• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    The present invention relates to a treatment process for the removal of sprouts from tubers, in particular potatoes, preferably by nebulization of a highly concentrated limonene composition. The invention also relates to tubers treated with limonene, capable of being obtained by carrying out said process. The invention further provides limonene compositions suitable for the elimination of germs by nebulization. The invention is advantageous because it provides a renewable and natural agent intended for the elimination of germs. The invention enables the elimination of tuber sprouts destined for the fresh produce market, where virtually no pesticide residue is permitted.
    公开号:BE1023345B1
    申请号:E2015/5671
    申请日:2015-10-20
    公开日:2017-02-10
    发明作者:Alan Pirotte
    申请人:Agriphar S.A.；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    TECHNICAL FIELD The invention relates to the technical field of food preservation, in particular to the storage of tubers, preferably potato tubers. More particularly, the invention relates to the treatment of tubers with an active ingredient of limonene from a plant. The invention is of particular importance in the field of fresh products.
    CONTEXT
    The storage of tubers, such as potatoes, is preferably carried out at a temperature between 2 and 10 ° C. However, at this temperature the potato transforms the starch into sugar and stores the sugar in the apple of the potato. earth giving it a sweeter taste. In the potato fries test, these potatoes brown too quickly when cooked (color chips). This leads to a decline in the quality of the potato.
    A solution to the accumulation of sugar in the potato is to store the potatoes at a higher temperature, preferably around 15 ° C two weeks before the potatoes are placed on the market. During this period, the sugar level in the potato will drop, but the potato will start to produce shoots or sprouts. With the formation of sprouts, the potato will start producing toxic glycoalkaloids. These molecules are not destroyed during cooking. This process makes the potato unmarketable.
    Some warehouses of potatoes are not equipped with an air conditioning unit, and storage temperature depends on weather conditions. If the temperature inside the warehouse can not be kept low enough, the potatoes will start to sprout. Therefore, other methods of treatment are needed, particularly for long-term storage.
    Synthetic germination inhibitors are known. 3 Chlorophenylisopropylcarbamate (CIPC), also known as chlorpropham, makes it possible to put a potato, bulb or tuber in a state of dormancy, with a weak formation of germs (mode of preventive action). However, treatment with CPIC leaves behind a film of CIPC residues on treated tubers. This residue renders the treated products unsuitable for marketing as fresh products. In this market segment, virtually no residues (up to 4-10 ppm) can be tolerated. Maleic hydrazide is another growth regulator that inhibits the formation of germs. Maleic hydrazide is applied to field foliage prior to harvest. The absorption of this one depends on the conditions of the ground. Maleic hydrazide is taken by the crop, such as the potato, and is stored inside the tuber for a relatively long time (preventive mode of action). The maximum residue limit is 50 ppm. Therefore, treatment with maleic hydrazide is not acceptable for products for the fresh market segment.
    With a high level of consumer awareness of pesticide residues on food products and increasing demand for organically produced vegetables, there is a need for effective alternatives to synthetic germination inhibitors, such as CPIC and maleic hydrazide. To find acceptance in the organic market segment, alternative treatment should preferably be based on a renewable resource, leaving no residue.
    Several terpenes have been studied as alternatives. In WO 92/10934, a study of monoterpenes and their oxides in terms of their ability to inhibit sprouting of potatoes has been reported. It was concluded that limonene did not influence potato sprouting at a head space concentration of 1.70 mg / L after 7 days. Three ungerminated potatoes treated with exposure to filter paper soaked in 2 mL of limonene in a 9.2 L drier bottle showed 0% of eyes with germs. The mode of action is not provided. The storage period is not specified.
    A known natural alternative is spearmint oil, with R-carvone as an active ingredient. Spearmint oil is effective at stopping germination, but gives potatoes a taste of mint, and a negative effect can be observed for the color test of French fries Mint oil is also likely to have a prohibitive cost. Other alternatives are caraway oil, with S-carvone as an active ingredient, and clove oil, with eugenol as the active ingredient. Both have an influence on taste and are much more expensive than commonly used synthetic anti-germinating agents. WO 00/32063 discloses a method of nebulization treatment using a liquid composition for the treatment of potatoes. One of the examples uses a 60% by weight limonene composition with 7% by weight of a nonionic emulsifier and 33% by weight of butyl acetate solvent. The treatment protocol consisted of 45 g / tonne at the beginning of storage and 15 g / tonne every 20 days, delivering 165 g of active ingredient per tonne of potatoes over a 6-month period. After 5 months, limonene-treated potatoes showed weight loss (4.5% vs. 5.4%) and sprout growth (96.8% vs. 100%; % with CPIC) close to those observed for the untreated control. US 5,811,372 discloses a method for controlling sprout formation in potatoes, using thermal fogging techniques. At 125 days after treatment, the combined use of 16.6 ppm CIPC with 16.6 ppm limonene showed that 97% of potatoes were unsuitable for use in fresh product packaging. Tubers with sprouts averaging more than 1 mm were considered unacceptable for use in fresh food packaging
    Therefore, there is a need in the field to provide additional alternative treatment methods for tuber storage, particularly for potato tubers. The industry is actively seeking alternative solutions to sprout suppressants that are of comparable level. efficacy, eg CPIC (chlorpropham). Producers who sell to organic markets and export markets, with stricter requirements, are looking for alternative solutions.
    Some countries have even imposed zero tolerance policies. Fresh market requirements have imposed stricter limits on the amount of CIPC residues likely to remain on potatoes sold to consumers.
    It is clear that the growing potato industry will benefit from new economic and efficient alternatives.
    The present invention aims to provide an improved method for storing tubers, particularly potato tubers. In particular, the invention aims to provide treated treated tubers for the fresh market. Suitable compositions are also provided.
    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
    Accordingly, the present invention provides a method for improving tuber storage, comprising the steps of: applying to a tuber bearing seed a composition comprising at least 50% limonene, expressed as weight of limonene based on the total weight of said composition, in an amount effective to remove said seeds.
    Surprisingly, it has been found that by application of a concentrated limonene composition, the formation of seeds in the tubers can be effectively treated. Germs that come into contact with an appropriate dose of limonene have fallen. With regard to the sprouts still at an early stage of development, the elimination of germs did not leave traces on the tuber. This stage can be described by germs of less than 5 mm. An advantage of the volatility of limonene is that a treatment does not leave pesticide residues. The invention thus proposes an alternative to inhibitors of germs. The use of synthetic germination inhibitors such as CIPC can be avoided. The treatment is low cost, so economically feasible.
    The tubers treated with limonene, treated according to a process of the invention, are characterized by the absence of limonene residues. The taste of the tubers is unaffected by limonene treatment. Tubers treated with limonene showed good performance in the frying test. Potatoes treated with limonene can be used in the processing industry as well as in the fresh produce market.
    In another aspect, the invention provides a composition for removing germs from seed-bearing tubers, and being suitable for nebulized application, said composition comprising at least 50% limonene, expressed by weight relative to total weight of the composition.
    A nebulized limonene composition has the advantage that spills of products from the nebulizer equipment can be reduced or even avoided. The compositions of the prior art, having less volatility than limonene, have shown spills of liquid exiting the nebulizing equipment. Spilled liquid made stains. For an applicator, this is undesirable because it requires cleaning.
    By the term "nebulization" as used in the present invention is meant the vaporization of pesticides in the form of mist (or mist) for pesticide delivery and application. Nebulization is performed by a nebulizer or mist / air spray. This type of equipment is known to those skilled in the art. A nebulizer can consist of a fuel tank, a formulation tank, a pump, a spray nozzle, a nebulizer coil, a water pump and controls.
    In another aspect, the invention relates to the use of limonene as a tuber germ removal agent. In a preferred embodiment, said tuber is the potato.
    Limonene has the advantage of coming from a natural source, for example, orange oil. It is a renewable raw material. The use of limonene makes it possible to make the tubers carrying germs, having received a treatment, still marketable, even on the market of fresh products. The treatment leaves no residue of limonene, has no influence on the taste, and barely leaves a mark.
    The preferred embodiments are reported in the form of dependent claims.
    DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
    Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the results of a potato frying test. It is shown by a bar graph the color notes of potatoes having undergone different treatments.
    Figure 2 gives a schematic representation of the results of a potato taste test. The potatoes have received different treatments. The scores obtained for a taste test are presented by a bar graph.
    Figure 3 shows the treatment results expressed as the weight of seeds for different potato processing schemes. Each cabin, except for the witness, was treated at three different times.
    Figure 4 shows a graphical representation of the results of the potato test. On the Y axis is shown the weight of sprouts, expressed in g / kg of potatoes. On the x-axis, the dose rate is represented, expressed in mL of product formulated per tonne of potatoes, with a treatment interval of every three weeks. The bars with the indication A represent a cold fogging application, the bars with the indication B represent a hot fogging application (Electrofog). Figure 4A shows the data obtained after 5 months of storage, Figure 4B provides the data for 6 months after storage. Figure 4C provides data 7 months after storage.
    Figure 5 shows a bar graph presentation of potato test results obtained by hot fog application (Electrofog). The results are presented for trials on the Bintje potato variety (moderately long to long dormancy), Nicola (medium dormancy), Charlotte (long dormancy). The products used were CIPC or orange oil (BIO 024, x% limonene). The applied dose is expressed in mL of product / tonne. The frequency of application is also provided. In the first trial of CIPC, 12g of active ingredient was applied on November 5, 2014, 8 g of active ingredient was applied on December 31, 2014, 8 g of active ingredient was applied on February 25, 2015, and 8 g of active ingredient were applied on April 22, 2015, 2: CIPC (in storage) + BIO024 after 9 weeks every 3 weeks, 3: CIPC (in storage) + BIO 024 after 3 weeks every 3 weeks, 4: 166 mL of BIO 024 every 5 weeks, 5: 133 mL of BIO 024 every 4 weeks, 6: 100 mL of BIO 024 every 3 weeks, 7: 66 mL of BIO 024 every 2 weeks, 8: 33 mL of BIO 024 every week, 9: untreated. The results were recorded 5 months after storage.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION "Approx." As used herein, with reference to a measurable value, such as a parameter, a quantity, a time duration, includes variations of 35 +/- 20% or less, of preferably of +/- 10% or less, more preferably +/- 5% or less, still more preferably of +/- 1% or less, and still more preferably +/- 0.1% or less, of and from of the specified value, insofar as such variations are appropriate for carrying out the disclosed invention. However, it is understood that the value to which the "about" modifier refers is itself also specifically described.
    Recitation of numeric ranges by end values includes all numbers and fractions included in this range, as well as the end values quoted. The expression "% by weight" or "% wt", here and throughout the description, refers to the relative weight of the component under consideration relative to the total weight of the formulation.
    As used herein, the term "tuber" refers to a modified plant structure that is enlarged to store nutrients for the plant to survive during the winter or during the dry months. They provide energy and nutrients for regrowth and asexual reproduction. In crops, they can be found in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum), sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas), cassava (Manihot esculenta), yam (Dioscorea) and dahlias.
    As used herein, the terms "shoot", "stem" or "seed" are synonymous. The terms refer to the very early growth of the plant from a tuber.
    The present invention provides a composition for removing germs from seed bearing tubers, and being suitable for nebulization application, said composition comprising at least 50% limonene, expressed as weight of limonene based on the total weight of the composition.
    According to a preferred embodiment, said nebulization limonene composition comprises at least 50% by weight of limonene. More preferably, said nebulization limonene composition comprises at least 55% by weight, 60% by weight, 65% by weight, 70% by weight of limonene or more, based on the total weight of the composition.
    A composition according to one embodiment of the invention comprises at least 50% of limonene by weight, preferably 60% of limonene by weight, more preferably 70% of limonene by weight, still more preferably 80% of limonene by weight and, most preferably, at least 90% of limonene by weight, expressed relative to the total weight of the composition. The high content of limonene has the advantage that lower volumes of composition can be shipped and stored relative to a more diluted product.
    Preferably, the composition comprises at least 500 g / l of limonene, preferably at least 600 g / l of limonene, more preferably 700 g / l of limonene, still more preferably 800 g / l of limonene and, most preferably preferred, at least 900 g / L of limonene, expressed as the amount of active ingredient having a purity of 100%, based on the total volume of the composition.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the composition comprises an essential oil, meaning an oil produced from a plant or part of a plant. The presence of an essential oil makes the treatment agent more natural and uses sustainable resources in production. Essential oils are often secondary products from agriculture, and finding applications for these secondary products can generate greater economic value to a crop's growth.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the composition comprises only an essential oil or a mixture of essential oils. This has the advantage that the composition is quite natural.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the composition comprises orange oil. Orange oil consists of more than 90% of D-limonene, a pure enantiomeric form of limonene. The content of limonene in orange oil depends on the variety of oranges from which the oil comes and depends on the region where the oranges are grown. Orange oil is classified by the FDA as "generally recognized as safe" and approved for use as an orange oil additive to food. The price of orange oil is much lower than the price of mint oil, clove oil or caraway oil, with orange oil being the economically the most favorable. Orange oil has no effect on the taste of treated tubers, preferably potatoes, since potatoes do not contain menthol as mint oil contains them. It is menthol that gives the mint flavor to potatoes treated with mint oil.
    In a more preferred embodiment, said orange oil is selected from the list consisting of technical grade orange oil, CAS 94266-47-4; food grade orange oil, CAS 8028-48-6, or cold-pressed orange oil. The person skilled in the art is familiar with orange oil and its characteristics from its referencing as an active substance (SANCO 12083/2013 rev 3, 2013) and from ISO 3140: 211 and European Pharmacopoeia standard references. 5.0, 2005.
    According to other embodiments, said citrus oil is selected from the group consisting of orange oil, lemon oil, lime oil, grapefruit oil and coconut oil. mandarin.
    According to a more preferred embodiment, the composition contains only orange oil, without any additive, or without any solvent. The use of only orange oil makes the process entirely natural and suitable for obtaining organically produced vegetables. These vegetables can be sold at a higher price compared to the price of vegetables treated with other synthetic anti-germinating agents.
    In another embodiment, a surfactant is added to the composition comprising limonene. The surfactant is preferably selected from a nonionic surfactant, preferably selected from the group consisting of sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monopalmitate, sorbitan sesquioleate, sorbitan trioleate, monolaurate, and the like. polyoxyethylene sorbitan, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monostearate, polyethylene glycol monooleate, polyethylene glycol alkylate, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether, polyglycol diether, lauroyl diethanol amide, iso-propanolamide fatty acid, acid hydroxyether maltitol fat, an alkylated polysaccharide, an alkyl glucoside, a sugar ester, an alkoxylated alcohol, oleophilic glycerol monostearate, self-emulsifiable glycerol monostearate, polyglycerol monostearate, polyglycerol alkylate, an alkoxylated fatty alcohol, sorbitan monooleate, polyethylene glycol monostearate, polyoxy sorbitan monooleate ethylene, polyoxyethylene cetyl ether, polyoxyethylene sterol, polyoxyethylene lanolin, polyoxyethylene beeswax, or combinations thereof.
    According to another preferred embodiment, the surfactant is an anionic surfactant. The anionic surfactant is preferably selected from the group consisting of sodium stearate, potassium palmitate, sodium cetyl sulphate, sodium lauryl phosphate, sodium polyoxyethylene lauryl sulphate, triethanolamine palmitate, sodium polyoxyethylene lauryl phosphate, and sodium N-acylglutamate, and combinations thereof.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the limonene composition is in the form of a water-emulsifiable composition (EC), comprising more than 50% by weight, 55% by weight, 56% by weight, 57% by weight, % by weight, 58% by weight, 59% by weight or more than 60% by weight of limonene and an emulsifying surfactant. According to a preferred embodiment, the composition comprises more than 65%, preferably more than 70%, and most preferably more than 71% by weight of limonene relative to the total weight of the composition. The most preferred composition typically has a content of 71 to 72% by weight of limonene, based on the total weight of the composition.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the composition is essentially free of water and any organic solvent, except orange oil or limonene. By the expression "substantially free of solvent" as used in the present invention is meant a composition with less than 10% by weight of solvent, preferably less than 5% by weight of solvent, relative to to the total weight of the composition. The term "solvent" is understood to mean a substance in which another substance is dissolved, forming a solution.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the composition comprises less than 10% by weight of solvent, preferably less than 5% by weight of solvent, and most preferably it is free of solvent, although traces of solvent, less than 0.1%, can not be excluded, all percentages being expressed in weight per weight. According to a preferred embodiment, the composition comprises less than 5% by weight of water, and, most preferably, it is free of water, although traces of water, less than 0.1% by weight weight, can not be excluded, all percentages being expressed by weight by weight.
    Preferably, the nonionic surfactant present in a composition according to the invention is a nonionic polymeric surfactant. More preferably, the polymeric surfactant is an alkoxylated alcohol, and even more preferably, a fatty alcohol alkoxylate, most preferably an ethoxylate and / or a propoxylate, preferably a fatty alcohol, and more preferably preferably, iso-tridecanol alkoxylate, most preferably iso-tridecanol penta-ethoxylate. The surfactant is preferably present in an amount in the range of 5 to 40%, more preferably 10 to 20%, most preferably 12 to 13%, all by weight. When limonene is added to the water, it forms an oily layer on the water, the addition of a surfactant leads to a stable emulsion of limonene in water.
    By the term "fatty alcohol" as used herein is meant a linear or branched alcohol having a carbon chain length of at least 4 carbon atoms, preferably at least 6, more preferably at least 4 carbon atoms. minus 8, even more preferably at least 10, most preferably at least 12. Preferably, the fatty alcohol has a carbon chain length of less than 22 carbon atoms, more preferably less than 20 carbon atoms carbon, most preferably less than 18 carbon atoms. Preferably, the alcohol is a primary alcohol. More preferably, the alcohol is a primary alcohol having a carbon chain length of between 4 and 22 carbon atoms in the chain, preferably 8-14 carbon atoms in the chain.
    In a preferred embodiment, a composition comprises a wetting agent. It contributes to lowering the surface tension of the emulsion formed after adding the composition to water. This reduced surface tension makes it possible to coat a larger area of tubers.
    The essentially water-free composition does not allow the presence of wetting agents commonly used in the prior art. The wetting agent is generally a water-soluble anionic surfactant. These surfactants need water to form a stable solution, since their counterion is usually a calcium ion, an ammonium ion, a sodium ion or a potassium ion.
    Anionic surfactants include agents such as sodium stearate, potassium palmitate, sodium cetyl sulphate, sodium lauryl phosphate, sodium polyoxyethylene lauryl sulphate, triethanolamine palmitate, sodium polyoxyethylene lauryl phosphate, N-acylglutamate and the like. sodium, and their combinations. The wetting agent in a composition according to the invention is preferably an anionic surfactant whose anionic part is preferably an alkylbenzenesulphonate, more preferably dodecylbenzenesulphonate. The cationic counterion is preferably chosen from the list consisting of triethylammonium ion, triethanolammonium ion, tetrabutylammonium ion, or other tetraalkylammonium ions, tetraphenylphosphonium ion or other tetraalkylphosphonium ions or a combination of a metal ion and a crown ether.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the wetting agent is preferably an ethanolamine alkyl benzene sulphonate. According to a preferred embodiment, the wetting agent is triethanolammonium dodecylbenzenesulphonate, CAS: 27323-417. A combination of this anion and the counterion allows solubilization of the wetting agent in the solvent-free composition other than limonene. An emulsifiable composition of limonene and this type of surfactant, in the absence of a solvent other than the active ingredient, has been found to have a satisfactory stability in cold storage. Preferably, the cold storage stability is achieved at temperatures in the range of from -20 ° C to 5 ° C, preferably at -10 ° C to 4 ° C, more preferably at -5 ° C. and 3 ° C, most preferably between -4 ° C and 0 ° C. Cold storage stability was measured for the stored compositions for a period of 7 days, according to the CIPAC method MT 39.3: stability at low temperature liquid formulations. A sample is stored at 0 ° C for 1 hour, and any volume of a separate solid or oily material is then recorded. Storage at 0 ° C is continued for 7 days, and any solid material is decanted by centrifugation and its volume is recorded. The measurement methods are known to those skilled in the art. The wetting agent is preferably present in the emulsifiable composition in an amount in the range of 5 to 25%, more preferably 10 to 20%, most preferably 15 to 16%, expressed as percentage by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the limonene composition comprises both a nonionic and anionic surfactant.
    According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the limonene composition is in the form of an emulsifiable concentrate (EC), comprising between 550 and 750 g / l of limonene and one or more emulsion stabilizing surfactants. Preferably, a limonene composition according to the invention comprises from 600 to 650 g / L of limonene and from 240 to 260 g / L of said one or more emulsion stabilizing surfactants.
    Most preferably, the composition comprising limonene comprises, as surfactants, a combination of an alkoxylated fatty alcohol and an ethanolamine alkylbenzene sulfonate.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the composition comprises an antioxidant. Preferably, the antioxidant is selected from the list consisting of diphenylamine, ethoxyquin, BHA which is a mixture of 3-t-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole and 2-t-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole, BHT. corresponding to 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol, ascorbic acid, tocopherols and polyphenols. The presence of an antioxidant can protect limonene from oxidation. For example, traces of oxygen may enter the composition or the free space of a bottle after opening the bottle. This is advantageous since limonene oxides are believed to be sensitizers. The antioxidant is preferably present in an amount of less than 1%, more preferably less than 0.5%, most preferably less than 0.1%, all expressed by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the antioxidant is BHT or BHA. The composition preferably comprises less than 1% BHT or BHA, more preferably less than 0.5% BHT or BHA, most preferably less than 0.1% BHT or BHA, all expressed by weight. relative to the total weight of the composition.
    A nebulized limonene composition has the advantage that product spills from the nebulizing equipment can be reduced or even avoided.
    The present invention provides a treatment protocol with limonene, i.e. an active ingredient of plant origin, which can replace the germination inhibitors, such as CIPC, or a synthetic active ingredient. The treatment is low cost, therefore economically feasible.
    In particular, the present invention provides a method for improving tuber storage, comprising the steps of: applying to a tuber bearing seed a composition comprising at least 50% limonene, expressed as weight of limonene based on the total weight of said composition, in an amount effective to remove said seeds. The elimination of germs makes it possible to recover potatoes that were considered unsaleable due to the presence of germs. A composition according to the invention comprising limonene is preferably applied to the potatoes by nebulization, and the seed will "burn". For a seed of considerable size, a spot will be visible on the surface of the potato, but it can be sold as a low quality potato. Preferably, such treated potatoes are sold to the potato processing industry.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the seeds are less than 15 mm, better still less than 10 mm, even more preferably less than 7 mm and, most preferably, less than 5 mm, 4 mm, 3 mm, 2 mm. , 1 mm. For the fresh produce market, sprouts are less than or equal to 1 mm.
    Surprisingly, it has been found that by application of a concentrated limonene composition, the formation of seed on tubers can be effectively treated. The germs that came into contact with limonene have fallen. For germs that are still at an early stage of development and do not yet show a visible shoot (white dot stage), the removal of the seed does not leave any trace on the tuber. This stage can be described as revealing germs of less than 5 mm. Repeated application of limonene at an effective dose and interval to prevent significant growth of germs may replace treatment with active synthetic ingredients. This presents a considerable advantage in that tubers, in particular potatoes, can be sold as fresh products. The effectiveness of the limonene treatment according to the invention is surprising, since the prior art documents have shown that those skilled in the art consider limonene as an inactive molecule in the inhibition of tuber germination, including potatoes. Still, the invention provides an effective method in the use of a composition comprising limonene for the treatment of tuber storage, preferably potatoes.
    Preferably, limonene is applied by nebulization. By the term "nebulization" as used in the present invention is meant the vaporization of pesticides in the form of fog or haze for the distribution and application of the pesticide. Nebulization is performed by a nebulizer or mist / air spray. A nebulizer can consist of a fuel tank, a formulation tank, a pump, a spray nozzle, a nebulizer coil, a water pump and controls.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the application of the composition is by cold fogging. By the term "cold fogging" as used herein is meant that the composition is not heated above, preferably at 40 ° C, more preferably not above 30 ° C, so even more preferably, not above 20 ° C and, most preferably, not above 10 ° C. Preferably, cold fogging is performed at a temperature above -10 ° C, more preferably at a temperature above 0 ° C and, most preferably, at a temperature above 5 ° C. Since limonene or orange oil is a volatile flammable liquid, the presence of a heat source in the nebulizer can be a fire hazard. In addition, cold fogging has the advantage that there is less or even no thermal degradation at all compared to hot fogging. Cold fogging does not use fuel, and no exhaust gas is emitted into the storage chambers. These exhaust gases have an influence on the sugar content in the potatoes and for this reason the storage chambers are ventilated after the mist of applied product is deposited by the hot nebulization. This ventilation disturbs the storage conditions in the chamber and requires additional energy to restore the conditions of optimal values.
    According to another preferred embodiment, the application of the composition is by hot nebulization. Product droplets obtained by hot nebulization tend to be larger than those obtained by cold nebulization. By the use of the hot nebulization, it is possible to obtain a better distribution of the product on the tubers, compared to the use of the cold nebulization.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the composition is applied in an initial dose of between 60 ml and 400 ml of limonene per ton of tubers, preferably between 70 and 300 ml, more preferably between 80 and 200 ml, and most preferably preferred, about 90 mL of limonene per tonne of tubers. This initial dose is preferably applied on the same day as the storage, more preferably one week after storage, more preferably 2 weeks after storage, and most preferably after one month of storage. This dose is high enough that limonene can access the heart of a stack of tubers and can cause the same effect on, for example, a tuber at the bottom of the pile and a tuber at the top of the pile.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the application of the composition comprising limonene is repeated every 3 days to 6 weeks, preferably every 5 days to 4 weeks, more preferably between 1 week and 3 weeks, and so the most favorite, every 2 weeks. If this is repeated more often, no germs are formed, and the treatment agent is wasted. If repeated less often, the germs will become larger, and after the treatment, a visual spot will be present outside the tuber where the germ was. These spots will devalue the tubers.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the composition comprising limonene will be applied after the initial application of a subsequent dose of 20 mL to 300 mL of limonene per ton of tubers, preferably 30 to 300 mL, more preferably 60 to 200 mL and most preferably about 90 mL of limonene per ton of tubers. At this dose, the bottom and the top of the pile will be fully treated.
    Preferably, a treatment method according to the invention provides tubers which show no seed greater than 15 mm, preferably less than 10 mm, more preferably less than 7 mm, and most preferably less than 5 mm. even after they have been stored for a long period of time, that is to say stored for more than 3 months, preferably for more than 5 months, more preferably for more than 7 months, and even more preferentially more than 9 months and most preferably up to 11 months. Preferably, the storage time is in the range of values from 4 to 8 months.
    According to a variant of a preferred embodiment, the first application is not by nebulization, but by spraying, wetting, soaking, misting, watering, showering, nebulizing, soaking, wetting, by drizzle, watering, the composition on the tubers at the moment they are put in the storage chambers. The advantage is that the first application is faster and requires less energy than nebulization of the composition.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the method is implemented in a storage chamber. The storage chamber is preferably designed to store the tubers, preferably the potatoes, so as to control the environment, and preferably the chamber will serve to store the tubers, preferably only the potatoes. Preferably, the storage chambers are equipped with a temperature control system and, even more preferably, with a humidity control system.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the tubers to be treated are potatoes. Preferably, the potatoes are intended to be sold on the fresh market. These potatoes can be sold at a higher price because they are residue free.
    In another aspect, the invention provides the limonene-treated tubers, obtainable by a method according to the invention. The tubers treated according to a process of the invention are characterized by the absence of limonene residues. The taste of the tubers is unaffected by limonene treatment.
    In a preferred embodiment, the tubers are potatoes. Potatoes are a crop with economic value. It is important that waste can be reduced. The recovery of potatoes, from unsalable to those marketable at low prices, is of interest, especially because of their large production volume.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the potatoes treated by a process according to the invention have a frying color less than 2.5, as determined according to the Munsell USDA color test. It has been found that treatment with limonene does not have a negative impact on the formation of color. Potatoes treated by a process according to the invention can provide better performance in a taste test compared to untreated potatoes.
    According to a preferred embodiment, the potato tuber is derived from a cultivar having a short dormancy period, such as Lady Christl, more preferably having a medium to long dormancy period, such as the Desiree, the Charlotte, the Bintje, and, most preferably, a long to very long period of dormancy, such as Agria and Hermes.
    According to another preferred embodiment, the potato tuber is a cultivar selected from the group consited by Russet Burbank, Ranger Russet, Umatilla Russet, Shepody, Norkotah Russet, Gold Yukon, Norchip, Gem Russet, Atlantic, Chipeta, Snowden , Charlotte, Dark Red Norland, Nicola, Bintje and Innovator. More preferably, the potato tuber is derived from a Bintje cultivar or Innovator.
    In another aspect, the invention provides the use of limonene as a seed-removing agent on tubers, preferably as a potato seed-removing agent, more preferably as a as nebulizing agent and elimination of potato sprouts.
    Limonene has the advantage that it comes from a natural source. It is a renewable raw material. The use of limonene allows that the tubers carrying sprouts, having received a treatment, are still marketable, even on the market of the fresh products. Limonene is a volatile oil, and after application, limonene will evaporate in less than a day, leaving no residue on the treated tubers. These treated tubers can be sold on the market the next day, with no limonene residue present on the tuber. The treatment has no influence on taste, and leaves hardly any mark.
    The present invention will now be described in more detail with reference to non-limiting examples.
    Example 1 Preparation of a composition for use by nebulization
    A composition suitable for use by cold fogging for the treatment of tubers is prepared as follows. Food grade orange oil has been selected as the starting material. For this terpenic oil rich in limonene, emulsifying surfactants were added, in particular a nonionic and ionic surfactant. The composition further comprises a limonene antioxidant. No solvent was added in addition to the listed components. The composition was as shown in Table 1.
    Table 1: Composition 600 CE Limonene, Product Code BCP425D
    Example 2: Tuber Treatment
    In a second example, there is illustrated the use of a composition of limonene 600 CE, according to Example 1, for the treatment of potatoes. The treatment schedule is summarized in Table 2.
    In this example, 10 equal amounts of potatoes (20 kg of Bintje and 20 kg of Innovator) were processed in 5 different booths. The first cabin was considered as a witness. No treatment agent was applied in the first cabin.
    Table 2: Treatment Program
    At the booth, 2 Neonet 500HN was applied by nebulization, the active ingredient being chlorpropham (CIPC). The product was applied every 3 weeks at a rate of 7.5 mL / 1000 kg of potatoes. The first application was made 2 weeks after the harvest.
    In booth 3, BIOX-M was used, with mint oil comprising carvone as the active ingredient. The first application was made 2 weeks after harvest, at a concentration of 90 mL / 1000 kg of potatoes. After this application, subsequent applications were made at a dose of 30 mL / 1000 kg of potatoes.
    In booth 4, a composition according to Example 1 was used with limonene as an active ingredient. The first application was made 2 weeks after harvest, at a concentration of 90 mL / 1000 kg of potatoes. After this application, subsequent applications were made at a rate of 30 mL / 1000 kg of potatoes.
    In booth 5, the same composition as used in booth 4 was used with 600 g / L of limonene as an active ingredient. The first application was made 2 weeks after harvest, at a concentration of 90 mL / 1000 kg of potatoes. The application was repeated every 3 weeks, with the same dose.
    For all cabins, the first treatment was done on October 22, 2 weeks after harvest. Potatoes were studied for sprout formation on February 5, the following year, March 4, and April 4. For each quantity of potatoes, the weight loss was determined, the germination index was determined and the weight of the seeds was measured.
    The sprout weight, expressed in grams for the Innovator potato variety, is shown in Figure 3 for each cabin and at 3 different times, corresponding to approximately 4, 5 and 6 months after harvest.
    It can be concluded from these data that limonene has been effective enough to be used as a treatment agent per se. Limonene did not leave residues on potatoes, and did not have a negative influence on the taste and smell of potatoes, compared to the use of mint oil.
    Example 3 Application by Cold Nebulization
    According to this application, the cold nebulization technique of a composition comprising limonene is illustrated. The treatment protocol is summarized in Table 3.
    The potatoes of the variety "Innovator" came directly from the field. We did not do cleaning or grading. No particular observations concerning tubers have been reported. The quality of the tubers was good. Each bag of potatoes was weighed before being placed in a treatment cell on November 12th.
    The cells were filled so that the treatments were performed at mid-height in the cell. The rest of the cell, below and above the bags needed for the test, consisted of a potato filling. The total was ± 3400 kg per cell.
    Each treatment was represented in each cell by 12 nets of ± 20 kg of potatoes; 4 repetitions, 3 sampling and observation dates.
    The products were applied in accordance with the protocol summarized in Table 3. In cell 1, by hot nebulization using the "FOG GENERATOR IGEBA TF-35", and, in cells 2, 3 and 4, by nebulization cold, using a VEUGEN potato misting fan in the upper part of the cell between the filling bags and the top of the cell.
    The first application by hot and cold nebulization in cells, on the potato variety "Innovator", was carried out on November 21st. From then on, the cold fogging applications were carried out every week or 3 weeks apart until 27 March of the following year, corresponding to a total of 19 and 7 applications respectively.
    The second application by hot nebulization was carried out on January 2, the following year, the third on February 13, and the last on March 27.
    The nebulization protocol used was as follows. During storage, the air temperature within the storage facility was maintained between 5.0 ° C and 9.5 ° C. The relative humidity was maintained between 87% and 100%. The application equipment used for the hot nebulization was an IGEBA TF-35, and, for cold fogging, a VEUGEN device, type: FOGCOL. The apparatus was operated at an operating pressure of 3.3 bar.
    The cold and hot nebulization conditions were similar to those obtained in the local storage practice. - About 15 minutes before the treatment, the automatic control was turned off and the internal manual ventilation was started (Force III), corresponding to a ventilation rate of about 900 m3 / h. This stimulates the circulation of the internal air. - As the exact weight of tubers in the cell was known, the exact amount of formulated product was calculated and prepared. - During spraying / fogging and until about 15 minutes after spraying, internal ventilation has been maintained (Force III) to ensure good contact between the product and the tubers. - About 15 minutes after spraying, the internal ventilation has been extinguished. - The next day (at least 12 hours after the end of the spraying) the automatic adjustment was switched on until the next application or until the end of the test.
    Table 3: Treatment Protocol
    In Cabin 1, the stored products were treated with Neonet 500 HN. It is a product having chlorpropham as an active ingredient, in a concentration of 500 g / L, and available in the form of a hot mist concentrate (HN), ie a formulation suitable for application by equipment hot nebulization, either directly or after dilution. A first application of 20 mL / 1000 kg was repeated after 6 weeks with an application of 10 mL / 1000 kg.
    In Cabin 2, the stored products were treated with Biox-M, a mint oil product in the form of a hot spray concentrate. An initial treatment of 90 mL / kg was repeated after 3 weeks at a lower dose of 30 mL / 1000 kg.
    In booth 3, an orange oil emulsion concentrate (EC) at 600 g limonene / L was used. An initial dose rate of 90 mL / 1000 kg was used, followed by repeated applications of 50 mL / 1000 kg, three weeks apart.
    In booth 4, the same orange oil emulsion concentrate as used in booth 3 was applied. An initial dose of 150 mL per 1000 kg of stored products was followed by repeated application at 50 mL per 1000 kg of products stored after 7 days, and again after an interval of 7 days.
    In booth 5, which served as an untreated control, no product was applied.
    Example 4: Quality control
    The quality control tests were carried out on the treated products obtained from the treatments described in Example 2. Two different taste and color tests of French fries were carried out on the potato material, respectively in the centers of search PCA and CRA-W.
    PCA Evaluation The French fries color test was performed according to the CKA method, to evaluate the color of fries, according to the "USDA Munsell Frozen French Fry" standard.
    The french fries were cooked for 3 minutes, at 180 ° C. The evaluation was carried out on 20 fries.
    A color index should be less than 3 or 4, and at least 80% of the fries should be of the color class: 000, 00, 0, 1 or 2, to have a good quality.
    For the taste test, the potatoes were cut into 10 slices and then steamed. They were evaluated by a tasting panel according to taste. They were scored from 1 to 9, with 1 referring to "very bad" or "nothing", and 9 "very good" or "strong", according to the schedule presented in Table 4.
    The results are shown in Figure 1 for the color of the French fries, and in Figure 2 for the taste test.
    CRA-W evaluation
    To test the frying quality of the potatoes, there were 20 "central" fries taken from the center of tubers, with a width of 1 * 1 cm. They were rinsed with water and then dried for a short time, preferably 10 minutes. After drying, they were put in hot oil for 3 minutes. The oil was at a temperature of 180 ° C. After frying, the color was compared to a color card and was noted.
    When the frying quality index, which represents the color of the fries, was low, it meant that the color was lighter (bright yellow). When the number was up, it meant they were darker (brown). The scale is: <2.5: excellent, 2.5 to 3.0: good, 3.0 to 3.5: average, 3.5 to 4.0: moderate, and> 4.0: bad. The taste assessment was done by a panel of 6 people, who were trained to tasting potatoes. The evaluation was done in a tasting room. The following scale is the one used for the evaluation (Table 4).
    Table 4: Rating scale to evaluate the intensity of taste
    For evaluation, 20 samples were fried in 2 times, in the same way as French fries made for consumption. During the first frying, they were cooked at 160 ° C for 4 minutes, for the second frying, they are fried at 180 ° C for 2 minutes. Each member of the jury received 6 unsalted fries for each sample.
    The results are shown in Figure 1 for testing the color of French fries, and in Figure 2 for the taste test. Unlike mint oil, there were no problems with taste or smell. Results of joint trials
    Figure 1 shows test results for color and frying tests. The tests show that a method according to the first aspect of the invention with a weekly application, gives better performance (the lower the value, the better), according to the Mussel USDA color test, than for the untreated sample and only for the sample treated with mint oil. Regarding the application of the composition comprising limonene, an interval of every 3 weeks is even better than the application with mint oil.
    Figure 2 shows the results of the two taste tests. A treatment process using limonene improves the taste (high values equivalent to better taste) of potatoes compared to untreated potatoes. On the other hand, a process using mint oil gives, for the taste test, worse perfomances compared to untreated potatoes.
    Example 6: Treatment with orange oil
    The potatoes were treated with 100% orange oil every 3 weeks via cold fogging using a VEUGEN potato misting fan in the upper part of a cell. storage between the filling bags and the top of the cell.
    The nebulization protocol used was as follows. During storage, the air temperature within the storage facility was maintained between 5.0 ° C and 9.5 ° C. The relative humidity was maintained between 87% and 100%. - About 15 minutes before the treatment, the automatic control was turned off and the internal manual ventilation was started (Force III), corresponding to a ventilation rate of about 900 m3 / h. This stimulates the circulation of the internal air. - As the exact weight of tubers in the cell was known, the exact amount of formulated product was calculated and prepared. - During spraying / fogging and until about 15 minutes after spraying, internal ventilation has been maintained (Force III) to ensure good contact between the product and the tubers. - About 15 minutes after spraying, the internal ventilation has been extinguished. - The next day (at least 12 hours after the end of the spraying) the automatic adjustment was switched on until the next application or until the end of the test.
    Example 7 Treatment with Orange Oil, Results
    The Bintje, Innovator and Nicola potatoes were stored in a storage chamber and each storage chamber (test number) was treated with a different product for the anti-germination treatment. Table 5 shows the treatment conditions for each chamber. BIO-024 is orange oil, with at least 900 g limonene / L, BIOX M is a trade name for a mint oil product that is commercially available as As an anti-germination agent, Gro Stop Fog is a trade name for a product that includes CPIC to treat potato sprouting.
    A review of the weight of fresh sprouts and weight loss of the samples that were taken on February 11, March 11, April 8 and May 6, is given in Table 7. The results demonstrate that treatment every 3 weeks with 100 mL / tonne of the composition gave a lower fresh seed weight than that obtained with BIOX M, the current natural alternative for CPIC. The treatment at 50 mL / tonne, which corresponds to 450 g of limonene / tonne or 450 ppm, was not effective enough to reach the control levels achieved by CPIC or mint oil. The storage was carried out from October 11 to May 16 of the following year, all the products having been applied by nebulization.
    Table 5: Treatment conditions
    A summary of the treatment program can be found in Table 6. Table 6: Treatment dates
    The weight loss percentage was calculated using the formula:
    Weight Loss (%) = ((weight at storage load - weight at storage unload (excluding germs)) / weight of storage load) * 100
    The quality of French fries has been evaluated (cv Innovator and Bintje). The tubers were washed and peeled. Twenty sticks of French fries were cut from twenty tubers (one stick for each tuber) and fried. The color of each fries was evaluated using the USDA index scale with seven categories 000 - 4 (000 = very light (high quality) - 4 dark brown).
    Frying index (1-6) was calculated:
    Frying index = (0 * n000 + 1 * n00 + 2 * n0 + 3 * n1 + 4 * n2 + 5 * n3 + 6 * n4) / n total (n = number of french fries for each category)
    The weight of the fresh sprouts was evaluated by weighing all the germs per sample. Sprout weight was calculated for a standard size sample of 1.0 kg of potatoes:
    Fresh sprouts weight (g) = fresh sprouts weight sample / (unloading sample weight - sprouts)
    Table 7: Weight of fresh sprouts and weight loss
    Table 8: Average amount of sprouts after storage
    Table 9: Average weight loss after storage
    Table 10: Quality of frying after storage
    Example 8
    A comparison was made between a treatment with spearmint oil and a treatment with orange oil. The treatment with spearmint oil was implemented with Biox M, a product formulated for the electric fogging, mainly based on carvone (65-85%). The orange oil treatment was carried out with BIO 024, an orange oil having a high content of limonene (at least 900 g limonene / L). One group of treatments was treated by cold fogging (group A), another group was treated by hot nebulization, in particular by electrospray. An untreated control was also included. The treatment conditions (storage temperature, ventilation, humidity, varieties used, loading / unloading / distribution) were the same. The potatoes were harvested on September 23, 2014 and loaded into the experimental chambers on September 30, 2014. The potatoes were dried and then cooled to 7 ° C. The first application took place on October 21, 2014.
    The results are summarized in Figure 4, for different periods of storage time (Figure 4A: 5 months after storage, Figure 4B: 6 months after storage, Figure 4C: 7 months after storage). Nine orange oil treatments were performed for 675 to 1350 mL of product formulated per ton (9x75 mL to 9x150 mL formulated product). For Biox-M, a first application of 90 mL was followed by 9 times 30 mL applications, providing a total of 310 mL / tonne. From the results, it can be concluded that the orange oil treatment provided the best growth regulation for the sprouts. Orange oil acts by direct contact. A good distribution on the surface of the potato is necessary to ensure a homogeneous control. From the figures, it can be seen that this is better achieved by hot nebulization than by cold fogging. Hot nebulization produces smaller droplets and therefore a better diffusion of the product. There was a clear dose-response relationship between 75 mL and 100 mL, but not between 100 mL versus 150 mL. A dose of 100 mL of product formulated per tonne of potatoes at 3 week intervals provided the best result. Effectiveness is thought to be based on a curative effect.
    In conclusion, treatment with orange / limonene oil has been shown to allow adequate control of germination, even in the absence of preliminary chemical treatments, such as maleic hydrazide or CPIC, on a long period of time. It provided better control of germination compared to Biox-M, based on spearmint oil. In addition, it does not leave a taste of mint in the potatoes processed for the production of fries.
    Example 9
    An evaluation was carried out on several application timings of Bio024 (940 g / L of orange oil) on the Bintje, Charlotte and Nicola potato varieties, by hot nebulization. The results are summarized in Figure 5.
    As references, an untreated control was included, as well as treatments with CIPC 500 HN (500 g / L chlorpropham). The treatments concerned the same total dose of active substance. The dose rate per application has been adapted according to the frequency of application used. Four replications were made. The air temperature per unit was 8.3 to 10.4 ° C, the relative humidity percentage was 90% at the start of the test and 99% during the test.
    In a first trial, a treatment program based on CPIC alone was used. Twelve grams of active ingredient were applied on November 5, 2014, followed by 8 g of active ingredient applied on December 31, 2014, 8 g of active ingredient applied on February 25, 2015, and 8 g of active ingredient applied on December 22, 2014. April 2015. In total, the maximum permitted quantity of 36 g per tonne of potatoes per year was applied, using 4 treatments.
    In a second test, 24 mL of CIPC formulated product was applied to storage, which corresponds to 12 g of active ingredient. Nine weeks after storage, 100 mL of BIO 024 was applied, which corresponded to 90 g of limonene. This was followed by treatments with 100 mL of BIO 024 every 3 weeks. This corresponded to 6 treatments in total. In a third test, 24 mL of CIPC formulated product was applied to storage. 3 weeks after storage, 100 ml of BIO024 were applied, followed by treatments with 100 ml of BIO 024 every 3 weeks. This corresponded to 8 treatments in total.
    In a fourth test, 166 mL of BIO 024 was applied every 5 weeks, for a total of 6 treatments. In a fifth test, 133 mL of BIO 024 was applied every 4 weeks, corresponding to 7 treatments. In a sixth trial, 100 mL of BIO 024 was applied every 3 weeks, corresponding to 9 treatments. In a seventh test, 66 ml were applied every 2 weeks, for a total of 14 treatments. In an eighth trial, 33 mL of BIO 024 was applied weekly, for a total of 27 treatments. In a ninth trial, no treatment was performed. From the results, it can be seen that the dosing regimen of 100 mL BIO 024, or 90 g limonene, every 3 weeks, provides the best control of germs, when the product is used alone. Providing the same amount of active ingredient with a smaller single dose and a shorter application rate (eg 33 mL of BIO 024 each week) or a higher single dose and a longer application rate (e.g., 133 mL of BIO 024 every 4 weeks) decreased the effectiveness of the product used alone.
    A combination of reduced dose CPIC (12 g of active ingredient) with orange oil (limonene as an active ingredient) in 100 mL treatments, gave a similar control compared to the treatment regimen. CIPC application that is in use today (12 g dose followed by three 8 g applications, providing a total of 36 g of active ingredient per tonne of potatoes). Because of its volatility and lack of a systemic effect, limonene does not contribute to providing residues. With this scheme, the amount of CIPC can be reduced while maintaining the effectiveness of germination control. With CIPC storage use, the time between the application of CIPC and the removal of potatoes from storage is long enough to reduce the level of CIPC residues to levels that are still acceptable for the CIPC segment. fresh produce market.
    权利要求:
    Claims (15)
    [1]
    A method for improved storage of tubers, comprising the steps of: applying to a tuber bearing seed a composition comprising at least 50% limonene, expressed as weight of limonene based on the total weight of the composition, in a quantity effective in removing said germs.
    [2]
    2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that said tuber is the potato and said seed is less than 5 millimeters.
    [3]
    3. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that said application is implemented by nebulization.
    [4]
    4. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that said composition comprises or consists of orange oil.
    [5]
    5. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that said composition does not comprise synthetic active ingredient.
    [6]
    6. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that said tuber is the potato.
    [7]
    7. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that said effective amount corresponds to a limonene dose between 60 ml and 400 ml per ton of tubers; preferably 100 to 150 ml / tonne of tubers.
    [8]
    8. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that said application is repeated at least once in an interval of 3 days to 6 weeks; preferably in an interval of 3 weeks.
    [9]
    9. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that an initial dose of 60 to 400 ml of limonene per ton of tubers is followed by one or more subsequent doses of 20 ml to 300 ml of limonene per tonne of said tubers.
    [10]
    10. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the storage period is 4 to 8 months.
    [11]
    11. Method according to any one of claims 2-10, characterized in that said nebulization is implemented in storage chambers for said tubers.
    [12]
    12. A composition for removing germs from tubers bearing seeds and being suitable for application by nebulization, comprising at least 50% of limonene, expressed as weight of limonene relative to the total weight of the composition, under the form of an emulsifiable concentrate (EC) comprising between 550 and 750 g / l of limonene and one or more emulsion stabilizing surfactants.
    [13]
    The composition of claim 12 comprising 600-650 g / l of limonene and 240-260 g / l of said one or more emulsion stabilizing surfactants.
    [14]
    14. Composition according to claim 12 or 13, comprising less than 10% by weight of solvent.
    [15]
    15. Use of limonene as a natural germ-clearing agent for the recovery of tubers carrying sprouts.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    CA2548111C|2010-12-21|Cipc solutions and a terpene or a terpene oil and use thereof for anti-germinating treatment of bulbs or tubers
    EP1728429B1|2009-07-15|Process for anti-germination treatment of bulbs and tubers using CIPC and terpenes or terpene oils
    US20200236959A1|2020-07-30|Method for anti-sprouting tuber treatment with reduced amount of cipc
    AU2021215268A1|2021-09-02|Improved tuber storage
    WO2012032262A1|2012-03-15|Fungicidal bactericidal and/or antioxidant treatment of foodstuffs via application of formulations comprising an essential oil and a dialkylene glycol
    CA2788896C|2017-04-04|Method for anti-sprouting and possibly fungicidal treatment of bulbs and/or tubers using clove oil and mint oil
    OA16340A|2015-05-11|Traitement fongicide bactéricide et/ou antioxydant des denrées alimentaires par application de formulations comprenant une huile essentielle et un dialkylène glycol.
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    FR3033982A1|2016-09-30|
    EP3011834A1|2016-04-27|
    FR3033982B1|2020-05-01|
    CO2017003792A2|2017-07-28|
    CA2965210C|2020-04-07|
    JP2021006533A|2021-01-21|
    CA2965210A1|2016-04-28|
    AR102375A1|2017-02-22|
    AU2021215268A1|2021-09-02|
    CL2017000978A1|2018-01-12|
    BE1023345A1|2017-02-10|
    AU2015335028B2|2019-04-04|
    ECSP17024562A|2017-06-30|
    WO2016062721A1|2016-04-28|
    FR3027191B1|2019-08-02|
    MX2017005184A|2017-07-27|
    AU2015335028A1|2017-05-04|
    US20170311618A1|2017-11-02|
    JP2019206560A|2019-12-05|
    AU2019201721B2|2021-05-13|
    JP6590922B2|2019-10-16|
    BR112017008289A2|2017-12-19|
    FR3027191A1|2016-04-22|
    JP2018505650A|2018-03-01|
    CN106998683A|2017-08-01|
    AU2019201721A1|2019-04-04|
    RU2670530C1|2018-10-23|
    JP6797978B2|2020-12-09|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    JPS5414406A|1977-07-05|1979-02-02|Dotolo V|Deterging compositions|
    US5139562A|1990-12-19|1992-08-18|The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture|Inhibition of potato spouting using volatile monoterpenes|
    RU2100921C1|1991-03-15|1998-01-10|Миннибаев Эдуард Файзиевич|Agricultural product storage|
    US5811372A|1997-05-21|1998-09-22|Platte Chemical Company|Method of controlling sprout formation in potatoes by selective application of chlorpropham, carvone, benzothiazole and ethylene|
    EP1052912B1|1998-12-03|2004-04-21|Xeda International|Fog treatment method using a liquid composition for treating fruits and vegetables and implementing device|
    US20060199739A1|2005-03-02|2006-09-07|Olav Messerschmidt|Limonene-containing herbicide compositions, herbicide concentrate formulations and methods for making and using same|
    FR2886516B1|2005-06-02|2007-10-05|Xeda Internat Sa|PROCESS FOR THE ANTI -MINMINATION AND / OR BIOCIDAL TREATMENT OF BULBS OR TUBERS USING CIPC AND TERPENE OR TERPENIC OIL|
    FR2923356B1|2007-11-09|2010-01-22|Xeda International|USE OF MINT OR L-CARVONE SOLUTIONS FOR FUNGICIDE AND / OR ANTI -MINMINATION TREATMENT OF BULBS AND / OR TUBERS|
    FR2945708B1|2009-05-19|2011-07-29|Xeda International|CONCENTRATED CIPC FORMULATIONS IN DIALCENE GLYCOL AND USES THEREOF FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANTIGERMINATIVE BULBS OR TUBERS|
    EP2440061B1|2009-06-12|2018-12-05|Bayer Cropscience LP|Methods of inhibiting, preventing, killing and/or repelling insects using simulated blends of chenopodium extracts|
    EP3011835B1|2014-10-20|2020-04-08|Arysta LifeScience Benelux Sprl|Method for anti-sprouting tuber treatment with reduced amount of CIPC|CN109007001B|2018-07-06|2021-11-23|昆明理工大学|Moringa oleifera leaf cleaning and fresh-keeping agent and using method thereof|
    法律状态:
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    EP14189559.9A|EP3011834A1|2014-10-20|2014-10-20|Improved tuber storage|
    EP14189559.9|2014-10-20|
    [返回顶部]