• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    The carbonate bonded press molded article is produced by press molding a carbonatable particulate material which contains water and carbonating the resulting tablet with carbon dioxide gas. In order to be able to guarantee optimum compressive strength of the article, two types of tests are provided. In the first type of test, a sample of the particulate material is compressed at increasing compaction pressure and when water begins to be forced out of the material from a particular compaction pressure, the step of molding Press is performed at a compaction pressure which is at least 7 MPa less than that compaction pressure. In the second type of test, different samples of the particulate material are press molded at different compaction pressures and, after releasing the compaction pressure, the density of the tablet is determined. In the event that this density decreases instead of increasing from a particular compaction pressure, the press molding step is performed at a compaction pressure which is lower than that particular compaction pressure.
    公开号:BE1022349B1
    申请号:E2015/5202
    申请日:2015-03-31
    公开日:2016-03-25
    发明作者:Nick Mayelle；Frédérique Bouillot；Mechelen Dirk Van
    申请人:Recoval Belgium；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    "Process for the production of a press-cast article with a carbonate connection"
    The present invention relates to a method for producing a carbonate-bound press-molded article, which method comprises the steps of providing a carbonatable particulate material which contains water; press-molding the particulate material to form a tablet; and carbonating the particulate material in said tablet to produce carbonates thereby transforming the tablet into a carbonate-bonded press-molded article. The carbonation step is performed by contacting the tablet with a gas that contains at least 1% by volume of carbon dioxide.
    There are different industrial production processes that produce carbonatable materials as by-products. These by-products are, for example, fly ash, residual ash (in particular industrial incineration ash from municipal waste) and slags generated during the production of phosphorus or during the production of ferrous and non-ferrous metals such as zinc , copper and lead, and iron or steel. Dust from air filters, for example from furnaces for the manufacture of steel, is also carbonatable, particularly when it contains calcium oxides. Some of these by-products can be used in different applications. Blast furnace slag can be used for example in road construction and also in cement production. Some slags, such as common steel slags (eg LD slag) which have a high neutralizing value can also be used as soil softening agent, for example. Other materials, such as residual ash and stainless steel slag, however, contain considerable quantities of heavy metals which are problematic in view of their leaching behavior.
    In order to limit the economic and environmental impact of these domestic and industrial wastes, more and more attempts have been made to develop processes for treating these materials, that is, processes for converting these wastes into materials with economic value. A large amount of this waste is alkaline and includes carbonatable substances, such as calcium oxides and / or hydroxides and magnesium oxides and / or hydroxides. Other substances, for example the calcium silicates contained in the waste, can also be carbonatable. It is known that the carbonation of these substances makes it possible to obtain materials having good mechanical properties. In addition, carbonation can also help prevent the leaching of pollutants such as heavy metals.
    For example, it has been proposed, in WO-A-2007/096671, to carry out an accelerated carbonation of waste in a rotating drum to produce a secondary granulate which can serve as a construction material. A similar process has been proposed for waste from the extraction or processing of metals in WO-A-2009/024826. In the materials obtained by these processes, carbonation of the lime present in the waste forms a limestone matrix that guarantees less leaching of the heavy metals contained in the waste and greater mechanical resistance.
    Stainless steel slag is a special group of slags that contain relatively large amounts of chromium and often nickel and / or molybdenum. As disclosed in EP-B-0837043, EP-B-1055647 and EP-B-1146022, stainless steel slag lixiviation problems can be solved by crushing the steel slag, removing from them the valuable stainless steel particles and applying the different fractions of the remaining crushed slag in limited applications, for example as a fine or coarse aggregate in concrete or asphalt. However, because of its high content of gamma (γ-C2S) dicalcium silicate, the finer fraction of these crushed steel slags (0 - 0.5 mm) has high water absorption properties and is therefore not suitable not for use in concrete or asphalt applications.
    In order to be able to recycle more of the valuable stainless steel remaining in stainless steel slag, there is also a growing interest in more crushed steel slag crushing so that more stainless steel can be recycled. . The finely milled fraction, for example having a particle size of less than 100 μm, has a smaller dicalcium silicate gamma content than the fines described above, since it is produced from a coarser fraction of crushed steel slag (preferably a coarser fraction which has a relatively high steel content, which can for example be obtained by a magnetic separation process). As disclosed for example in EP 2160367, this finely milled fraction can be used as a filler in concrete or asphalt but other large scale applications of this finely milled fraction would be very useful for having a larger potential market and even of greater value for these fine waste materials.
    To reduce the high water absorption of these fines removed from coarser fractions of crushed stainless steel slag so that not only these coarser fractions but also fines can be used in concrete or asphalt, WO 2009/090219 proposes to aggregate and then to carbonate these fines at a relatively low pressure. In this way, aggregates with less water-absorbing properties and the strength needed for use in concrete or asphalt could be produced. Another possible application of these aggregated and carbonated fines is disclosed in WO 2009/090226. In this application, aggregated and carbonated fines are introduced as foaming slag in an electric steel furnace.
    Another carbonation process for producing higher value building materials starting with carbonatable particulate materials, particularly crushed stainless steel slag fines which have a size between 0 and 0.5 mm, is disclosed in US Pat. WO-2009/133120. In this process, the particulate material is first press-molded at a relatively high compaction pressure between 5 and 65 MPa, and the resulting tablet is then carbonated at a relatively high temperature and pressure. In this way, carbonated tablets having a relatively high compressive strength can be produced. By controlling the intrinsic porosity and permeability of the tablets and by carbonation for more hours (especially for 18 hours at an increased pressure and temperature), compressive strengths between 26 and 66 MPa with a fine fraction were obtained. of 0-500 μm stainless steel slag which was press-molded at a compacting pressure of 182 kg / cm 2 (= 17.8 MPa). A disadvantage of this prior art process is that, despite the fact that relatively small blocks have been carbonated (62 × 62 × 32 mm and 120 × 55 × 46 mm), high gas pressures have been observed. required, which makes this process very expensive.
    A problem of prior art carbonation processes further includes that, as described, for example, at p. 201 of the article "A review of aceelerated carbonation technology in the treatment of cement-based materials and sequestration of CO 2" by Fernandez Bertos et al., In the Journal of Hazardous Materials B112 (2004) 193-205, the water content particulate material should be high enough for the carbonation reaction but should be very low to allow CO 2 to diffuse into the tablet This is particularly important when carbonation takes place at low gas pressures, i.e. at pressures below 5 bar, and when the particulate material is compacted at relatively high compaction pressures to have a reduced porosity In the case where the water content of the particulate material is too high, it must be This is the case, for example, for stainless steel slag fines which are separated from the coarser fractions of crushed stainless steel slag. Compared with coarser fractions, the fines have a relatively high gamma dicalcium silicate content (so-called steel slags produced by the expansive transformation of beta-dicalcium silicate into gamma dicalcium silicate during cooling of steel slag stainless) and absorb more water. They have in particular a particle size of between 0 and 0.5 mm and are in practice separated from the coarser sand fraction (having a particle size greater than 0.5 mm) of the stainless steel slag by a technique wet separation. Even when these wet fines are allowed to dry for a long time under atmospheric conditions, they still have a moisture content of about 17% by dry weight which hinders the carbonation process. Although the penetration of carbon dioxide into the tablet is enhanced by the high pressure in the high pressure carbonation process disclosed in WO 2009/133120, the fines were nevertheless first dried to a moisture content. of 12% by weight. A disadvantage of such a drying process is that it requires a lot of time and energy, since the water is strongly absorbed, inter alia by capillary forces, into the stainless steel slag particles .
    When the particulate material is molded to form the tablet to be carbonated, the green strength of the tablet should preferably be sufficiently high so that it can be handled more easily without disintegrating or being damaged. For a relatively low compaction pressure, corresponding to the same degree of compaction as that obtained in the Proctor test (described in ASTM D698 / AASHTO T99), the maximum green resistance, or minimum porosity, is obtained for a water content. corresponding to the Proctor density. As described in WO 2009/090219, stainless steel slag fines of 0 - 0.5 mm have for example an optimum Proctor density for a water content of 22% by weight. At this optimum water content, the smallest compaction pressures are required to achieve some green strength. At lower water contents, higher compaction pressures are generally required to achieve the same reduction in porosity and thus the same increase in compressive strength. It is therefore advantageous in practice to apply higher water contents in the particulate material in order to obtain higher green resistances, but on the other hand, lower water contents are required in order to obtain a higher water content. optimal degree of carbonation.
    It is now an object of the present invention to provide a novel process for the production of press-molded, carbonate-bonded articles which makes it possible to ensure optimum compressive strengths of press-molded and carbonated tablets both for lower water contents, which provide the green strength (compressive strength) required at a relatively high compaction pressure, than for higher water contents, which provide the green strength required with a relatively small compaction pressure and have the advantage that no drying or less drying of the particulate material is required in the case of relatively wet particulate materials. To this end, the method of the present invention is characterized in a first aspect in that, prior to press molding the particulate material to form said tablet, a series of tests are performed in which for each compaction pressure of a series of increasing compaction pressures, ranging from the lowest compaction pressure to the highest compaction pressure, at least one sample of the particulate material is press-molded to the compaction pressure and after releasing the compaction pressure, a parameter indicating the density of the press-cast sample is determined. The particulate material is then press-molded to form said compact with a compaction pressure that is selected within a range delimited by a lower compaction pressure limit and an upper compaction pressure limit. The lower compaction compression limit is greater than 5 MPa while the upper compaction pressure limit is equal to or less than the highest compaction pressure and, in the case where the density decreases when in said series of tests the compaction pressure is increased by a smaller compaction pressure from said series of compaction pressures to a larger compaction pressure of said series, said upper compaction pressure limit is smaller than said larger compaction pressure; and preferably equal to or less than said smaller compaction pressure.
    According to this first aspect of the invention, it has been found that a too high compaction pressure can have a negative effect on the compressive strength of the carbonated tablet. In particular, it has been found that such a negative effect occurs when applying compaction pressure which is so high that the density of the compact, measured after releasing the compaction pressure, decreases rather than increases despite the fact that the particulate material had initially been compressed to a higher density in the press mold. Starting at a certain compaction pressure, it was found that the compressed particulate material returned to a larger volume upon release of compaction pressure. Although this expansion occurred before the carbonation step, it was found that the compressive strength of the carbonated tablet was adversely affected by this expansion. It has been found that the negative effect observed was so great that the compressive strength of the compressed carbonated tablet at a too high compaction pressure was even very much lower than the compressive strength of a compressed carbonated tablet at the same mass. volume in the mold with significantly lower compaction pressure. The method according to the first aspect of the present invention avoids this negative effect on the compressive strength of the carbonated tablet so that, in order to maximize this compressive strength, the compaction pressure can be increased to the upper compaction pressure limit as determined by the method of the first aspect of the present invention.
    According to the invention, it has also been found that in the case where the particulate material has a relatively high water content, the water contained in the particulate material can also have a considerable negative effect on the compressive strength of the carbonated tablet. . In order to be able to minimize this negative effect, the method of the invention is characterized in a second aspect in that, before molding the particulate material to form said tablet, at least one sample thereof is subjected to a test in which the sample is compressed with increasing compaction pressure until a predetermined compaction pressure is reached or, in the case where the particulate material has a water content so high that when it is compressed sample, the water begins to be expelled from said sample from a lower compaction pressure, which is lower than said predetermined compaction pressure, at least until said lower compaction pressure is reached. The particulate material is then press-molded to form said compact with a compaction pressure that is selected within a range delimited by a lower compaction pressure limit and an upper compaction pressure limit. In the method of the second aspect of the present invention, the lower compaction pressure limit is again greater than 5 MPa while the upper compaction pressure limit is at least 7 MPa lower than said predetermined and lower compaction pressure. at least 7 MPa at said lower compaction pressure in the case where the particulate material has said high water content.
    According to this second aspect of the invention, it has been found that when the particulate material comprises a quantity of water such that the water is expelled from the particulate material when it is molded by compression, the carbonated tablet has a resistance to compression greatly reduced. However, despite the very high water content, a considerably higher compressive strength can be obtained according to the second aspect of the invention by using a lower compaction pressure, more particularly a compaction pressure which is lower than at least 7 MPa at the compaction pressure from which water begins to be expelled from the particulate material.
    When applying the second aspect of the invention in combination with the first aspect, in the case of a relatively high water content, the upper compaction pressure limit should therefore be at least 7 MPa lower than the compaction from which water begins to be expelled from the particulate material even when the upper compaction pressure limit determined according to the first aspect of the invention is higher. In the case of relatively dry particulate materials, the upper compaction limit should be less than the compaction pressure at which the density of the decompressed compact would decrease rather than increase and the compaction pressure from which the water would begin to be expelled from the particulate material should be determined (since it has no expelled water or only at compaction pressures that are at least more than 7 MPa higher than the highest compaction pressure applied in the tests of the first aspect of the invention).
    In an advantageous embodiment of the method according to the present invention, said upper compaction pressure limit is less than 60 MPa, preferably less than 50 MPa and more preferably less than 40 MPa and / or said lower compaction pressure limit is greater than 7 MPa, preferably greater than 10 MPa and more preferably greater than 15 MPa.
    It has been found that for such compacting pressures, maximum compressive strengths can be obtained. The tests provided for in the first and second aspects of the present invention make it possible to avoid resistance to compaction which would result in poor compressive strength of the carbonated articles. This is the case when the particulate material has a relatively high water content which may adversely affect the compressive strength of the carbonated tablet if too high compaction pressures are applied and / or when the particulate material has properties such as when it is compacted too strongly, the density of the tablet increases instead of decreasing.
    In a preferred embodiment of the process according to the present invention, the particulate material comprises slags from a metal production process, slags from the production of phosphorus, residual ash and / or fly ash, the material particulate material preferably comprises steel slag, in particular stainless steel slag.
    In another preferred embodiment of the process according to the present invention, at least 50% by volume of said particulate material has a particle size of less than 1000 μm, preferably less than 500 μm, more preferably less than 250 μm and most preferably less than 250 μm. 100 μm and at least 50% by volume of said particulate material has a particle size greater than 1 μm, preferably greater than 5 μm and more preferably greater than 10 μm.
    In yet another embodiment of the process according to the present invention, the particulate material which is press-molded to form said tablet has a water content of at least 1%, preferably at least 3% and more preferably by at least 5% by dry weight.
    A minimum amount of water is required for the carbonation step, especially at least 1% by dry weight, while higher water contents are advantageous for obtaining higher green strengths of the tablet.
    In an advantageous embodiment of the process according to the present invention, the gas used to carbonate the tablet is at a gauge pressure of less than 0.5 MPa, preferably at a gauge pressure of less than 0.2 MPa and more preferably at a gauge pressure of less than 0.1 MPa. Manometric pressure means the pressure above the ambient pressure. The absolute pressure is preferably at least equal to atmospheric pressure or at most somewhat below atmospheric pressure, in particular at most 0.02 MPa, preferably at most 0.01 MPa below atmospheric pressure.
    One advantage of such a low-pressure carbonation process is that it is easier and less difficult to implement and also requires less costly equipment than so-called high-pressure carbonation processes. By selecting the claimed compaction pressures, high compressive strengths can additionally be obtained with such low pressures. In addition, tests have shown that lower gas pressures result in higher compressive strengths when the same amount of carbonates is produced. Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following more detailed description of certain particular embodiments. The reference numbers used in this description refer to the accompanying drawings in which:
    Figure 1 shows the particle size distribution (cumulative% by volume versus particle size) of the stainless steel slag load fraction in Experiment 1 and the fine fraction of steel slag sand stainless used in Experiment 2;
    FIGS. 2A to 2D schematically illustrate the process used in Experiments 1 and 2 to produce the carbonated press-molded tablets;
    FIGS. 3A to 3D illustrate the results of tests obtained with the filler fraction in Experiment 1, FIG. 3A illustrating the calculated unsaturated porosity of the tablets; FIG. 3B the compressive strength of the carbonated tablets, FIG. calculated total porosity of the tablets and FIG. 3D the overall dry density of the tablets as a function of the water content of the tablets and the compaction pressure applied before molding them to the press; and
    FIGS. 4A to 4D are the same as FIGS. 3A to 3D but illustrate the results obtained with the fine fraction of sand in Experiment 2.
    The present invention generally relates to a method of producing a carbonate-bonded press-molded article by press-molding and carbonating a carbonatable particulate material. The term "particulate material" or also "granular material" refers to any material that consists of bulk particles, these particles may be of different sizes so that the term "particulate material" does not include only coarse aggregates or Fine particulate material applied in the process according to the present invention, however, preferably has a particle size, or particle size distribution, such as at least 50% by volume of the particulate material. a particle size of less than 1000 μm, preferably less than 500 μm, more preferably less than 250 μm and most preferably less than 100 μm, and at least 50% by volume of the particulate material preferably has a particle size. greater than 1 μm, more preferably greater than 5 μm and most preferably greater than 10 μm.
    The particulate material may be particulate material that is carbonatable or it may be a mixture of at least a first particulate material that is carbonatable and at least one second particulate material that may or may not be carbonatable. A particulate material that is not carbonatable includes, for example, dust extracted from the effluent gases of a steel mill converter, waste resulting from the deburring of steel parts or mixtures thereof. Such particulate material may comprise in particular more than 30%, preferably more than 40% and more preferably more than 50% by dry weight of metallic iron and more than 1%, preferably more than 4% and more preferably more than 8% by weight. % by dry weight of iron oxides. The carbonate-bonded press-molded article which includes such a second particulate material bound by means of a first carbonatable particulate material is preferably loaded into a blast furnace to recycle the metals therein. It can also be loaded in an oven for the manufacture of steel, in particular a steel mill converter, but its loading in a blast furnace has the advantage that the carbonatable material must not be dried after the carbonation step .
    The particle size of the particulate material, or mixture of the first and second particulate materials, is preferably selected to achieve a higher compactness, i.e. less total porosity, since higher compressive strength can be achieved. be obtained this way. The compressive strength of the tablet before the carbonation step, that is to say the green resistance of the tablet, as well as the compressive strength of the carbonated tablet is determined according to the European standard EN 12390-3: 2009 .
    The particulate material that is carbonatable, i.e. the particulate material as a whole, or in the case of the above-described mixtures of first and second particulate materials, the first particulate material and / or the second particulate material when it is carbonatable, preferably comprises a by-product or a waste product The particulate material which is carbonatable in particular has a pH of at least 8.3 and comprises a source of at least one alkaline earth metal, in particular calcium. The pH of the carbonatable material is defined as the pH of demineralised water in which the particulate material has been immersed for 18 hours in a liquid / solid ratio of 4.5. The carbonatable material may contain different crystalline and amorphous phases and preferably contains at least one alkaline earth metal silicate phase, in particular crystalline dicalcium silicate.
    The particulate material which is carbonatable also preferably comprises calcium oxide and / or calcium hydroxide, the total amount of calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide being preferably at least 1% by weight. dry weight, more preferably at least 2% by dry weight. It may also contain magnesium oxide and / or magnesium hydroxide. These oxides and hydroxides may be in an amorphous form and / or in a crystalline form, in particular in the form of portlandite (CafOHfe), free lime (CaO), brucite (Mg (OH) z) and periclase (MgO). Initially, since they are often produced at elevated temperatures, the freshly produced carbonatable materials usually do not contain hydroxides but only oxides, the hydroxides being formed upon aging (weathering) of the carbonatable material or during the carbonation step. Since the air also contains a small amount of carbon dioxide, a portion of the hydroxides is further transformed into carbonates (by natural carbonation) as the carbonatable material ages.
    A wide variety of carbonatable materials are suitable for processing according to the process of the invention. Residual ash, more particularly residual ash produced during the incineration of waste, in particular municipal waste (that is to say, residual ash from the incineration of municipal waste) are for example suitable carbonatable materials. Fly ash may also be carbonated, in particular fly ash not derived from coal and furthermore filter dust from a furnace for the manufacture of steel, particularly an electric arc furnace (filter dust FAE). The most preferred carbonatable materials, however, are slag materials resulting from metal production processes (production of pig iron, steel, stainless steel and production of non-ferrous metals such as copper and zinc) and phosphorus production. The carbonatable material used is preferably a non-hydraulic or essentially non-hydraulic material. Since a non-hydraulic material can not provide such a curable matrix by reaction with water (especially by CSH formation), a solid article can still be produced by carbonation of this material.
    The slag material may be blast furnace slag but is preferably slag from steelmaking, more preferably slag from the manufacture of stainless steel. Slags in steelmaking may be converter slag (such as LD slag) or electric arc furnace slag (EAF slag). Common steel slags do not contain or only small amounts of heavy metals such as chromium and nickel and, therefore, do not have leaching problems as do stainless steel slags. Stainless steel slags generally contain more than 3000 mg / kg of chromium and usually even more than 5000 mg / kg of chromium. They may also contain nickel, more particularly more than 300 mg / kg, in particular more than 400 mg / kg and often even more than 500 mg / kg of nickel. By carbonating these carbonatable slags, it is possible to reduce or even prevent the leaching of these heavy metals.
    Steel slag, and in particular stainless steel slag, is usually crushed to produce a granular material from which the metal fraction can be recycled. The coarser fraction of crushed stainless steel slag can be used as a coarse or fine aggregate in concrete or asphalt. The finer fraction, especially the 0-500 μm fraction, however, has high water absorption properties, so that it is not suitable as such for these applications. The finer fraction, ie the so-called fines, contains in fact a greater amount of gamma (γ-C2S) dicalcium silicate which is produced during the solidification of liquid slag when a part of Dicalcium silicates beta (β-C2S) is transformed into the gamma polymorph. Due to the resulting expansion, cracks are formed and so-called fusing slags are produced which have high water absorption properties. The stainless steel slag material, which contains in particular at least 3% by dry weight, more particularly at least 5% by dry weight and even more particularly at least 7% by dry weight of y-C2S, is preferably used as particulate material, or as one of the particulate materials, in the process of the present invention. FIG. 1 represents the particle size distribution, as cumulative values of the particles that pass through the various screens, of such a fine fraction of stainless steel slag (% by volume relative to the particle size / size of the screen in mm).
    As described in WO 2008/145758, it is also possible to grind a coarser fraction of crushed stainless ader slag to a fine particle size, particularly to obtain a filler that can be used in asphalt or concrete . Since the fines (which are rich in γ-C2S) have been removed from this coarser fraction, it has a lower content of γ-C2S, in particular a y-C2S content which is less than 7% by weight. dry weight or even less than 5% by dry weight. Comminution or finer grinding of the coarser fraction allows for the recycling of more precious metal. The coarser fraction which is finely comminuted is preferably separated, for example by a magnetic separation technique, so as to have a higher metal content than the remaining slag fraction. FIG. 1 also shows the particle size distribution, as cumulative values of the particles passing through the different screen sizes, of a sample of a slag fraction of finely ground stainless steel (% by volume with respect to the particle size). screen size in mm).
    In the method of the present invention, which is schematically illustrated in FIG. 2, the carbonatable particulate material 1 is applied in a mold 2 and compressed therein to form a tablet 3. The mold 2 illustrated in FIGS. 2C is provided with a lid 4 on which the required pressure can be exerted. This can be done by means of a hydraulic pressure mechanism which is known per se and of which only the piston rod is shown in FIG. 2C. After press-molding the carbonatable material 1, with a compaction pressure which according to the present invention is greater than 5 MPa, the produced tablet is carbonated by means of a gas which contains at least 1% by volume of carbon dioxide, thus producing carbonates which convert the tablet 3 into a press-molded, carbonate-bound part.
    As illustrated in FIG. 2D, the tablet 3 can be placed in a closed container 6 in which the gas containing carbon dioxide is introduced through an inlet 7. The gas containing carbon dioxide can be stored in a bottle of pressurized gas 8 which may contain in particular essentially pure gaseous carbon dioxide. In an initial phase, the vessel 6 can be purged by Center 7 and the outlet 9 with pure carbon dioxide so that the carbonation is carried out with almost pure carbon dioxide gas. Less concentrated gases can however also be used, for example industrial process exhaust gases. The gas used to carbonate the tablets preferably comprises at least 3% by volume, more preferably at least 5% by volume and ideally at least 7% by volume of carbon dioxide. Higher carbon dioxide contents of at least 20, 50 or 75% by volume are even more preferred, particularly for accelerating the carbonation process.
    The pressure of the gas in the container 6 is preferably controlled to be less than 0.5 MPa, preferably less than 0.2 MPa and more preferably less than 0.1 MPa above atmospheric pressure. that is, the pressure is preferably less than these pressure values. When the gas bottle 8 is formed, the pressure in the container may drop somewhat below atmospheric pressure due to the consumption of gaseous carbon dioxide.
    The method according to the present invention provides two types of tests to be carried out before molding the particulate material 1 to the press and making it possible to guarantee in a quick and simple manner that the carbonated articles produced will have the required compressive strength without to know important properties of the particulate material such as water content, porosity after press molding and the effect of increasing compaction pressure on the porosity. It is possible by these two types of tests to more specifically determine a range of compaction pressures in which the compaction pressure used to produce the tablets can be selected. This range is delimited by an upper compaction pressure limit and a lower compaction pressure limit. Since the porosity of the tablet decreases as the compaction pressure increases, higher compaction pressures, i.e. compaction pressures closer to the upper limit, can be selected in this range in the where higher compressive strengths are required.
    In a first aspect of the invention, a series of tests is carried out in which, for each compaction pressure of a series of increasing compaction pressures, ranging from a lowest compaction pressure to a compaction pressure the higher, at least one sample of the particulate material is press-molded to the compaction pressure in question. After releasing the compaction pressure, a parameter indicating the density of the press-cast sample is determined.
    In the case where the samples all have the same weight, this parameter can simply be the volume of the press-cast sample or even more simply the height of the press-molded sample. In the case where the samples do not have identical weights, the weight of the sample should be divided by the volume measured to obtain the density. Alternatively, the weight may also be divided by the height of the press-molded sample to obtain a parameter that is indicative of the density of the press-cast sample.
    The upper compaction pressure limit of the range in which the compaction pressure used to press-mold the particulate material is to be selected is first at least equal to or less than the highest compaction pressure applied in the series. test. In the case where a decrease is observed instead of an increase in the density when the compaction pressure is increased in said series of tests from a smaller compaction pressure to a higher compaction pressure, the upper compaction pressure limit should be smaller than this greater compaction pressure and should preferably be equal to or smaller than the smaller compaction pressure. It has indeed been observed that, when the density of the press-molded particulate material, measured after releasing the compaction pressure, decreases rather than increases, the compressive strength of the carbonated tablets decreases considerably. As a result, the upper compaction pressure limit should be sufficiently low so that such a decrease in density does not occur in the range in which the compaction pressure is to be selected.
    Depending on the type of particulate material, a decrease in density does not occur or only at higher compaction pressures. The highest compaction pressure that is applied in the test series is selected on the basis of compaction pressures that are practically achievable. In addition, in the case where the density of the tablets does not decrease when the compaction pressure is increased, it is not necessary to apply such high compaction pressures since no additional resistance is obtained with those -this. On the contrary, too great compaction pressures can damage the particles. Since it has been found that it is possible to obtain good compressive strengths with relatively low compaction pressures, the upper compaction pressure limit is therefore preferably less than 60 MPa, more preferably less than 60 MPa. 50 MPa and ideally less than 40 MPa. The highest compaction pressure applied in the test series must not be greater than these upper limits. As mentioned above, the lower compaction pressure limit should be greater than 5 MPa. This lower compaction pressure limit is preferably greater than 7 MPa, more preferably greater than 10 MPa and ideally greater than 15 MPa. In general, higher compressive strengths are obtained at higher compaction pressures because of the reduced porosity of the tablet, unless, as explained above, the higher compaction pressure results from a decrease in instead of increasing the density of the tablet (measured after eliminating the compaction pressure).
    In the case where the particulate material has a relatively high water content, this water content determines, in a second aspect of the invention, the upper compaction pressure limit in the range in which the compaction pressure should be selected. In this second aspect of the invention, at least one sample of the particulate material is subjected to a water saturation test in which the sample is compressed with increasing compaction pressure until a predetermined compaction pressure is or in the case where the particulate material has such a high water content that when the sample is compressed the water begins to be expelled from said sample from a lower compaction pressure, which is lower than said predetermined compaction pressure, at least until said lower compaction pressure is reached.
    The upper compaction pressure limit of the range in which the compaction pressure used to press mold the particulate material is selected is first at least 7 MPa lower than the predetermined compaction pressure applied in the test. saturation in water. In the case where the particulate material has such a high water content that the water is already expelled from the particulate material when a lower compaction pressure is reached, the upper compaction pressure limit should be less than 7 MPa at this lower compaction pressure. It has indeed been observed that, when the particulate material is compressed to a compacting pressure such that the water begins to be expelled, or even to a compression pressure which is somewhat lower, more particularly lower by less than 7 MPa, the compressive strength of carbonated tablets decreases considerably. On the other hand, it has been found that even with relatively high water contents, good compressive strengths can be obtained when lower compaction pressures, i.e. compaction pressures, are applied. at least 7 MPa less than the compaction pressure at which water begins to be expelled from the compressed particulate material.
    The upper compaction pressure limit of the range in which the compaction pressure to be applied to press-mold the particulate material is selected is preferably at least 10 MPa lower than the highest compaction pressure applied in the press. water saturation test and at least 10 MPa lower than said lower compaction pressure from which water begins to be expelled from the particulate material.
    Depending on the water content of the particulate material, there is no expelled water or only at higher compaction pressures. The predetermined compaction pressure which is applied in the water saturation test as the highest compaction pressure is selected on the basis of compaction pressures which are practically achievable. Since it has been found that it is already possible to obtain good compressive strengths with relatively low compaction pressures, the upper compaction pressure limit is therefore preferably less than 60 MPa, more preferably lower. at 50 MPa and ideally less than 40 MPa. The highest compaction pressure applied in the water saturation test should therefore not exceed 7 MPa above these upper limits. As mentioned above, the lower compaction pressure limit should be greater than 5 MPa. This lower compaction pressure limit is preferably greater than 7 MPa, more preferably greater than 10 MPa and ideally greater than 15 MPa. Both the density test and the water saturation test are preferably performed. If the density test and the water saturation test are both performed, both tests result in a range in which the compaction pressure must be selected. In the case where the range obtained by the density test is not the same as the range obtained by the water saturation test, the superimposed part of the two ranges should be determined and the compaction pressure should be selected in this superimposed part of the two ranges, thus satisfying the density test and the water saturation test.
    The particulate material preferably contains at least a minimum amount of water, particularly at least 1% by dry weight, so that there is no need to supply water during the carbonation, for example via the gas containing carbon dioxide, to allow the carbonation reaction. High contents of water, in particular water contents of at least 3% by dry weight and preferably at least 5% by dry weight are however preferred, in particular with a view to making tablets having a resistance in higher green. The water content of the particulate material may be increased by adding water thereto in order to increase the green strength of the tablets, in particular to a compressive strength which is greater than 1 MPa, preferably greater than 2 MPa and better still above 3 MPa. The water saturation test makes it possible to increase the water content to such a degree that a maximum green resistance is obtained while still obtaining the required compressive strength after the carbonation step. The water saturation test makes it possible to easily determine when the water content becomes too high so that the maximum compaction pressure that can be used to press mold the particulate material becomes too low to achieve sufficient compaction. particulate material. This maximum compaction pressure should in particular remain greater than the lower compaction pressure limit of 5 MPa, preferably 7 MPa, more preferably 10 MPa and ideally 15 MPa.
    In the case where the particulate material has a water content so high that the required compressive strength can not be attained, particularly in the case where the upper compaction pressure limit in the range determined by means of the test water saturation would be lower than the lower compaction pressure limit of this range (which is greater than 5 MPa, preferably 7 MPa, more preferably 10 MPa and ideally 15 MPa), the water content of the water material particulate matter can be reduced by the press molding step, in particular by drying. The water content is in particular reduced to a predetermined water content which is greater than 3% by dry weight and preferably greater than 5% by dry weight.
    Given the costs of a drying step, it is preferable to avoid such a drying step. This can be done by composing the particulate material as a mixture of an amount of a first particulate material having a first water content with an amount of a second particulate material having a second water content which is less than the first water content, and decreasing the ratio between the amount of the first particulate material and the amount of the second particulate material. Similarly, if the water content of the particulate material is too high, the water content can be reduced by re-composing the particulate material as a mixture of said first and second particulate materials but increasing instead of decreasing the ratio of the amount of the first particulate material and the amount of the second particulate material.
    The first particulate material, i.e., the material having the highest water content, can be in particular stainless steel slag material which contains at least 3% by dry weight, in particular at least 5% by weight. % by dry weight and more particularly at least 7% by dry weight of dicalcium silicate-y. This first particulate material can therefore be so-called slag fines of stainless steel. In practice, they have a very high water content, for example between 15 and 20% by dry weight, and are difficult to dry since water is strongly absorbed in the particulate material.
    The second particulate material, i.e., the particulate material having the lowest water content, can be in particular stainless steel slag material which contains less dicalcium silicate than the first particulate material. This second material may therefore consist of a coarser fraction of stainless steel slag which has been milled to a finer particle size, in particular so that at least 50% by volume of this second particulate material has a particle size. less than 1000 μm, preferably less than 500 μm, more preferably less than 250 μm and most preferably less than 100 μm. When the coarser fraction of stainless steel slag is dry milled, it has been found that the resulting fine material has a low water content, particularly a water content of less than 0.3% by dry weight.
    This second particulate material may also be a particulate material that is not carbonatable. It could, for example, include waste, ie fine steel particles, resulting from the deburring of steel parts and also dust from filtering effluent gas from a converter. in the case where these effluent gases comprise, for example, fine particles of steel which are loaded into the steel-making furnace but a considerable part of which can be driven out of the furnace by the updraft generated therein . Experimental Results Experiment 1: Fraction of Charge
    A stainless steel slag material was crushed to a particle size between 0 and 35 mm and separated into a fraction of 10 to 35 mm and a fraction of 0 to 10 mm. The fraction of 0 to 10 mm was separated into a fraction of 0 to 2 mm and a fraction of 2 to 10 mm.
    The steel particles were removed from the 0 to 2 mm fraction and this fraction was separated into a 0.5 to 2 mm coarse sand fraction and a 0 to 0.5 mm fine sand fraction.
    The steel particles were removed from the 2 to 10 mm fraction by means of a wet sieving apparatus. The remaining slag fraction was magnetically separated into a fraction that was still relatively rich in metal and a fraction that contained less metal. The metal-rich fraction was milled by a dry grinding process to a size of less than 100 μm and the metal particles were removed. The particle size distribution of the remaining slag fraction, i.e. the so-called filler fraction, is shown in FIG. 1. This filler fraction had a water content of less than 0.3% by dry weight. A chemical analysis showed that the fraction of charge contained neither hydroxides nor carbonates. When this fraction of feed is placed in an atmosphere which is saturated with water at a temperature of 20 ° C, it absorbs only about 1% by dry weight of water.
    The density of the filler particles was determined to be 3392 kg / m3 by means of a pyknometer. The bulk density of the filler fraction, compacted by its own weight, was 1053 kg / m3 so that it had a porosity of 69%. 1500 g of this filler fraction were mixed with different amounts of water (expressed as dry weight percentage by dry weight). The blends were placed in a 14 cm x 10 cm x 8 cm mold and press-molded at different compaction pressures. As illustrated in FIG. 2A, the side walls of the mold were provided in the bottom of holes so that water could be expelled from the particulate material at high water contents and compaction pressures. After the press molding step, the resulting tablets were transferred to a 2 liter glass vessel for the carbonation step. The period between the addition of water to the particulate material and the beginning of the carbonation step was less than 15 minutes.
    During the carbonation step, the glass vessel was held in a water bath having a temperature of 30 ° C. Initially, the vessel was purged for 1 minute with 100% pure dry gaseous carbon dioxide. The outlet port of the vessel was then closed and the carbon dioxide was maintained in the vessel at a pressure of between 0.01 and 0.02 MPa. After 24 hours, the carbonated tablets were dried for 2 hours at 105 ° C. and the compressive strength of the carbonated tablets was determined according to the European standard EN 12390-3: 2009. Each experiment was performed with five repetitions and the average values of the different values are shown in Table 1.
    Table 1: Carbonation Experiments of the Pressed Stainless Steel Slag Load Factor at Different Compaction Pressures with Different Water Content.
    nd: not determined
    In the different experiments, the height, and therefore the volume, of the press-molded tablets was measured after releasing the compaction pressure and after carbonating the tablets. The total porosity of the tablets was calculated from this volume, the weight of the filler fraction (1500 grams) and the density (3392 kg / m3). The unsaturated porosity was calculated as the total porosity minus the volume of water (1 kg of water being equal to 1 dm3). The dry density obtained after compression molding of the tablets, i.e. before the carbonation step, was calculated from the volume of the tablets and the weight of the filler fraction. The amount of carbon dioxide absorbed during the carbonation step was determined on the carbonated tablets by an ATD (Differential Thermal Analysis).
    FIGS. 3A 3D show the unsaturated porosity, the compressive strength (after carbonation), the total porosity (before carbonation) and the dry density (before carbonation) of the tablets of the various experiments indicated in Table 1. identical values were plotted in these figures by means of the Surfer®9 computer program.
    It can be seen in Figures 3B to 3D, and in Table 1, that when, for the same water content, the compaction pressure increases and the dry density of the tablets increases (or the total porosity decreases), the resistance to compression of carbonate tablets increases. This is the case, for example, for the series of experiments F5A to F5C and for the series F10A to F10B. In contrast, as the dry density of the tablets decreases (or the total porosity increases) upon an increase in compaction pressure, the compressive strength of the carbonated tablets decreases suddenly. This is the case, for example, for the series of experiments F10B to F10C in which the compaction pressure applied was respectively 21.4 and 25.7 MPa. For a water content of 10% by dry weight, the compaction pressure should therefore be less than 25.7 MPa so that, despite the lower compaction pressure, the compressive strength of the carbonated tablets increases from 13.8 MPa to 21.8 MPa. , 6 MPa.
    In experiments F15C, F17A and F20A, the compaction pressure was increased until water began to be expelled from the compressed material, which occurred at the compaction pressures indicated. It can be seen in Figures 3A-3D that when water begins to be expelled from the compressed material at these compaction pressures, the compaction pressure applied to press molding of the tablets should be considerably lower than this pressure. compaction. In experiment F15C, for example, water was started to be expelled at a compacting pressure of 25.7 MPa. Despite the fact that at this compaction pressure, the dry density of the tablet further increased (or the total porosity further decreased), the carbonated tablet had almost no resistance (not measurable). A small decrease in compaction pressure at 21.4 MPa in experiment F15B has already resulted in a small compressive strength (of only 2.6 MPa) but a greater decrease in compaction at 14.3 MPa in the F15A experiment, a significantly greater compressive strength of 21.4 MPa was achieved. Therefore, even for relatively large water contents, the process of the present invention achieves the most optimal compressive strengths without having to dry the material.
    According to the invention, the compacting pressure applied for press molding the particulate material should be at least 7 MPa less than the compaction pressure at which water is expelled from the material. In the F17A experiment, water was already expelled from the particulate material at a compacting pressure of 10.7 MPa, due to the relatively high water content of 17.5% by weight. Lowering the compaction pressure to less than 3.7 MPa, however, is not possible according to the present invention since the compaction pressure should be greater than 5 MPa. In the case of a feed fraction which contains 17.5% by weight or more of water, the drying of the material or its mixture with a drier particulate material is therefore necessary.
    Experiments F15C, F17A and F20A show that water is expelled from the press-molded material when it is compressed to a compacting pressure such that the calculated unsaturated porosity is about 4.5% by volume. In fact, the unsaturated porosity will be even a little larger, since the particles of the filler fraction absorb a small amount of water which is not present in the pores.
    It can be seen in FIG. 3B that, particularly for compaction pressures between 15 and 30 MPa, the compressive strength of the carbonated tablets increases sharply when the water content of the tablets is increased from 0 to 5% by dry weight. The total porosity also decreases sharply, while the dry density increases correspondingly. For a water content of 0%, that is to say for a dry material, the tablets had a minimum green resistance, even when they had been press-molded at a high compaction pressure, so that they could not be handled by hand. Tablets having a higher water content, in particular a water content of 5% or more, on the contrary had sufficient green strengths, which results in significantly lower total porosities of these tablets. At lower compaction pressures, particularly compaction pressures between 5 and 15 MPa, higher water contents result in lower porosities or higher dry densities resulting in higher compressive strengths. high. However, the compressive strengths obtained are generally less than the compressive strengths obtained at lower water contents with higher compaction pressures.
    Experiment 2: Fine Sand Fraction Experiment 1 was repeated with the 0-0.5 mm fine sand fraction of the stainless steel slag material. Other compaction pressures were however used and also an additional water content. The particle size distribution of the fine sand fraction is shown in FIG.
    The fraction of fine sand has strongly absorbed water. When stored at 20 ° C in an atmosphere that is saturated with water, it absorbs for example more than 15% water. Proctor compaction tests carried out with such a fraction of fine sand showed that the highest compactness is obtained in the Proctor compaction test for a water content of about 22% by dry weight. The compactness obtained in the Proctor compaction test corresponds to the compactness obtained with a relatively low compaction pressure, in particular a compaction pressure between 10 and 15 MPa.
    The parameters applied and the measured and calculated test results are shown in Table 2.
    Table 2: Carbonation experiments of the fraction of fine sand from 0 to 0.5 mm of stainless steel slag molded to the press at different compacting pressures and having different water contents.
    In the different experiments, the height, and therefore the volume, of the press-molded tablets was measured after releasing the compaction pressure and after carbonating the tablets. The total porosity of the tablets was calculated from this volume, the weight of the fine sand fraction (1500 grams) and the density of the slag sand particles (3000 kg / m3). The unsaturated porosity was calculated as the total porosity minus the volume of water (1 kg of water being 1 dm 3). The dry density obtained after press molding of the tablets, that is to say before the carbonation step, was calculated starting from the volume of the tablets and the weight of the fine sand fraction.
    FIGS. 4A to 4D respectively show the unsaturated porosity, the compressive strength (after carbonation), the total porosity (before carbonation) and the dry density (before carbonation) of the tablets of the various experiments indicated in Table 2.
    It can be seen in Figures 4B to 4D, and in Table 2, that when, for the same water content, the compaction pressure increases and the dry density of the tablets increases (or the total porosity decreases), the resistance to compression of carbonate tablets increases. This is the case for example for the series of experiments S5A to S5E and S10A to S10F. Unlike the load fraction, a decrease in the dry density of the tablets during an increase in compaction pressure was not observed in the experiments with the fine sand fraction. This may be due to a different structure or composition of fine sand particles or perhaps due to a more balanced particle size distribution of these. The method of the present invention does not require an examination of the particle size structure or particle size distribution but merely requires testing the effect of an increase in compaction pressure on the dry density of the tablets.
    It can also be seen in Figures 4A to 4D that when water begins to be expelled from the compacted material at some compaction pressure, the compaction pressure applied for press molding of the tablets should be considerably lower than this compaction pressure. In experiment S25, the fine sand fraction was compressed to achieve unsaturated porosity of only 0.8% so that a considerable amount of water was expelled from the compressed material. In fact, another experiment has shown that water begins to be expelled from the fine sand fraction as soon as its calculated unsaturated porosity (not taking into account the water absorbed by the sand particles proper) is reduced to 3% by volume. The fact that this unsaturated porosity is less than the unsaturated porosity of the fraction of charge can be explained by the fact that the particles of the fine sand fraction absorb more water than the particles of the fraction of charge.
    For a water content of 15% by dry weight, the compressive strength increased when the compaction pressure was increased from 7.7 to 15.4 MPa (Exp S15A to S15B) but then decreased when there was continued to increase the compaction pressure from 15.4 to 38.3 MPa (Exp S15B to S15E), despite the fact that the porosity decreased. Since the porosity was reduced in the S15E experiment to only 3.14% by volume, it is clear that at a somewhat greater compaction pressure, water would begin to be expelled from the material. In order to achieve a sufficiently high compacting pressure, in particular a compacting pressure of at least 10 MPa (which is for example an essential element of the definition of "mass retaining a shape" in the Belgian legislation), a pressure of Lower compaction should therefore be used for such a high water content. For lower water contents, particularly for a water content of 5% by dry weight, higher compaction pressures resulted in higher compressive strengths. However, since it is necessary to avoid drying the wet fine sand fraction, in the case where the fine sand fraction has a water content of 15% by dry weight, the method of the present invention makes it possible to obtain a very high compressive strength of about 25 MPa by simply using a lower compaction pressure of 15 MPa for a relatively high water content. On the other hand, if the water content is even higher, for example 20% by weight, it is not possible to achieve such high compressive strengths. However, it is possible to avoid a drying step by mixing for example 75% by weight of the fraction of fine sand (containing 20% water) with 25% by weight of the filler fraction (containing less than 0.3% of water) to obtain a mixture containing about 15% water.
    It can be seen in FIG. 4B that, particularly for compacting pressures between 15 and 30 MPa, the compressive strength of the carbonated tablets increases sharply as the water content of the tablets is increased from 0 to 5% by dry weight. By comparison with the fraction of charge, the total porosity, however, decreased significantly. However, a similar increase in compressive strength may possibly be explained by the fact that the particles of the fine sand fraction absorb more water than the filler fraction so that the addition of more water does not occur. not only reduces the porosity but also improves the carbonation reaction. Legends of figures Fia. 1
    Passage (% cumulative)
    Sieve (mm) milled load fine sand slag
    EfrL3AM4A F | g.3Bet4B
    Unsaturated porosity (%) Resistance to compression (MPa)
    Compaction (MPa) Compaction (MPa)
    Moisture content (%) Moisture content (%)
    Fio. 3C and 4C Fia. 3Det4D
    Total Porosity (%) Dry Density (g / cm3)
    Compaction (MPa) Compaction (MPa)
    Moisture content (%) Moisture content (%)
    权利要求:
    Claims (19)
    [1]
    A process for producing a carbonate-bonded press-molded article, which method comprises the steps of: providing a particulate material which is carbonatable and which contains water; molding the particulate material to form a tablet; and - carbonating the particulate material in said tablet to produce carbonates thereby transforming the tablet into said carbonate-bound press-molded article, the particulate material being carbonated by contacting the tablet with a gas which contains at least 1% by weight a volume of carbon dioxide, characterized in that prior to press molding the particulate material to form said tablet, a series of tests is carried out in which for each compaction pressure a series of increasing compaction pressures, ranging from at the lowest compact pressure, at least one sample of the particulate material is press-molded to the compaction pressure and, after releasing the compaction pressure, a mass-indicating parameter volume of the press-cast sample is determined; and the particulate material is press-molded to form said compact at a compaction pressure which is selected within a range defined by a lower compaction pressure limit and an upper compaction pressure limit, the lower compaction pressure limit being greater than 5 MPa and the upper compaction pressure limit being equal to or less than said highest compaction pressure and, in the case where the density decreases when in said series of tests the compaction pressure is increased by smaller compaction pressure of said series of compaction pressures at a greater compaction pressure of said series, said upper compaction pressure limit is smaller than said larger compaction pressure and preferably equal to or less than said compression pressure; smaller compaction.
    [2]
    2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that before the compression molding of the material to form said tablet, at least one sample thereof is subjected to a test in which the sample is compressed to a compacting pressure. increasing, comprising at least compaction pressures between said lowest compaction pressure and said highest compaction pressure, until a predetermined compaction pressure is reached or, in the case where the particulate material has a water content so high that, when the sample is compressed, water begins to be expelled from said sample from a lower compaction pressure, which is lower than said predetermined compaction pressure, at least up to said lower compaction pressure is reached; and said upper compaction pressure limit is at least 7 MPa lower than said predetermined compaction pressure and at least 7 MPa lower than said lower compaction pressure in the case where the particulate material has said high water content.
    [3]
    A method of producing a carbonate-bound press-molded article, which method comprises the steps of; - provide a particulate material that is carbonatable and contains water; molding the particulate material to form a tablet; and - carbonating the particulate material in said tablet to produce carbonates thereby transforming the tablet into said carbonate-bound press-molded article, the particulate material being carbonated by contacting the tablet with a gas which contains at least 1% by weight carbon dioxide volume, characterized in that prior to press molding the particulate material to form said tablet, at least one sample thereof is subjected to a test in which the sample is compressed at increasing compaction pressure until a predetermined compaction pressure is reached, or in the case where the particulate material has a water content so high that, when the sample is compressed, water begins to be expelled from said sample from a lower compaction pressure, which is lower than said predetermined compaction pressure, at least until said press n lower compaction is reached; and the particulate material is press-molded to form said compact at a compaction pressure which is selected within a range defined by a lower compaction pressure limit and an upper compaction pressure limit, the lower compaction pressure limit being greater than 5 MPa and the upper compaction pressure limit being at least 7 MPa lower than said predetermined compaction pressure and at least 7 MPa lower than said lower compaction pressure in the case where the particulate material has said high water content.
    [4]
    The method of claim 2 or 3, characterized in that said upper compaction pressure limit is at least 10 MPa lower than said predetermined compaction pressure and at least 10 MPa lower than said lower compaction pressure. in the case where the particulate material has said high water content.
    [5]
    5. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that said upper compaction pressure limit is less than 60 MPa, preferably less than 50 MPa and more preferably less than 40 MPa.
    [6]
    6. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that said lower compaction pressure limit is greater than 7 MPa, preferably greater than 10 MPa and more preferably greater than 15 MPa.
    [7]
    7. Process according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the particulate material comprises slags from a metal production process, slags from the production of phosphorus, residual ash and / or As fly ash, the particulate material preferably comprises steel slag, in particular stainless steel slag.
    [8]
    The method of any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that said particulate material is prepared by mixing a first particulate material, which is carbonatable, with a second particulate material, which is not carbonatable.
    [9]
    9. The method of claim 8, characterized in that said second particulate material comprises dust extracted from effluent gas from a steel converter and / or waste resulting from the deburring of steel parts, which second particulate material comprises in particular more than 30%, preferably more than 40% and more preferably more than 50% by dry weight of metallic iron and more than 1%, preferably more than 4% and more preferably more than 8% by dry weight of iron oxides, the carbonate-bonded press-molded article being preferably loaded into a blast furnace.
    [10]
    A process according to any one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that it comprises the steps of increasing the water content of the particulate material which is intended to be press-molded and carbonated to a predetermined water content. thereby increasing the compressive strength of said tablet before it is carbonated, in particular a compressive strength which is greater than 1 MPa, preferably greater than 2 MPa and more preferably greater than 3 MPa.
    [11]
    The method of claim 10, characterized in that the water content of said particulate material is increased to said predetermined water content by adding water to said particulate material and / or composing said particulate material as a mixture of an amount of a first particulate material, having a first water content, and an amount of a second particulate material, having a second water content which is less than said first water content, and increasing the ratio of between the amount of the first particulate material and the amount of the second particulate material.
    [12]
    Process according to any one of claims 1 to 11, characterized in that it comprises the step of decreasing the water content of the particulate material which is intended to be press-molded and carbonated to a in predetermined water, which is greater than 3% by dry weight, preferably greater than 5% by weight.
    [13]
    The method of claim 12, characterized in that the water content of said particulate material is decreased to said predetermined water content by drying the particulate material and / or composing said particulate material as a mixture of an amount of a first particulate material, having a first water content, with an amount of a second particulate material, having a second water content which is lower than said first water content, and decreasing the ratio of the amount of the first material particle and the amount of the second particulate material.
    [14]
    14. The method of claim 11 or 13, characterized in that said first particulate material comprises stainless steel slag material which contains at least 3% by dry weight, in particular at least 5% by dry weight and more particularly at minus 7% by dry weight of dicalcium silicate-y.
    [15]
    The method of claim 14, characterized in that said second particulate material comprises a stainless steel slag material which contains less calcium silicate than said first particulate material.
    [16]
    16. Process according to any one of claims 1 to 15, characterized in that the said gas contains at least 3% by volume, preferably at least 5% by volume and better still at least 7% by volume of carbon dioxide.
    [17]
    17. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 16, characterized in that said gas is at a pressure of less than 0.5 MPa, preferably at a pressure of less than 0.2 MPa and better still at a gauge pressure of less than 0.1 MPa.
    [18]
    18. Process according to any one of claims 1 to 17, characterized in that the particulate material which is press-molded to form said tablet has a water content of at least 1%, preferably at least 3%. and more preferably at least 5% by dry weight.
    [19]
    19. Process according to any one of claims 1 to 18, characterized in that at least 50% by volume of said particulate material has a particle size of less than 1000 μm, preferably less than 500 μm, more preferably less than 250 μm. and ideally less than 100 μm and at least 50% by volume of said particulate material has a particle size greater than 1 μm, preferably greater than 5 μm and more preferably greater than 10 μm.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    BE1022349B1|2016-03-25|Process for producing a carbonate-bonded press-molded article
    EP3356295B1|2019-03-13|Baked briquettes containing a burnt calcium-magnesium compound and calcium ferrites, and method for manufacturing same
    CA2912499A1|2015-01-22|Composition comprising one or more calcium-magnesium compounds in the form of compacts
    CA2992025A1|2017-01-19|Process for manufacturing calcium aluminates
    BE1023414B1|2017-03-13|COMPOSITION COMPRISING ONE OR MORE COMPOUNDS OF CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM IN THE FORM OF COMPACTS
    BE1024612B1|2018-04-24|Process for producing a mass retaining a shape
    EP2903756B1|2016-11-23|Method for producing a water barrier material as landfill cover, capping or landfill liner underneath and/or aside a landfill and water barrier material produced thereby
    JP4538575B2|2010-09-08|Artificial stone by mixing rock sludge and waste molten slag
    FR3053675A1|2018-01-12|TABLET-COMPOSITION COMPRISING VITAL CALCO-MAGNESIVE COMPOUNDS, PROCESS FOR OBTAINING SAME AND USE THEREOF
    CA3069615A1|2019-01-17|Method for obtaining a compacted material and compacted material obtained thereby
    BE1021261B1|2015-10-12|COMPOSITION COMPRISING CALCO MAGNEI COMPOUNDS IN THE FORM OF COMPACTS
    BE1021863B1|2016-01-22|RALENTIATED REACTIVITY LIME, METHOD OF MANUFACTURE AND USE THEREOF
    JP2009221088A|2009-10-01|Artificial lightweight aggregate using mixture of diatomaceous earth and garbage molten slag
    FR3023551A1|2016-01-15|RALENTIATED REACTIVITY LIME, METHOD OF MANUFACTURE AND USE THEREOF
    WO2013135629A1|2013-09-19|Method for manufacturing agglomerates from powdered materials
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    CN106795053B|2021-02-05|
    DK3186210T3|2019-04-15|
    UA120187C2|2019-10-25|
    HRP20190462T1|2019-04-19|
    EP3186210A1|2017-07-05|
    BR112017003494A2|2017-12-05|
    EP2990393A1|2016-03-02|
    ES2716934T3|2019-06-18|
    BR112017003494B1|2022-01-25|
    US20170241871A1|2017-08-24|
    HUE042045T2|2019-06-28|
    AU2015308347B2|2019-07-11|
    LT3186210T|2019-04-10|
    PL3186210T3|2019-06-28|
    CN106795053A|2017-05-31|
    TR201903737T4|2019-04-22|
    RU2017107496A3|2019-02-11|
    WO2016030531A1|2016-03-03|
    MA40544B1|2019-05-31|
    PT3186210T|2019-04-01|
    RS58485B1|2019-04-30|
    US10598573B2|2020-03-24|
    SI3186210T1|2019-05-31|
    RU2705667C2|2019-11-11|
    RU2017107496A|2018-09-07|
    EP3186210B1|2018-12-26|
    MA40544A|2017-07-05|
    CA2958707A1|2016-03-03|
    AU2015308347A1|2017-03-30|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US5518540A|1995-06-07|1996-05-21|Materials Technology, Limited|Cement treated with high-pressure CO2|
    BE1010700A5|1996-10-17|1998-12-01|Trading And Recycling Company|METHOD FOR PROCESSING stainless steel slags.|
    US6264736B1|1997-10-15|2001-07-24|Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University And Agricultural And Mechanical College|Pressure-assisted molding and carbonation of cementitious materials|
    JP2000203922A|1998-11-02|2000-07-25|Inax Corp|Production of inorganic material caked body|
    JP2000302569A|1999-04-19|2000-10-31|Sekisui Chem Co Ltd|Hardened cement compact and its production|
    RU2171177C1|1999-11-29|2001-07-27|Ерофеев Анатолий Александрович|Method of article molding form dispersed material|
    JP2002356385A|2001-06-01|2002-12-13|Clion Co Ltd|Method of manufacturing carbon dioxide hardened compact|
    RU2252838C2|2003-07-01|2005-05-27|Научно-исследовательское учреждение Институт физики прочности и материаловедения |Powder refractory metal hot pressing method|
    GB0603443D0|2006-02-21|2006-04-05|Hills Colin D|Production of secondary aggregates|
    WO2008145189A1|2007-05-31|2008-12-04|Recmix Belgium|Process for preparing a filler for asphalt or concrete starting from a slag material|
    WO2009089906A1|2008-01-15|2009-07-23|Recoval Belgium|Process for producing mortar or concrete|
    WO2009089907A1|2008-01-15|2009-07-23|Recoval Belgium|Process for preparing a foaming slag former, product and use thereof.|
    US8119100B2|2008-02-13|2012-02-21|Russell Sr Charles William|Method and system for hydrogen powered fuel cells|
    WO2009132692A1|2008-04-28|2009-11-05|Carbstone Innovation Nv|Production of an article by carbonation of alkaline materials|
    FR2940163B1|2008-12-19|2013-04-19|Maussa Filali|METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING BLOCK OF MATERIAL IMITANTING NATURAL STONE|
    HUE047223T2|2011-10-26|2020-04-28|Carbstone Innovation Nv|Method for producing a bonded article comprising a press-moulded, carbonated granular material|
    CN103992054A|2014-02-23|2014-08-20|济南大学|Carbonated steel slag aggregate and preparation method thereof|
    SI3119730T1|2014-03-21|2020-10-30|Carbicrete Inc.|Method for making carbonate-bonded construction products from steel-making residues|US10981831B2|2017-09-21|2021-04-20|Crown Products & Services, Inc.|Dry mix and concrete composition containing bed ash and related methods|
    EP3802462A1|2018-06-05|2021-04-14|Vito NV|Method of producing a metal carbonate bonded article and carbonate bonded article|
    PT110895B|2018-08-01|2021-09-06|Univ Da Beira Interior|OBTAINING CAO-MGO LINKERS AND CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS WITH THE REUSE OF BY-PRODUCTS AND/OR WASTE AND CARBON DIOXIDE ABSORPTION|
    US11254028B2|2019-05-20|2022-02-22|Saudi Arabian Oil Company|Systems and processes for accelerated carbonation curing of pre-cast cementitious structures|
    法律状态:
    2017-12-13| FG| Patent granted|Effective date: 20160325 |
    2017-12-13| HC| Change of name of the owners|Owner name: ORBIX SOLUTIONS; BE Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), CHANGEMENT NOM PROPRIETAIRE; FORMER OWNER NAME: RECOVAL BELGIUM Effective date: 20170904 |
    2020-12-23| MM| Lapsed because of non-payment of the annual fee|Effective date: 20200331 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    EP14182955.6|2014-08-29|
    EP14182955.6A|EP2990393A1|2014-08-29|2014-08-29|Method for producing a carbonate bonded, press-moulded article|
    [返回顶部]