• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    The present invention relates to a protein mixture as well as a nutritional composition comprising such a mixture, for the nutrition of adults, athletes, the elderly, or persons who need to improve their physical condition, such as the sick, bedridden persons, people who are weakened or malnourished, or persons suffering from sarcopenia. According to the invention, the protein mixture comprises a mixture of vegetable proteins and of milk proteins in a weight ratio of A hydrolysed wheat protein / milk protein between 55/45 and 20/80, wherein the milk proteins are a mixture of casein and serum proteins in a weight ratio of B casein serum proteins between 70/30 and 20/80.
    公开号:BE1023864B1
    申请号:E2016/5792
    申请日:2016-10-21
    公开日:2017-08-24
    发明作者:Jeremy Marichez
    申请人:Syral Belgium Nv；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    Food composition rich in wheat proteins
    Technical area
    The present invention relates to a protein mixture as well as a nutritional composition comprising such a mixture, for the nutrition of adults, athletes, the elderly, or persons who need to improve their physical condition, such as the sick, bedridden persons, people who are weakened or malnourished, or persons suffering from sarcopenia. According to the invention, the protein mixture comprises a mixture of vegetable proteins and of milk proteins in a weight ratio A wheat protein / milk protein between 55/45 and 20/80, wherein the milk proteins are a mixture of casein and serum proteins in a weight ratio B casein / serum proteins between 70/30 to 20/80.
    State of the art
    Many studies have shown that animal proteins in Europe represent up to 70% of the average daily protein intake. However, such consumption of animal protein would be responsible for the increase in cardiovascular disease and human cancer. Moreover, the production of vegetable proteins appears to be much more ecological, both from the point of view of water consumption and air and soil pollution, as well as in terms of energy balance.
    In fact, vegetable proteins all seem to be appropriate for replacing animal protein in food, in particular for replacing milk proteins. Given the differences in taste, nutritional value and solubility, proposing a product that has a good taste, good stability and a balanced nutritional value and in which a large part of the milk proteins is replaced by vegetable proteins on both a technological and nutritional level a big challenge.
    Detailed description of the invention
    The invention relates to a protein mixture comprising a mixture of vegetable proteins and milk proteins in a weight ratio A wheat protein / milk protein between 55/45 and 20/80, typically between 50/50 and 25/75, preferably 48/52 and 27/73 and more preferably between 40/60 and 20/80, wherein the milk proteins are a mixture of casein and serum proteins in a weight ratio B casein / serum proteins between 70/30 to 20/80, preferably between 60/40 and 30/70.
    The "wheat protein" or "gluten" stands for a protein fraction that is insoluble in water, wet from wheat flour and then dried, also called wheat gluten.
    Advantageously, the wheat protein is hydrolyzed. Hydrolysates of vegetable proteins, in particular of wheat, are defined as preparations obtained by hydrolysis by enzymatic means, by chemical means, or simultaneously or sequentially by both ways, of vegetable proteins, in particular of wheat. Protein hydrolysates comprise a higher percentage of peptides of different sizes and free amino acids than the original composition. This hydrolysis can have an impact on the solubility of the proteins. The enzymatic and / or chemical hydrolysis is described, for example, in patent application US 5180597 A or in J. of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (1965) p.407-410. Typically the hydrolysis can be thermal, acidic or enzymatic. Enzymatic hydrolysis is preferred.
    Methods for preparing protein hydrolysates are well known to those skilled in the art and may include, for example, the following steps: dispersion of proteins in water to obtain a suspension, hydrolysis of the suspension by the treatment chosen. Usually it will be an enzymatic treatment in which a mixture of different proteases is combined, possibly followed by a thermal treatment aimed at inactivating the enzymes that are still active. The resulting solution can then be filtered on one or more membranes to separate the insoluble compounds, optionally the remaining enzymes and the high molecular weight peptides (more than 10,000 daltons).
    Preferably, the hydrolysis of the proteins is incomplete, that is, it does not result in a composition comprising exclusively or mainly amino acids and small peptides (with 2 to 4 amino acids). The preferred hydrolysates comprise more than 50%, more preferably more than 60%, even more preferably more than 70%, even more preferably more than 80%, and in particular more than 90% proteins and polypeptides of more than 500 Da.
    Typically, the wheat proteins with an average molecular mass between 7 and 1000 kDa are obtained by hydrolysis according to methods well known to those skilled in the art [Anfinsen, C.B. Jr. (1965) Advances in protein Chemistry: v.20. New York and London: Academic Press], Typically, the hydrolysed wheat protein according to the invention has a weight average molecular mass between 7 and 800 kDa, 5 and 500 kDa or 8 and 100 kDa, preferably between 9 and 80 kDa, more preferably between 10 and 70 kDa, even more preferably between 12 and 50 kDa, even more preferably between 13 and 40 kDa. Such peptides are particularly advantageous because they exhibit improved solubility (which decreases as hydrolysis becomes more substantial) and because, unlike a more strongly hydrolysed protein, they exhibit no or very limited aftertaste, and in particular do not exhibit a bitter taste.
    Typically, the wheat protein has a degree of hydrolysis between 1 and 4, typically between 1.5 and 2.5. The degree of hydrolysis (DH) was determined by the Sorenson titration method.
    A wheat gluten that is particularly suitable for the present invention is MERIPRO® 500 or SOLPRO® 508, which is traded by TEREOS SYRAL.
    Advantageously, the hydrolyzed wheat protein has a solubility of at least 55% at pH 7 (NSI). Typically, the NSI solubility is realized according to the method described under reference AACC 46-23.
    In the present invention, the term "milk protein" means all proteins derived from milk and from products derived from milk. The proteins may be natural or hydrolysed. Hydrolysates of milk proteins are defined as preparations obtained by hydrolysis by enzymatic means, chemical pathway, or simultaneously or successively along both pathways, of milk proteins.
    From a chemical point of view, milk proteins can be divided into two groups: caseins and serum proteins. The caseins represent 80% of the total milk proteins. The serum proteins, representing the remaining 20%, are soluble at pH 4.6.
    The "caseins" according to the invention can be natural caseins, acid caseins, rennet caseins, sodium caseinates, potassium caseinates and calcium caseinates. Typically, the caseins can be obtained from skimmed milk and precipitated either by acidification by acid or harmless bacterial cultures suitable for human consumption (acid caseins) or by the addition of rennet or other enzymes that coagulate the milk (rennet casein) ). Caseinates are the products obtained by drying acidic caseins that have been treated with neutralizing agents. Depending on the neutralizing agents used, sodium, potassium, calcium and mixed (= co-neutralization) caseinates are obtained. The natural caseins can be obtained from skimmed milk by tangential microfiltration and diafiltration of water.
    The term "serum protein" as used herein refers to whey proteins, advantageously to lactoglobulins, lactoferrins and immunoglobulins. Typically, the whey proteins are mainly formed by β-lactoglobulin (50%), α-lactalbumin (20%), immunoglobulins ( 10%), bovine serum albumin (10%) and lactoferrin (2.8%).
    The respective total protein weights are measured by the method wherein the dosing of the soluble nitrogen fraction contained in the sample is performed according to the Kjeldahl method. The total protein content is then obtained by multiplying the nitrogen content expressed as a percentage of dry product weight by a factor of 6.25. This method is well known to those skilled in the art.
    The total protein content can also be measured by the dosage of the soluble nitrogen fraction contained in the sample according to the method of Dumas A. (Dumas A., 1831, Annales de chimie, 33, 342; Buckee, 1994, Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 100, pp 57-64). The total protein content is obtained by multiplying the nitrogen content expressed as a percentage of dry product weight by a factor of 6.25. This method, also known as the method for dosing nitrogen through combustion, consists of a complete combustion of the organic matrix under oxygen. The gases produced are reduced with copper and then dried, after which the carbon dioxide is captured. The nitrogen is then quantified using a universal detector. This method is well known to those skilled in the art.
    The invention further relates to a food composition comprising a protein mixture according to the invention.
    "Food composition" means a composition suitable for use in a mammal's diet. Advantageously, the food composition is an aqueous composition (liquid or gel) or a composition in solid form. Advantageously, the food composition is in a liquid form such as a beverage; a solid form such as a tablet, a cookie or a powdered composition; or the shape of a gel, a syrup or a cream. Advantageously, the solid composition is particularly suitable for being dissolved or suspended in an aqueous composition.
    Typically, the mixture with an A ratio between 50/50 and 30/70 is particularly advantageous due to its neutral taste in a nutritional composition with a light aroma such as a fruit aroma. A ratio A between 40/60 and 30/70 is particularly advantageous if the nutritional composition must be relatively stable in the time before it is consumed, while in the case of a rapid solubilization of a powdered nutritional composition, for example, a ratio A between 55/45 and 40/60 is particularly advantageous.
    The nutritional composition may, for example, be a dairy product.
    For the purposes of the present invention, "dairy product" is understood to mean any product obtained as a result of any possible processing of milk and which may contain food additives and other functional components necessary for processing (Codex Alimentarius). In the context of the present invention, the milk is the product of milking a female dairy animal. Typically, the milk and dairy products may come from any animal species; for example, it can be goat, sheep, donkey or buffalo milk.
    Advantageously, the nutritional composition according to the invention further comprises from 8 to 80%, preferably from 50 to 70% proteins, from 0 to 30%, preferably from 1 to 15%, typically from 2 to 5% lipids, from 0 to 50% , typically from 10 to 40% glucides or carbohydrates, the percentages being given for 100 g of dry product.
    Typically, the nutritional composition is a nutritional supplement or a nutritional composition. Advantageously, it may be a composition intended for the feeding of young mammals, typically comprising humans, pigs, horses, cattle, dogs, cats, or sheep.
    The composition preferably comprises from 5 to 20% by weight of lipid on the total weight of the composition. This fat can be of vegetable and / or animal origin. Preferably, the nutritional composition further comprises a lipid fraction comprising at least one source of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids such as linolenic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid or docosahexaenoic acid, or mixtures thereof in an amount between 20 and 2000 mg when said composition is provided for a daily administration and / or a source of omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids such as sesame oil, safflower oil, grape seed oil or any other marine or vegetable-rich oil rich in omega-6, with the ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 being preference is between 1 and 5.
    Typically, said source of omega-3 fatty acids is selected from milk fat derived from ruminants, fish oil, algae, rapeseed, coconut palm linseed oil or any other oil of marine or vegetable origin that is rich in omega-3 and said omega-6- source selected from sesame oil, safflower oil, grape seed oil or any other possible oil of marine or vegetable origin that is rich in omega-6.
    The composition also usually contains a number of additives such as glucides, synthetic essential amino acids, minerals and vitamins.
    The amount of glucides or carbohydrates represents 5 to 30% by weight. Suitable glucides are starch, lactose, sucrose, fructose, dextrose or a mixture thereof.
    The amount of synthetic essential amino acids represents 0 to 3% by weight of the composition. These added amino acids provide the composition with the necessary balance of amino acids. Typical amino acids that can be added are the following: lysine, threonine, methionine, histidine and tryptophan.
    The nutritional composition further comprises 2 to 5% by weight of vitamins and minerals. Typically, these vitamins and minerals may in particular be in the form of a premix. Such premixes are known to those skilled in the art and usually contain calcium, chalk, trace elements as well as vitamins.
    Advantageously, the composition comprises vitamins such as vitamins A, B1, B2, B5, B6, B8, B9, B12, C, D, E, K, PP in an amount that is preferably between 0 g and 120 mg when provided for a daily administration.
    Typically, the nutritional composition further comprises trace elements and / or minerals, such as selenium, zinc, copper, the amount of which can go up to 800 mg when said composition is provided for a daily administration.
    Advantageously, the nutritional composition further comprises one or more ingredients selected from prebiotics, probiotics, the coenzyme Q10, antioxidants, texture-forming agents, colorants, thickeners, flavorings, or a mixture thereof.
    Preferably, the nutritional composition further comprises a glucide fraction in an amount between 10 and 80 g when said composition is provided for a daily administration.
    Typically, the nutritional composition according to the invention is in liquid form and comprises between 2 and 30 g of said protein mixture per 100 ml, preferably between 12 and 22 g per 100 ml.
    If the food composition is a composition for replacing milk, for example calf milk, it is given in the form of an emulsion in water. The emulsion preferably contains 12.5 to 17.5 g of composition per 100 ml of emulsion.
    The invention further relates to the use of the composition according to the invention for the replacement of milk from a mammal, preferably from a calf, wherein said composition preferably has a ratio A that is between 40/60 and 20/80.
    The invention relates to the use of the composition according to the invention as a dietary supplement or in nutrition programs for the purpose of re-feeding or nutritional supplementation to combat the effects of deficiencies in adults, athletes, the elderly or persons who need to improve their physical condition, such as the sick bedridden persons, people who are weakened or malnourished, or people who suffer from sarcopenia.
    Typically according to the invention, the nutritional supplement or nutritional composition is advantageous in that it is rich in proteins. Typically according to the invention, maintaining or improving physical fitness includes improving muscle performance, maintaining muscle mass, improving muscle synthesis, improving physical performance and fatigue resistance, improving physical mobility, improving the response to re-feeding, maintaining bone density.
    Although they have different meanings, the terms "include", "contain", "consist of" and their derivatives are used interchangeably in the description of the invention and can be replaced by one another.
    The invention will be more clearly understood by reading the following figures and examples, which are given by way of example only.
    Examples
    Example 1 - Organoleptic quality of different sources of vegetable proteins
    To develop a protein-rich drink for athletes that includes vegetable proteins, the taste quality of various botanical sources was evaluated. Furthermore, it was first and foremost tested whether they can be optimally combined with the most common flavorings used in this type of application, such as flavors of the fruity, vanilla or chocolate type.
    To determine which of the botanical sources of vegetable proteins is / are most suitable to be optimally combined with the common flavors used in protein-rich drinks for athletes, various sensory tests have been performed.
    In a first session, the different botanical sources of vegetable proteins were evaluated according to a method described by William AA and Langron SP (William AA and Langron SP, 1984. The use of free-choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports) to generate descriptors that allow you to distinguish the various tested proteins from each other in the most complete way. To this end, solutions of each of the proteins with a concentration of about 15% were prepared and presented in random order and in an anonymous manner to a group of 20 tasters. The proteins tested are the following:
    The hydrolysed wheat proteins MERIPRO® 500 from TEREOS and GBSP51® from CHAMTOR
    The soy protein isolate (SPI) CLARISOY® 150 from ADM
    The pea protein isolate (PPI) PISANE® F9 from COSUCRA
    The descriptors generated during this session were then collected and discussed with the entire trial panel to reach a consensus on the most distinctive of the different botanical sources of tested proteins.
    Table 1: most important descriptors generated during the session for free profiling of the descriptors
    This first series of sensory tests has shown that, compared to the pea or soy proteins, the hydrolyzed wheat proteins can be combined in a more optimal way with flavors of the vanilla and chocolate type. The tests determined in the case of the hydrolysed wheat proteins correspond to the same aromatic families that are characteristic of the flavors of the vanilla and chocolate type, while the tests determined in the case of the pea or soy tested proteins are too far away.
    In order to check the alignment between the aromatic profiles of the different botanical sources of vegetable proteins and the most sensitive flavors of the fruity type, a second profiling test was carried out in a second step according to a standardized method (Norm NF ISO 13299: 2003 “sensory analysis - methodology - general guidelines for establishing a sensory profile ”) based on the following descriptors: fruity aroma, bitterness, acidity and overall rating. To this end, 5% of each of the following proteins was added to a multi-fruit juice base: hydrolyzed wheat protein MERIPRO® 500 from TEREOS and soy protein isolate (SPI) CLARISOY® 150 from ADM. Briefly summarized, this second test has made it possible to demonstrate that the bitterness of the soy isolate as well as its specific aromatic tests result in a significantly lower overall rating.
    The results of these different sensory assessments therefore show that hydrolysed wheat proteins emerge as better candidates for the preparation of powder mixtures intended for the preparation of protein-rich drinks for athletes.
    Example 2 - Dispersibility and foaming properties of the hydrolyzed wheat proteins compared to milk proteins
    An additional advantage of using vegetable proteins in protein-rich beverage applications is their price that is considerably lower than that of concentrated animal proteins such as, for example, milk proteins, which are used very frequently in these applications because of their amino acid composition. As a result, the use of vegetable proteins to replace a fraction of concentrated animal proteins advantageously makes it possible to reduce the final cost of such formulations without reducing their nutritional value. From this point of view, hydrolysed wheat proteins were compared with different milk proteins, alone or in combination, based on a set of criteria that determine the quality of protein-rich drinks for athletes.
    The proteins tested are:
    The hydrolysed wheat proteins MERIPRO® 500 from TEREOS and GBSP51® from CHAMTOR
    The milk protein isolate rich (90%) of caseins PRODIET® 85 from INGREDIA NUTRITIONAL
    The whey protein isolate PRODIET® 90 from INGREDIA NUTRITIONAL
    The dispersibility and foaming properties are important in the case of powder compositions intended for use in the preparation of protein-rich drinks ready to be drunk. These drinks are most often prepared at the place where they are consumed and are quickly taken. In this case, it is necessary that these powder compositions be fully and quickly dispersed to ensure optimum quality of the beverage thus prepared and to prevent any possible unpleasant experience for the consumer, such as, for example, the presence of lumps formed by non-dispersed and non-dispersed hydrated powder particles that can cause a cough in the consumer during exercise. With regard to this last point, considerable foaming can also be problematic for the consumption of these drinks in good conditions.
    To assess the dispersibility and foaming properties of various combinations of hydrolyzed wheat proteins, milk protein isolate rich in casein and whey protein isolate, 30 g of each powder mixture was mixed with 200 ml of mineral water (Vittel®) using a special shaker for the preparation of protein-rich drinks for athletes (Blender Bottle®).
    Dispersibility and foaming properties were evaluated by shaking the shaker five times to prepare the beverage and then pouring the entire mixture through a 400 µm stainless steel screen.
    The foaming properties are determined by the absence or presence of foam, by evaluating the thickness and diameter of the foam layer on the screen, as well as its lifetime from the time the mixture was poured through the screen. This property is noted as: + + when no foam is present on the screen - - when there is a thick layer of foam that remains on the screen for a longer or shorter period
    The dispersibility properties are determined by the absence or presence of lumps on the screen, by their dimensions as well as by their lifetime from the moment the mixture was poured through the screen. This property is noted as: + + when no lumps are present on the screen - - when several lumps of considerable size remain on the screen for a longer or shorter period
    Table 2: dispersibility and foaming properties of the different protein sources tested separately
    The first finding made during these tests is that despite the fact that the hydrolysed wheat proteins seem to be better candidates for this application because of their organoleptic qualities, their poorer dispersibility and their tendency to foam, they can limit the production of protein rich drinks for athletes. Based on these tests, it was demonstrated that hydrolysed wheat proteins exhibit relatively weak dispersibility and very substantial foaming in comparison with milk proteins. Of the milk proteins tested, the casein-rich milk protein isolate has the best balance between dispersibility and foaming compared to the whey protein isolate. At first glance, the whey protein isolate does not appear to be recommended given its tendency to foam.
    To compensate for limitations with regard to dispersibility and foaming properties, a combination of hydrolyzed wheat proteins with milk proteins was considered. In addition to the fact that the combination of milk proteins with the hydrolysed wheat proteins possibly allows the improvement of the technological properties of the mixture, it could also enrich the amino acid composition of the mixture.
    Example 3 - Comparison of the quality of the protein combinations based on the PDCAAS score.
    To propose a mixture that would offer the best nutritional and functional qualities, different combinations were considered.
    The quality of these protein combinations was assessed according to the latest report, published in 2001, on sports nutrition published by the European Scientific Committee on Food. According to this report, a minimum protein fraction quality level of 70%, based on the Net Protein Use (NPU) score, is recommended for protein-rich and protein-enriched products for athletes. According to FAO / WHO publications, it is generally accepted that the PDCAAS is a relevant criterion for measuring the quality of a protein for human consumption (G. Schaafsma, 2010. Journal of Nutrition Vol 130 n ° 7). This method compares the concentration of the first essential determining amino acid of the protein or of the mixture of proteins being tested with the concentration of that same amino acid in the composition of a reference protein. The amino acid composition of this reference protein is defined based on the category of the consumer in question and his specific needs for essential amino acids. If the PDCAAS score exceeds the value of 100%, it is automatically limited to 100%.
    Table 3: PDCAAS score of different combinations of hydrolysed wheat proteins MERIPRO® 500 / Milk protein isolate rich in casein PRODIET® 85 / Whey isolate ProDIET® 90
    Based on this simulation we can conclude that a combination of 70% hydrolysed wheat proteins / 15% casein / 15% whey protein makes it possible to achieve the minimum quality value of 70% for the protein fraction. The optimum quality value of 100% for the protein fraction is achieved by combining a maximum of 50% hydrolysed wheat proteins with 25% casein and 15% whey protein isolate.
    Example 4 - Dispersibility and foaming properties of different combinations of hydrolysed wheat proteins and milk proteins
    The dispersibility and foaming properties of different combinations of proteins were evaluated in recipes of powders that make it possible to prepare a protein-rich drink according to the method described in Example 2. Apart from the protein fraction, the recipe also contains sodium chloride and an aroma (vanilla, banana, ...). The tested recipes are specified in Table 3 below.
    Table 4: Composition of the tested recipes containing different combinations of MERIPRO® 500 hydrolysed wheat proteins / Milk protein isolate rich in PRODIET® 85 casein / ProDIET® 90 whey isolate. The recipes are expressed in% of the total weight of the mixture
    The recommended test dose for the preparation of a protein-enriched drink is: ~ 15 g in 100 ml of water. This recommended dosage makes it possible to prepare a protein-rich drink that provides ~ 10 g of protein per 100 ml portion.
    The results obtained are shown in Table 5.
    Table 5: Dispersibility and foaming properties of the different combinations of MERIPRO® 500 hydrolysed wheat proteins / Milk protein isolate rich in casein PRODIET® 85 / Whey isolate ProDIET® 90
    Based on these tests and in view of the results obtained for the sources of individual proteins (Table 2, Example 2), we can determine that the increase in the proportion of milk proteins in the mixture improves dispersibility and reduces foaming. At this point it can be concluded that a good balance between foaming and dispersibility is observed for a mixture that has at least 50% hydrolyzed wheat proteins. In addition, we also note that, contrary to what was observed in the individual whey protein test (Table 2, Example 2), the negative influence of whey proteins on foaming is no longer observed when these proteins are combined with caseins and wheat proteins. Namely, a net reduction in this foaming property begins to become noticeable for blends containing 25% casein-rich milk protein isolate and 25% whey-protein isolate isolate, with the blend containing 35% of these milk proteins yielding the best results.
    Example 5 - Stability of protein-rich drinks after preparation in a shaker
    The stability of a protein-rich drink prepared on the basis of a powder mixture is a critical parameter because it has an influence on its homogeneity and can therefore have an impact on its ability to optimally meet the nutritional needs of a sporting consumer. The stability of the different protein sources as well as their combinations was assessed 10 and 30 minutes after preparation in a shaker. It was measured based on the presence and thickness of a layer of sediment.
    It is noted as: + + + when no single layer of sediment is observed over time - when a substantial layer of sediment is observed, and this soon after the drink has been prepared.
    Table 6: Stability of the different protein sources tested individually
    Based on these tests, it was determined that hydrolyzed wheat proteins exhibit a rather poor stability compared to milk proteins. In the case of milk proteins, whey proteins exhibit optimum stability compared to milk proteins rich in caseins, which exhibit a thin layer of sediment that appears very early.
    Table 7: Stability of the various combinations of hydrolysed wheat proteins MERIPRO® 500 / Milk protein isolate rich in casein PRODIET® 85 / Whey isolate ProDIET® 90.
    On the basis of these tests and in view of the results obtained with the individually tested protein sources (Table 6), it was surprisingly found that an increase in the proportion of milk proteins in the mixture improves stability over time but does not improve short-term stability. From this point of view, since in the case of preparation and consumption by athletes the latter occurs quickly, within a few minutes after preparation, it seems that an ideal compromise is found with the mixture of 50% hydrolyzed wheat protein / 25% casein / 25% whey protein. Mixtures containing 60% to 70% milk proteins and 30 to 40% hydrolysed wheat proteins seem particularly suitable for delayed consumption such as a milk substitute intended for calves.
    Example 6 - Organoleptic quality of the combinations of hydrolysed wheat proteins and milk proteins tested
    Finally, to reach a conclusion regarding the overall quality of each tested recipe, the organoleptic quality of the different combinations was evaluated as described in Example 1. The different recipes were tested in a dosage of 15 g of powder mixed with 100 ml of water but without adding an aroma to distinguish them as well as possible.
    Table 8: organoleptic quality of the different combinations tested
    We note that the organoleptic properties of the blends A and D allow consumption to be as they are, i.e. without the addition of flavor, while the blends B and C have a sufficiently neutral taste allowing use with a large group of aromas like fruity aromas.
    Taking into account different criteria that were assessed for the different combinations, it was found that a better compromise between foaming / dispersibility properties, stability of the protein-rich drink, score of the quality of the protein mixture and taste seems to be the mixture that is formed by 40% hydrolysed wheat proteins / 30% casein / 30% whey proteins.
    权利要求:
    Claims (10)
    [1]
    CONCLUSIES
    1. Eiwitmengsel omvattende een mengsel van plantaardige eiwitten en van gekeiten in een gewichtsverhouding A gehydrolyseerde tarwe-eiwitten / melkeiwit tussen 55/45 en 20/80, waarbij de melkeiwitten een mengsel zijn van casein serum-eiwitten in een gewichtsverhouding B caseinen / serum -eiwitten tussen 70/30 tot 20/80.
    [2]
    2. Eiwitmengsel volgens conclusie 1, met het kenmerk dat genoemde tarwe-eiwitten and gemiddeld molecuulgewicht hebben tussen 7 in 1000 kDa.
    [3]
    3. Eiwitmengsel volgens conclusie 1, met het kenmerk dat de verhouding A ligt tussen 50/50 in 25/75, bij voorkeur 40/60 in 30/70 in / of verhouding B ligt tussen 60/40 in 30/70.
    [4]
    4. Voedingssamenstelling omvattende een eiwitmengsel zoals gedefinieerd in éen der completes 1 tot 3.
    [5]
    5. Voedingssamenstelling volgens completie 4, met het kenmerk dat ze verder 8 tot 80% eiwitten omvat, 0 tot 30% lipiden, 0 tot 50% gluciden of koolhydraten, waarbij of percentages zijn vermeld voor 100 g droog product.
    [6]
    6. Voedingssamenstelling volgens éen der completes 4 en 5, met het kenmerk dat het gaat om een waterige samenstelling, bij voorkeur in vloeibare vorm, zoals een drank, in de vorm van een gel, een siroop of een cream, of dat het gaat om een vast samenstelling, zoals een tablet, een koekje of een poedervormige samenstelling.
    [7]
    7. Voedingssamenstelling volgens éen der completes 4 tot 6, met het kenmerk dat ze een vloeibare vorm heeft in tussen 2 in 30 g van genoemd eiwitmengsel per 100 ml, bij voorkeur tussen 12 in 22 g per 100 ml.
    [8]
    8. Gebruik van de samenstelling volgens éen der completes 4 tot 7 voor de vervanging van melk van een zoogdier, bij voorkeur van een kalf, waarbij genoemde samenstelling bij voorkeur een verhouding A heeft die ligt tussen 40/60 in 20/80.
    [9]
    9. Gebruik van de samenstelling volgens éen der completes 4 tot 7 als voedingssupplement of in voedingsprogramma's met het oog op hervoeding de nutritionele aanvulling om de effeten van deficiënties te bestrijden bij volwassenen, sporters, ouderen de personen die hun licelije moiten verbeteren, zoals zieken , bedlegerige personen, mensen die verzwakt of ondervoed zijn, of personen die lijden aan sarcopenie.
    [10]
    10. Gebruik volgens completie 9, waarbij het handhaven de verbeteren van de lichamelijke conditie het verbeteren van de spierprestaties, het behoud van de spiermassa, het verbeteren van de spiersynthese, het verbeteren van de fysieke prestaties en weerstand tegen vermoeidheid, het verbeteren van de lichamelijke mobiliteit, het verbeteren van de reactie op hervoeding, het behoud van de botdichtheid omvat.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    Aspri et al.2017|Donkey milk: An overview on functionality, technology, and future prospects
    ES2632178T3|2017-09-11|Granulated powder containing vegetable proteins and maltodextrins, their method of obtaining and their uses
    US20150157047A1|2015-06-11|Whey Protein Composition with a Reduced Astringency
    ES2837050T3|2021-06-29|Liquid nutritional composition comprising micellar casein and hydrolyzed whey protein
    US20120258236A1|2012-10-11|Composition with high protein content for the food industry
    KR20100107498A|2010-10-05|Chia seed composition
    Kumar et al.2018|Whey Proteins: A potential ingredient for food industry-A review
    WO2013148688A1|2013-10-03|Pea protein containing nutritional compositions
    JP2011157329A|2011-08-18|Mitochondria function-improving agent
    JP2008255033A|2008-10-23|Amino acid composition and food/drink
    BE1023864B1|2017-08-24|FOOD COMPOSITION RICH IN WHEAT PROTEINS
    JP2002020312A|2002-01-23|Food composition for promoting reduction in body fat and promoter for reduction in body fat
    US20160309755A1|2016-10-27|Nutritional compositions containing rice protein together with pea and/or potato proteins
    JP2016506753A|2016-03-07|Food composition and use thereof
    CN108697679A|2018-10-23|Composition containing amino acid
    JP2002335913A|2002-11-26|Mineral-enriched nutrition supplementary food
    DK2880996T3|2017-06-12|Nutritional composition containing brown rice protein
    Yushchenko et al.2020|Determining the Expediency of Using Protein Polysaccharide Complexes Based on Dairy and Vegetable Proteins in the Technology of Butter Pastes
    JP4317023B2|2009-08-19|Denatured methionine-rich food and process for producing the same
    JP2020195284A|2020-12-10|Composition for prevention/amelioration of disuse muscular atrophy
    KR102291249B1|2021-08-18|Food composition for protein supplement containing chocolate flavor
    JP2019030269A|2019-02-28|Engineering method of protein composition with reduced protein metabolism requirement, and manufacturing method of protein-containing food and drink composition based on the engineering method
    Davanço et al.2013|Acceptability of an alimentary supplement of whey-protein concentrate and TGF-β in patients with Crohn’s disease
    JP2019099498A|2019-06-24|Composition for promoting lipid metabolism
    JP2005512584A6|2005-05-12|Denatured methionine-rich food and process for producing the same
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    FR3042687B1|2019-07-05|
    US20180303146A1|2018-10-25|
    FR3042687A1|2017-04-28|
    WO2017068536A1|2017-04-27|
    BR112018008096A2|2018-11-06|
    EP3364772A1|2018-08-29|
    BE1023864A1|2017-08-23|
    CA3002776A1|2017-04-27|
    AU2016340357A1|2018-06-14|
    CN108347968A|2018-07-31|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US6348222B1|1998-08-18|2002-02-19|Grober Inc.|Milk replacer without animal fat, for feeding veal calves|
    EP1224869A1|2001-01-12|2002-07-24|Campina Melkunie B.V.|Method for producing a gluten-free peptide preparation and preparation thus obtained|
    EP2545789A1|2011-07-15|2013-01-16|Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e.V.|Nutritional compound containing protein|
    US5180597A|1991-01-14|1993-01-19|Cpc International Inc.|Process for the production of hydrolyzed vegetable proteins using gaseous hydrochloric acid and the product therefrom|
    GB0425517D0|2004-11-19|2004-12-22|Galactogen Products Ltd|Endurance bar|
    EP1969950A1|2007-03-12|2008-09-17|Cargill, Incorporated|Partially hydrolysed cereal protein|FR3100429A1|2019-09-05|2021-03-12|Nutriset|Enriched cooking aid for elderly people suffering from malnutrition and / or sarcopenia|
    法律状态:
    2017-11-30| FG| Patent granted|Effective date: 20170824 |
    2021-07-15| MM| Lapsed because of non-payment of the annual fee|Effective date: 20201031 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    FR1502238A|FR3042687B1|2015-10-22|2015-10-22|NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION RICH IN BLEED PROTEINS|
    FR1502238|2015-10-22|
    [返回顶部]