [0063] Microorganisms that can grow under conditions of mixotrophic culture comprise microalgae and cyanobacteria. Non-limiting examples of mixotrophic microorganisms may include organisms of the genera: Agmenellum, Amphora, Anabaena, Anacystis, Apistonema, Arthrospira (Spirulina), Botryococcus, Brachiomonas, Chlamydomonas, Chlorella, Chloroccum, Cruci- placolithis, Cylindrith , Cyanophora, Cyclotella, Du- naliella, Emiliania, Euglena, Extubocellulus, Fragilaria, Galdieria, Goni-otrichium, Haematococcus, Halochlorella, Isochyrsis, Leptocylindrus, Micractinium, Melosira, Monodus, Nostoc, Nannochis, Nannochchis ., Odontella, Ochromo- nas, Ochrosphaera, Pavlova, Picochlorum, Phaeodactylum, Pleuro-chyrsis, Porphyridium, Poteriochromonas, Prymnesium, Rhodomonas, Scenedesmus, Skeletonema, Spumella, Stauroneis, Stichococir, Por- cheneat Synechococcus, Synechocystis, Tetraselmis, Thraustochytrids, Thallassiosira, and species thereof.
[0064] [0064] Non-limiting examples of microorganism species suitable for myxotrophic growth using acetic acid as a source of organic carbon may comprise organisms of the genera: Chlorella, Anacystis, Synechococcus, Syneococystis, Neospongiococcum, Chlorococcum, Phaeodactylum , Spirulina, Micractinium, Haematococcus, Nannochloropsis, Brachiomonas, and species thereof.
[0065] [0065] Sources of organic carbon suitable for cultivating a microorganism in a mixotrophic or heterotrophic form may include: acetate, acetic acid, ammonium linoleate, arabinose, arginine, aspartic acid, butyric acid, cellulose, citric acid, ethanol , fructose, fatty acids, galactose, glucose, glycerol, glycine, lactic acid, lactose, maleic acid, maltose, mannose, methanol, molasses, peptone, hydrolyzed
[0066] [0066] While microorganisms capable of mycotrophic growth can also grow in 100% phototrophic conditions or 100% heterotrophic conditions, it was found that the combination of light and an organic carbon source can outperform the conditions phototrophic effects in a bioreactor, including open systems. Microorganisms capable of myxotrophic growth can also grow under a combination of conditions, such as making the transition between phototrophic, mixotrophic and heterotrophic conditions. Culture methods with transitions between trophic conditions can regulate the food source for bacteria, while allowing myxotrophic microorganisms to continue to grow under varying conditions.
[0067] [0067] For example, the growth of microalgae can be slow under phototrophic conditions compared to myxotrophic or heterotrophic conditions, but bacterial growth can also be slow and not grow phototropically if the bacterium is deprived of a photosynthetic metabolism. The ability to grow mixotrophic in non-axenic conditions also provides a simpler method than traditional fermentation and closer to the simplicity of phototrophic methods. The optimization of productivity from a mixotrophic microorganism in non-axenic conditions, therefore, comprises the selection of an organic carbon source, the system and methods for administering the organic carbon source and the methods for applying the type of light most appropriate and the amount of light, the systems and methods to administer the nutrients, the systems and methods to control the pH level, and the systems and methods to control the population of contaminating organisms (for example, bacteria, fungi). The use of an acetic acid / pH auxostat system provides an efficient method for cultivating a mixotrophic culture of microorganisms in non-axenic conditions by maintaining the source of organic carbon at a constant or substantially constant level. in culture while helping to maintain culture conditions that inhibit contaminating bacterial growth.
[0068] [0068] Abbreviations in a formula such as g / m d; g / L d; h / day; L / d; Watts h / g; or mg / L d are used throughout this text. g / m d means gram per square meter per day or grams per square meter per day. g / L d means gram per liter per day or grams per liter per day; L / d means liter per day or liters per day; h / day and h / d mean hours a day; Wh / g means Watt hours per gram or Watt hours per gram.
[0069] [0069] The term "productivity" refers to the measurement of the growth rate of microalgae or cyanobacteria.
[0070] [0070] The term "sandy productivity" or "aerial growth rate" (sometimes also called aerial) means the mass of micro-algae or cyanobacteria produced per unit area of land per day. An example of such a rate is grams per square meter per day (g / m D) which means grams of microalgae or cyanobacteria produced per m of the reactor area per day.
[0071] [0071] The term "volume productivity" or "volumetric growth rate" means the mass of microalgae or cyanobacteria produced per unit of culture volume per day. An example of such a unit is g / L d (grams per liter per day) which means grams of microalgae or cyanobacteria produced in each liter of culture per day.
[0072] [0072] An auxostat is a device that uses the feed rate to control a stable variable in a continuous culture. The organisms in the culture set their own dilution rate. An auxostat tends to be much more stable at high dilution rates than a chemostat commonly known in the art. The pressures of population selection on an auxiliary switch lead to rapidly growing crops. Practical applications include high-rate propagation, destruction of waste with control at a maximum rate concentration, open culture due to potentially contaminating organisms not adapting before being weakened, and a process operation that benefits from careful balancing of proportions of nutrient concentrations.
[0073] [0073] The term "pH auxostat" refers to the microbial cultivation technique that combines the addition of fresh medium (for example, medium containing organic carbon or acetic acid) to control the pH. As the pH moves from an established point, fresh medium is added to bring the pH back to the established point. The rate of change in pH is often an excellent indication of growth and matches conditions as a growth dependent parameter. The feed will keep the concentration of residual nutrient in balance with the buffer capacity of the medium. The established pH point can be changed depending on the microorganisms present in the culture at the time. The microorganisms present can be targeted by the location and station where the bioreactor is operated and how close the crops are positioned to other sources of contamination (for example, other farms, agriculture, ocean, lake, river, sewage). The rate of addition to the medium is determined by the buffering capacity and the food concentration of the limited nutrient and not directly by the set point (pH) as in a traditional axostat. The pH auxostat is robust but controls the concentration of nutrients indirectly. The pH level represents the completion of the production of different ionic species and the release of ions during the uptake of nutrients and carbon. In this way, the pH level can move either up or down as a function of the growth of microorganisms. The most common situation is the pH depression caused by the production of organic acid and the uptake of ammonium. However, for microorganisms that grow in protein or media rich in amino acids, the pH level will increase with growth due to the release of excess ammonia.
[0074] [0074] The terms "microbiological culture", "microbial culture", or "microorganism culture" refer to a method or system for multiplying microorganisms through reproduction in a predetermined culture medium, which include being under controlled laboratory conditions. Microbiological cultures, microbial cultures and cultures of microorganisms are used to multiply the organism, to determine the type of organism, or the abundance of the organism in the sample being tested. In a liquid culture medium, the term microbiological, microbial or microorganism culture generally refers to the entire liquid medium and microorganisms in the liquid without taking into account the vessel in which the culture resides. A liquid medium is often referred to as "media", "culture medium", or "culture medium". The act of cultivating is generally referred to as "culture of microorganisms" when the emphasis is on plural microorganisms. The act of cultivating is generally referred to as "culture of a microorganism" when importance is placed on a species or genus of microorganism. The culture of the microorganism is used synonymously with the culture of microorganisms.
[0075] [0075] The terms "monoalgae" and "unialgae" refer to the culture of microalgae or cyanobacteria that is operated under non-axenic conditions, but dominated by a single genus or species of microalgae or cyanobacteria. Despite the presence of other heterotrophic microorganisms (ie, non-axenic conditions), the culture remains stable due to the inorganic culture medium used in cultures. Monoalgae cultures could be used for heterotrophic cultures, however the combination of an organic medium with the presence of heterotrophic bacteria and fungi does not guarantee the stability of the monoalgae culture found in phototrophic conditions "per se" and so the term it is less appropriate. Monoalgae culture can also be used to define a non-axenic microorganism culture dominated by a single genus or species.
[0076] [0076] The term "inoculate" refers to implanting or introducing microorganisms into a culture medium. Inoculate or inoculate a microorganism culture under the culture conditions described throughout the specification refers to initiating a microorganism culture under the culture conditions, as is commonly used in the microorganism culture technique. Microorganisms that are introduced into a culture medium can be referred to as a seed or inoculum.
[0077] [0077] The term "ozone" means a form of oxygen, Oz, with a peculiar odor that suggests little chlorine, produced when an electrical spark or ultraviolet light is passed through air or oxygen. Ozone is a toxic colorless unstable gas with powerful oxidation properties, formed from oxygen by electrical discharges.
[0078] [0078] The term "coagulate" means to transform a liquid suspension into a viscous or thickened, semi-solid, or solid mass. Coagulating means dehydrating in order to remove enough water to cause a liquid suspension to become a thickened, viscous, semi-solid or solid mass. Dehydration methods can be used in conjunction with microorganism cultures to cause microorganisms to coagulate and form a denser mass that may be more suitable for harvesting and downstream processing.
[0079] [0079] The terms "mixotrophic" and "mixotrophic" refer to culture conditions in which light, organic carbon, and inorganic carbon (eg, carbon dioxide, carbonate, bicarbonate) can be applied to a micro culture -organisms. Microorganisms capable of growing under myxotrophic conditions have the metabolic profile of both phototrophic and heterotrophic microorganisms, and can use both light and organic carbon as energy sources, as well as both inorganic and organic carbon as carbon sources. . A mixotrophic microorganism may be using light, inorganic carbon and organic carbon simultaneously through phototrophic and heterotrophic metabolism or alternating between the use of each metabolism. A microorganism in conditions of mixotrophic culture can be a liquid oxygen or carbon dioxide producer depending on the energy source and the carbon source used by the microorganism. Microorganisms capable of myxotrophic growth include microorganisms with natural metabolism and the ability to grow under myxotrophic conditions, as well as microorganisms which obtain metabolism and capacity through the modification of cells by means of methods such as mutagenesis or genetic engineering.
[0080] [0080] The terms "phototrophic", "phototrophic", "photoautotrophic", "photoauototrophic", and "autotrophic" refer to culture conditions in which light and inorganic carbon (for example, carbon dioxide, carbon - bicarbonate) can be applied to a micro culture
[0081] [0081] The terms "heterotrophic" and "heterotrophy" refer to culture conditions in which organic carbon can be applied to a culture of microorganisms in the absence of light. Microorganisms capable of growing in heterotrophic conditions can use organic carbon as both an energy source and a carbon source. A microorganism in heterotrophic conditions can produce carbon dioxide.
[0082] [0082] The term "axenic" describes a culture of an organism that is totally free from all other "contaminating" organisms (ie, organisms that are harmful to the health of the culture of micro-algae and cyanobacteria). Throughout this descriptive report, the axenic refers to a culture that, when inoculated on an agar plate with bacterial basal medium, does not form colonies other than the microorganism of interest. The axenic describes cultures not contaminated by or associated with other living organisms such as, but not limited to, bacteria, cyanobacteria, microalgae and / or fungi. Axenic is generally used in reference to pure cultures of microorganisms that are completely free from the presence of other different organisms. An axenic culture of microalgae or cyanobacteria is completely free from other different organisms.
[0083] [0083] The term "harvest" refers to removing the culture of microorganisms from the culture vessel and / or separating the microorganisms from the culture medium. The harvesting of microorganisms can be conducted by any method known in the art such as, but not limited to, skimming, runoff, flotation,
[0084] [0084] A method of culturing microorganisms in non-axenic conditions comprises: inoculating an aqueous culture medium with a culture of microorganisms that comprises at least some contaminating bacteria in a culture vessel; supply the culture of microorganisms with at least some light; and supply a source of organic carbon in the culture of microorganisms. The selection of an organic acid as the source of organic carbon can contribute to maintaining a level of contaminating bacteria below an acceptable limit to achieve high growth rates. It is recognized that in practice, a culture comprising microorganisms in non-axenic conditions such as an illuminated culture of microalgae or cyanobacteria with an organic carbon source will have at least some contaminating bacteria, such as the practical ability to reduce the population bacterial to near zero (for example, steam sterilization or other known procedures) can be cost prohibitive for large-volume lighted cultures with a culture density of 0.05-10 g / L. In addition, it may not be desirable to completely eliminate the bacterial population from a culture, as some bacteria may be involved in the production of essential nutrients for microalgae or cyanobacteria, such as cyanocobalamin, or other valuable products. Thus, in some embodiments, the level of contaminating bacteria can be kept below 25%, 20%, 10%, or 5% of the total cell counts of the culture.
[0085] [0085] As previously described, maintaining a certain level of specific types of bacteria can be beneficial to a culture of microalgae or cyanobacteria. Bacteria that may be present in microalgae and cyanobacteria cultures include, but are not limited to: Achromobacter sp., Acidovorax sp., Acinetobacter sp., Aeromonas Sp., Agrobacterium sp., Alteromonas sp., Ancylobacter sp., Aquaspirillum sp ., Azospirillum sp., Azotobacter sp., Bacillus sp., Bergeyella sp., Brevundimonas sp., Brochothrix sp., Brumimicrobium sp., Burkholderia sp., Caulobacter sp., Cellulomonas sp., Chryseobacterium sp., Curtobacterium sp. ., Delftia sp., Empedobacter sp., Enterobacter sp., Escherichia sp., Flavobacterium sp., Gemmatimonas sp., Halomonas sp., Hydrogenophaga sp., Janthinobacterium sp., Lactobacillus sp., Marinobacter sp., Massilia sp., Microbacterium sp., Myroides sp., Pantoea sp., Paracoccus sp., Pedobacter sp., Phaeobacter sp., Phyllobacterium sp., Pseudoalteromonas sp. Pseudomonas sp., Rahnella sp., Ralstonia sp., Rhizobium sp., Rhodococcus sp., Roseo- monas sp., Sphingobacterium sp., Sphingomoas sp., Staphylococcus sp., Stenotrophomonas Sp., Vibrio sp., And Zobelliae sp.
[0086] [0086] Bacteria that have a negative or harmful effect on micro-algae and cyanobacteria can be designated as contaminating bacteria. Bacteria that have a negative or harmful effect on microalgae or cyanobacteria in a culture include, but are not limited to: Achromobacter sp., Acidovorax sp., Aeromonas Sp., Agrobacterium sp., Alteromonas sp., Aquaspirilum sp., Azospirillum sp. ., Azotobacter sp., Bergeyella sp., Brochothrix sp., Brumimicrobium sp., Burkholderia sp., Caulobacter sp., Cellulomonas sp., Chryseobacterium sp., Curtobacterium sp., Delftia sp., Empedobacter sp., Entero- bacter sp., Escherichia sp., Flavobacterium sp., Marinobacter sp., Microbacterium sp., Myroides sp., Paracoccus sp., Pedobacter sp., Phaeobacter sp., Pseudoalteromonas sp., Pseudomonas sp., Rahnella sp., Ralstonia sp., Rhizobium sp., Rhodococcus sp., Roseomonas Sp., Staphylococcus sp., Stenotrophomonas sp., Vibrio sp., Zobelliae sp. and other bacteria that share similar characteristics.
[0087] [0087] Bacteria that may have a beneficial or neutral effect on microalgae or cyanobacteria in a culture comprise, but are not limited to: Acidovorax sp., Acinetobacter sp., Aeromonas sp., Agrobacterium sp., Alteromonas sp., Ancylobacter sp. ., Azospi- rilum sp., Azotobacter sp., Bacillus sp., Brevundimonas sp., Brumimi- crobium sp., Burkholderia sp., Caulobacter sp., Cellulomonas sp., Delphia sp, Empedobacter sp. Gemmatimonas sp., Halomonas sp., Hydrogenophaga sp., Janthinobacterium sp., Lactobacillus sp., Marinobacter sp., Pantoea sp., Paracocecus sp., Phaeobacter sp., Phyllobacterium sp., Pseudoalteromonas sp., Pseudomonas sp. ., Rhizobium sp., Sphingomoas sp., Zobelliae sp. and other bacteria that share similar characteristics. While the bacteria of a particular genus have the same characteristics, it is recognized that a genus of bacteria with most species generally identified as harmful to microalgae or cyanobacteria can also include a particular species within the genus that is neutral or beneficial to a specific culture of microalgae or cyanobacteria and vice versa. For example, many species of Pseudomonas have been observed to be harmful to microalgae, however the literature has described some species of Pseudomonas with antifungal functionality which can be beneficial for a culture of microalgae or cyanobacteria.
[0088] [0088] Bacteria that provide a beneficial or neutral effect can be added to a culture of microalgae or cyanobacteria in a probiotic role to help control the level of contaminating bacteria, increase the growth yield of microalgae or cyanobacteria or increase the culture longevity. In a non-limiting example, recent data showed that by inoculating mixotrophic cultures of Chlorella with Bacillus sp., Rhizobium sp., And Sphingomonas sp., Chlorella grew well at 35ºC and outperformed control cultures that were not inoculated with the bacteria. Other additives can be applied to the medium that inhibits gram (+) and / or gram (-) bacteria to reduce the growth of all bacteria and / or specific bacteria present in the culture.
[0089] [0089] Some species of bacteria that have been observed to have a beneficial or neutral effect on microalgae or cyanobacteria and can be added to the culture in a probiotic role to provide functions such as: organic and inorganic cycle nutrients; producing valuable pharmaceutical and industrial products such as extracellular polymer substances, nutrients, vitamins, and chelated minerals; produce antifungal agents; produce growth enhancers; produce antibiotics; produce biocompounds; adjust nitrogen; transform nutrients; decompose organic matter; help maintain a biological balance in the microorganism culture; and help with nitrification and denitrification. Some bacteria may have photopigments that react to light in a similar way to microalgae or cyanobacteria. As a non-limiting example, Azospirilum sp. grown in a culture with Chlorella can increase pigment content, lipid content, lipid variety, and growth. Sphingomonas sp. it is known in the literature for being associated with plants and capable of adjusting nitrogen. Bacteria with photopigments can also be manipulated with specific light intensity and / or light wavelengths to influence a culture.
[0090] [0090] The microorganisms are inoculated in an aqueous culture medium contained in a suitable container for growth. In some embodiments, the culture medium may be any liquid culture medium suitable for cultivating microorganisms, such as, but not limited to, the BG-11 culture medium, a modified BG-11 culture medium, a culture medium f / 2 and a modified f / 2 culture medium. In some modalities, the culture medium comprises any one or more of: ocean water, lake water, river water,
[0091] [0091] The microorganism culture can be maintained at a constant or substantially constant pH and temperature level. In other embodiments, microorganism culture can be operated between a range of pH levels or a range of temperature hysteresis, including temperatures following a daytime cycle, or a range of pH levels and temperatures. In some modalities, the pH level varies from about 6 to 9 and the temperature varies from about 10ºC to 30ºC. In other modalities, the pH level varies from about
[0092] [0092] In some embodiments, the culture temperature can be controlled with a heat exchanger such as, but not limited to, cooling or heating coils. In some modalities, the established pH point can be changed within a range suitable for the growth of microalgae during culture depending on the composition of microorganisms present. A change in pH can be used to shock (ie, stress) the bacteria and to reduce the proliferation of contaminating bacteria in the culture harmful to primary microalgae or cyanobacteria. A change in pH can be combined with a cessation of supply of the carbon source for a period of time (eg 4 hours - 48 hours), manipulation of dissolved oxygen (DO) levels, temperature modification, addition of bactericidal agents , addition of amino acids or other food sources, and combinations of them that can reduce the proliferation of bacteria that can be harmful to microalgae or cyanobacteria and / or promote the proliferation of bacteria that can be beneficial / non-harmful bacteria.
[0093] [0093] A source of illumination that comprises synthetic active radiation (PAR) supplies the culture with at least some light for photosynthetic activity. The light source can be natural, artificial, or any combination thereof. The period of exposure to light (ie, photoperiod) can vary from about 0 to 24 h / day. In additional modes, the period of exposure to light (ie, photoperiod) can vary from about 10 to 16 h / day. In some modalities, the light supply can be continuous, discontinuous (for example, intermittent), of constant intensity, or of variable intensity. In some embodiments, the source of natural light may comprise solar radiation. In alternating modalities, the culture can be exposed to light on an intermittent basis, at the end of the culture's life, for a few minutes a day, or for a day and the like. In some modalities, the artificial light source may comprise light emitting diodes (LEDs), micro-LEDs, fluorescent lights, incandescent lights, gas lamps, or halogen lamps.
[0094] [0094] In additional modalities, the source of natural light can be filtered or the source of artificial light can be modulated to limit the light supplied in a specific wavelength spectrum or a combination of specific wavelength spectra such as but not limited to, spectra of light violet (about 380-450 nm), blue (about 450-495 nm), green (about 495-570 nm), yellow (570-590 nm), orange (about 590-620 nm), red (about 620-750 nm), and long-red (about 700-800 nm). LEDs modulated to a specific wavelength spectrum or light wavelengths filtered by specific greenhouse films can be used to manipulate the growth and product production of microorganisms in the culture. Finalization steps with LEDs of a specific wavelength can be used before, during or after harvest to influence the product profile in microorganisms. Different intensities and / or light wavelengths can be applied to microorganisms at particular times to: improve growth, improve product formation, manipulate pigment formation, or "naturally sterilize" the crop with ultraviolet (UV) light. For example, increasing the intensity of UV light in a Haematococcus culture can yield formation of pigment and cyst.
[0095] [0095] The culture can be mixed by hydraulic mixing (for example, pumps), mechanical mixing (for example, agitators, agitators, propellers), or paddle wheels. In some modalities, the culture can be aerated with air, carbon dioxide, oxygen or any other suitable gas. In some embodiments, aeration may be provided by a gas injector, porous diffuser, micropore diffuser, gas permeable membranes, microbubble generator, venturi injection device or a fluid microbubble oscillator. The mixing, agitation and / or aeration of the culture allows the circulation of microorganisms in the culture for a homogeneous distribution of nutrients, gases, and the source of organic carbon, as well as access to light.
[0096] [0096] In some embodiments, an organic acid such as acetic acid can be used as a source of organic carbon and supplied to the microorganism culture from a feed tank through an auxiliary system of pH. In some modalities, the pH auxiliary system may comprise a solenoid valve, a peristaltic pump, a pH probe and a pH controller. In some embodiments, the pH auxostat system may comprise a drop delivery device controlled by a needle valve, a metering pump or a peristaltic pump and a pH controller. The uptake of carbon and nitrogen (ie, sodium acetate, sodium nitrate) and photosynthetic activity (ie, sodium bicarbonate uptake) increase the pH level of the crop. The pH controller can be adjusted to a limit level (ie, set point) and activate the auxiliary system to supply acetic acid to the culture when the measured pH level is above the established limit level. The frequency of pH measurements, the administration of acetic acid by the auxostat system, and the mixing of the culture are controlled in combination to keep the pH value substantially constant. In some modalities, the acetic acid feed can be diluted in water to a concentration below 100% and as low as 0.5%, with a preferable concentration between 15% and 50%. In other embodiments, acetic acid may be in concentrations below 10% in order to continuously dilute the culture of microorganisms. In other ways, acetic acid can be mixed together with other media or sources of organic carbon.
[0097] [0097] In other modalities, the source of organic carbon, such as acetic acid, can be combined or mixed together with other nutrient components such as sources of nitrogen or phosphorus. In other embodiments, the other nutrients can be added directly to the organic carbon source, such as acetic acid, and a single solution (or multiple solutions) can be added to the culture through the supply of acetic acid controlled by the pH. In one embodiment, nutrients can be added directly to acetic acid or alternate the carbon source before supplying the solution in the culture. In such embodiments when using an organic acid, the need for filtration of the nutrient medium can be reduced due to the organic acid, such as acetic acid, keeping the nutrient medium sterile. The amount of organic carbon source, such as acetic acid, consumption can be monitored by measuring the level of organic carbon (eg acetic acid) in the feed tank, which can be correlated with growth microorganism cell. Nitrates (eg, NO; z), phosphates, and other nutrients known to be used by plants (for example, a non-limiting set of nutrients would be iron, cobalt, copper, sodium, manganese, zinc, molybdenum, silica, salts, and combinations thereof) can also be added to the culture to keep nitrate and nutrients at a desired level. In some modalities
[0098] [0098] In some embodiments, the level of contamination in the culture of myxotrophic microorganisms (eg microalgae or cyanobacteria) can be managed to limit the free or residual floating food sources available for the contaminating microorganisms (for example, bacteria, fungi). In some modalities, the organic carbon feed and at least one other nutrient can be mixed and supplied together to introduce the organic carbon and at least one other nutrient together in an amount that will be substantially consumed by the mixotrophic microorganisms and to minimize the amount of free-floating or residual organic carbon and at least one nutrient available to contaminating microorganisms. Such modalities can effectively keep the crop concentration close to zero for organic carbon and at least one other nutrient. In some modes, the proportion of organic carbon to at least one other nutrient can be selected so that the consumption of organic carbon mixotrophic microorganism is compatible with the consumption of at least one other nutrient. The rates of consumption of organic carbon and nutrients for various microorganisms separately can be determined through experimentation and review of the available literature.
[0099] [0099] In some embodiments, the source of organic carbon comprises acetic acid. In some embodiments, acetic acid can be diluted to a concentration of about 30% or less. In some embodiments, at least one other nutrient comprises NO; z. In some embodiments, the NOz: Acetic Acid ratio can range from 0.5: 10 to 2:10, preferably about 1:10. In some embodiments, acetic acid may comprise acetic acid and its precursors, such as acetate and acetic anhydride.
[00100] [00100] In some modalities, the proportion of organic carbon in at least one other nutrient can be selected so that the dosage of at least one other nutrient raises the concentration in the culture medium to maintain a basic level. A non-limiting application for this modality may be to cultivate a microorganism from wastewater treatment such as, not limited to, bacteria, for reasons of remediation of waste in a wastewater culture medium. Organic carbon can be mixed and administered with another growth-limiting nutrient, such as nitrates, to effectively keep the concentration of the nitrate culture to a minimum or basic level such as, but not limited to, 100 ppm.
[00101] [00101] The growth of myxotrophic microorganism consumes and produces oxygen in this way by changing the concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO) (mg / L) in the culture medium. The concentration of dissolved oxygen can be controlled to stimulate the growth of myxotrophic microorganisms and keep a contaminating bacterial population controlled. Cellular respiration in microalgae and cyanobacteria seems to be less efficient than in bacteria, which can scavenge oxygen in low concentration or even grow in an anerobic way better than microalgae and cyanobacteria. Consequently, dissolved oxygen can be used as a variable parameter to manage populations of contaminating bacteria in myxotrophic cultures with little or no effect on the productivity and viability of microalgae and cyanobacteria. Oxygen transfer can be reduced or increased to manage populations of contaminating bacteria within myxotrophic cultures to increase culture longevity and reduce bacterial contamination.
[00102] [00102] The concentrations of oxygen dissolved in the culture solution can be controlled mechanically, chemically or biologically. The mechanical control may include injection of fresh air; air mixed with increased oxygen concentrations when using an oxygen concentrator or compressed oxygen injection; or air mixed with nitrogen that reduces dissolved oxygen concentrations. Mechanical control can also comprise the design and dimension of the reactor, the depth of the culture unit, the mixing rates, and the surface area of the reactor which dictates the exchange of air / water gas. The chemical control may comprise sodium sulfite that reduces concentrations of dissolved oxygen, or other chemicals that would increase dissolved oxygen, such as ozone. Sodium sulfite can act as an oxygen scavenger, for example, two molecules of sodium sulfite will react with two oxygen atoms when dissolved in water. Thus, to remove 1 ppm of oxygen, 7.8 ppm of sodium sulfite can be used (2Na + 2S8O; 3 + 20 = 2Na + 28SO;).
[00103] [00103] A non-limiting list of oxygen scavengers includes sodium sulfite and hydrazine, (Sigma-Aldrich St. Louis, MO), EliminoxO carbohydrazide and SurGardO erythrobate (Nalco Chemical Co. Naperville, IL), methyl ethyl keto Mekor & (Drew Chemical Corporation, Boonton, NJ), Hydroquinone Magni-FormO (Betz Laboratories, Trevose, PA), Dihydrohydroxylamine Steamate & (Dearborn Chemical Co. Lake Zurick, IL). Dissolved oxygen can also be controlled biologically by making the culture transition between myxotrophic and phototrophic conditions. When the dissolved oxygen concentrations reach the target concentrations and the populations of contaminating bacteria have been reduced, the system can switch from phototrophic conditions back to myxotrophic conditions thus creating a cyclic pattern that reduces contaminating bacteria and increases the culture's longevity. microalgae or cyanobacteria.
[00104] [00104] The limit levels (ie, established points) for oxygen dissolved in a culture of myxotrophic microorganism can vary from about 0.1 mg of Ox / L to about 30 mg of O »/ L depending on the bacterial population and species. Variations in dissolved oxygen can be maintained in targeted concentrations for an extended period of time. When populations of contaminating bacteria reach concentrations not suitable for the longevity and viability of myxotrophic microorganism culture, dissolved oxygen can be increased in targeted concentrations which reduce populations of contaminating bacteria without affecting the viability of the culture of microalgae or cyanobacteria. The target concentrations of dissolved oxygen may be between 1-6 mg O7z / L, or above atmospheric saturation concentrations such as 100 to 300% saturation. In some embodiments, the source of organic carbon may be supplied to the crop until a level of dissolved oxygen measured from the crop reaches a critical level below 2 mg O7z / L.
[00105] [00105] In an exemplary non-limiting modality, a factor that contributes to the efficiency of the pH auxostat system in supplying acetic acid (ie organic carbon) to the culture includes the ability to initially activate the auxostat system and initiate the supply of acetic acid to control the pH level. In some modalities, the acetic acid / pH auxostat system can be initially activated by the photosynthetic activity of microorganisms by increasing the pH of the culture. In some embodiments, sodium acetate, sodium hydroxide, or potassium hydroxide can be added to the initial culture medium to increase the concentration of residual acetic acid and automatically activate the acetic acid / pH auxostat system before photosynthetic activity. by microorganisms. In some embodiments, 0.05-10 g / L sodium acetate can be initially added to the culture medium. In additional modalities, 0.1-6 g / L of sodium acetate can be initially added to the culture medium to help with the transition from phototrophic to mixotrophic conditions. In some embodiments, the concentration of sodium acetate may be above 1.6 g / L in order to inhibit the growth of contaminating microorganisms. (for example, bacteria, fungi). In some embodiments, the concentration of sodium acetate can be supplied by at least the first day of microorganism growth. In some embodiments, sodium acetate may be supplied for the first 1-5 days of microorganism growth and preferably the first two days of microorganism growth.
[00106] [00106] In an alternative modality, sodium acetate can be added to the nutrient formulation of the culture medium to ensure that the initial sodium acetate concentration is present. The culture medium with the nutrient formulation comprising sodium acetate can also be added continuously to the culture as the harvest takes place. In another modality, the source of organic carbon can be added at low levels to adjust the water used to refill the crop and the water used to wash the system as an alternative to a system that doses the crop with a source of organic carbon.
[00107] [00107] As the microorganism culture reaches a desired concentration or maturity, at least part of the microorganism culture can be harvested for further processing. Microorganisms can be harvested by any method known in the art such as, but not limited to, flotation of dissolved gas, foam fractionation, centrifugation, filtration, sedimentation
[00108] [00108] In other modalities, an ammonia auxostat or other means of pH change can also be used. In other modalities, the addition of organic carbon can be balanced with carbon dioxide to rotate organic matter within the culture and allow the contaminating bacteria to be controlled or kept under control without dominating a culture (as defined by more than 50% of living cells in the culture that comprise the contaminating bacteria). In other modalities, manipulating the supply of carbon source (for example, acetic acid or CO> z) may allow control of the pH level, but changes in the pH level may be intentionally increased to maintain the pH level. balance between the taming of microalgae or cyanobacteria on contaminating bacteria in the culture (for example, changes in the pH level from 7.5 to
[00109] [00109] The use of an organic carbon source in the culture medium introduces a higher risk of bacterial contamination of the microorganism culture than in a phototrophic culture medium without an organic carbon source. With some species of bacteria being able to grow faster than microalgae or cyanobacteria, the bacteria can reach the culture resources of microalgae or cyanobacteria and the microalgae or cyanobacteria themselves. In this way, the ability to control bacterial contamination is a factor that contributes to the efficiency of a mixotrophic culture. It has been found that an organic acid such as acetic acid inhibits bacterial growth under certain conditions, which can be associated with denaturation of the enzyme responsible for the synthesis of methionine (o-succinyltransferase). It was found that bacterial proliferation is faster in a culture medium containing glucose than in a culture medium containing acetic acid, demonstrating the benefit of selecting acetic acid as the source of organic carbon. In addition, it was found that acetic acid still decreases bacterial resistance to oxidative stress (that is, ozone, hydrogen peroxide) more than was observed with cultures fed with glucose.
[00110] [00110] In some modalities, keeping the pH above 7.5e € and the temperature below 30ºC in a defined minimum mineral medium specific for a genus of microalgae or cyanobacteria are the conditions that have been shown to be unfavorable conditions for the propolis - damaging contaminating organisms such as bacteria. In some modalities, the pH level can be below 5 and the temperature between 30ºC to 50ºC. Through the contamination control methods described in this document, including the use of the acetic acid / pH auxostat system to deliver acetic acid to the non-axenic culture, bacterial cell counts for culture contamination can be kept below 25% of the total, below 20% of the total cells, below 10% of the total cells, and preferably below 5% of the total cells of the culture (<0.05% of total biomass) through of a cultivation method that can comprise a combination of residual acetic acid in the culture medium, the maintenance of a constant pH level, or the use of an oxidizing agent. A heat exchanger that maintains a constant temperature, such as cooling or heating coils, also improves control over the contaminating bacteria population when used in combination with other contamination control methods, such as but not limited to the acetic acid / pH and oxidizing agents.
[00111] [00111] Additional methods of controlling bacteria and contaminating organisms in a mixotrophic culture may comprise the application of hydrogen peroxide, ozone, antibiotics, ultraviolet (UV) radiation / sterilization or other oxidizing agents (eg chlorine , chlorite, hypochlorite, nitric acid, chromium, permanganate, silver oxide, bromine). Methods of controlling contamination in the mixotrophic culture can be used individually or in combination. Adding hydrogen peroxide to a culture medium that includes contaminating bacteria has been shown to inhibit the growth of contaminating bacteria in applications between 2.5 and 30 mM H, O>. Bacteria that grow in mixotrophic culture media including acetic acid have been shown to be more susceptible to oxidative stress than in mixotrophic culture media which comprise glycoside. Ozone can be applied to a crop using any known gas injection method such as, but not limited to, spraying or venturi injection. Ozone treatments can be applied to the microorganism culture in concentrations of 0.01-2.0 mg / L, and preferably in concentrations of 0.01-0.50 mg / L. Antibiotic treatments may include, but are not limited to, penicillin (100-500 mg / L), tetracycline (10-100 mg / L), chloramphenicol (1-20 mg / L), and aureomycin (1-20 mg / L).
[00112] [00112] The use of electrocoagulation for periodic concentration and purification of a culture provides an example for a method that comprises the daily and continuous harvesting of a culture to contribute to the control of contamination through the regular concentration and removal of microalgae or cyanobacteria from the medium contaminated, and replacing the culture in a new and treated medium. A method of harvesting and purifying a crop to control contamination can also be carried out using known methods of harvesting or separating microalgae from a crop such as, but not limited to, foam fractionation, dissolved gas flotation, centrifugation, and flocculation. When a harvest and purification method is used, the addition of the organic carbon source may need to be adjusted accordingly. Harvesting and purifying can promote the health of a population of microalgae or cyanobacteria and thus their resistance to contamination. In some modalities, the separate culture medium can be processed to convert the disintegration of organic matter (mineralization) into a carbon source available to mixotrophic microorganisms.
[00113] [00113] In an alternative modality, sonication can be used to control contamination in a mixotrophic culture. The crop can be subjected to sonic energy at various intensities to reduce contamination. Sonication can reduce contamination within the culture by creating gas bubbles the same size as the gas vacuoles within the contaminating bacteria. As the gas bubbles explode, the same bubbles of the same size in the bacteria will resonate and explode in the same way. Sonication can also reduce contamination within the culture by breaking the cell walls of contaminating bacteria, which are weaker than the cell walls of microalgae, cyanobacteria or diatoms. In some embodiments, sonic energy can be provided at about 40-99% intensity from a 30 kHz diffuser. In some
[00114] [00114] In an alternative modality, the addition of plant extracts to the culture can control the contaminating bacteria by decreasing the growth of the bacterium to allow microalgae or cyanobacteria to competitively overcome the contaminating bacteria within the culture. In some embodiments, cultures with contaminating bacteria may have reduced populations with 1, 2, or 3 or more in the reduction of records in with a previously described medium. DISSOLVED OXYGEN LEVELS
[00115] [00115] Dissolved oxygen (DO) levels have been shown to be a limiting nutrient for adequate myxotrophic growth. Thus, the ability to transfer gases, such as oxygen, to the culture at a high rate is a factor that contributes to the efficiency of a mixotrophic culture. In a stable state, the rate of oxygen transfer is equal to the rate of oxygen consumption by the cells of micro-algae or cyanobacteria. The transfer of the gas-liquid interfacial mass can be calculated using the following formula:
[00116] [00116] therefore, kva = oxygen utilization rate / (concentration gradient);
[00117] [00117] kKkéo mass transfer coefficient for the transfer of oxygen in the liquid medium;
[00118] [00118] aerial surface area of gas by volume of liquid;
[00119] [00119] ka is a metric gas-liquid interfacial mass transfer system measured in Hz or (s), where greater volumes of k, a are equivalent to better mass transfer and greater reactor performance as determined by the rate volumetric growth of microalgae.
[00120] [00120] By increasing the ka in a container the limitations on the growth of the microorganism due to insufficient oxygen supply can be overcome. In modalities, the culture of microalgae or cyanobacteria with acetic acid as the carbon source, the ka can vary from 2.00 x 10º s ”to 2.10 x10º s'. In some modalities, the ka can be at least 2.40 x 10º sº. Methods to increase ka in a container include decreasing the size of the gas bubbles and increasing the resistance time, and can be achieved by: increasing the shear stress of the mechanical mixture, decreasing the size of the injection points and / or increase the number of injection points to dissolve more gas in the microorganism culture solution, or increase the gas pressure. The increase in ka can be achieved through any known system for injection or microflow of gas or gas micro-bubbles in a liquid such as, but not limited to, a gas injector, a porous diffuser, a micropore diffuser , a gas permeable membrane, a microbubble generator, a venturi injection device, and a fluidic microbubble oscillator. An increase in gas pressure can be achieved by any known method such as, but not limited to, increasing the height of the liquid column. Oxygen transfer can also be improved by breaking the bubbles with mechanical shear and increasing the residence time of the bubbles through horizontal, vertical, or angular mixing. Increasing the photosynthetic contribution to myxotrophy will further improve oxygen transfer through a chemical transfer pathway.
[00121] [00121] In some modalities, the supply of acetic acid to the mixotrophic culture can be controlled by stabilizing the pH, resulting in the next reagents for the microorganism culture process with oxygen followed by nitrates and other nutrients. In some modalities, nitrate, as well as other nutrients, may be on an automatic feeding regime based on feedback control controls that use sensors in the micro-algae culture. In an alternative modality, nutrients, organic carbon, or air can be fed using feedback from a nitrate sensor, electrical conductivity readings in clean water systems, or dissolved oxygen sensor. In addition, the relationship between oxygen limitation and mechanical design allows changes in the mechanical design to change the culture's dissolved oxygen conditions accordingly. The oxygen demand based on stoichiometry is calculated in Example 11. In some embodiments, the culture can function at a much higher ka than the stoichiometric minimum (calculated in Example 11 as the ratio of utilization rate to oxygen for equilibrium concentration (C *)) to ensure that the reaction is metabolically limited and not limited in mass transfer.
[00122] [00122] Various methods known in the art to improve culture k a and dissolved oxygen conditions can be used with a myxotrophic microorganism process. The methods known in the art can be categorized into mechanical methods and chemical methods. In some modalities, the method of enhancing the culture ka and oxygen conditions may be a mechanical method or combination of mechanical methods. The mechanical methods may include, but are not limited to, the addition of oxygen rich air, venturi injection, eductors, weirs, and lowering the temperature of the culture. In some embodiments, the method for improving crop ka and oxygen conditions can be a chemical method, or a combination of chemical methods. Chemical methods may include the addition of high-surface bubbles with culture-compatible products such as ozone, nano-sized hydrocarbon bubbles, vegetable oil, mineral oil and nano-sized metallic oxygen vehicles. Any of the above methods can be used individually or in combination to increase k, culture and oxygen conditions, including combinations of mechanical and chemical methods. Of these methods, mechanical methods can be the least invasive to the growth of the culture and potentially modular to implement.
[00123] [00123] In addition, the dissolved oxygen concentration can also be monitored to manage the contaminating bacterial population. Contaminating bacteria that grow aerobically can use excess oxygen in the culture; in this way, if the oxygen available to the contaminating bacteria is limited, then the growth of the contaminating bacteria can be limited. EXAMPLE 1
[00124] [00124] —Chlorella sp. SNL 333 (a local strain isolated by Arizona State University and initially reported as Chlorella sp. At the time of the test; additional analysis was performed by Dr. Barbara Melkonian at the University of Cologne, Zúlpicher Strasse 47 b, 50674 Kôln, Ger- many, confirming that the microalgae strain shares characteristics
[00125] [00125] The acetic acid treatment system comprised a solenoid, a peristaltic pump, and a pH controller set to 7.5 to control the acetic acid fed by the pump into the reactor from the acetic acid supply tank. The acetic acid feed was diluted between a concentration of 10% and 50% with water. A probe was attached to the feed tube to ensure that the pumping was safe and within a pH fluctuation control range. Samples were taken every 24 s, with dry weight and triple ash free dry weight taken once a day. The contamination photos were taken daily. Every 2-3 days a single sample of non-destructive dry weight (200 ml centrifugation) for lyophilization, fatty acid analyzes were taken. The centrifugation supernatant was frozen for analysis of acetic acid by gas chromatography. Acetic acid consumption was measured by monitoring the level in the acetic acid feed tank.
[00126] [00126] When referring to FIGURES 1-2 and Table 1, the results showed that the mixotrophic culture was more productive than the standard photoautotrophic culture (autotrophy) in relation to the dry cell weight (g / L). Table 1 lists the volumetric and sand yields for a mixotrophic and photoautotrophic culture of Chlorella Sp. SNL 333. The results also showed that the mixotrophic culture had a higher lipid content (% dry weight) than than the photoautotrophic culture. For the values listed in Table 1, the (lit) surface for the 2X2 feet reactor volume ratio is 19 L / m . The sandy productivity from the flat panel reactor experiment was calculated by multiplying the volumetric productivity with the volume (19 L) that can be contained in 1 m . The grams of sand productivity extrapolated per square meter per day (g / m D) assumed 300 L / m in mixotrophy. In addition, myxotrophy,
[00127] [00127] When referring to FIGURES 344, the results showed that the uptake of NaNO; it was higher in the mixotrophic culture than in the photoautotrophic culture (autotrophy). Referring to FIG. 5, the results showed that the residual acetic acid concentrations were relatively low (8 times lower than that of table vinegar) in the mixotrophic culture when using the acetic acid / pH auxostat system with a pH level adjusted to 7.5, and would imply a low risk of environmental problems (spills, emissions of volatile organic carbon), risks at work or loss of substrate. Residual acetic acid increased as nitrates and other nutrients was consumed. EXAMPLE 2
[00128] [00128] —Chlorella sp. SNL 333 grew under non-axenic mixotrophic conditions using an acetic acid feed system
[00129] [00129] When referring to FIG. 6 and Table 2, the results showed mixotrophic cultures doing better than photoautotrophic cultures (autotrophy) in relation to dry cell weight (g / L), and that the dry cell weight of mixotrophic culture was less affected by the reduction - tion in exposure to light than the photoautotrophic culture. Table 2 lists the volumetric and sand productivity for the mixotrophic and photoautotrophic cultures of Chlorella sp. SNL 333 grown in a 24 h and 14 h photoperiod. For the values in Table 2, the (illuminated) surface for the volume ratio of the 2x2 feet reactor is 19 L / m . The beach productivity from the flat panel experiment was calculated by multiplying the volumetric productivity with the volume (19 L) that can be contained in 1 m . Extrapolated sand productivity (g / m D) assumed 300 L / m in mixotrophy. In addition, myxotrophy, instead of phototrophy, was driving the growth of Chlorella based on the results. TABLE 2 Productivity Range Growth Phase (2d) Total Batch (8 d) BR Volumetric Productivities (g / L d) Treatment - 24h Photoperiod 1.06 0.70 Photoautotrophy 14h 0.66 0.47 24h 2.74 1.21 Mixotrophy 14h 2.76 1.30 Real Area Productivities (g / m2 d) 24h 20.1 13.3 Photoautotrophy 14h 12.5 8.9 24h 521 23.0 Mixotrophy 14h 46.7 24.7 Extrapolated sand productivity (g / m2 d) 24h 20.1 13.3 Photoautotrophy 14h 12.5 8.9 24h 822 363 Mixotrophy 14h 828 390
[00130] [00130] When referring to FIG. 7, the results showed that the uptake of NaNO; it was affected more by the reduction in the period of exposure to light for the photoautotrophic culture (autotrophy) than for the mixotrophic culture. Referring to FIG. 8, the results showed that the uptake of acetic acid in myxotrophic cultures was lower for exposure to light for 14 hours than exposure to light for 24 hours. Referring to FIG. 9, the results also showed that the dissolved oxygen level was under a possible saturation of the critical point (20%), suggesting that the poor transfer of oxygen gas in the 2x2 ft flat panel photioreactor was more crucial in limit the growth of myxotrophic cultures than light energy.
[00131] [00131] When referring to Table 3, the results showed that the levels of bacteria in the mixotrophic culture were kept low despite the non-axenic conditions and the introduction of an organic carbon source. Table 3 lists the incidence of bacterial populations in a culture of Chlorella sp. SNL 333 operated under a mixotropic or photoautotrophic regimen. For the values listed in Table 3, algae cells were identified by chlorophyll autofluorescence and bacterial cells were identified by the green backlight dye. The values in Table 3 also assumed a Chlorella weight of 27 x 107 cell and bacterial cell weight of 0.2 x 10 grcell. TABLE 3 Bacterial population% of cell counts% of total biomass * 1 total * 2 Photoperido treatment | 24h 4.9 0.04 Mixotrophy 14h 39 0.03 Photoautotrophy 24h 18 oo! 14h 1.6 0.01 EXAMPLE 3
[00132] [00132] —Chlorella sp. SNL 333 grew under non-axenic mixotrophic conditions using an acetic acid / pH auxostat feeding system in non-axenic conditions for 4 days. The test was performed with the same equipment and the procedure as previously described in Example 2, with the exception of the period of exposure to light (photoperiod) and acetic acid. Tests one and two were performed with 24 h exposure to light and tests three and four were performed with O h exposure (heterotrophic). Acetic acid was fed with 200 g / L, and 1 g / L of the initial sodium acetate for the culture densities of 0.5 to 5-6 g / L; and the 10 g / L acetic acid feed at culture densities above 5-6 g / L. Acetic acid was fed to the auxostat in response to the pH change. The reactor was fitted with a discharge tube to allow the culture volume exceeding the operating volume of the 2X2 bioreactors (14 L) to be drained (harvested) in 4 L flasks for measurement and analysis.
[00133] [00133] When referring to FIG. 10, the results showed that Chlorella cultures fed with acetic acid grew better on exposure to 24 h light than on exposure to O h light. It has also been found that photosynthetic activity helps to improve dissolved oxygen values from 4.9 mg / L for close heterotrophic treatment (exposure to O h light with minimal light input) to 6.5 mg / L for treatment myxotrophic (exposure to light for 24 h). Referring to FIG. 11, the results showed that the consumption of acetic acid for myxotrophic treatment (exposure to 24 h light) was higher than in heterotrophic treatment (exposure to O h light). Referring to FIG. 12, the results showed that the concentration of NaNO; residual was lower for myxotrophic culture (exposure to 24h light) than for heterotrophic culture (exposure to Oh light) or photoautotrophic cultures (autotrophy). EXAMPLE 4
[00134] [00134] —Chlorella sp. SNL 333 grew under non-axenic myxotrophic conditions using a pH acetic acid / ausostat feeding system for 10 days. The test was carried out with two raceway water tank photobioreactors made of PVC, with a cultivable area of 5.6 m and a 10 cm light path (ie, depth of culture). Both photobioreactors contained mixotrophic cultures, aerated with two 50 cm porous diffusers at 10 liters per minute (LPM), and were placed on the outside. The first photobioreactor (Reactor 1) was mixed hydraulically (pump). The second photobioreactor (Reactor 2) was mixed with a paddle wheel. Chlorella sp. SNL 333 was inoculated at a density of 0.3 g / L in Reactors 1 and 2. Chlorella was adapted to the external conditions under pH / CO control, until a density of 0.3-0.4 g / L was achieved for experimental tests. Additions of acetic acid occurred when using the drip system previously described in Example
[00135] [00135] The cultures were harvested as necessary when the density of the culture reached 1.5 g / L. The starting medium was a BG-11 medium with sodium acetate (1 g / L) supplemented in the starting medium. Natural sunlight was applied to the crop, with an average photoperiod in May 2012 for Gilbert, AZ being around 14.5 h. The temperature was controlled by the cooling coils to 28 C. The pH controller of the pH auxostat system, as previously described, was set at 7.5. The temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen were measured continuously. The acetic acid consumption was monitored by the daily acetic acid feed level. Dry weights were taken three times (n = 3) daily and nitrate levels were taken daily. Spin down to measure residual acetate (200 ml) and biomass was performed every two days.
[00136] [00136] The observation of contamination (400X, 1000X micrograph of oil immersion phase contrast and cell cytometry with bacterial death) was performed every 2 days, including a measurement of bacterial contamination by flow cytometry. For the measurement of bacterial contamination, for each 1 ml sample, 1 ul of BacLight'M Green bacterial strain (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA) as added, and the samples were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 to 60 minutes . After incubation, the samples were analyzed in a BD FACSAria "" (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and the population of bacteria and algae were behaved based on BacLight fluorescence "" and chlorophyll autofluorescence.
[00137] [00137] When referring to FIG. 13, did the results show a maximum daily productivity of 97 g / m d (0.97 g / L d) for Reactor 1 (ie, SP3) and 127 gum d (1.27 g / L d) for Reactor 2 (ie SP4). Was the average daily productivity (for more than 9 days) 56 g / m d (0.56 g / L d) for Reactor 1 and 76 g / m d (0.76 g / L d) for Reactor 2. The productivity of mixotrophic cultures in external reactors was approximately six times the productivity of photoautotrophic cultures previously obtained in external reactors. Referring to FIGS. 14-16, the results showed Reactor 1, which had the lowest productivity than Reactor 2 (R2), also had the lowest level of dissolved oxygen, which corresponds to the previous finding that refers to low levels of dissolved oxygen with limitation on growth. When referring to FIG. 17, the results showed that the levels of bacteria were below 5% of the total cell counts (<0.05% of total biomass) on the outside, non-axenic mixotrophic conditions where the temperature was kept below 30 ºC .
[00138] [00138] —Chlorella sp. SNL 333 (grew in a mixotrophic manner under non-axenic conditions in external raceway water reservoir photobioreactors using an acetic acid / pH aid system for 10 days before being transferred to flat panel photobioretors for growth The external reactors were operated as described above in Example 4. The flat panel photobioreactors were inoculated with a Chlorella culture from the external reactors at a density of 0.5 g / L, and operated at an average temperature of 25 ºC, pH of 7.5 controlled by CO ', aeration of 10 LPM, vibrations of CO, at 2 LPM, exposure to light (photoperiod) of 14 ha from the FTS-HO 8 lamp panels (one lamp = 259.6 umol / m s) on each side of the photobioreactor. Data collected once a day included: optical density at 750 and 680 nm and pH. Dry weight measurements, nitrate measurements, and chlorophyll analyzes were performed at the beginning, middle and end of the test. Referring to FIG. 18, the results showed that the inoculants that grew in a mixotrophic manner from external reactors share typical photoautotrophic growth rates (autotrophic) after transferring to flat panel photobioreactors for photoautotrophic growth, and that the trophic conversion was instantaneous.
[00139] [00139] —Chlorella sp. SNL 333 grew in a mixotrophic manner under non-axenic conditions using an acetic acid / pH aid system and the initial addition of sodium acetate to the culture medium. The equipment and procedure as previously described in Example 2 were used to grow Chlorella in a myxotrophic manner with a 14 h exposure to light (photoperiod). The first and fourth tests received 2 g / L of sodium acetate initially, and the second and third tests did not receive sodium acetate initially. Acetic acid was fed at 200 g / L. Dry weight, ash-free dry weight, dissolved oxygen, acetic acid, bacterial contamination, and nitrates were monitored as described in previous experiments. When referring to FIGURES 19-20, the results showed that the residual acetic acid reflects the buffer requirement of the culture medium, which is determined by the consumption of mineral salts (nutrients), the consumption of CO, by photosynthetic processes , as well as the excretion of organic acids by the cell. Thus, the system is not purely an auxostat (constant concentration), but the concentration varies by +0.5 g of acetic acid / L within the batch. The results also showed that the initial sodium acetate ensured the presence of acetate at all times and a successful activation of the pH control without taking into account the photosynthetic process.
[00140] [00140] —Chlorella sp. SNL 333 was grown in open water reservoir reactors, under non-axenic conditions using an acetic acid / pH auxostat system. The R1 equipment and the procedure as previously described in Example 4 was used with the exception that sodium acetate was not initially added to the culture medium. The results showed a failure in the activation of the acetic acid / pH auxostat system and the productivities equivalent to those obtained in the photoautotrophic system.
[00141] [00141] Hydrogen peroxide was applied to an E. coli culture to determine the inhibitory effects on the bacteria. 200 ml of bacteria inoculum from a bacteria-contaminated photobioreactor was added to 200 ml of BG-11 culture medium. The solution was divided in half, with the first solution receiving 6.84 g of glucose and the second solution receiving 5 g of sodium acetate. The pH and optical density of both solutions were taken. The two solutions were divided into three groups of three separate volumes of 100 ml, for a control treatment of 10 mM H2O, and 20 mM H2O ,. Each volume contained 2,092 g of MOPS buffer (Sigma Chemical St. Louis, MO), and then placed in an incubator adjusted to 27 ºC, 96 rpm, and 100 umol / m LED light. The volumes were incubated overnight, then brought to a pH of 7.5 using 10 M NaOH and the optical density was measured. The 10 mM H7O, and 20 mM H, O treatments were then added and incubated for 24 h. The optical density and pH were then measured, and methionine was added to a volume for each treatment. Optical density and pH were measured again on the third day and on the sixth day before analysis under a microscope on the sixth day. The results showed that the addition of H, O, had little effect on the pH of the culture. Referring to FIG. 21, the results also showed that the addition of H, O, negatively affected the growth of bacterial cultures in both glucose and acetate media, with the treatment of 20 mM HO, having a greater effect than the treatment of 10 mM H2O ,. EXAMPLE 9
[00142] [00142] The contaminating bacteria were isolated from the microalgae cultures and identified as Escherichia coli. Different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide were applied to E. coli cultures to determine the inhibitory effects on bacteria using the same equipment and procedures as those used in Example 8. Cultures of bacteria in glucose and sodium acetate were treated with O mM H2O, (control), 1 MM H2O>, 2.5 mM H2O ,, and 5 MM H2O ,. Referring to FIG. 22, the results showed that as the HO concentration increased, the inhibitory effect on the growth of bacteria increased. The results also showed that the growth of the bacterial culture would eventually recover from one treatment at a time, indicating that continued treatment would be necessary to control the bacterial population. Due to the recovery of bacteria, periodic dosing would help to control the bacterial population. For cultures containing glucose: a 2.5 mM H, O treatment must be dosed every 2 days, or every 6 days if a 5 mM H2O treatment is used ». For cultures containing sodium acetate, a 2.5 mM H, O treatment should be dosed every 3 days, suggesting that the higher sensitivity of acetate-fed bacteria to oxidative stress than algae fed on glucose. EXAMPLE 10
[00143] [00143] —Chlorella sp. SNL333 grew in a mixotrophic system in the raceway-type water tank systems described above in Example 4. Was the raceway-type photobioreactor area 5.6 m with an operating volume of 568 L at a depth of 15 cm. One unit was mixed with a pump (Reactor 1), and the other through a paddle wheel (Reactor 2). Air was released to the paddle wheel system through a porous stone. The air was released to the pumped reactor through a venturi injection system. Eductors were used in the pumped reactor to increase the speed of the water and increase the transfer of oxygen from the liquid medium. The growth rate is proportional to the amount of oxygen available. Would the oxygen required for the estimated productivity of 20 - 200 g / m2 d be approximately 34 - 100 g / m d. Reactor1 and Reactor 2 were inoculated with 0.48 g / L Chlorella. Sodium acetate was added to the culture medium of the starting culture on day 0 at a concentration of
[00144] [00144] During the test the residual nitrate in both systems reached 0 a few days until the test. Nitrate levels were adjusted until the end of the test to maintain residual nitrate in the system (400 mg / L). The harvests took place daily throughout the tests. The harvest consisted of 50% of the culture volume daily, with an 80% harvest taking place on day 7. The total test lasted 12 days for Reactor 1 and 10 days for Reactor 2.
[00145] [00145] When referring to FIG. 23, the results showed that the highest concentration of biomass reached in Reactor 1 was 1.47 g / L (120 h) and in Reactor 2 it was 1.34 g / L (120 h). The biomass concentration is shown with ash-free dry weight (AFDW) in g / L. The system was harvested when concentrations reached 1.0 g / L or more. The harvests consisted of 50% of the total culture volume per day, with an 80% harvest taking place on day 8 for both systems.
[00146] [00146] When referring to FIG. 24, the results showed that the yield in g / m d for the mixotrophic systems of the raceway in the
[00147] [00147] Aos refer to FIG. 25, the results of the volumetric growth rate of Reactor 1 and Reactor 2 are shown. The average volumetric productivity in Reactor 1 was 1 g / L d for the 12-day test and 0.66 g / L d for the first 10 days of the test. The maximum volumetric productivity achieved in Reactor 1 during the test was 0.92 g / L d. The average volumetric productivity in Reactor 2 was 0.49 g / L d for the 10-day test and 0.50 g / L d for the first 8 days of the test. The maximum volumetric productivity achieved in Reactor 2 during the test was 0.81 g / L d.
[00148] [00148] AFIG.26 shows the performance of the results and the consumption of acetic acid during the tests. Reactor 1 consumed on average
[00149] [00149] When referring to FIG. 28, the percentage of bacteria in Chlorella in myxotrophic cultures was quantified when using the
[00150] [00150] The oxygen demand for a mixotrophic microalgae culture was calculated for the external open raceway water tank reactors described in Example 4. The growth rate calculated from Example 10 was measured as 0.6 g / L d on average over 9 days of continuous operation. Approximately 33% of acetic acid by mass is converted into biomass which is equivalent to 3.33 g of acetic acid / g of biomass produced. The theoretical stoichiometric consumption of oxygen to consume acetic acid is as follows: CH3; COOH + 20.7 -> 2CO, + 2H, 0
[00151] [00151] 1 mol of acetic acid requires 1.5 mol of oxygen or 60 g of acetic acid requires 64 g of O, or 1.07 g of O2 / g acetic acid.
[00152] [00152] Alternative intermediates, other than CO, are possible for conversion to biomass and not explicitly noted in this document. Carbon sources other than acetic acid, such as, but not limited to, glucose, are also possible in a mixotrophic culture. The calculated oxygen consumption rate is as follows: (0.6 g of biomass / L dx 3.33 g of acetic acid / g of biomass x 1.07 g O7 / g of acetic acid) = 2.14 g O7 / L d, which calculates a consumption rate of 1.48 ppm Oz / min.
[00153] [00153] The oxygen concentration in equilibrium at 25 ºC is 8.5 PPpm, therefore the ka calculated from the experiment described in Example 9 is 0.17 min or 2.90 x 10º s. EXAMPLE 12
[00154] [00154] An additional experiment was conducted on a small sample removed from open external reactors as described in Example 4. The culture in the open water reservoir was in equilibrium at a level of dissolved oxygen below saturation, suggesting that the oxygen consumed equal to the oxygen transferred. Two tests
[00155] [00155] From FIG. 29, the O consumption rate, was shown to be the slope of the curve at 0.54 ppm / min for Reactor 1 and 0.57 Ppm / min for the Reactor 2 sample. The initial concentration was 5 Ppm O, and so the concentration gradient for the test would be
[00156] [00156] A test as described in Example 12 was performed on a different day from Reactor 1 and the results are shown in FIG. 30. The graph in FIG. 30 outlines the rate of oxygen consumption as measured in Reactor 1 during the growth period with an average volumetric growth rate of 0.6 g / L d or 100 g / m d for the 15 cm deep reactor. The rate of oxygen consumption in the sample was 0.5413 ppm / min. The initial concentration was 4.8 ppm, and so the concentration gradient for the test would be 8.5-4.8- 3.7 ppm. The k a in this case for Reactor 1 would be 0.107 min ”or 2.44 x 10º s'. The average ka for the experiment was 2.7 x 10 . The results for the ka calculations are summarized in Table
[00157] [00157] In a prophylactic example, can the sandy growth rate of microalgae or cyanobacteria biomass for the mixotrophic reaction vary from 100 to 10,000 g / m d, with a more likely range of 100 to 4,000 g / m d. The rate of volumetric growth can vary from 0.6 g / L d to 600 g / L d, with a more likely range from 0.6 to 6 g / L d. The prophylactic microorganism growth reactors can be closed or opened and operate inside or outside. The internal reactors can be operated with external light around the reactor or a light tube or another that can insert light into the volume of a microalgae growth reactor.
[00158] [00158] The reaction of acetic acid with oxygen and microalgae is volumetric in nature and limited by interfacial mass transfer. As described in Example 2, the internal volumetric growth rate was 2.7 g / L d. This experiment was limited by mass transfer of oxygen into the liquid as seen by the low value of dissolved oxygen. For Example 2, oxygen was fed as air through a simple spray bottle made from a tube with spatially distributed nozzles approximately 0.079375 cm (1.32 inches) in diameter spaced every 1,905 cm ( 0.75 inches) and spread between two rows (approximately 32 holes in total).
[00159] [00159] With smaller air injection points, an increased number of injection points, and / or an increase in the rupture of larger bubbles, more oxygen can be dissolved in the microalgae culture solution. With more oxygen dissolved in the microorganism culture solution, a higher volumetric myxotrophic growth rate of microalgae or cyanobacteria can be achieved. With an air injection diameter of less than 0.1 mm and more preferably between 1x10 ”m and 1x10 ° m, the corresponding volumetric growth rate will exceed 2.7 g / L d and the range from 0.6 g / L d to 600 g / L d.
[00160] [00160] In addition, increased oxygen solubility or uptake within the liquid reaction medium can also be achieved with an increase in pressure. One means to increase the pressure is the use of the height of the liquid column. In a prophylactic example, a reactor ranging from 0.2 m to 40 m high can be used, with a preferred range of 0.2 m to 10 m high. This reactor can be tubular in nature and have air, oxygen-enhanced air from a pressure impulse absorption generator (PSA) or other unitary operation, such as but not limited to, membrane separation, which releases a gas with an oxygen composition ranging from 25% to about 98%, or high purity oxygen fed into or near the bottom of the reaction vessel. Oxygen levels can be controlled to improve the growth of microalgae or cyanobacteria and to control contaminating organisms. A creation of microalgae or cyanobacteria of the invention can be comprised of tubular reactors from 0.2 m to 40 m high with air fed to the bottom and optionally including a spatially distributed center or tube of light. The light tube can preferably be made of LEDs of specific wavelength comprised of any wavelength that can improve the growth and / or formation of photovigilance product, and can alternatively be arranged around the outside of the pipe. The diameter of the tube can vary from 0.1 m to 10 m. The creation
[00161] [00161] In an alternative embodiment, a column of culture medium or water may be adjacent to a reactor (for example, tubular, flat panel or substantially planar reactor), according to which the more dissolved oxygen can be added to the medium in the column. - both before adding to the reactor of the invention or cyclized in and from the reactor to increase the amount of dissolved oxygen to aid the reaction.
[00162] [00162] In an alternative embodiment, a substantially planar and substantially tubular reactor are used together, where a first stage tubular reactor is used for high growth and a second substantially planar reactor used for the production of lipids or pigments for a microalgae strain that can comprise species from the genera such as: Agmenellum, Amphora, Anaabena, Anacystis, Apistonema, Pleurochyrsis, Arthrospira (Spirulina), Botryococcus, Brachiomonas, Chlamydomonas, Chlorella, Chloroc-cumoth, Cruciplacolith , Coenochloris, Cyanophora, Cyclotella, Dunaliella, Emiliania, Euglena, Extubocellulus, Fragilaria, Galdieria, Goniotrichium, Haematococcus, Halochlorella, Isochyrsis, Leptocylindrus, Micractinium, Melosira, Monodus, Nococis, Nostoc, Nostoc, Nostoc, Nostoc, Nostoc, Nostoc, Noch Odontella, Ochromonas, Ochrosphaera, Pavlova, Picochlorum, Phaeodactylum, Pleurochyrsis, Porphyridium, Poteriochromonas, Prym nesium, Rhodomonas, Scenedesmus, Skeletonema, Spumella, Stauroneis, Stychococcus, Auxenochlorella, Cheatoceros, Neochloris, Ocromonas, Porphiridium, Synechococcus, Synechocystis, Tetraselmis Thrausto-
[00163] [00163] As described by Yue et al., Chemical Engineering Science 62 (2007) 2096-2108, a k, a gas s-liquid of 21 s * for CO, in water has been described in the literature using techniques for intensifying the process. A gas mass transfer factor 10,000 times higher in a liquid is possible than the value calculated from the mixotrophic examples. As the transfer rate of the oxygen mass increases, other reaction phenomena or inherent microalgae conversion rates can become limiting, and with such a 6,000 g / L d (or 10,000 rates higher than those described here ) may not be possible. It is theorized that up to 600 g / L d may be possible to achieve in a continuous mixotrophic culture with the use of improved gas-liquid mass transfer in a culture of microalgae growth.
[00164] [00164] From the experiment described in Example 10, a sand productivity of 101 g / m2 d was measured with a volumetric growth rate of 0.66 g / L d. With 100 times improved mass transfer, which is still below the theoretical possibility of 10,000 times, and with an increase in reactor depth from 15 cm to 150 cm (or a 10-fold increase in reactor volume for the same surface area) shown exposed to the sun) while still maintaining a mixing regime to allow at least some access to light for the entire crop, then the resulting sandy growth would be three orders of magnitude greater than the current reported experiments or even more than 10,000 g / m d. with a lower depth of culture or less optimized gas-liquid mass transfer, then can the rate of sandy productivity from a mixotrophic culture vary from 100 g / m d to 1,000 g / m2 d. EXAMPLE 15
[00165] [00165] An experiment was conducted in a raceway-type water reservoir bioreactor with a total volume of 6600 L, a depth of 15 cm, and a length of approximately 23.4 m (80 feet). Two of the bioreactors were placed inside a greenhouse to limit the entry of dirt and contaminants, as well as to mitigate the effect of climate-induced events. The reactor was inoculated with Chlorella sp. SNL 333 at an initial density of 0.2 g / L. The pH was controlled with acetic acid (20% solution in water) following the procedures described above for the measurement of acetic acid. The reactors were hydraulically mixed and aerated with porous hoses. The system was operated in a semi-continuous manner with 50% of the cultures being harvested daily to maintain cell density between 0.5 and 1.5 g / l dry weight. The cell dry weight of the cultures was measured before and after each harvest. The reactors were operated in duplicates for 6 consecutive days before completely harvesting the cultures. Bacterial counts were kept below 5% of total cell counts during the growing period. Did the system's productivity exceed 100 g / m d showing results comparable to the smaller volume bioreactors described in Example 10. EXAMPLE 16
[00166] [00166] An experiment was conducted to determine the effect on microalgae growing in a mixotrophic form (Chlorella sp. SNL 333) in culture with contaminating bacteria. A UID 400 sonicator from Hy-
[00167] [00167] A mixotrophic bioreactor system comprising a raceway-type water reservoir that provides the part of the bioreactor system receiving at least some light, and a protein skimmer (ie, column apparatus using gas injection for conduct foam fractionation) providing a part of the bioreactor system that received no light, was used to cultivate Chlorella under mixotrophic culture conditions in an aqueous culture medium. The raceway water reservoir maintained a volume of 500 L at an operating depth of 30 cm and was in fluid communication with a protein skimmer with an adjustable operating volume of 408-466 L, resulting in a volume of total bio reactor of 908-966 L. The microorganism culture was circulated by pumps in the raceway-type water reservoir, and left the raceway-type water reservoir through an outlet in fluid communication with the protein skimmer. An injection of air to manipulate the concentration of dissolved oxygen in the culture was performed by the venturi pump of the protein skimmer. The acetic acid was dosed in the microorganism culture at a concentration of 20% by an omega metering pump in the discharge line of the protein skimmer, which returned the microorganism culture to the raceway-type water reservoir. and completed the circulation path of the culture between the protein skimmer and the raceway water reservoir parts of the bioreactor system.
[00168] [00168] The pH level was perceived by Hannah pH probes in the raceway-type water reservoir at the exit of the protein skimmer and at the entrance of the protein skimmer. The Eutech dissolved oxygen probes were mounted at the entrance of the protein skimmer and the discharge tubes to detect the concentration of dissolved oxygen. A redfish temperature probe was placed in the raceway-type water reservoir near the outlet to detect the temperature of the microorganism culture. The illumination of the micro-organism culture was provided by natural light (ie, solar radiation). A low-profile greenhouse cover with a 30% aluminum screen covered the raceway-type water reservoir and blocked at least some sunlight while also exposing the volume of the culture in the raceway-type water reservoir to at least some light solar. A fan mounted on the cover of the greenhouse forced the circulation of air on the other side of the surface of the culture of aqueous microorganisms and the space above the surface of the culture of aqueous microorganisms. The circulation of the culture between the part of the raceway-type water reservoir and the protein skimmer resulted in a 5% liability cycle (ie, the amount of time the microorganism culture was exposed to light on the total circulation time). The pH level was maintained between about 7.5 and about 8.5 during the test run, with the controls set to 7.5.
[00169] [00169] The bioreactor was cleaned and sterilized with chlorine by Heliae's standard procedures before the experiment. The bioreactor was inoculated at an initial concentration of 0.08 g / L. The culture medium was prepared using UV treated water and laboratory BG-11 stocks. The medium was prepared once with reduced nitrates and phosphatod for the external reactors. The medium was sprayed with nitrogen to decrease the concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO) to 3 mg of O, IL (only in the initial inoculation and not soon after). During inoculation, the carboys containing Chlorella seed cultures were opened and the seed was poured directly into the circulating culture medium. It was noted that immediately after inoculation the DO concentration had reached - 9 mg Oz / L. All general samples for nutrients and bacteria were collected as previously described in the other examples.
[00170] [00170] The samples for concentration and nitrate levels were sent to the laboratory daily. The samples were submitted daily to FACs, petrifilm, and microscopy when the associates trained to perform the tests mentioned above were available. The samples were collected from the south bank of the bioreactor system where the sample on the cover was placed. A record book was completed three times daily. The record book had the following fields: Date, Time, pH, Temperature, DO concentration, PAR, ACID refill, Sample taken, unit volume, harvest, Initial, and Notes. To maintain the DO concentration, the air flow within the protein skimmer was increased as the cell concentration of the culture increased. The protein skimmer unit produced wet foam as it ran, and the protein skimmer discharge valve was fully opened to let the dry white foam be constantly skimmed and the volume of the protein skimmer unit decreased from the
[00171] [00171] Chlorella biomass harvesting was performed by pumping a volume of the culture from the raceway-type water reservoir equivalent to a culture of 55% of the volume of the total bioreactor system. The harvest periods are noted in the figures below by the vertical dashed lines. The UV-treated water was then added to replace the harvested culture once as well as the BG-11 (700 ppm nitrate) stocks for the entire reactor volume. The concentration in the culture was maintained between 2-5 g / L for most of the test run with the concentration reaching 7-8 g / L soon in two days.
[00172] [00172] The results for concentration, volumetric growth rate and sandy growth rate are shown over time in FIGURES 32-33 for the test run. The harvest lines dashed in the figures correspond to a 55% harvest (-500L), before the first harvest, the increase in concentration shows a classic algae growth curve (interval - exponential - stationary).
[00173] [00173] FIGURES 34-35 show the concentration correlation (g / L) in volumetric growth rate and sandy growth rate for the test run, and may suggest to the bioreactor system that 3 g / L should be the lower limit when harvesting and operating the reactor. The two points of very high growth occur
[00174] [00174] FIGURES 36-40 show the environmental parameters during the culture excitation of the mixotrophic bioreactor system, including temperature, pH level, dissolved oxygen concentration, lighting (ie, photosynthetic active radiation), and the nitrate concentration. At the temperature shown in the figure, the results show the thermal stability of the culture volume through small changes in temperature on a daily basis.
[00175] [00175] During execution, daily microscopic observations were performed. Observations showed culature following the same progression as most external cultures, increasing in cell density as well as in contamination comprising parts of cells and bacteria. However, the culture of Chlorella in the mixotrophic bioreactor system differed from that of the previous reactor in the warning signs (for example, putrid odor, predators, or bacteria attacking the algae) that predicted a collapse in the culture (ie, dominance contaminating organisms) has not been observed. Acetic acid was used as the source of organic carbon, but without antifoam, antibiotics, ozone, or UV were used in the test run. The mixotrophic bioreactor system was not sealed and was operated in non-axenic conditions. The culture continued to grow for 34 days, with an average 34-day growth rate of 302 gm D. ORGANIC CARBON COMBINATIONS
[00176] [00176] Although mixotrophic cultures can operate using a supply of an organic carbon source, some microorganism cultures may experience a benefit from using a combination of organic carbon sources. In some modalities
[00177] [00177] When the culture of microorganisms under myxotrophic conditions using acetic acid as the main source of organic carbon, the excretion of small amounts of succinic acid in the culture medium may occur due to metabolic excess. The excretion of succinic acid can decrease the alkalinity of the medium and displace the residual acetic acid present in the culture medium. In a modality using a pH auxostat system to measure acetic acid in a Chlorella mixotrophic culture, it was observed that succinic acid was excreted in the culture medium but acetic acid was still supplied and consumed by microorganisms, with residual concentrations above 0.5 g acetate / L.
[00178] [00178] “Because succinic acid is an intermediate of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle that is responsible for metabolizing acetic acid, the accumulation of succinic acid in the culture medium may suggest the use of the organic carbon source in microorganisms due to to some type of metabolic stress or disability. The energy of acetic acid is produced through TCA, which is a non-catalytic cycle. Because TCA is a non-catalytic cycle, the amount of oxaloacetate supplied depends on the starting material and not on how much acetyl-coA enters the cycle. In a culture of microorganisms fed by glucose, oxaloacetate can be produced from pyruvate through pyruvate carboxylase; however, neither a microorganism culture supplied with acetic acid, Pyruvate can be supplied through photosynthesis-glycolysis. The excretion of succinic acid (a TCA intermediate) indicates that photosynthesis may not be able to meet the metabolic demand for oxaloacetate.
[00179] [00179] —It is known in the art that propionic acid can help to recycle oxaloacetate in the culture of dinoflagellate fed by acetate (for example, Crypthecodinium cohnii). It is also known in the art that in fungi, propionic acid enters TCA after conversion to succinyl-coA or via citramalate. Entering TCA after conversion to succinyl-coA or via citramalate can increase the oxaloacetate supply needed to activate TCA, and therefore produce enough energy for growth and biosynthesis. Pyruvate can also be converted to oxaloacetate through the enzyme pyruvate carboxylase that catalyzes the irreversible carboxylation of pyruvate. Applying this knowledge in the context of an acetic acid-fed culture of myxotrophic microorganisms, a method can be created to improve the metabolism of acetic acid in myxotrophic microorganisms.
[00180] [00180] In some embodiments, a small amount of an oxaloacetate promoter can be combined with the acetic acid supplied to the container of a culture of myxotrophic microorganism to help recycle oxaloacetat in TCA, improve growth, improve productivity of biomass and reduce the inhibitory effect of one or more inhibitors on TCA. The oxaloacetate promoter can comprise pyruvate; pyruvate hexose sugar precursors; propionic acid; and propionic acid precursors such as odd-chain fatty acids, valine, isoleucine, threonine, and methionine. In some embodiments, the ratio of acetic acid to oxaloacetate promoter can vary from 10: 0.01 to 10: 2. In some ways, acetic acid may comprise acetic acid and its precursors, such as acetate and acetic anhydride.
[00181] [00181] A species of Chlorella was grown in a mixotrophic bioreactor system comprising a pH auxostat system with 100 g / l of acetic acid and 10 g / l of propionic acid (a proportion of acetic acid: propionic acid 10: 1) in the supply container of the organic carbon source. For the culture vessel, a bubble column reactor with 800 ml of ongoing volume was used. Chlorella was grown in a semi-continuous mode in which 80% of the culture was harvested every two days during myxotrophic growth. Crop yields are shown in FIG. 41 where the direction lines on the dry cell weight chart have a sharp decline. Fresh culture medium (BG-11) was added to the culture in order to replace the lost culture medium with each harvest.
[00182] [00182] Cultures were maintained at 25ºC and constant aeration of 50 air volume / culture volume per minute (VVM). Fluorescent light was provided on one side of the culture vessels at 200 umol of photons / m over a continuous 24-hour photoperiod. The light path in the culture vessels was 4 cm. Bacterial levels were kept below 5% of total cell counts throughout the experiment.
[00183] [00183] Four days after inoculation, and after the first semi-continuous harvest, the culture that receives organic carbon plus the acetic acid promoting treatment: propionic acid (10: 1) began to outperform the culture that receives the treatment with acetic acid only in terms of cell density and biomass productivity. At the end of the experiment, the culture that receives organic carbon plus the promoter treatment of acetic acid: propionic acid (10: 1) showed an increase in productivity of 25% over the culture that receives only acetic acid. As shown in FIG. 41 and Table 6, the mixture of acetic acid and propionic acid performed as well or better than acetic acid on a daily basis. TABLE 6 [| Daily Productivity of Mixotrophic Chlorella (glL dia) | [The amine | met | mer | nes | nes | nes Organic
[00184] [00184] Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to verify, using no more than routine experimentation, several equivalent to the specific modalities described specifically in this document. Such equivalents are intended to fall within the scope of the following claims.

权利要求:
Claims (14)
[1]
1. Method of cultivating Chlorella under non-axenic myxotrophic culture conditions, characterized by the fact that it comprises: (a) inoculating an aqueous culture medium with a culture comprising Chlorella in an open culture vessel; (b) providing light that comprises photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in a photoperiod in the range of 10 to 16 hours of light for each 24-hour day; where the remaining hours of each 24-hour day are in the dark; (c) activate the auxostat system with an initial concentration of sodium acetate in a range of 0.05-10 g / L in the aqueous culture medium to start supplying acetic acid to a concentration in the range of 15-50% (v / v) to the culture comprising Chlorella, in which the pH auxostat system operates with a pH setpoint in the range 6 to 9; (d) maintain a concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO) in the range of 1 to 6 mg Oz / Liter of culture in a culture comprising Chlorella.
[2]
2. Method according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that it also comprises controlling the temperature of the culture with heating and cooling to maintain the temperature within the range of 10-30ºC.
[3]
Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the supplied acetic acid is mixed with a second organic carbon component comprising propionic acid.
[4]
4. Method according to claim 3, characterized in that the acetic acid and the propionic acid mixture still comprises acetic acid and propionic acid in a ratio of acetic acid: propionic acid g / L in the range of 10: 0.01 to 10: 2.
6/12
[5]
5. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the supplied acetic acid is mixed with at least one additional nutrient that comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of nitrates and phosphates.
[6]
6. Method according to claim 5, characterized in that acetic acid and at least one additional nutrient mixture comprises acetic acid and NO; in a proportion of acetic acid: NO; g / L from 10: 0.5 to 10: 2.
[7]
7. Method according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that the density of Chlorella inoculation in the culture comprises 0.3-0.5 g / L.
[8]
8. Method according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that the volume of the culture is at least 500 liters.
[9]
9. Method according to claim 1, the method characterized by the fact that it still comprises the harvesting of Chlorella from the culture on a periodic basis since the density of Chlorella in the culture reaches a limit density of 5 g / L .
[10]
10. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the initial concentration of sodium acetate, sodium hydroxide, or potassium hydroxide is in the range of 1-6 g / L.
[11]
11. Method according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that the initial concentration of sodium acetate, is provided for the first 1-5 days after the culture is inoculated.
[12]
12. Method of cultivating microalgae under non-axenic mixotrophic culture conditions, characterized by the fact that it comprises: (a) inoculating an aqueous culture medium with a culture comprising microalgae in an open culture vessel; (b) providing light that comprises photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in a photoperiod in the range of 10 to 16 hours of light for each 24-hour day; where the remaining hours of each 712 24-hour day are in the dark; (c) providing a source of organic carbon comprising at least one selected from a group consisting of acetic acid and acetate.
[13]
13. Method of cultivating microalgae under non-axenic mixotrophic culture conditions, characterized by the fact that it comprises: (a) inoculating an aqueous culture medium with a culture comprising microalgae in an open culture vessel with a light path defined by a depth culture of at least 15 cm; (b) providing light that comprises photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) to the microalgae through the light path; and (c) providing a source of organic carbon comprising at least one selected from a group consisting of acetic acid and acetate.
[14]
14. Method of cultivating Chlorella in non-axenic mixotrophic culture conditions, characterized by the fact that it comprises: (a) inoculating an aqueous culture medium with a culture comprising Chlorella in an open culture vessel; (b) providing light that comprises photosynthetically active radiation (PAR); (c) activate a pH auxostat system with an initial concentration of sodium acetate in the range of 0.05-10 g / L in the aqueous culture medium to start supplying acetic acid to a concentration in the range of 15 -50% v / v to the culture comprising Chlorella, in which the pH auxostat system operates with a pH setpoint in lane 6a 9; and (d) maintaining a residual acetate concentration of at least 0.5 g / L to create an environment that allows the growth of Chlorella and inhibits the growth of bacteria.
8/12

类似技术:

---

公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题

---

US20190169564A1|2019-06-06|Methods of culturing microorganisms in non-axenic mixotrophic conditions

---

Markou et al.2014|Ammonia inhibition on Arthrospira platensis in relation to the initial biomass density and pH

---

Hu et al.2012|Influence of exogenous CO2 on biomass and lipid accumulation of microalgae Auxenochlorella protothecoides cultivated in concentrated municipal wastewater

---

SundarRajan et al.2019|A review on cleaner production of biofuel feedstock from integrated CO2 sequestration and wastewater treatment system

---

US10533148B2|2020-01-14|Membrane photobioreactor for treating nitrogen and phosphorus that are out of limits in biogas slurry and treating method thereof

---

JP2019141056A|2019-08-29|Large scale mixotrophic production systems

---

US10240120B2|2019-03-26|Balanced mixotrophy method

---

CN106396112B|2019-09-13|A kind of helotisn purifies the composite system of high ammonia nitrogen pig raising biogas slurry in conjunction with biological floating bed technology

---

Barrut et al.2013|Separation efficiency of a vacuum gas lift for microalgae harvesting

---

Daneshvar et al.2021|Insights into upstream processing of microalgae: A review

---

CN104805016B|2018-02-16|One kind utilizes CO2The method for cultivating microalgae

---

CN102851211B|2014-04-16|Formula of nannochloropsis oculata medium and three-stage cultivation method

---

WO2011102593A2|2011-08-25|Photobioreactor for high-density microalgae culturing, and a microalgae culturing and harvesting method using the same

---

Kaloudas et al.2021|Phycoremediation of wastewater by microalgae: a review

---

Nguyen et al.2016|Effect of Tris-|-amino methane on microalgae biomass growth in a photobioreactor

---

JP5899100B2|2016-04-06|Microalgae culture apparatus and microalgae culture method

---

JP2011177047A|2011-09-15|Apparatus for culturing algae

---

CN103184157B|2016-04-20|A kind ofly administer protozoon and realize stablizing the algal culture technique of high yield

---

Sara et al.2012|Treatments of industrials wastewater by using microalgae

---

KR20130006409A|2013-01-16|Photobioreactor and microalgae culture method, and microalgae harvesting method by using that

---

Habibi et al.2018|A novel open raceway pond design for microalgae growth and nutrients removal from treated slaughterhouse wastewater

---

Simosa2016|Factors affecting algal biomass growth and cell wall destruction

---

Shirzadi2021|Growth and nutrient removal capacity of Chlorella vulgaris microalgae in high ammonia media

---

Coimbra2019|Support in microalgae pilot scale production plant

---

KR101469828B1|2014-12-08|Light cultivating and efficient harvesting method for micro algae

同族专利:

---

公开号 | 公开日

---

CA2888493A1|2014-05-15|

---

NZ707059A|2019-05-31|

---

US20190169564A1|2019-06-06|

---

WO2014074769A8|2015-10-01|

---

MX358393B|2018-08-17|

---

WO2014074769A2|2014-05-15|

---

JP2016501518A|2016-01-21|

---

US20150118735A1|2015-04-30|

---

JP6349322B2|2018-06-27|

---

MX2015005622A|2015-08-20|

---

AU2013341123A1|2015-05-07|

---

CN104955937A|2015-09-30|

---

WO2014074769A3|2014-07-17|

---

SG11201503614UA|2015-06-29|

---

EP2917333A2|2015-09-16|

---

US20170145378A1|2017-05-25|

---

AU2013341123B2|2019-09-19|

---

EP2917333B1|2018-01-10|

---

CL2015001054A1|2015-07-03|

引用文献:

---

公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题

---

---

US3444647A|1961-08-08|1969-05-20|Masahito Takahashi|Process of cultivating algae|

---

JPS5011466B1|1970-03-31|1975-05-01|

---

JPS574302B2|1979-10-30|1982-01-25|

---

GB9916537D0|1999-07-14|1999-09-15|Univ Hull|Culture of microorganisms for the synthesis of a polyunsaturated fatty acid|

---

JP3277372B2|1999-11-19|2002-04-22|八重山殖産株式会社|Chlorella culture method|

---

JP2002238545A|2001-02-15|2002-08-27|Kurorera Kogyo Kk|Method for producing chlorella and highly unsaturated fatty acid-containing compound lipid, phospholipid or glycolipid obtained by the production method, food, food additive|

---

US20090304810A1|2005-06-22|2009-12-10|Martin Roy W|Composition and method for enhanced sanitation and oxidation of aqueous systems|

---

JP2010528627A|2007-06-01|2010-08-26|ソラザイム、インク|Oil production by microorganisms|

---

AU2008333824A1|2007-12-04|2009-06-11|The Ohio State University Research Foundation|Molecular approaches for the optimization of biofuel production|

---

US20120011620A1|2007-12-21|2012-01-12|Old Dominion University|Algae Strain for Biodiesel Fuel Production|

---

US20100330653A1|2009-06-24|2010-12-30|Hazlebeck David A|Method for Nutrient Pre-Loading of Microbial Cells|

---

WO2012109375A2|2011-02-08|2012-08-16|Phycal Inc.|Methods for improved mixed trophic algal culture|

---

US8501475B2|2011-12-21|2013-08-06|Heliae Development Llc|Systems and methods for contaminant removal from a microalgae culture|WO2014152599A1|2013-03-15|2014-09-25|Algal Scientific Corporaton|Method and apparatus for unicellular biomass production using ph control system and industrial wastewater with high biochemical oxygen demand levels|

---

JP2016514471A|2013-03-29|2016-05-23|ロケット フレールＲｏｑｕｅｔｔｅ Ｆｒｅｒｅｓ|Protein enhancement method of microalgal biomass|

---

FR3008991B1|2013-07-26|2016-11-04|Roquette Freres|METHOD FOR FERMENTATION OF CHLORELS IN DISCONTINUOUS MODE SUPPLIED BY SEQUENTIAL AND AUTOMATED GLUCOSE FEEDS|

---

KR20160045066A|2013-08-23|2016-04-26|로께뜨프레르|Method for the industrial production of flour from lipid-rich microalga biomass with no off-notes by controlling the oxygen availability|

---

US9386774B2|2014-12-16|2016-07-12|Heliae Development, Llc|Application of mixotrophic chlorella for the improved yield and quality of solanaceae plants|

---

US10357038B2|2014-12-16|2019-07-23|Heliae Development, Llc|Mixotrophic chlorella-based composition, and methods of its preparation and application to plants|

---

EP3649862B1|2014-12-16|2021-10-13|Heliae Development, LLC|Method of enhancing plant growth by administrating a pasteurised chlorella-based composition|

---

US9113607B1|2015-03-25|2015-08-25|Heliae Development, Llc|Methods for treating a culture of Haematococcus pluvialis for contamination using hydrogen peroxide|

---

KR101763367B1|2015-04-09|2017-07-31|한국화학연구원|Hydrolysis method of biomass with enzymes for reducing unfavorable metabolite by the contaminated microorganisms and apparatus therefor|

---

JP2018526024A|2015-07-29|2018-09-13|アルガル リサーチセンター，エルエルシー|Light emitting diode photobioreactor and method of use|

---

FR3041653B1|2015-09-25|2017-12-29|Fermentalg|PROCESS FOR CULTIVATION OF ALGAE, PARTICULARLY UNICELLULAR RED ALGAE |

---

FR3044679A1|2015-12-04|2017-06-09|Fermentalg|PROCESS FOR CULTIVATION OF ALGAE, PARTICULARLY UNICELLULAR RED ALGAE , WITH LACTOSE|

---

EP3407723A1|2016-01-29|2018-12-05|Heliae Development LLC|Dried chlorella based compositions and methods for plant enhancement|

---

CN105684880B|2016-02-16|2020-10-02|珀莱雅化妆品股份有限公司|Culture method capable of improving mycosporine-like amino acid content in umbilical laver|

---

WO2018053211A1|2016-09-15|2018-03-22|Heliae Development Llc|Microalgae-based compositions for benefiting plants and methods of application|

---

WO2017218896A1|2016-06-16|2017-12-21|Heliae Development, Llc|Microalgae-based composition, and methods of its preparation and application to plants|

---

WO2017218996A1|2016-06-17|2017-12-21|Heliae Development, Llc|Systems and methods for continuously culturing microalgae in mixotrophic conditions|

---

WO2018053075A1|2016-09-15|2018-03-22|Heliae Development Llc|Gracilaria based compositions, and methods of application to plants|

---

WO2018053071A1|2016-09-16|2018-03-22|Heliae Development Llc|Methods of treating wastewater with microalgae cultures supplemented with organic carbon|

---

US20190218504A1|2016-09-30|2019-07-18|Heliae Development Llc|Methods of culturing aurantiochytrium using acetate as an organic carbon source|

---

US20200045981A1|2016-10-21|2020-02-13|Heliae Development Llc|Ascophyllum active ingredient compositions for modulating plant characteristrics|

---

WO2018075948A1|2016-10-21|2018-04-26|Heliae Development Llc|Kappaphycus active ingredient compositions for modulating plant characteristics|

---

WO2018112177A1|2016-12-14|2018-06-21|Heliae Development, Llc|Phytohormone enriched microalgae methods and compositions|

---

JP6218096B1|2016-12-31|2017-10-25|甲斐水産有限会社|Nannochloropsis and its production method.|

---

US10701941B2|2017-11-10|2020-07-07|Heliae Development, Llc|Biomass compositions|

---

EP3498855B1|2017-12-12|2020-09-09|BIO-P S.r.l.|Process for the cultivation of microalgae for the production of starch|

---

US10745724B2|2017-12-22|2020-08-18|Heliac Development LLC|Anaplerotic oil production in microbials|

---

KR102024456B1|2018-01-15|2019-09-23|부경대학교 산학협력단|Effects of on the Mass culture of the Prasinophyte Tetraselmis suecica and T. tetrathele using Light Emitting Diodes |

---

US20190216031A1|2018-01-17|2019-07-18|Christopher James Hintz|Algae Culturing|

---

JP2019172932A|2018-03-29|2019-10-10|リンテック株式会社|Repeat bending device, manufacturing method therefor and suppression method of bent trace|

---

WO2019236502A1|2018-06-04|2019-12-12|Heliae Development Llc|Biomass compositions|

---

CN108587920B|2018-07-20|2021-09-07|中国科学院武汉植物园|Method for mixotrophic culture of microalgae by using acetic acid/sodium acetate|

---

CN112481339A|2019-09-12|2021-03-12|台湾海洋大学|Preparation method for improving phycoerythrin yield|

---

WO2021057711A1|2019-09-23|2021-04-01|山东拜昂生物技术有限公司|Method for producing astaxanthin by heterotrophic culture of haematococcus pluvialis|

---

CN111117892B|2020-01-17|2020-09-08|北京大学|Green alga Auxenochlorella sp.BSC-01 and application thereof|

---

CN112094780B|2020-09-26|2022-02-08|中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所|Seawater spirulina-interstellar bacterium symbiotic system, construction method and application|

---

CN112159788B|2020-11-16|2021-08-31|宁波大学|A strain of the genus Hateria|

法律状态:
2018-03-06| B06F| Objections, documents and/or translations needed after an examination request according [chapter 6.6 patent gazette]|

---

2018-03-13| B06F| Objections, documents and/or translations needed after an examination request according [chapter 6.6 patent gazette]|

---

2018-03-20| B06I| Publication of requirement cancelled [chapter 6.9 patent gazette]|Free format text: ANULADA A PUBLICACAO CODIGO 6.6.1 NA RPI NO 2462 DE 13/03/2018 POR TER SIDO INDEVIDA. |

---

2019-12-03| B06I| Publication of requirement cancelled [chapter 6.9 patent gazette]|Free format text: ANULADA A PUBLICACAO CODIGO 6.21 NA RPI NO 2542 DE 24/09/2019 POR TER SIDO INDEVIDA. |

---

2020-11-03| B15I| Others concerning applications: loss of priority|Free format text: PERDA DA PRIORIDADE US 61/877,894 DE 09/09/2013 POR NAO CUMPRIMENTO DA EXIGENCIA PUBLICADA NA RPI 2549 DE 12/11/2019. |

---

2020-11-17| B08F| Application dismissed because of non-payment of annual fees [chapter 8.6 patent gazette]|Free format text: REFERENTE A 7A ANUIDADE. |

---

2021-03-09| B08K| Patent lapsed as no evidence of payment of the annual fee has been furnished to inpi [chapter 8.11 patent gazette]|Free format text: EM VIRTUDE DO ARQUIVAMENTO PUBLICADO NA RPI 2602 DE 17-11-2020 E CONSIDERANDO AUSENCIA DE MANIFESTACAO DENTRO DOS PRAZOS LEGAIS, INFORMO QUE CABE SER MANTIDO O ARQUIVAMENTO DO PEDIDO DE PATENTE, CONFORME O DISPOSTO NO ARTIGO 12, DA RESOLUCAO 113/2013. |

---

2021-12-07| B350| Update of information on the portal [chapter 15.35 patent gazette]|

优先权:

---

申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题

---

US201261724710P| true| 2012-11-09|2012-11-09|

---

US61/724,710|2012-11-09|

---

US201361799151P| true| 2013-03-15|2013-03-15|

---

US201361798969P| true| 2013-03-15|2013-03-15|

---

US61/798,969|2013-03-15|

---

US61/799,151|2013-03-15|

---

US61/877,894|2013-09-09|

---

US201361877894P| true| 2013-09-13|2013-09-13|

---

PCT/US2013/069046|WO2014074769A2|2012-11-09|2013-11-08|Methods of culturing microorganisms in non-axenic mixotrophic conditions|

---