Apparatus for supporting an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules and method for preparing an app

专利摘要:
An apparatus for supporting an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the apparatus comprising: a body (11), formed in a surface of the body, an array of sensor wells (10) capable of supporting a layer of amphiphilic molecules (30) across the sensor wells, the sensor wells each containing an electrode (12) for connection to an electrical circuit, and formed in the surface of the body between the sensor wells, flow control wells capable of smoothing the flow of a fluid across the surface.
公开号:AU2013220148A1
申请号:U2013220148
申请日:2013-02-13
公开日:2014-08-28
发明作者:Gaelle Anne-Leonie Andreatta；James Anthony Clarke；Jason Robert Hyde
申请人:Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC；
IPC主号:G01N33-487

专利说明:
WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING AN ARRAY OF LAYERS OF AMPHIPHILIC MOLECULES AND METHOD OF FORMING AN ARRAY OF LAYERS OF AMPHIPHILIC MOLECULES 5 The present invention relates to an apparatus for supporting an array of amphiphilic molecules and a method of forming such an array. In particular, the invention relates to the efficient formation of arrays of amphiphilic molecules. One area of application is the preparation of lipid bilayers. In one type of known technique, a membrane based layer of amphiphilic molecules may 10 be used as a means of separating two volumes of aqueous solution. The amphiphilic layer resists the flow of current between the volumes when a potential difference is applied between the two volumes. A membrane penetrating protein is inserted into the amphiphilic layer to allow the passage of ions across the layer, which is recorded as an electrical signal detected by electrodes placed in each of the aqueous solutions, such as disclosed in W02009/077734. 15 In this technique, a target analyte may interact with the membrane penetrating protein to modulate the flow of ions and may be detected by observing the resultant variations in the electrical signal. This technique therefore allows the layer of amphiphilic molecules to be used as a biosensor to detect the analyte. The layer of amphiphilic molecules has a two-fold purpose in this technique. Firstly, the 20 layer provides a platform for the protein that acts as a sensing element. Secondly, the layer isolates the flow of ions between the volumes. The electrical resistance of the layer ensures that the dominant contribution of ionic flow in the system is through the membrane protein of interest, with negligible flow through the layer of amphiphilic molecules, thus allowing detection with single protein channels. 25 A specific application of this technique is in nanopore sensing, where the number of membrane proteins is kept small, typically between 1 and 100, so that the behaviour of a single protein molecule can be monitored electrically. This method gives information on each specific molecular interaction and hence provides richer information than a bulk measurement. However, due to the small currents involved, typically a few pA, this approach relies on the 30 formation of a very high resistance seal, typically greater than 1GQ, and sufficient electrical sensitivity to measure the current. While the requirements for stochastic sensing have been met in the laboratory, conditions and expertise limit its practical application in commercial products. In addition, laboratory methods are laborious and time-consuming and are not scalable easily to the high-density arrays 1 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 that are desirable for any commercial biosensor. Furthermore, the fragility of single amphiphilic layer membranes means that they can be difficult to form, so that anti-vibration tables are often employed in the laboratory. Necessitating the use of such anti-vibration tables would not be desirable in a commercial product. 5 There have been great efforts to increase the ease of bilayer formation using micro fabrication. Some techniques have attempted to miniaturise standard systems for folded lipid bilayers or painted lipid bilayers. Other techniques include bilayer formation on solid substrates or directly on electrode surfaces, through either absorption or adsorption. A large proportion of nanopore sensing devices form a bilayer by using a variant of either the folded lipid bilayers 10 technique, or the painted bilayer technique. To date, most have concentrated either on novel methods of aperture formation, on utilising the emerging technologies in micro fabrication to miniaturise the device, or to create a plurality of addressable sensors such as disclosed in EP2107040 and W02010/122293. There are problems associated with the conventional supported amphiphilic layer 15 approach that makes the approach unsuitable. The first problem lies with the resistance of the lamellar membrane which typically is about 100MQ. While this may be suitable for examining protein behaviour at large protein concentrations, it is not sufficient for a high-fidelity assay based on single molecule sensing. To achieve single-molecule sensing a resistance of at least 1GQ, and for some applications one or two orders of magnitude higher, is required. The second 20 problem relates to the small volume of solution trapped in the small distance between the amphiphilic layer and the solid support, typically of the order of m. This small volume does not contain many ions, and this affects the stability of the potential across the amphiphilic layer and limits the duration for which recording can be performed. The techniques used in the silicon chip industry provide an attractive technology for 25 creating a large number of electrodes that could be used in biosensor applications. This approach is disclosed in the related applications US 7,144,486 and US 7,169,272. US 7,144,486 discloses a method of fabricating a microelectrode device containing microcavities etched into layers of an insulator material. The devices are said to have a wide range of electrochemical applications in which electrodes in the cavities allow measurement of electrical signals. 30 In summary, the known technologies discussed above either present methods of amphiphilic layer formation that cannot reproducibly achieve high resistances; suffer from low ionic reservoirs; are not capable of high duration direct current measurements; and/or require a separate fluidic chamber for each array element. This limits the scale up of the techniques to produce a high-density array device. 2 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 WO 2009/077734 describes a simplified apparatus to prepare amphiphilic layers across a recess and to scale the apparatus with multiple recesses forming chambers of a large scale sensor array without any need for a complicated apparatus. In this method a lipid amphiphilic layer is formed as a layer separating two volumes of 5 aqueous solution, the method comprising: (a) providing an apparatus comprising elements defining a chamber, the elements including a body of non-conductive material having formed therein at least one recess opening into the chamber, the recess containing an electrode; (b) applying a pre-treatment coating of a hydrophobic fluid to the body across the recess; (c) flowing aqueous solution, having amphiphilic molecules added thereto, across the body to cover the 10 recess so that aqueous solution is introduced into the recess from the chamber and so that a layer of the amphiphilic molecules forms across the recess separating a volume of aqueous solution A key feature of this method is the preparation of high quality amphiphilic layers that are suitable for high sensitivity biosensor applications such as nanopore sensing and single channel recording. The method has been demonstrated to form amphiphilic layers of high resistance, 15 providing highly resistive electrical seals having an electrical resistance of greater than 1GQ, typically 100GQ, which for example, enable high-fidelity recordings from single protein pores. In this method, formation of a layer of the amphiphilic molecules across a recess simply by flowing the aqueous solution across the body to cover the recess is possible provided that a pre-treatment coating of a hydrophobic fluid is applied to the body across the recess. The pre 20 treatment coating assists formation of the amphiphilic layer and aids the wetting of the, microcavity forming the sensor well, with aqueous solution. However, under some circumstances the formation of high quality amphiphilic layers may be compromised. The present invention aims to at least partly address this problem. According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided an apparatus for supporting 25 an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the apparatus comprising: a body, formed in a surface of the body, an array of sensor wells capable of supporting a layer of amphiphilic molecules across the sensor wells, the sensor wells each containing an electrode for connection to an electrical circuit, and formed in the surface of the body between the sensor wells, flow control wells capable of smoothing the flow of a fluid across the surface. 30 This aspect is directed to a body in which inactive flow control wells are provided for increasing uniformity of distribution. That is, the additional wells reduce any stick/slip characteristics, resulting in a more predictably uniform wetted surface. The provision of the additional wells allows the sensor wells to be distributed and function as desired, without needing to account for the wetting characteristics of the system. That is, the desired sensor well 3 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 distribution can be selected, and the additional wells can be supplied to account for the system wetting characteristics. Optionally, the cross-sectional area of a flow control well is less than the area of a sensor well. 5 Optionally, the flow control wells do not contain electrodes. Alternatively, the flow control wells each contain an electrode, the electrodes in the sensor wells being connected to the electrical circuit but the electrodes in the flow control wells not being connected to the electrical circuit. In the embodiments where the flow control wells do not function as active sensor wells, their function is to solely improve the wetting characteristics of the system. As such the 10 constraint of requiring the flow control wells to be able to function as flow sensor wells is removed and the flow control wells may be provided of dimensions, for example the cross sectional area of the aperture or shape of the wells, or of a pitch that are/is unsuitable for use as sensor wells. Optionally, the apparatus further comprises a cover over the surface of the body defining 15 a cavity therebetween, and a common electrode arranged in the cavity for connection to the electrical circuit. The cover can have an internal surface facing the surface of the body that is roughened to smooth the flow of fluid thereover. Optionally, the array of sensor wells is a regular array, and the flow control wells consist of a regular array of flow control wells. Optionally, the pitch of the array of at least a portion of 20 the flow control wells is smaller than the pitch of at least a portion of the array of sensor wells. That is, the axial distance between the flow control wells can be smaller than the axial distance between the sensor wells. The flow control wells may be of a different dimension than the flow sensor wells, for example a different size, a different cross-sectional area and/or a different cross-sectional area of the aperture than the sensor wells. Optionally, the sensor wells are 25 circular, and optionally the flow control wells are square. Optionally, the flow control wells are distributed over a larger area than the sensor wells. Optionally, the sensor wells and flow control wells are arranged such that a pre treatment, being a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, on the surface would not enter the Cassie-Baxter state. Optionally, the sensor wells and flow control wells are 30 shaped to provide a surface roughness r, defined as the total area of the surface and wells divided by the projected area of the surface, and a solid surface area fractionf, defined as the area of the surface between the wells divided by the projected area of the surface, that meet the requirement in respect of a pre-treatment, that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic 4 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 molecules, having a contact angle 0 that ((p -1)/(r- p))>cos(0). This ensures that the pre treatment can enter the wells. Optionally, the wells are formed on the surface with a number density of 3.2x10-5 wells/micron 2 or more, optionally 6.4x1O-5 wells/micron 2 or more, further optionally 1.5x10- 4 5 wells/micron 2 or more, and still further optionally 2.5x10- 4 wells/micron 2 or more. Optionally, the apparatus further comprises a pre-treatment of a hydrophobic fluid applied to the surface of the body. According to this aspect, there is also provided a method of preparing an apparatus for forming an array of amphiphilic layers , the method comprising: providing an apparatus as 10 discussed above; delivering across the surface of the body to the wells a pre-treatment coating of a hydrophobic fluid. The pre-treatment coating serves to support the amphiphilic layer such that a highly resistive electrical seal may be formed across the well. Optionally, the pre-treatment is delivered in a solvent, the method further comprising drying the surface of the body to remove the solvent. Said step of drying the surface of the body 15 to remove the solvent is preferably performed under a pressure below atmospheric pressure. Optionally, the method is performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 15% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the 20 respective sensor wells falls within a 40% of the average values. Further optionally, the method is performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 5% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 0.5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 25 20% of the average values. In this context, the 'average values' refer to the mean values of the rectangularity and the perimeter of the annuli, respectively, as calculated for all the sensor wells. According to this aspect, there is also provided a method of forming an array of the sensor wells each containing an electrode for connection to an electrical circuit, wherein the wells have a number density of 3.2x10- 5 wells/micron 2 or more, optionally 6.4x10-5 30 wells/micron 2 or more, further optionally 1.5x10- 4 wells/micron 2 or more, and still further optionally 2.5x10- 4 wells/micron 2 or more. Optionally, all the wells are sensor wells. Alternatively, some of the wells are sensor wells, and the remainder of the wells are flow control wells, formed in the surface of the body between the sensor wells. 5 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 Optionally, the area of a flow control well is less than the area of a sensor well. Optionally, the flow control wells do not contain electrodes. Alternatively, the flow control wells each contain an electrode, the electrodes in the sensor wells being connected to the electrical circuit but the electrodes in the flow control wells not being connected to the electrical 5 circuit. Optionally, the array of sensor wells is a regular array, and the flow control wells consist of a regular array of flow control wells. Optionally, a pitch of the array of flow control wells is smaller than a pitch of the array of sensor wells. Optionally, the sensor wells are circular, and the flow control wells are square. 10 Optionally, the flow control wells are distributed over a larger area than the sensor wells. Optionally, the apparatus further comprises a cover over the surface of the body defining a cavity therebetween, and a common electrode arranged in the cavity for connection to the electrical circuit. Optionally, the cover has an internal surface facing the surface of the body that is roughened to smooth the flow of fluid thereover. 15 Optionally, the wells have an area density of 0.141 or more. Optionally, the wells are arranged such that a pre-treatment applied to the surface of the body does not enter the Cassie-Baxter state. Optionally, the sensor wells and flow control wells are shaped to provide a surface roughness r, defined as the total area of the surface and wells divided by the projected area of the surface, and a solid surface area fractionf, defined as the 20 area of the surface between the wells divided by the projected area of the surface, that meet the requirement in respect of a pre-treatment, that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, having a contact angle 0 that ((p -1)/(r- p))>cos(0). Optionally, the apparatus further comprises a pre-treatment of a hydrophobic fluid that is applied to the sensor wells. 25 According to the second aspect, there is also provided a method of preparing an apparatus for forming an array of sensor wells, the method comprising: providing an apparatus of the second aspect, as discussed above; delivering across the surface of the body to the wells a pre treatment of a hydrophobic fluid. Optionally, the pre-treatment is delivered in a solvent, the method further comprising 30 drying the surface of the body to remove the solvent. Optionally, the step of drying the surface of the body to remove the solvent is performed under a pressure below atmospheric pressure. Optionally, the method is performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 15% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 5%; and 6 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 40% of the average values. Further optionally, the method is performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 5% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the 5 proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 0.5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 20% of the average values. According to the second aspect, there is also provided a method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: preparing an apparatus by a method of 10 the second aspect, as discussed above; and flowing a fluid containing amphiphilic molecules across the surface of the body to form layers of amphiphilic molecules across at least some of the array of sensor wells. According to a third aspect, there is provided a method of preparing an apparatus for forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: providing an 15 apparatus comprising a body, and, formed in a surface of the body, an array of wells, at least some of which are sensor wells capable of supporting a layer of amphiphilic molecules across the sensor wells after application to the sensor wells of a pre-treatment of a hydrophobic fluid, the sensor wells each containing an electrode for connection to an electrical circuit, and delivering across the surface of the body a pre-treatment, that is a fluid capable of interacting 20 with the amphiphilic molecules, in a solvent to apply the pre-treatment to the wells; and drying the surface of the body to remove the solvent under a pressure below atmospheric pressure. According to this aspect, the use of low-pressure drying produces a more uniform dried pre-treatment on the surface of the body. Optionally, the apparatus is an apparatus according to the first or second aspect, 25 discussed above. Optionally, the method can be performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 15% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the 30 respective sensor wells falls within a 40% of the average values. Further optionally, the method can be performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 5% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 0.5%; and the values of 7 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 20% of the average values. The third aspect of the invention also provides a method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: preparing an apparatus by a method according to 5 the method of the third aspect, as discussed above; and flowing a fluid containing amphiphilic molecules across the surface of the body to form layers of amphiphilic molecules across at least some of the array of sensor wells. According to a fourth aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of preparing an apparatus for forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: 10 providing an apparatus comprising a body, and, formed in a surface of the body, an array of wells, at least some of which are sensor wells capable of supporting a layer of amphiphilic molecules across the sensor wells after application to the sensor wells of a pre-treatment of a hydrophobic fluid, the sensor wells each containing an electrode for connection to an electrical circuit, and delivering to the body a pre-treatment of a hydrophobic fluid, the method being 15 performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 15% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 5%; and the values of rectangularity and of the perimeter of each of the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within 40% of the average values. The visible coverage can be determined with any appropriate 20 light-source. For example, under appropriate lighting conditions, the coverage may be visible in normal light. Alternatively, additives in the pre-treatment may be used to highlight the coverage under particular lighting conditions. For example, in one embodiment of the invention, a green fluorescent dye (a boron-dipyrromethene) is used to highlight the pre-treatment and a red fluorescent dye (sulforhodamine) is used to highlight the buffer under the membrane layer. 25 Optionally, the method is performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 5% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 0.5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 20% of the average values. 30 Optionally, the pre-treatment is applied to the body in a solvent, and the method further comprises drying the surface of the body to remove the solvent, the method being performed so that said conditions are met after said drying. The fourth aspect further provides a method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: preparing an apparatus according to the method of the fourth 8 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 aspect, discussed above; and flowing a fluid containing amphiphilic molecules across the surface of the body to form layers of amphiphilic molecules across at least some of the array of sensor wells. The fourth aspect further provides an apparatus for forming an array of layers of 5 amphiphilic molecules, the apparatus comprising: a body; and formed in a surface of the body, an array of wells, at least some of which are sensor wells capable of supporting a layer of amphiphilic molecules across the sensor wells after application to the sensor wells of a pre treatment of a hydrophobic fluid, the sensor wells each containing an electrode for connection to an electrical circuit, the array of wells being arranged such that after delivery to the body of a 10 pre-treatment that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 15% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 40% of the average values. 15 Optionally, the array of wells is arranged such that after delivery to the body of a pre treatment of a hydrophobic fluid, each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 5% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 0.5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor 20 wells falls within a 20% of the average values. Optionally, the apparatus further comprises a pre-treatment of a hydrophobic fluid applied to the sensor wells. The present invention will be described with reference to exemplary embodiments and 25 the accompanying Figures in which: Fig. 1 is a diagram of ideal fluid behaviour in a well; Fig. 2 is a diagram of undesirable fluid behaviour in a well; Fig. 3 is a diagram showing different wetting behaviours; Figs. 4a and 4b are of the expected modified contact angles for different 'native' contact 30 angles, for an array of 50 micron wells spaced (a) 63 microns apart and (b) 81 microns apart; Figs. 5a -c are images that illustrate how changing surface design affects pre-treatment dispersal; Fig 6 is an image showing pre-treatment dispersal for a first design; Figs. 7a-d are images showing pre-treatment dispersal for a second design; 9 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 Figs. 8a are images showing pre-treatment dispersal for the second design under different conditions; Figs. 9a-9c are images showing pre-treatment dispersal for a third design; Fig. 10a is a schematic representation of a fourth design, and Figs. lOb-c are images 5 showing pre-treatment dispersal for the fourth design; Fig. 11 a is a schematic representation of a fifth design, and Figs. 1 lb-c are images showing pre-treatment dispersal for the fifth design; Fig. 12a is a schematic representation of a sixth design, and Figs. 12 b and 12c are images showing pre-treatment dispersal for the sixth design; and 10 Fig. 13a is a schematic representation of a sixth design, and Figs. 13 b and 13c are images showing pre-treatment dispersal for the seventh design; As mentioned above, the techniques of WO 2009/077734, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, can result in amphiphilic layers of compromised quality in some 15 circumstances. The present invention has identified that this can be the result of the pre treatment coating being, in some parts of the array, either greater or less than an optimal level. Fig. 1 shows a schematic cross section through a microcavity or sensor well 10 of a sensor array. The well 10 is formed in a material 11 such as SU-8 forming a body, and many wells 10 may be formed in close proximity within the material to form an array of sensor wells. 20 Preferably the material in which the wells are formed is itself solid and not porous, so that the wells maintain their integrity and liquid does not leak or leach from the wells. The body may also be made of other materials such as such as a positive or negative photoresists, plastics such as polycarbonate or polyester or solid state inorganic materials such as silicon, glass or silicon nitride. Examples of photoresists that may be used are SU8 2000 or 3000 series materials, 25 poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(methyl glutarimide) (PMGI), phenol formaldehyde resin (DNQ/Novolac), or polyhydroxystyrene-based polymers. At the bottom of the well is an electrode 12 for connection to an electrical circuit, which can be used (in combination with another electrode above the well, not shown in Fig. 1) to monitor the flow of current through the well 10. 30 In practice, an array of such sensor wells 10 formed in a body will be provided in an apparatus further comprising a cover over the surface of the body, so as to define a cavity between the cover and the body. An electrode is arranged in the cavity for connection to the electrical circuit, and acts a common electrode for the wells in the array. 10 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 Fig. 1 shows the ideal configuration, in which a pre-treatment 20 is pinned tightly to the edges of the well 10. This configuration allows for the maximum trapped volume (i.e. volume of amphiphilic layer 30) within the well 10. This configuration results in a biosensor with the longest lifetime. 5 The pre-treatment is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules. The pre-treatment coating is typically a hydrophobic substance, usually having long chain molecules, in an organic solvent. Suitable organic substances include without limitation: n-decane, hexadecane, isoecoisane, squalene, pristane (2,6,10,14-tetramethylpentadecane), fluorinated oils (suitable for use with fluorinated lipids), alkyl-silane (suitable for use with a glass membrane) 10 and alkyl-thiols (suitable for use with a metallic membrane). Suitable solvents include but are not limited to: pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, decane, and toluene. The material might typically be 0.1 1d to 1 0 1 of 0.l1% to 50% (v/v) hexadecane in pentane or another solvent, for example 2[tl of 1% (v/v) hexadecane in pentane or another solvent, in which case lipid, such as diphantytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPhPC), might be included at a concentration of 15 0.6mg/ml. Some specific materials for the pre-treatment coating 30 are set out in Table 1 by way of example and without limitation. Pre-treatment formulation Volumes applied 0.3% hexadecane in pentane 2x 1 1d 1% hexadecane in pentane 2x2x 0.5 l; 2x 0.5 l; 1 1; 2x 1 ; 2x 1 ; 2 1; 2x 2 1; 5 1 3% hexadecane in pentane 2x 1 ; 2 1 10% hexadecane in pentane 2x 1 ; 2[tl; 5 1 0.5% hexadecane + 0.6mg/ml 5 1 DPhPC lipid in pentane 1.0% hexadecane + 0.6mg/ml 2x 2x 0.5 l DPhPC lipid in pentane 1.5% hexadecane + 0.6mg/ml 2 1; 2x 1 DPhPC lipid in pentane Table 1: Examples of pre-treatment materials. 20 The amphiphilic layer can be made of any amphiphile that forms a lamellar phase. Amphiphiles include lipids capable of forming lipid bilayers. The amphiphiles are chosen such 11 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 that an amphiphilic layer having the required properties, such as surface charge, ability to support membrane proteins, packing density or mechanical properties, is formed. The amphiphiles can comprise one or more different components. For instance, the amphiphiles can contain up to 100 amphiphiles. The amphiphiles may be naturally-occurring or synthetic. The 5 amphiphile may be a block copolymer. In embodiments where the amphiphile is a lipid, the lipid typically comprises a head group, an interfacial moiety and two hydrophobic tail groups which may be the same or different. Suitable head groups include, but are not limited to, neutral head groups, such as diacylglycerides (DG) and ceramides (CM); zwitterionic head groups, such as 10 phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and sphingomyelin (SM); negatively charged head groups, such as phosphatidylglycerol (PG); phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatic acid (PA) and cardiolipin (CA); and positively charged headgroups, such as trimethylammonium-Propane (TAP). Suitable interfacial moieties include, but are not limited to, naturally-occurring interfacial moieties, such as glycerol-based or 15 ceramide-based moieties. Suitable hydrophobic tail groups include, but are not limited to, saturated hydrocarbon chains, such as lauric acid (n-Dodecanolic acid), myristic acid (n Tetradecononic acid), palmitic acid (n-Hexadecanoic acid), stearic acid (n-Octadecanoic) and arachidic (n-Eicosanoic); unsaturated hydrocarbon chains, such as oleic acid (cis-9 Octadecanoic); and branched hydrocarbon chains, such as phytanoyl. The length of the chain 20 and the position and number of the double bonds in the unsaturated hydrocarbon chains can vary. The length of the chains and the position and number of the branches, such as methyl groups, in the branched hydrocarbon chains can vary. The hydrophobic tail groups can be linked to the interfacial moiety as an ether or an ester. The lipid can also be chemically-modified. The head group or the tail group of the lipid 25 may be chemically-modified. Suitable lipids whose head groups have been chemically-modified include, but are not limited to, PEG-modified lipids, such as 1,2-Diacyl-sn-Glycero-3 Phosphoethanolamine-N -[Methoxy(Polyethylene glycol)-2000]; functionalised PEG Lipids, such as 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-Glycero-3 Phosphoethanolamine-N- [Biotinyl(Polyethylene Glycol)2000]; and lipids modified for conjugation, such as 1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-Glycero-3 30 Phosphoethanolamine-N-(succinyl) and 1,2-Dipalmitoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphoethanolamine-N (Biotinyl). Suitable lipids whose tail groups have been chemically-modified include, but are not limited to, polymerisable lipids, such as 1,2-bis(10,12-tricosadiynoyl)-sn-Glycero-3 Phosphocholine; fluorinated lipids, such as 1-Palmitoyl-2-(16-Fluoropalmitoyl)-sn-Glycero-3 12 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 Phosphocholine; deuterated lipids, such as 1,2-Dipalmitoyl-D62-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphocholine; and ether linked lipids, such as 1,2-Di-O-phytanyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphocholine. The lipid may comprise one or more additives that will affect the properties of the lipid bilayer. Suitable additives include, but are not limited to, fatty acids, such as palmitic acid, 5 myristic acid and oleic acid; fatty alcohols, such as palmitic alcohol, myristic alcohol and oleic alcohol; sterols, such as cholesterol, ergosterol, lanosterol, sitosterol and stigmasterol; lysophospholipids, such as 1-Acyl-2-Hydroxy-sn- Glycero-3-Phosphocholine; and ceramides. The lipid preferably comprises cholesterol and/or ergosterol when membrane proteins are to be inserted into the amphiphilic layer. 10 When pre-treatment oil 20 is not deposited in the optimum configuration of Fig. 1, a smaller trapped volume is the most probable outcome. There is also a higher probability that excess pre-treatment oil will be located on the upper surface of the well 10. This is shown schematically in Fig. 2. In Fig. 2, the pre-treatment 20 is not pinned tightly to the edges of the well 10. As a result, the trapped volume of the amphiphilic molecule 30 is reduced. Further, 15 pre-treatment 20a is also present on the upper surface of the well 10. In order to form a good contact between pre-treatment 20 and the amphiphilic layer 30, it is preferable to use a hydrophobic material for forming the well 10. This encourages a small contact angle between the pre-treatment 20 and the amphiphilic layer 30. However, this also makes it more likely that pre-treatment oil will form droplets 20a on the surface of the array 20 material unless pinned into the well 10 and collected by Laplace pressures. The appropriate hydrophobic surface properties may be achieved by suitable selection of materials. However, where there are conflicting constraints, for example where the desired surface properties are not available using photoresist material appropriate for fabrication of the required structure, this may not be possible. In this case, commonly, surface treatments are applied to achieve a hydrophilic 25 surface, such as the addition of a chemical coating or plasma modification. These methods are not ideal, typically they are unstable over a long product storage lifetime or may cause interference with the sensor chemical system. Where there is a desire to form the amphiphilic layers quickly, requiring fast flow rates over the surface or where a very large scale array is used, it has been found that the flow of 30 aqueous solution during the amphiphilic layer formation phase may cause a transfer of pre treatment 20 to the downstream areas of the array or lead to the creation of an emulsion in the aqueous solution, which is undesirable.. This is more likely in situations where pre-treatment oil 20 is located outside of the well, for example on the SU-8 surface. 13 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 In the current invention, the introduction of surface patterning to the bulk surface of the array allows for improved formation of the pre-treatment layer 20 with good uniformity and aids retention of the pre-treatment layer during the subsequent fluid flow associated with amphiphilic layer formation. 5 The uniformity of pre-treatment distribution can be further enhanced by extending the surface patterning beyond the bulk surface of the array to consider the other internal faces of the fluidic flow cell in which the array is contained. In this example, during the pre-treatment application phase, the pre-treatment oil material is also coated onto all other internal surfaces. During the subsequent fluid flow steps this material may also be redistributed, therefore 10 compromising formation of high quality lipid amphiphilic layers. A surface pattern can be introduced to these other surfaces, and tailored to control the degree of coating with pre treatment and to enhance retention of the pre-treatment on those surfaces enhancing the overall performance of the apparatus. The surface patterning also enables the required surface hydrophobicity, which is 15 conventionally achieved by surface chemistry modification of the array material, to be achieved through altering the ratio of contribution of surface energies between that of the native material and that of air, or whatever the surrounding bulk medium may be. The surface states that may exist for a well-containing surface are defined by the overall thermodynamic position. 20 In the 'Cassie-Baxter' state, the hydrophobicity is high enough that the wells are not filled by the wetting fluid, but remain filled with the bulk medium. However, this state is thermodynamically unstable and can, under the correct circumstances, collapse to a lower energy state. In the most thermodynamically stable 'Wenzel' state, the wells are completely filled by 25 the wetting fluid. Once achieved it is impossible to revert between the Wenzel and Cassie Baxter states. Fig. 3 illustrates the wetting of (a) a flat surface in comparison to wetting a surface containing microstructures in the (b) Wenzel and (c) Cassie-Baxter states. As can be seen from the Figure, the contact angle 0 differs in the different states. 30 The modified angles of the Wenzel, Ow, and Cassie-Baxter, OCB, states can be calculated once the contact angle, 0, of the native material is known. cos~ 3 cB = <p(cosW -+ 1) - 1 coseic= rcos + 14 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 where p is defined as the area of the surface between the wells divided by the projected area of the surface (calculated as: (total area - well area)/(total area)), r is defined as the ratio of true area of the solid surface to the apparent area. 5 As such it is possible to calculate the effects for both phenomena over a range of fluid contact angles. Figs. 4a and 4b show graphs of the expected modified contact angles for different 'native' contact angles, for an array of 50 micron wells spaced (a) 63 microns apart and (b) 81 microns apart. These graphs show that there is a significant difference in Cassie-Baxter 10 contact angles between surfaces of 50 p.im micro-wells spaced either 63 or 81 p.im apart. For example, native SU-8 has a contact angle of around 760, thus, for 63 p.im wells, a Wenzel state would have a modified contact angle of around 650, whilst the Cassie-Baxter state exhibits modified contact angles in the region of 1150. As such the surface properties of the array can thus be tailored to specific fluids or to 15 produce a desired surface state, by controlling the surface patterning. In particular, it may be desirable to form the array with additional wells, not intended for sensing, in order to modify the surface properties. Such additional wells may be inactive for sensing, either because they do not contain an electrode or because the electrode is not connected to the sensing circuitry. This approach holds several advantages. 20 For flow through pre-treatment application on the large-scale, the surface can be controlled to promote pinning of the pre-treatment on the sensor array surface so that pre treatment does not move during amphiphilic layer formation. Additionally, it is preferable to avoid the Cassie-Baxter state, otherwise the pre-treatment will not fill the wells. That is, it is preferable to design the surface to have a contact angle 0 for which: ((P -1)/(r- P))>cos(0). 25 Using a high density of wells, including inactive wells, over the bulk surface forming the surface pattern also allows maximum flexibility into the design. That is, if it becomes desirable to change the arrangement of the sensing wells, for example to produce a more closely packed electronic array, this can be produced with minimal impact to the overall surface by appropriate 'balancing' with inactive wells. That is, the inactive wells can be formed in the surface of the 30 body in which the 'active' wells have been formed, adding to the array of active wells to create the desired surface properties. As a result, the surface properties can remain virtually unaltered whilst varying the structure of the active array, and so the optimal fluidic procedure will not need to be changed. The additional 'flow control' wells may not contain electrodes, or may contain electrodes that are not attached to the electrical circuit of the sensor wells. 15 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 Controlling the hydrophobicity based on the well geometry and placement avoids the need for additional processing steps associated with modifying the surface properties by chemical means. Further, this method of surface control is applicable to all materials, making it unnecessary to tailor a particular chemistry to a particular material. 5 In addition, it has been found that the flow through of pre-treatment is also enhanced by using micro-patterned surfaces. The pre-treatment front can be observed to progress across an array more smoothly in the presence of additional wells, particularly on larger arrays. That is, the additional wells increase the homogeneity of flow across the surface of the body such that the uniformity of wetting is increased. The additional wells are capable of increasing the uniformity 10 of the distribution of said pre-treatment during deliver across the surface of the body. This smoothing reduces the tendency for the fluid to undergo large scale pinning during flow which results in so-called 'stick/slip' movement of a fluid front. Wetting in this stick/slip fashion is irregular and can result in the fluid being pinned for a period of time before moving to the next pinning position. This can also result in de-wetting of surfaces that have already been wetted as 15 the shape of the wetting profile changes. To this end, it can also be preferable to roughen the internal surface of the cover, opposite the body, to further smooth the flow of fluid. It can also be preferable to provide the additional wells over a large area than the sensor wells, in order to ensure the edges of the array of sensor wells experience the enhanced flow of pre-treatment. The pre-treatment distribution is monitored by tagging the pre-treatment oil with a 20 fluorescent dye. The dye is then imaged using epi-fluorescence microscopy in situ. The images show in Figs. 5a-d show an example of the difference in distributions obtained by introducing additional wells in a surface for otherwise identical fluidic flows of pre treatment oils dissolved in hexane over an array. Fig. 5a shows an overview of a treated array of active wells, with no additional wells, whilst Fig. 5b shows a close up view of some the wells. 25 The bright areas indicate the presence of pre-treatment. As is particularly clear in Fig. 5b, many of the wells are completely filled by pre-treatment, and there is much excess pre-treatment on the surface. In contrast, Fig. 5c shows an overview of an array incorporating additional (smaller) inactive wells in addition to the active wells, and Fig. 5d is a close up view of some of the wells. The pre-treatment uniformly forms the 'ideal' ring structure around the wells and no wells are 30 completely filled. Further, there is much less variation between wells in the quality of pre treatment (even only considering non-filled wells). It is noted that the brighter areas towards the right hand side of Fig. 5c is excess pre-treatment located on the window of the cell not on the array surface (focal plane). 16 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 These images illustrate that the behaviour of fluid flowing over a surface containing wells can be influenced by changing the surface texture in between the wells. The introduced wells may, but need not, also be used as active wells. As such, if it is desired to keep a certain active well spacing, but improve the distribution of the pre-treatment, that is possible by introducing 5 'inactive' wells. These inactive wells help the pre-treatment flow across the surface during the application stage and further aid in the formation of a well distributed pre-treatment during the drying phase. Exemplary experiments are discussed below. 10 Experimental procedures Materials Required: Clean room, Oven, RIE, Hotplate x2, Mask aligner, Resist spinner, Develop dishes x2, Nitrogen supply, Wafer tweezers, Inspection microscope, Silicon Wafers, SU-8 10 photoresist, 15 SU-8 2 photoresist, EC Developer, Photolithography mask 1st layer: 4KCSH51 4201, Photolithography mask 2nd layer: 4KCSH41 4149, Acetone (propan-2-one), IPA (propan-2-ol / 2-propanol). Method for preparing wafers with well designs: To ensure that the surfaces were clean from organic greases and salts from manufacturing 20 and handling, silicon wafers were rinsed with acetone, 2-propanol and deionised water prior to use. The wafers were dried with a gentle supply of nitrogen. Wafers were then placed in a preheated oven for 1 hour at 150'C. The SU-8 solutions (SU-8 2, and SU-8 10) were removed from cold storage and allowed to reach room temperature prior to use. The hotplates were cleaned and allowed to reach stable temperatures of 80'C and 1 10 C. The spin coater and 25 developer dishes were set-up ready for use. SU-8 2 (9mL)was spun onto oxygen plasma treated (200W, 50mTorr) wafers at 2000 rpm, which was then first placed on a hotplate at 80'C for 1 minute prior to a 2 minute treatment on a hotplate set to 1 10 C. The soft-baked SU-8 2 layer was then exposed to the electrode-mask for 10 seconds, after suitable alignment to the wafer. A post exposure bake at 80'C for 1 minute and 2 minutes at 1 10 C for 2 minutes was performed. The 30 wafer was then developed in a two-stage rinsing process, followed by a thorough rinse with 2 propanol. The wafer was dried with nitrogen prior to inspection. The wafer was then re-spun with SU-8 10 (9mL) at 1600 rpm. The wafer was then baked again at 80'C for 1 minute followed by 2 minutes at 1 10 C. The wafer was then aligned and exposed to UV for 55 seconds under the mask. A further post exposure bake of 3 minute at 80'C followed by a second at 17 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 110'C for 7 minutes was performed. The wafer was then developed thoroughly and washed with 2-propanol prior to a de-scumming oxygen plasma process of 1 minute. The wafers were then hard-baked at 150'C for 1 hour. Wafers were then processed for dicing and bonding. Diced and bonded 128 chips were then examined for surface defects prior to use. A 5 single water wash removed surface dust particles, whilst a single ethanol wash removed surface greases prior to use. Designs were fabricated on SiO 2 /SU-8 with a well depth of 20 rm. Design 1 10 A standard design of 'active' wells, Design 1, is a square array of 75 [tm wells, pitched at 250 [tm along the X and Y axes. Pre-treatment was applied to Design 1 using by dip-coating an SU-8 and silicon piece in a pre-treatment solution of 10% pristane (2,6,10,14 tetramethylpentadecane) in hexane, at a velocity of approximately 1 mm/s. Lipid bilayers were prepared in the following way. The micro-wells were first filled with 15 a solution of lipid vesicles in buffer (3.6 g/L of 1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine in a buffer composed of 400 mM KCl, 25 mM Tris in water). An air-solution interface was then created by slowly retracting the excess lipid solution from the flow cell. The lipid bilayers were then painted by slowly introducing the solution of lipid in the flow cell (the optical dye sulforhodamine 101 (green excitation, red emission) was added to the lipid solution at the 20 concentration of 0.0lg/L). The meniscus of the introduced solution effectively paints lipid bilayers on the micro-wells. The excess lipids were then flushed by a large volume of buffer. Thereafter, the presence of lipid bilayers was determined by epifluorescence, using the optical dye introduced to the lipid solution, which was trapped in the wells as the bilayer formed. A representative image, giving a general overview of the result (without particular detail of the 25 wells), is shown in Fig 6, in which brighter areas represent the presence of pre-treatment. As can be seen, the quality of pre-treatment is variable, with some wells not showing the presence of any pre-treatment at all. Counting a bilayer as present if it covers a micro-well entirely, standard image processing methods of particle counting can be used to analyse the epifluorescence images. An average of 68.5% bilayer formation was found, after 3 tests, with a 30 standard deviation of 2.7%. To determine the effect of the design parameters on the quality of bilayer formation, further experiments were conducted. 18 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 In the following examples arrays of wells were mounted in flow cell. Pre-treatment (10% pristane in hexane, 100p.l) was pushed through the array chip at a flow rate of 100pl/s. The chips were then dried in one of two methods. (1) By removing the connecting pipe-work and placing the array chip in a desiccator for 15 minutes under vacuum, at 200 mBar pressure (i.e. below 5 atmospheric pressure). This allowed the hexane to evaporate leaving behind the pristane in the location it is deposited. (2) By pushing air through the array chip at a constant, but low, flow rate for 15 minutes. This allowed the hexane to evaporate at atmospheric pressure, but the vapour removed which drives the drying process. 10 Design 2 The design had 75 pm wells, pitched at 250 pm along the X and Y axes. These were interleaved with the same design off set 125 p.im on the X and Y axes, effectively producing a square array of 75 p.im wells, pitched at 177 p.im along axes angled at 450 to the X and Y axes. This design, Design 2, doubles the micro-well density on the SU-8 array compared to Design 1. 15 Representative images of these results are shown in Figs 7a-f, in which Fig. 7a is an overview of a desiccator drying experiment (and does not provide particular detail of the wells), Fig. 7b is close up of a desiccator drying experiment, Fig. 7c is an overview of a pump drying experiment (and does not provide particular detail of the wells), Fig. 7d is a close up of a pump drying experiment. 20 Using the desiccator drying method, as shown in Figs. 7a and 7b, an acceptable pre treatment distribution was obtained. The arrays when dried in this way do not show any significant signs of pre-treatment on the surface of the SU-8 (i.e. between the micro-wells). However, it is noted that the arrays did not seem particularly even in intensity, and the overall intensity was low. 25 Using the pump drying method, as shown in Figs. 7c and 7d, the results were clearly unsatisfactory. Much of the surface was covered in larger pools of pre-treatment and many of the micro-wells were filled with pre-treatment. Although this may lead to the conclusion that the pre-treatment drying method is the most important factor in obtaining a good pre-treatment distribution, it is not the only 30 consideration. As shown in Figs. 8a and 8b, a sample produced via dip coating the pre treatment (rather than the painting technique used for Figs. 7a-d), produces a satisfactory but un even distribution, even though the surface is clear of pre-treatment. Fig. 8a is an overview of the example produced via dip coating (and does not provide particular detail of the wells), and Fig. 8b is a close up of the example produced via dip coating. 19 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 Design 3 A design having: 75 pm wells, squarely pitched at 125pim on both X and Y axes, was used as Design 3. This effectively represents a grid of 'active' wells as in Design 1, with an 5 additional array of 'inactive' wells also of 75 p.im diameter and squarely pitched at (0, 125 p.im), (125 pim, 125 p.im) and (125 pim, 0) on the X and Y axes between the 'active' wells. Design 3 increases the array density by a factor of 4 compared with Design 1. Representative images of these results are shown in Figs 9a-d, in which Fig. 9a is an overview of a desiccator drying experiment (and does not provide particular detail of the wells), 10 Fig. 9b is close up of a desiccator drying experiment, Fig. 9c is an overview of a pump drying experiment (and does not provide particular detail of the wells), Fig. 9d is a close up of a pump drying experiment. The background brightness running through Figs. 9c and 9d is pre-treatment deposited on the top surface of the viewing cell and not on the chip surface. As can be seen, desiccator drying resulted in the surface of the chip being completely 15 homogeneous with respect to the pre-treatment. There is little, if any, pre-treatment sat on the SU-8 surface between the micro-wells. Pump Drying provides an improvement over Design 2 (which has a well density half that of Design 3). However, this design still leads to significant filling of the micro-wells towards the front of the array, less so towards the rear of the chip. This is probably due to flow rate 20 variations over the surface of the chip. Moreover, we can see the pinning effects of the micro wells; in many cases the pre-treatment is pinned on the top SU-8 surface rather than filling the micro-wells (producing the square looking blobs between wells in Figs. 9c and 9d). This is an unsatisfactory result. 25 Design 4 Design 4 utilised wells of different shaped micro-wells, to investigate the effect the well shape has on the quality of the pre-treatment. Changing the well shape changes the aspect ratio of the area covered and also probes if any pinning is due to the shape (and symmetry) of the micro-wells. 30 Design 4 uses the same pitch as Design 3 (square pitch of 125pim on both X and Y axes). However as shown in Fig. 10a, instead of an array of only circular wells (as in Design 4), an array based on the repeating pattern of one circular well and three square wells (arranged so that the four wells form a square on the array), was used as Design 4. Each circular well had a diameter of 75 pim, whilst the square wells had a side length of 75 rm. 20 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 In this design, the circular wells can be considered as representing 'active' wells, whilst the square wells represent 'inactive' wells. Therefore, Design 4 corresponds to Design 3, but with the shape of the 'inactive' wells changed. Representative images of these results are shown in Figs 10 b-e, in which Fig. l0b is an 5 overview of a desiccator drying experiment (and does not provide particular detail of the wells), Fig. 10c is close up of a desiccator drying experiment, Fig. 10d is an overview of a pump drying experiment (and does not provide particular detail of the wells), Fig. l0e is a close up of a pump drying experiment. Once again, the bright background in Figs. 10d and l0e is due to pre treatment deposited on the view cell not on the chip surface. 10 As can be seen, desiccator drying provided a very similar result to the "all circular" equivalent of Design 3. The shape does not seem to affect the amount of pre-treatment remaining on the surface. That is, the change in shape does not make the quality of pre treatment worse. Indeed, the pump drying experiment indicates the change in shape has a positive effect. 15 In the pump dried example (Figs. 10d and l0e), the amount of surface remaining pre-treatment is quite high as in the "all round" counterpart. However, only the square micro-wells have filled. As a result, the quality of pre-treatment is acceptable. Design 5 20 Design 5 (shown in Fig. 11 a) removes a large amount of the SU-8 surface. 75 pm circular wells are arranged on a square pitch oft 250 pm on both X and Y axes, as in Design 1. In addition, a 'background' pattern of 20um squares with a 5 pm boarder is provided. The use of a square background pattern, closely spaced, provides an efficient pattern for removing as much surface material as possible, whilst providing a texture. 25 Representative images of these results are shown in Figs 11 b-e, in which Fig. 1 lb is an overview of a desiccator drying experiment (and does not provide particular detail of the wells), Fig. 1Ic is close up of a desiccator drying experiment, Fig. I1d is an overview of a pump drying experiment (and does not provide particular detail of the wells), Fig. 11 e is a close up of a pump drying experiment. Once again, the bright background in Figs. 11 d and 11 e is due to pre 30 treatment deposited on the view cell not on the chip surface. As expected in view of the results for Designs 3 and 4, desiccator drying of Design 5 provided a surface that is very uniform and free of excess pre-treatment. The small micro-wells make it difficult to see the pre-treatment, but it is very uniform over the whole surface. The variation in background intensity in Fig. 1 lb is due to pre-treatment on the view cell, not the chip 21 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 surface. Further, the bright area at the bottom right was found to be caused by dust on the surface, pinning more pre-treatment, but it is notable no filled wells were produced even in this region. The pump drying experiment provided an apparently identical result (barring variations 5 due to the presence of pre-treatment on the view-cell) to the desiccator drying experiment. We look to the designs that we short-listed, namely the 50-81 and 50-63 (which denotes the size of the micro-patterned wells and their pitched spacing - in pims). We know that desiccator drying methods at this scale work well for both designs, since the 125pim pitched micro-patterned wells performs well under these conditions. 10 Designs 6 and 7 Designs 6 and 7 are also based upon an 'active' array of 75 p.im circular wells are arranged on a square pitch oft 250 pm on both X and Y axes, as in Design 1. In addition, Design 6 (Fig. 12 a) incorporates a background pattern of 50 p.im circular 'inactive' wells between the 15 'active' wells, on a square pitch of 81 pim, whilst Design 7 (Fig. 13a) incorporates a background pattern of 50 pm circular 'inactive' wells between the 'active' wells, on a square pitch of 63 pm. As such, in these designs the cross-sectional area of the aperture of the additional (or 'inactive' or 'flow control') wells is less than the area of the 'active' or 'sensor' wells. Only pump drying experiments were performed for these designs, as it can be inferred 20 from the results for Design 3 that desiccator drying will work well. Representative images of the results for Design 6 are shown in Figs. 12b and 12c, in which Fig. 12b is an overview of a desiccator drying experiment (and does not provide particular detail of the wells), and Fig. 12c is close up of a desiccator drying experiment. Representative images of the results for Design 7 are shown in Figs. 13b and 13c, in which Fig. 13b is an 25 overview of a desiccator drying experiment (and does not provide particular detail of the wells), and Fig. 13c is close up of a desiccator drying experiment. Satisfactory results were obtained from Design 6. The majority of the surface is uniform, (there is some variation in the pre-treatment over the surface but this may be more related to the surface chemistry of the chip), however there are on average only a few micro-wells that are 30 filled or are non-uniform compared to the majority of the micro-wells for which the pre treatment forms in a uniform manner.. Good results were obtained from Design 7. Accounting for the obvious view cell variations, there do not appear to be any filled micro-wells, and the distribution appears to be more homogeneous compared to Design 6 22 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 The results for the above discussed designs have been quantified, and tabulated in Table 2, by allocating the quality of the pre-treatment distribution a grade. In order to do this, the homogeneity of the pre-treatment distributions were assessed by image analysis, in order to 5 measure the rectangularity and perimeter of the pre-treatment in the wells. The rectangularity is defined as the ratio of the cross-sectional area of pretreatment to the cross-sectional area of a notional inscribed (non-rotational) rectangle within the well (i.e. the rectangle with the largest cross-sectional area which can be inscribed within the pre-treatment cross-sectional area). This ratio is pi/4 for a perfect circular object and unity for a non-rotated rectangle. To do this, the 10 image being analysed was split into its red, green and blue components. A green fluorescent dye (a boron-dipyrromethene) was used to highlight the pretreatment and a red fluorescent dye (sulforhodamine) was used to highlight the buffer under the membrane layer. The gray-scale image was then threshold filtered just above background level. The duotone image was then subjected to a shape analysis on each object identified. On this basis the following grades were 15 defined: Grade 1: - the visible pre-treatment coverage of the surface is lower than 5% of the surface of the array in the fluidic cell 20 * the number of filled wells in the array (both 'active' and 'inactive') is smaller than 0.5% - the homogeneity of the distribution of the pre-treatment annuli in the wells is high, as quantified by the rectangularity and perimeter being is within + 20% of the average value. For example, if the average value of the perimeter is 140 for a 50 p.im well, then all the perimeters measured on the 50 pm wells needs to be in the interval of 112 pm to 168 rm. 25 Grade 2 * 5% < surface coverage by pre-treatment < 15% * 0.5 % < number of filled wells < 5% - 20% of average < intervals for characteristics of the annuli < 40% of average 30 Grade 3 - surface coverage by pre-treatment > 15% - number of filled wells > 5% - intervals for characteristics of the annuli > ± 40% of average 23 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 'Additional' X Pitch Y Pitch Drying Grade Well (pm) (pm) Method Diameter (pm) Design 2 75 250 250 Vacuum 2 Design 2 75 250 250 Pump 3 Design 3 75 125 125 Vacuum 1 Design 3 75 125 125 Pump 3 Design 4 75 (square) 125 125 Vacuum 1 Design 4 75 (square) 125 125 Pump 2 Design 5 15 (square) 5 5 Vacuum 1 Design 5 15 (square) 5 5 Pump 1 Design 6 50 81 81 Pump 2 Design 7 50 63 63 Pump 1 Table 2: Summary of results for Designs 2-7. As can be seen from Table 2, and the forgoing discussion, vacuum/desiccator drying 5 provides better quality distributions for similar well geometries than pump/convection drying for less textured (i.e. having larger, more spaced apart additional wells) surfaces. However, for highly textured surfaces the drying method does not affect the grade of pre-treatment obtained (i.e. as shown by Design 5). It can also be seen that is preferable to have more closely spaced 'additional' wells (e.g. 10 by comparing Designs 2 and 3), to obtain better quality pre-treatment distribution. Preferably the additional wells are spaced at 125 p.m apart or less, more preferably 100 p.m apart or less, more preferably 81 p.m or less, more preferably 63 p.m or less. Preferably, the pitch of the additional wells is smaller than the pitch of the array of 'sensor' or 'active' wells. It is also possible to calculate the number density of wells (wells/micron 2 ), area density of 15 wells (well area/ total area), nearest-neighbour distance between wells for the Designs I to 3. These designs represent designs have only one shape of well is present (both in terms of geometry and size). These values are quantified in Table 3. 24 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 Well Number Density Well Area Density Well Nearest (wells/micron 2 ) (-) Neighbour Distance (microns) Design 1 1.6x103 5 0.071 175 Design 2 3.2x10 5 0.141 102 Design 3 6.4x10 5 0.283 50 Table 3: Bulk characteristics of Designs 1-3 From the trends in Tables 2 and 3, it is apparent that it is preferable to have a higher density of wells on the surface to provide a better pre-treatment distribution. Preferably, the 5 2 5 number distribution of wells (whether active or inactive) is at least 3.2x10- wells/micron , more preferably 6.4x10 5 wells/micron 2 . Preferably, the well area density is 0.141 or more, more preferably 0.283 or more. Preferably the wells are formed so that the distance to the next nearest well is 102 microns away or less, more preferably 50 microns or less. It is also contemplated that future apparatuses may reduce further in size, in which case 10 the 'additional' wells provided in Designs 6 and 7, may actually be used as a continuous array of active wells. In that case, the Designs would have the characteristics shown in Table 4. Well Number Density Well Area Density Well Nearest (wells/micron 2 ) (-) Neighbour Distance (microns) Design 6 1.5x10 4 0.299 31 Design 7 2.5x10 4 0.495 13 Table 4: Bulk characteristics of 'additional' wells of Designs 6 and 7 15 As such, the number distribution of wells is still more preferably 1.5x10- 4 wells/micron 2 or more, and still more preferably 2.5x10-4 wells/micron2 or more. Further the well area density is still more preferably 0.299 or more, and still more preferably 0.495 or more. Additionally, the wells are still more preferably formed so that the next nearest well is 31 microns away or less, and more preferably 13 microns away or less. 20 It is further apparent from Table 1 that is preferable for the wells, whether they are all active or not, to be smaller. Preferably the wells are 75 microns in diameter or smaller, more preferably 50 microns in diameter or smaller. 25 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 In practice, the advantage of the present invention may be achieved using arrays constructed either only partially or entirely of active wells. By controlling the surface energy by using the additional wells (whether they are ultimately used for sensing or otherwise) an improved flow of the pre-treatment can be obtained as well as an improvement of the subsequent 5 pre-treatment distribution. Even in the absence of a pre-treatment step, the improved flow control gives more uniform flows that can help bilayer formation. The present invention has been described above with reference to specific embodiments. It will be understood that the above description does not limit the present invention, which is defined in the appended claims. 10 26

权利要求:
Claims (55)
[1] 1. An apparatus for supporting an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the apparatus 5 comprising: a body, formed in a surface of the body, an array of sensor wells capable of supporting a layer of amphiphilic molecules across the sensor wells, the sensor wells each containing an electrode for connection to an electrical circuit, and 10 formed in the surface of the body between the sensor wells, flow control wells capable of smoothing the flow of a fluid across the surface.
[2] 2. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the cross-sectional area of a flow control well is less than the area of a sensor well. 15
[3] 3. An apparatus according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the flow control wells do not contain electrodes.
[4] 4. An apparatus according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the flow control wells each contain an 20 electrode, the electrodes in the sensor wells being connected to the electrical circuit but the electrodes in the flow control wells not being connected to the electrical circuit.
[5] 5. An apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 4, further comprising a cover over the surface of the body defining a cavity therebetween, and a common electrode arranged in the 25 cavity for connection to the electrical circuit.
[6] 6. An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the cover has an internal surface facing the surface of the body that is roughened to smooth the flow of fluid thereover. 30
[7] 7. An apparatus according to any one of claims I to 6, wherein the array of sensor wells is a regular array, and the flow control wells consist of a regular array of flow control wells. 27 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333
[8] 8. An apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the pitch of at least a portion of the array of flow control wells is smaller than the pitch of at least a portion of the array of sensor wells. 5
[9] 9. An apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the sensor wells are circular. Claim 9a An apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein the flow control wells are square.
[10] 10. An apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the flow control wells are 10 distributed over a larger area than the sensor wells.
[11] 11. An apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the sensor wells and flow control wells are arranged such that a pre-treatment of a hydrophobic fluid applied to the surface of the body would not enter the Cassie-Baxter state. 15
[12] 12. An apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the sensor wells and flow control wells are shaped to provide a surface roughness r, defined as the total area of the surface and wells divided by the projected area of the surface, and a solid surface area fractionf, defined as the area of the surface between the wells divided by the projected area 20 of the surface, that meet the requirement in respect of a pre-treatment, that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, having a contact angle 0 that ((P -1)/(r Pcos(6).
[13] 13. An apparatus according to any one of claims I to 12, wherein the wells are formed on the 25 surface with a number density of 3.2x10- 5 wells/micron2 or more, optionally 6.4x10-5 wells/micron2 or more, further optionally 1.5x10-4 wells/micron2 or more, and still further optionally 2.5x10-4 wells/micron2 or more.
[14] 14. An apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein further comprising a pre 30 treatment, that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, applied to the sensor wells.
[15] 15. A method of preparing an apparatus for forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: 28 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 providing an apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 13; delivering across the surface of the body a pre-treatment of a hydrophobic fluid.
[16] 16. A method according to claim 15, wherein the pre-treatment is delivered in a solvent, the 5 method further comprising drying the surface of the body to remove the solvent.
[17] 17. A method according to claim 16, wherein said step of drying the surface of the body to remove the solvent is performed under a pressure below atmospheric pressure. 10
[18] 18. A method according to any one of claims 15 to 17, wherein the method is performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 15% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 5%; and 15 the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 40% of the average values.
[19] 19. .A method according to any one of claims 15 to 18, wherein the method is performed so that each of the following conditions is met: 20 the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 5% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 0.5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 20% of the average values. 25
[20] 20. A method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: preparing an apparatus by a method according to any one of claims 15 to 19; and flowing a fluid containing amphiphilic molecules across the surface of the body to form layers of amphiphilic molecules across at least some of the array of sensor wells. 30
[21] 21. A method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: providing an apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 13; and flowing a fluid containing amphiphilic molecules across the surface of the body to form layers of amphiphilic molecules across at least some of the array of sensor wells. 29 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333
[22] 22. An apparatus for supporting an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the apparatus comprising: a body; and 5 formed in a surface of the body, an array of wells, at least some of which are sensor wells capable of supporting a layer of amphiphilic molecules across the sensor wells after application to the sensor wells of a pre-treatment that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, the sensor wells each containing an electrode for connection to an electrical circuit, 10 wherein the wells have a number density of 3.2x10- 5 wells/micron 2 or more, optionally 6.4x10 5 wells/micron2 or more, further optionally 1.5x10-4 wells/micron2 or more, and still further optionally 2.5x10- 4 wells/micron 2 or more.
[23] 23. An apparatus according to claim 22, wherein all the wells are sensor wells. 15
[24] 24. An apparatus according to claim 22, wherein some of the wells are sensor wells, and the remainder of the wells are flow control wells, formed in the surface of the body between the sensor wells. 20
[25] 25. An apparatus according to claim 24, wherein the area of a flow control well is less than the area of a sensor well.
[26] 26. An apparatus according to claim 24 or claim 25, wherein the flow control wells do not contain electrodes. 25
[27] 27. An apparatus according to claim 24 or claim 25, wherein the flow control wells each contain an electrode, the electrodes in the sensor wells being connected to the electrical circuit but the electrodes in the flow control wells not being connected to the electrical circuit. 30
[28] 28. An apparatus according to any one of claims 24 to 27, wherein the array of sensor wells is a regular array, and the flow control wells consist of a regular array of flow control wells.
[29] 29. An apparatus according to any one of claims 24 to 28, wherein a pitch of the array of flow control wells is smaller than a pitch of the array of sensor wells. 30 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333
[30] 30. An apparatus according to any one of claims 24 to 29, wherein the sensor wells are circular, and the flow control wells are square. 5
[31] 31. An apparatus according to any one of claims 24 to 30, wherein the flow control wells are distributed over a larger area than the sensor wells.
[32] 32. An apparatus according to any one of claims 24 to3 1, further comprising a cover over the surface of the body defining a cavity therebetween, and a common electrode arranged in the 10 cavity for connection to the electrical circuit.
[33] 33. An apparatus according to claim 32, wherein the cover has an internal surface facing the surface of the body that is roughened to smooth the flow of fluid thereover. 15
[34] 34. An apparatus according to any one of claims 22 to 33, wherein the wells have an area density of 0.141 or more.
[35] 35. An apparatus according to any one of claims 22 to 34, wherein the wells are arranged such that a pre-treatment, that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, on 20 the surface does not enter the Cassie-Baxter state.
[36] 36. An apparatus according to any one of claims 22 to 35, wherein the sensor wells and flow control wells are shaped to provide a surface roughness r, defined as the total area of the surface and wells divided by the projected area of the surface, and a solid surface area 25 fractionf, defined as the area of the surface between the wells divided by the projected area of the surface, that meet the requirement in respect of a pre-treatment, that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, having a contact angle 0 that ((P -1)/(r P))>cos(0). 30
[37] 37. An apparatus according to any one of claims 22 to 34, wherein further comprising a pre treatment, that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, applied to the sensor wells. 31 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333
[38] 38. A method of preparing an apparatus for forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: providing an apparatus according to any one of claims 22 to 36; delivering across the surface of the body a pre-treatment that is a fluid capable of 5 interacting with the amphiphilic molecules to apply the pre-treatment to the wells.
[39] 39. A method according to claim 38, wherein the pre-treatment is delivered in a solvent, the method further comprising drying the surface of the body to remove the solvent. 10
[40] 40. A method according to claim 39, wherein said step of drying the surface of the body to remove the solvent is performed under a pressure below atmospheric pressure.
[41] 41. A method according to any one of claims 38 to 40, wherein the method is performed so that each of the following conditions is met: 15 the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 15% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 40% of the average values. 20
[42] 42. A method according to claim 41, wherein the method is performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 5% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; 25 the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 0.5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 20% of the average values.
[43] 43. A method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: 30 preparing an apparatus by a method according to any one of claims 38 to 42; and flowing a fluid containing amphiphilic molecules across the surface of the body to form layers of amphiphilic molecules across at least some of the array of sensor wells. 32 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333
[44] 44. A method of preparing an apparatus for forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: providing an apparatus comprising a body, and, formed in a surface of the body, an array of wells, at least some of which are sensor wells capable of supporting a layer of amphiphilic 5 molecules across the sensor wells after application to the sensor wells of a pre-treatment that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, the sensor wells each containing an electrode for connection to an electrical circuit, and delivering across the surface of the body a pre-treatment, that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, in a solvent to apply the pre-treatment to the 10 wells; and drying the surface of the body to remove the solvent under a pressure below atmospheric pressure.
[45] 45. A method according to claim 44, wherein the apparatus is an apparatus according to any one 15 of claims 22 to 36.
[46] 46. A method according to claim 44 or claim 45, wherein the method being performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 15% of the area in 20 which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 40% of the average values. 25
[47] 47. A method according to claim 46, wherein the method is performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 5% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 0.5%; and 30 the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 20% of the average values.
[48] 48. A method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: preparing an apparatus by a method according to any one of claims 44 to 46; and 33 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 flowing a fluid containing amphiphilic molecules across the surface of the body to form layers of amphiphilic molecules across at least some of the array of sensor wells.
[49] 49. A method of preparing an apparatus for forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, 5 the method comprising: providing an apparatus comprising a body, and, formed in a surface of the body, an array of wells, at least some of which are sensor wells capable of supporting a layer of amphiphilic molecules across the sensor wells after application to the sensor wells of a pre-treatment that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, the sensor wells each 10 containing an electrode for connection to an electrical circuit, and delivering to the body a pre-treatment that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, the method being performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 15% of the area in 15 which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 40% of the average values. 20
[50] 50. A method according to claim 49, wherein the method is performed so that each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 5% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 0.5%; and 25 the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 20% of the average values.
[51] 51. A method according to claim 49 or 50, wherein the pre-treatment is applied to the body in a solvent, and the method further comprises drying the surface of the body to remove the 30 solvent, the method being performed so that said conditions are met after said drying.
[52] 52. A method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the method comprising: preparing an apparatus according to any one of claims 49 to 51; and 34 WO 2013/121193 PCT/GB2013/050333 flowing a fluid containing amphiphilic molecules across the surface of the body to form layers of amphiphilic molecules across at least some of the array of sensor wells.
[53] 53. An apparatus for forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules, the apparatus 5 comprising: a body; and formed in a surface of the body, an array of wells, at least some of which are sensor wells capable of supporting a layer of amphiphilic molecules across the sensor wells after application to the sensor wells of a pre-treatment that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic 10 molecules, the sensor wells each containing an electrode for connection to an electrical circuit, the array of wells being arranged such that after delivery to the body of a pre-treatment that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 15% of the area in 15 which the array of sensor wells is located; the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 40% of the average values. 20
[54] 54. An apparatus according to claim 53, wherein the array of wells is arranged such that after delivery to the body of a pre-treatment that is a fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, each of the following conditions is met: the visible coverage of the surface by the pre-treatment is less than 5% of the area in which the array of sensor wells is located; 25 the proportion of sensor wells that are filled is less than 0.5%; and the values of rectangularity and the perimeter of all the annuli of pre-treatment around the respective sensor wells falls within a 20% of the average values.
[55] 55. An apparatus according to claim 54, wherein further comprising a pre-treatment, that is a 30 fluid capable of interacting with the amphiphilic molecules, applied to the sensor wells. 35

类似技术:

---

公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题

---

US20190391128A1|2019-12-26|Apparatus for supporting an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules and method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules

---

JP2019134704A|2019-08-15|Formation of array of membranes and apparatus therefor

---

US10416117B2|2019-09-17|Formation of layers of amphiphilic molecules

---

JP2010531972A|2010-09-30|Method and device for controlled monolayer formation

---

Mager et al.2008|Nanopore‐Spanning Lipid Bilayers for Controlled Chemical Release

---

US7678545B2|2010-03-16|Polyelectrolyte multilayer films at liquid-liquid interfaces and methods for providing and using same

---

Ahmed et al.2020|Rapid lipid bilayer membrane formation on Parylene coated apertures to perform ion channel analyses

---

EP3811078A1|2021-04-28|A method and device for assaying the interaction and dynamics of permeation of a molecule and a lipid bilayer

---

US20180355314A1|2018-12-13|3D spatially organized cultured neuronal tissue by means of stacking beads comprising hydrogel encapsulated cells

---

Marchand et al.2017|Integration of solid-state nanopores into a functional device designed for electrical and optical cross-monitoring

---

Takahashi et al.2015|Autonomous buckling of micrometer-sized lipid-protein membrane patches constructed by Dictyostelium discoideum

---

JP5839706B2|2016-01-06|Microhole substrate manufacturing method

---

Elias2021|Microfluidics to characterize and manipulate biomimetic membranes

---

Hromada Jr2007|Bilayer lipid membrane | integration into microfluidic platforms with application toward BLM-based biosensors

---

Sung2007|Electric and Microfluidic Manipulation of Molecules and Particles in Microfabricated Devices.

同族专利:

---

公开号 | 公开日

---

IN2014DN06797A|2015-05-22|

---

EP2815234A2|2014-12-24|

---

US20150014160A1|2015-01-15|

---

GB201202519D0|2012-03-28|

---

US20190391128A1|2019-12-26|

---

CN104246498B|2016-06-29|

---

WO2013121193A3|2013-10-24|

---

US10338056B2|2019-07-02|

---

EP2815234B1|2018-04-11|

---

CA2864397A1|2013-08-22|

---

CN104246498A|2014-12-24|

---

WO2013121193A2|2013-08-22|

---

JP2015508164A|2015-03-16|

---

AU2013220148B2|2018-10-11|

引用文献:

---

公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题

---

US3799743A|1971-11-22|1974-03-26|Alexander James|Stable lysis responsive lipid bilayer|

---

JPS5274882A|1975-12-18|1977-06-23|Fujitsu Ltd|Superhigh density liquid contact connector|

---

US4154795A|1976-07-23|1979-05-15|Dynatech Holdings Limited|Microtest plates|

---

WO1990002327A1|1988-08-18|1990-03-08|AUSTRALIAN MEMBRANE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE LTD., Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization|Improvements in sensitivity and selectivity of ion channel membrane biosensors|

---

GB8924338D0|1989-10-28|1989-12-13|Atomic Energy Authority Uk|Electrodes|

---

JPH0414773A|1990-05-07|1992-01-20|Fujitsu Ltd|Electric connecting member and device|

---

JPH04127066A|1990-09-18|1992-04-28|Fujitsu Ltd|Method and apparatus for connecting signal terminal|

---

JPH04215052A|1990-10-23|1992-08-05|Yokogawa Electric Corp|Lipid film type chemical material sensor|

---

EP0532215B1|1991-09-10|1997-04-16|Fujitsu Limited|Electrical connecting method|

---

EP0690983A4|1993-03-05|1998-01-28|Univ Wollongong|Pulsed electrochemical detection using polymer electroactive electrodes|

---

WO1994025862A1|1993-05-04|1994-11-10|Washington State University Research Foundation|Biosensor substrate for mounting bilayer lipid membrane containing a receptor|

---

US5605662A|1993-11-01|1997-02-25|Nanogen, Inc.|Active programmable electronic devices for molecular biological analysis and diagnostics|

---

US6095148A|1995-11-03|2000-08-01|Children's Medical Center Corporation|Neuronal stimulation using electrically conducting polymers|

---

JP3822946B2|1996-05-30|2006-09-20|三洋電機株式会社|Bilayer device|

---

JP3961588B2|1996-06-18|2007-08-22|日本メジフィジックス株式会社|Radionuclide elution device packaging interior material|

---

US6503452B1|1996-11-29|2003-01-07|The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University|Biosensor arrays and methods|

---

US7144486B1|1997-04-30|2006-12-05|Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Arkansas|Multilayer microcavity devices and methods|

---

US7169272B2|1997-04-30|2007-01-30|Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Arkansas|Microfabricated recessed disk microelectrodes: characterization in static and convective solutions|

---

GB9712386D0|1997-06-14|1997-08-13|Univ Coventry|Biosensor|

---

US7244349B2|1997-12-17|2007-07-17|Molecular Devices Corporation|Multiaperture sample positioning and analysis system|

---

EP1054992B1|1998-02-17|2005-04-27|University College Cardiff Consultants Ltd.|Method and packaging for introducing substances into the cell plasma membrane and/or cytosol|

---

CA2348002A1|1998-10-27|2000-05-04|Malcolm W. Mcgeoch|Biological ion channels in nanofabricated detectors|

---

US6267872B1|1998-11-06|2001-07-31|The Regents Of The University Of California|Miniature support for thin films containing single channels or nanopores and methods for using same|

---

US6300141B1|1999-03-02|2001-10-09|Helix Biopharma Corporation|Card-based biosensor device|

---

US6916488B1|1999-11-05|2005-07-12|Biocure, Inc.|Amphiphilic polymeric vesicles|

---

WO2001059447A1|2000-02-11|2001-08-16|Yale University|Planar patch clamp electrodes|

---

WO2001083674A1|2000-05-03|2001-11-08|Gau Jen Jr|Biological identification system with integrated sensor chip|

---

AU8747201A|2000-09-19|2002-04-02|Cytion Sa|Sample positioning and analysis system|

---

EP1322955B1|2000-10-02|2012-06-13|Sophion Bioscience A/S|System for electrophysiological measurements|

---

GB0026276D0|2000-10-27|2000-12-13|Univ Ulster|Method for chlorine plasma modification of silver electrodes|

---

CN1310379C|2001-01-16|2007-04-11|郑慧光|Method for improving conductive performance of easily detachable connector for electric line|

---

US6913697B2|2001-02-14|2005-07-05|Science & Technology Corporation @ Unm|Nanostructured separation and analysis devices for biological membranes|

---

AU2002338371A1|2001-04-06|2002-10-21|The Regents Of The University Of California|Silicon-wafer based devices and methods for analyzing biological material|

---

AU2002307529B2|2001-04-26|2007-02-01|Agilent Technologies, Inc.|Hollow fiber membrane sample preparation devices|

---

US7077939B1|2001-06-18|2006-07-18|The Texas A&M University System|Method and apparatus for nanoparticle transport and detection|

---

US6863833B1|2001-06-29|2005-03-08|The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University|Microfabricated apertures for supporting bilayer lipid membranes|

---

US6890409B2|2001-08-24|2005-05-10|Applera Corporation|Bubble-free and pressure-generating electrodes for electrophoretic and electroosmotic devices|

---

US20050230272A1|2001-10-03|2005-10-20|Lee Gil U|Porous biosensing device|

---

AU2002365079A1|2001-10-03|2003-06-30|Osman A. Basaran|Device and bioanalytical method utilizing asymmetric biofunction alized membrane|

---

EP1451584B1|2001-11-09|2011-05-11|3dbiosurfaces Technologies, LLC|High surface area substrates for microarrays and methods to make same|

---

US6783645B2|2001-12-18|2004-08-31|Dionex Corporation|Disposable working electrode for an electrochemical cell|

---

FR2844052B1|2002-08-28|2005-07-01|Commissariat Energie Atomique|DEVICE FOR MEASURING THE ELECTRIC ACTIVITY OF BIOLOGICAL ELEMENTS AND ITS APPLICATIONS|

---

JP2004158330A|2002-11-07|2004-06-03|Toshiba Corp|Test socket of semiconductor device|

---

CN1232813C|2003-03-13|2005-12-21|东南大学|Method for preparing probe tip of nano tube|

---

WO2004092331A2|2003-04-08|2004-10-28|Li-Cor, Inc.|Composition and method for nucleic acid sequencing|

---

US7347921B2|2003-07-17|2008-03-25|Agilent Technologies, Inc.|Apparatus and method for threading a biopolymer through a nanopore|

---

JP4394917B2|2003-09-19|2010-01-06|独立行政法人科学技術振興機構|Current measuring device with artificial lipid bilayer membrane|

---

JP4394916B2|2003-09-19|2010-01-06|独立行政法人科学技術振興機構|Artificial lipid bilayer membrane formation apparatus, artificial lipid bilayer membrane formation method, and use thereof|

---

JP3769622B2|2003-09-22|2006-04-26|国立大学法人東京大学|Artificial lipid membrane formation method and lipid planar membrane formation apparatus therefor|

---

EP1678488A1|2003-10-22|2006-07-12|Ambri Limited|Novel sensor configuration|

---

WO2005071405A1|2004-01-21|2005-08-04|Japan Science And Technology Agency|Method of forming planar lipid double membrane for membrane protein analysis and apparatus therefor|

---

GB2431013B|2004-07-23|2008-05-21|Electronic Bio Sciences Llc|Method and apparatus for sensing a time varying current passing through an ion channel|

---

US7163830B2|2004-10-12|2007-01-16|Salmon Peter C|Method for temporarily engaging electronic component for test|

---

KR100698961B1|2005-02-04|2007-03-26|주식회사 아이센스|Electrochemical Biosensor|

---

GB0505971D0|2005-03-23|2005-04-27|Isis Innovation|Delivery of molecules to a lipid bilayer|

---

WO2006104639A2|2005-03-29|2006-10-05|Stanford University|Device comprising array of micro-or nano-reservoirs|

---

US20060228402A1|2005-04-08|2006-10-12|Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin|Techniques for forming a lipid bilayer membrane|

---

CA2605025A1|2005-04-15|2006-10-26|Genencor International, Inc.|Viral nucleoprotein detection using an ion channel switch biosensor|

---

JP4953044B2|2005-05-09|2012-06-13|財団法人生産技術研究奨励会|Method and apparatus for forming lipid bilayer membrane|

---

EP1909852A4|2005-06-16|2009-02-18|Univ California|Amyloid beta protein channel structure and uses thereof indentifying potential drug molecules for neurodegenerative diseases|

---

US7713218B2|2005-06-23|2010-05-11|Celleration, Inc.|Removable applicator nozzle for ultrasound wound therapy device|

---

JP5114702B2|2005-07-29|2013-01-09|国立大学法人東京大学|Method and apparatus for forming bilayer film by contact with amphiphilic monolayer|

---

US8005526B2|2005-08-31|2011-08-23|The Regents Of The University Of Michigan|Biologically integrated electrode devices|

---

US8986781B2|2005-10-27|2015-03-24|Corning Incorporated|Immobilized multi-layer artificial membrane for permeability measurements |

---

WO2007049576A1|2005-10-28|2007-05-03|Kuraray Co., Ltd.|Cell culture container and cell culture method|

---

AU2007251545A1|2006-05-17|2007-11-22|Eppendorf Array Technologies S.A.|Identification and quantification of a plurality of biological organisms or their components|

---

JP2009156572A|2006-04-06|2009-07-16|National Institutes Of Natural Sciences|Ion channel protein biosensor|

---

US20070298511A1|2006-04-27|2007-12-27|The Texas A&M University System|Nanopore sensor system|

---

GB0614835D0|2006-07-26|2006-09-06|Isis Innovation|Formation of bilayers of amphipathic molecules|

---

US9018019B2|2006-10-04|2015-04-28|President And Fellows Of Harvard College|Engineered conductive polymer films to mediate biochemical interactions|

---

JP2008194573A|2007-02-09|2008-08-28|Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd|Lipid double film forming method|

---

EP2122344B8|2007-02-20|2019-08-21|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Lipid bilayer sensor system|

---

GB2446823A|2007-02-20|2008-08-27|Oxford Nanolabs Ltd|Formulation of lipid bilayers|

---

US20080254995A1|2007-02-27|2008-10-16|Drexel University|Nanopore arrays and sequencing devices and methods thereof|

---

EP3798317A1|2007-04-04|2021-03-31|The Regents of the University of California|Compositions, devices, systems, and methods for using a nanopore|

---

WO2008156041A1|2007-06-18|2008-12-24|Kuraray Co., Ltd.|Cell culture container and cell culture method|

---

CN100523799C|2007-06-27|2009-08-05|浙江大学|Polyelectrolyte / intrinsic conducting polymer composite humidity sensor and its production method|

---

GB0716264D0|2007-08-21|2007-09-26|Isis Innovation|Bilayers|

---

US8698481B2|2007-09-12|2014-04-15|President And Fellows Of Harvard College|High-resolution molecular sensor|

---

JP5441142B2|2007-11-26|2014-03-12|国立大学法人東京大学|Microfluidic planar lipid bilayer array and analytical method using the planar lipid bilayer membrane|

---

GB2482446B|2007-11-30|2012-03-14|Electronic Bio Sciences Llc|Method and apparatus for single side bilayer formation|

---

GB0724736D0|2007-12-19|2008-01-30|Oxford Nanolabs Ltd|Formation of layers of amphiphilic molecules|

---

AT530497T|2008-03-31|2011-11-15|Sony Deutschland Gmbh|METHOD FOR PRODUCING A MEMBRANE WITH A TAPERIC PORE|

---

CA2750874A1|2009-01-30|2010-08-05|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Hybridization linkers|

---

JP2010186677A|2009-02-13|2010-08-26|Ritsumeikan|Conductive structure, actuator, variable resistor, turning member, turning connector, electric motor, controller, rotation information detecting device, stroke detection device, and method of manufacturing conductive terminal|

---

WO2010117470A2|2009-04-10|2010-10-14|Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc.|Nanopore sequencing devices and methods|

---

EP2422198B1|2009-04-20|2013-09-25|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Lipid bilayer sensor array|

---

GB0909923D0|2009-06-09|2009-07-22|Oxford Gene Tech Ip Ltd|Picowell capture devices for analysing single cells or other particles|

---

CN102741430B|2009-12-01|2016-07-13|牛津楠路珀尔科技有限公司|Biochemical analyzer, for first module carrying out biochemical analysis and associated method|

---

US20120010085A1|2010-01-19|2012-01-12|Rava Richard P|Methods for determining fraction of fetal nucleic acids in maternal samples|

---

US8324914B2|2010-02-08|2012-12-04|Genia Technologies, Inc.|Systems and methods for characterizing a molecule|

---

US20110287414A1|2010-02-08|2011-11-24|Genia Technologies, Inc.|Systems and methods for identifying a portion of a molecule|

---

KR20110100963A|2010-03-05|2011-09-15|삼성전자주식회사|Microfluidic device and method for deterimining sequences of target nucleic acids using the same|

---

CA2793971A1|2010-03-23|2011-09-29|Kuraray Co., Ltd.|Culture method for causing differentiation of pluripotent mammalian cells|

---

DE102010022929B4|2010-06-07|2013-07-18|Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg|Method for producing a bilipid layer and microstructure and measuring arrangement|

---

CN103392008B|2010-09-07|2017-10-20|加利福尼亚大学董事会|Movement by continuation enzyme with the precision controlling DNA of a nucleotides in nano-pore|

---

WO2012107778A2|2011-02-11|2012-08-16|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Mutant pores|

---

WO2013041878A1|2011-09-23|2013-03-28|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Analysis of a polymer comprising polymer units|

---

AU2012324639B2|2011-10-21|2017-11-16|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Method of characterizing a target polynucleotide using a pore and a Hel308 helicase|

---

EP2798083B1|2011-12-29|2017-08-09|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Method for characterising a polynucelotide by using a xpd helicase|

---

KR102086182B1|2011-12-29|2020-03-06|옥스포드 나노포어 테크놀로지즈 리미티드|Enzyme method|

---

WO2013121224A1|2012-02-16|2013-08-22|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Analysis of measurements of a polymer|

---

US9777049B2|2012-04-10|2017-10-03|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd.|Mutant lysenin pores|

---

CA2879355C|2012-07-19|2021-09-21|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Helicase construct and its use in characterising polynucleotides|

---

US10808231B2|2012-07-19|2020-10-20|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Modified helicases|

---

WO2014019603A1|2012-07-30|2014-02-06|Nmi Naturwissenschaftliches Und Medizinisches Institut An Der Universitaet Tuebingen|Connector plate for a microfluidic sample chip, microfluidic sample chip and examination method using a microfluidic sample arrangement region|

---

WO2014064444A1|2012-10-26|2014-05-01|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Droplet interfaces|

---

WO2015055981A2|2013-10-18|2015-04-23|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Modified enzymes|

---

EP2970605B1|2013-03-14|2021-12-01|Arkema, Inc.|Methods for crosslinking polymer compositions in the presence of atmospheric oxygen|

---

GB201313121D0|2013-07-23|2013-09-04|Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd|Array of volumes of polar medium|

---

CN203466320U|2013-09-20|2014-03-05|番禺得意精密电子工业有限公司|Electric connector|

---

GB201418512D0|2014-10-17|2014-12-03|Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd|Electrical device with detachable components|EP2122344B8|2007-02-20|2019-08-21|Oxford Nanopore Technologies Limited|Lipid bilayer sensor system|

---

GB0724736D0|2007-12-19|2008-01-30|Oxford Nanolabs Ltd|Formation of layers of amphiphilic molecules|

---

GB201313121D0|2013-07-23|2013-09-04|Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd|Array of volumes of polar medium|

---

GB201418512D0|2014-10-17|2014-12-03|Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd|Electrical device with detachable components|

---

GB2574048B|2018-05-24|2021-06-16|Oxford Nanopore Tech Ltd|Nanopore sensor component with electrostatic discharge protection|

---

US11124829B2|2018-06-29|2021-09-21|Illumina, Inc.|Flow cells|

---

CN113061531B|2021-06-03|2021-08-20|成都齐碳科技有限公司|Chip structure, chip assembly, film forming method, nanopore sequencing device and application|

法律状态:
2018-10-25| DA3| Amendments made section 104|Free format text: THE NATURE OF THE AMENDMENT IS: AMEND THE INVENTION TITLE TO READ APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING AN ARRAY OF LAYERS OF AMPHIPHILIC MOLECULES AND METHOD FOR PREPARING AN APPARATUS FOR FORMING SUCH AN ARRAY |

---

2019-02-07| FGA| Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)|

优先权:

---

申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题

---

GB1202519.3||2012-02-13||

---

GBGB1202519.3A|GB201202519D0|2012-02-13|2012-02-13|Apparatus for supporting an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules and method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules|

---

PCT/GB2013/050333|WO2013121193A2|2012-02-13|2013-02-13|Apparatus for supporting an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules and method of forming an array of layers of amphiphilic molecules|

---