• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    The invention relates to a method for the model-based control of an SCR system (1) having at least one SCR catalytic converter (13), wherein an SCR catalytic converter model (26) of the SCR controls the injection of a reductant upstream of the SCR catalytic converter (13) Catalyst (13), wherein in the SCR catalyst model (26) at least one Arrhenius approach based reaction rate f and / or SCR efficiency (HSCR) of at least one relevant reaction in the SCR catalyst (13) is calculated, and wherein Deviations between a real system behavior and the simulated system behavior can be adapted by means of an adaptation logic (28). In order to minimize the deviations between the model and the real system behavior and to achieve an improved control accuracy, it is provided that at least one adaptation parameter (k) is included in the calculation of at least one reaction rate rr and / or one SCR efficiency (HSCR) Deviations between a real system behavior and the simulated system behavior taken into account, wherein the adjustment parameter (k) is determined as a function of at least one operating parameter (Pi, P2) of the SCR system (1).
    公开号:AT512514A4
    申请号:T50330/2012
    申请日:2012-08-21
    公开日:2013-09-15
    发明作者:Bernd Dipl Ing Dr Techn Breitschaedel；Bernhard Dipl Ing Breitegger
    申请人:Avl List Gmbh；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    | iÖ2dl 2/50 ^ 0 56468
    The invention relates to a method for model-based control of an SCR system having at least one SCR catalytic converter, wherein a physical SCR catalytic converter model of the SCR catalytic converter is used to control the injection of a reductant upstream of the SCR catalytic converter, wherein in the SCR catalytic converter model at least one calculated on an Arrhenius approach reaction rate r and / or an SCR efficiency of at least one relevant reaction in the SCR catalyst is calculated, and wherein deviations between a real system arrest and the simulated system behavior are adapted by means of an adaptation logic.
    It is known to perform model-based SCR control in SCR systems with at least one SCR catalyst. In this case, a physical model of the SCR catalytic converter is implemented in the control. This observer model serves as a so-called virtual sensor to determine system sizes that can not be measured directly. In the application, deviations between the real system behavior and the simulated model values must always be expected. Therefore, an adaptation logic must be implemented, which identifies the model error based on metrologically accessible quantities and adapts the model values in a suitable manner.
    The model of the SCR catalytic converter includes modules for calculating the SCR efficiency, for NH3 oxidation and for NH3 absorption and NH3 desorption. Under SCR efficiency is here understood the efficiency of the conversion of nitrogen oxides (NOx) into harmless components (N2 and water).
    The documents DE 103 47 130 A1, DE 103 47 131 A1 and DE 103 47 132 A1 each disclose a method for estimating an amount of ammonia stored in a urea-based SCR catalyst on the basis of a dynamic model of the catalyst. The model takes into account the chemical and physical properties of the catalyst, such as catalyst volume, the number of available ammonia storage locations,
    Adsorption and desorption dynamics, as well as poisoning, thermal aging, and catalyst operating temperatures, and generates the estimate based on an amount of reductant injected into the catalyst to facilitate NO * reduction and downstream of a measured value of NOx in an exhaust mixture from the catalyst. The estimated amount of 2 stored ammonia is used to maintain the desired amount of ammonia storage so that maximum NOx conversion efficiency associated with minimal ammonia leakage is achieved.
    The publications DE 10 2010 002 620 A1, DE 10 2011 105 626 A1 and DE 10 2009 027 184 A1 describe methods for the compensation of the errors in the estimation of the stored NH3 by adaptation of the amount of reductant added.
    DE 10 2008 041 603 A1 describes a method for the direct adaptation of errors in the stored NH 3.
    DE 10 2008 036 884 A1 describes a method for the compensation of errors in the stored NH 3, and for the compensation of errors in the amount of the reductant.
    There is no known from the prior art, which compensates for errors in the SCR efficiency.
    The object of the invention is to minimize the deviations between the model and the real system behavior and to achieve an improved control inaccuracy.
    According to the invention, this is achieved by including in the calculation of at least one reaction rate r and / or SCR efficiency at least one adaptation parameter k, which takes into account deviations between a real system behavior and the simulated system behavior, wherein the adaptation parameter is a function of at least one operating parameter of the SCR system.
    Preferably, it is provided that at least one reaction rate f is determined according to the following equation: f-K-klA.PJ-eKtC-jy / fC.Z), 3
    I where r ... the reaction rate [mol / m 2 s] # k (P i, P 2) ... the adaptation parameter,
    Pi, P2 ... considered operating parameters of the SCR system, K ... a pre-exponential term for the reaction, E ... the activation energy for the reaction [J / mol], R ... the universal gas constant [J / mol / K] T ... the temperature [K] C ... vector with concentration of gas species such as NO, N02, NH3, 02 [mol / m3] Z ... vector with surface species such as NH3, HC [ mol / m2].
    From these reaction rates r, the SCR efficiency is determined. The SCR efficiency is calculated from the NOx concentrations at the inlet and outlet of the SCR system. .100%
    CNOx, US where 77 ^ the SCR efficiency (%) the ΝΟχ concentration upstream of the SCR system [mol / m3]
    CNOx.US 4 cnox, that is the ΝΟχ concentration downstream of the SCR system [mol / m3]. Thus, a numerical modeling is required, which calculates the concentrations after the SCR catalyst from the calculated reaction rates, and the concentrations before the SCR catalyst. Models of this kind are already prior art and therefore not part of the invention. In DE 103 47 130 Al, for example, such a numerical model is described, but numerous changes or modifications of this numerical model are possible. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the adaptation parameter k may depend not only on two operational parameters as in this example, but also on only one operating parameter or even more operating parameters. In the mathematical formulation of the reaction rates r, an adaptation parameter k is inserted. This adaptation parameter k is defined as a function of one or more operating parameters.
    It is preferably provided that an adaptation parameter is determined as the quotient of the efficiency calculated from the measured SCR efficiency and from the SCR model. As an operating parameter, the temperature of the SCR catalyst, and / or the temperature of an arranged in the same exhaust line upstream of the SCR catalyst oxidation catalyst can be considered.
    Dependent on an operating parameter, a characteristic curve results for the adaptation parameter k, and a characteristic field depends on two operating parameters. This characteristic curve or characteristic map is thus stored as a data field with discrete interpolation points. The adaptation parameter k is advantageously defined as a function of an operating parameter of the SCR system by a characteristic curve or as a function of two operating parameters by a characteristic diagram with interpolation points. An adaptation parameter that is not exactly on the interpolation points can be calculated by weighting the distance to neighboring interpolation points from the respective interpolation point values.
    An adaptation logic minimizes the deviation between the model value and the real behavior by adapting those values at the adjacent nodes in the characteristic curve 5 or in the characteristic map which are closest to the current operating point. If the correction factor is stored in the form of a characteristic, so-called 2-point adaptation can be used. In this case, those 2 interpolation points which are closest to the current operating point are adjusted simultaneously. If the adaptation parameter is stored in the form of a characteristic field, a so-called 4-point adaptation can be used. Here, 4 interpolation points are adjusted simultaneously which are closest to the current operating point. It is particularly advantageous if, in a self-learning process, those values at the interpolation points which are closest to the respective current operating point are adapted to the real behavior, by adapting from the second adaptation parameter calculated from the characteristic or the characteristic field and the measured first adjustment parameter, a third adaptation parameter is calculated, wherein the neighboring support points are preferably updated on the basis of the third adaptation parameter and the corresponding weighting factors determined on the basis of the distances to the adjacent support point values. The temporal change of this third adaptation parameter and subsequently the interpolation point values calculated therefrom can be realized by fed-back filters, for example an infinite impulse response filter (IIR filter).
    The method described makes it possible to minimize the deviations between the physical model and the real system behavior. As a result, an improved control accuracy and an improved rege quality can be achieved. This results in high SCR efficiencies with low NH3 emissions. Furthermore, by applying the method production fluctuations of the installed catalysts as well as changes in the catalyst behavior (for example due to aging effects) can be detected by control technology. The evaluation of the adaptation parameters can also be taken into account in diagnostic functions of an on-board diagnostic system.
    The invention will be explained in more detail below with reference to FIG.
    1 schematically shows hardware and software of an SCR system, FIG. 2 shows the dependence of the SCR efficiency on the adaptation parameter k, FIG. 3 shows the SCR efficiency diagram with characteristics for the adaptation parameter and the real system, FIG. 4 the adaptation parameter k as a function of a 6
    6 shows a 2-point interpolation for an adaptation parameter k, FIG. 7 shows a 2-point adaptation for an adaptation parameter k, FIG. 8 shows a 4-point interpolation for a 9, a 4-point adaptation for an adaptation parameter k, and FIG. 10 an example of a write-back process of corrected values to individual interpolation points.
    A model-based SCR system 1 consists of a hardware 10 and the software 20. The hardware 10 includes an exhaust line 11 of an internal combustion engine 12 with an SCR catalytic converter 13, upstream of the SCR catalytic converter 13 a injector 14 for a reductant, for example urea, is arranged. Upstream US and downstream DS of the SCR catalyst 13, a NOx sensor 15, 16 is arranged in each case. Further sensors 17 serve to detect the temperature T, the mass flow m, the pressure p or the like in the exhaust line 11 upstream of the US or downstream DS of the SCR catalytic converter 13. Furthermore, in the exhaust line 11 upstream of the SCR catalytic converter 13, a diesel diesel unit (not shown) can be provided. Oxidation catalyst may be arranged.
    The software 20 also calculates a calculated SCR efficiency (nsciuness) from the signals of the two NOx sensors 15 and 16.
    The software 20 has an exhaust emission model 21, a solver 22 with a controller core 23 and a setpoint adjuster 24, tuning values and maximum values, and an observer 25 with an SCR catalyst model 26, a NOx sensor model 27 and an adaptation logic 28. The exhaust emission model, the data of the sensors 15 and 17 are supplied.
    The SCR catalyst model 26 is used for the control of the SCR catalyst 13. The observer 25 serves as a virtual sensor to determine system sizes, which can not be measured directly. In the application, deviations between the real system behavior and the simulated model values are always to be expected. Therefore, an adaptation logic 28 has to be implemented which identifies the model error based on the metrologically accessible quantities and adapts the model values in a suitable manner. 7
    The SCR catalyst model 26 is based on a physical approach, that is, the rates of the relevant reactions are calculated individually. Here, so-called Arrhenius approaches are used:
    Example of such formulation: (i) 4NHS + 2NO + 2NO 2 4N 2 + 6H 2 O
    where r ... the reaction rate [mol / m2s], K ... a pre-exponential term for the reaction, E ... the activation energy for the reaction, R ... the universal gas constant [J / kmol /] T .. the temperature [K]
    Cx ... the concentration of species x [mol / m3] ZNH3 ... The surface loading on NH3 [mol / m2] is. Because of the limited computational capabilities of today's controllers that implement such methods of controlling an SCR system, such formulas are often implemented, at least in part, in the form of characteristics, maps, or the like. However, the method according to the invention can also be applied mutatis mutandis to such implementations.
    In order to be able to adapt the SCR catalytic converter model 26, an adaptation parameter k is inserted in one or more reaction rates r. By varying the adaptation parameter k, the model result can be influenced:
    r = K-k (Pl, P2) · exp 1Γ, (3) where k (Pi, P2) ... the adaptation parameter,
    Pi, P2 ... considered operating parameters of the SCR system, K ... a pre-exponential term for the reaction, E ... the activation energy for the reaction [J / mol], R ... the universal gas constant [J / mol / K] T ... the temperature [K]
    Cx ... the concentration of the species x [mol / m3]
    Znh3 ... The surface loading on NH3 [mol / m2] is.
    FIG. 2 schematically shows the dependence of the model result ME on an influencing variable x upon variation of the adaptation parameter k.
    However, the deviation between measured data and model may require different adaptation factors k for different values of the input parameters. Therefore, k is defined as a function of one or two operating parameters Pi, P2: r = Kk (Pi, P1) Qxif -E RT, 'Cnoi' C-no '
    FIG. 3 shows a model result ME (for example SCR efficiency) as a function of an influencing variable x (operating parameter Pi), where "+" is used. Points are plotted with real system behavior. By varying the adaptation parameter k, an approximation to the real system behavior can take place. (4)
    Depending on an operating parameter PI, k results in a characteristic curve. In the dependence of two operating parameters results for k a map. This characteristic curve or the characteristic field is stored as a data field with discrete interpolation points.
    The adaptation logic 28 minimizes the deviation between model value and real behavior by adjusting those nodes in the characteristic curve or in the map which are closest to the current operating point. FIG. 4 shows a characteristic for a 2-point adaptation, wherein A denotes the current operating point and Bi and B2 denote the modified reference points closest to the current operating point A. 5 shows, analogously, a 4-point adaptation in the case of a characteristic diagram, with the current operating point A and the modified reference points Bi, B2 "B3, B4.
    The adaptation consists of the steps of interpolation and the actual adaptation, the interpolation always being selective and the adaptation being selectively active.
    FIGS. 6 and 7 show a 2-point interpolation (FIG. 6) and a 2-point adaptation (FIG. 7) using the example of a characteristic.
    In the following, the SCR efficiency Hscr is used as a considered model result ME.
    A first adaptation parameter k is preferably determined as the quotient of the measured sensor-based SCR efficiency nSCR, mess and the efficiency nScR calculated from the model, modei at defined operating conditions as a function of one or more operating parameters Pi, P2. The temperature of the SCR catalytic converter is taken into account as the first operating parameter Pi, while the temperature of a diesel oxidation catalytic converter is taken into account as the second operating parameter P2. k = tfsCR, mess (5)
    In the case of a single operating parameter Pi, the SCR efficiency riscR.modei is calculated via a characteristic curve, in the case of two influencing variables via a characteristic diagram. 10
    A second adaptation parameter kscR, corr2 is obtained in a 2-point interpolation (characteristic curve) or a 4-point interpolation (characteristic diagram) over the distances ai, a2, a3, a4 to the two or four adjacent interpolation points Bi, B2, B3 / B4 calculated as shown in Figs. 6 and 8 is demonstrated. In the adaptation shown in FIGS. 7 and 9, from this second adaptation parameter kSCRiC0 [r2 and the measured first adaptation parameter k, a new third adaptation parameter kscR, coir3 is calculated, which increases with the same weighting factors (distances a1 # a2, a3, a4) the interpolation points Bi, B2, B3 / B4 is written to the respective interpolation point values (two or four) Bi, B2, B3, B4. The calculation of this third adaptation parameter kScR, corr3 is performed similarly to a feedback IIR filter to allow a slow adaptation to the measured SCR efficiency nscR, measZu. The adaptation parameter kScR ^ orr3 can also be treated as a difference. The writing back of the corrected values to the individual interpolation points can optionally be permitted or suppressed by suitable activation conditions AB. This process is illustrated by way of example for a 4-point interpolation to a 4-point adaptation in FIG. 10, wherein the filter constant a is used to weight the currently calculated correction value kscR.con-i by multiplication by a and to store the stored correction value kscR.con-i. 2, which is weighted by 1-a by multiplication. This then results in the new correction value kSCR.Corr3 · Via activation conditions AB, the supporting bodies Bi, B2, B3, B4 of the 4-point adaptation shown in FIG. 10 in the right-hand section can be activated (possibly partially) or not. The nodes Bi, B2, B3, B4 of the 4-point adaptation shown in the left section are always active.
    权利要求:
    Claims (11)
    [1]
    A method for model-based control of an SCR system (1) having at least one SCR catalytic converter (13), wherein an SCR catalytic converter model (26) for controlling the injection of a reductant upstream of the SCR catalytic converter (13) SCR catalyst (13) is used, wherein in the SCR catalyst model (26) at least one Arrhenius approach based reaction rate r and / or SCR efficiency (Hscr) of at least one relevant reaction in the SCR catalyst (13) is calculated, and wherein deviations between a real system behavior and the simulated system behavior are adapted by means of an adaptation logic (28), characterized in that at least one adaptation parameter (k) is included in the calculation of at least one reaction rate r and / or one SCR efficiency (η5α0) Deviations between a real system behavior and the simulated system behavior are considered, whereby the adaptation parameter (k) is determined as a function of at least one operating parameter (Pi, P2) of the SCR system (1).
    [2]
    2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that at least one reaction rate r is determined according to the following equation:

    where r ... the reaction rate [mol / m2s]. k (Pi, P2) ·· the adaptation parameter, Pj, P2 ... considered operating parameters of the SCR system, K ... a pre-exponential term for the reaction E ... the activation energy for the reaction [J / mol], 12 R ... the universal gas constant [J / mol / K] T ... the temperature [K] C ... vector with concentration of gas species such as NO, N02, NH3 / 02 [mol / m3] Z ... Vector with loadings of surface species such as NH3 / HC [mol / m2].
    [3]
    3. Method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the simulated system behavior is the SCR efficiency (Hscr).
    [4]
    4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the adaptation parameter (k) as a quotient of the measured SCR effect level (nscR.mess) and the calculated from the SCR catalyst model (26) efficiency (riscR_modei) is determined ,
    [5]
    5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that at least one operating parameter (Pi) is the temperature of the SCR catalyst (13).
    [6]
    6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that at least one operating parameter (P2) is the temperature of an oxidation catalyst upstream of the SCR catalyst.
    [7]
    7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the adaptation parameter (k) as a function of at least one operating parameter (Pi, P2) of the SCR system (1) by a characteristic curve or a map with support points (Bi, B2, B3, B4) is shown.
    [8]
    8. Method according to one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that a second adaptation parameter (kscR, ^) is calculated over the distance to adjacent support points (Bi, B2, B3, B4) weighted from the respective support value values and the adaptation parameter ( k) is corrected by the second adaptation parameter (kScR, corr2). ί





    13
    [9]
    9. The method according to claim 7 or 8, characterized in that those interpolation points (Bi, B2 / B3, B4), which are closest to the respective current operating point, are adapted to the real behavior by using in the adaptation from the second adaptation parameter ( kscR, corr2) and the adaptation parameter (k) a third adaptation parameter (kscR, corr3) is calculated, preferably based on the third adaptation parameter (kScR, corr3) and on the basis of the distances to the adjacent support points (Bi, B2, B3, B4) are updated to certain corresponding weighting factors (ai, a2, a3, a4) the adjacent nodes (Bi, B2, B3, B4).
    [10]
    10. The method according to claim 9, characterized in that the update of the adjacent support points (Bi, B2, B3, B4) is performed by means of at least one filter with infinite impulse response.
    [11]
    11. The method according to claim 9 or 10, characterized in that the updating of the support points (Bi, B2, B3, B4) by suitable activation conditions (AB) can either be either allowed or suppressed. 2012 08 21 Fu
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    AT512514B1|2013-09-15|Method for model-based control of an SCR system having at least one SCR catalytic converter
    EP2310112B1|2018-04-18|Method for operating an exhaust gas treatment system having an scr catalytic converter
    DE112011101563T5|2013-06-27|Ammonia sensor controller with NOX feedback from an SCR aftertreatment system
    DE102009047960B4|2016-10-27|Apparatus and method for optimizing exhaust temperature control in a vehicle during particulate filter regeneration
    DE102016122849A1|2017-06-08|Soot load estimation during idle or low load
    EP2684597A1|2014-01-15|Method for reducing nitrogen oxides in diesel engine exhaust
    DE102011103346A1|2012-08-16|Method for the model-based determination of the temperature distribution of an exhaust aftertreatment unit
    DE102013204422A1|2013-09-19|Low-dimensional three-way catalyst model for control and diagnostics
    DE102015100286A1|2015-07-23|One-dimensional three-way catalyst model for control and diagnostics
    DE19903439A1|2000-08-03|Method and device for controlling an exhaust gas aftertreatment system
    DE102017207362A1|2017-11-09|METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MONITORING PARTICLES IN AN EXHAUST SYSTEM
    DE102014018037A1|2015-06-25|A method of determining a NOx reduction performance of a NOx reduction catalyst device disposed in an exhaust passage of an automotive internal combustion engine
    DE102018132313A1|2019-06-19|Method and apparatus for monitoring an exhaust aftertreatment system for an internal combustion engine
    DE102011085952A1|2013-05-08|SCR catalyst system and method of operation
    DE102016222010A1|2017-06-01|Method for controlling an internal combustion engine with a low-pressure exhaust gas recirculation system
    WO2017063987A1|2017-04-20|Exhaust gas treatment for an internal combustion engine
    WO2011138277A1|2011-11-10|Method for operating an internal combustion engine
    DE102011083775A1|2013-04-04|Method and device for operating an internal combustion engine
    EP3320195B1|2019-08-07|Method for operating an exhaust gas aftertreatment systemcomprising a selective catalytic reduction catalyst
    DE102014115631A1|2015-04-30|System for efficiency compensation of the washcoat thickness of an SCR filter
    DE102014115630A1|2015-04-30|System for ammonia compensation of the washcoat thickness of a filter for selective catalytic reduction
    DE102013222308B4|2016-05-19|Method and system for predicting a flow rate of soot leaving the engine
    DE102004000065A1|2006-06-08|Controlling the regeneration of a particulate filter for an internal combustion engine comprises spatially resolved modeling of the combustion of particulates in the filter
    DE102018007421B4|2021-07-01|Dynamic ammonia excess detection using a software algorithm to eliminate the ammonia sensor
    DE102016120919A1|2017-05-18|Method and apparatus for controlling reductant injection into an exhaust gas feed
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    DE102013108483A1|2014-05-28|
    AT512514B1|2013-09-15|
    US20140056788A1|2014-02-27|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    DE10347131A1|2002-10-21|2004-05-13|Ford Global Technologies, LLC, Dearborn|exhaust aftertreatment systems|
    DE10347132A1|2002-11-21|2004-06-17|Ford Global Technologies, LLC, Dearborn|exhaust aftertreatment systems|
    DE10347130A1|2002-11-21|2004-06-17|Ford Global Technologies, LLC, Dearborn|exhaust aftertreatment systems|
    US20100313548A1|2009-06-16|2010-12-16|Ford Global Technologies, Llc|Emission Control System with an Optimized Reductant Injection Model|
    DE102010060099A1|2010-10-21|2012-04-26|Ford Global Technologies, Llc.|Method for adapting an SCR catalyst in an exhaust system of a motor vehicle|
    DE102011011441B3|2011-02-16|2012-06-14|Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh|Dynamic breakthrough detection method for SCR catalysts|
    US8281572B2|2008-04-30|2012-10-09|Cummins Ip, Inc.|Apparatus, system, and method for reducing NOx emissions from an engine system|
    DE102008036884A1|2008-08-07|2010-02-11|Daimler Ag|Method for operating an emission control system with an SCR catalytic converter|
    DE102008041603A1|2008-08-27|2010-03-04|Robert Bosch Gmbh|Method for operating an internal combustion engine with SCR catalytic converter|
    DE102009027184A1|2009-06-25|2010-12-30|Robert Bosch Gmbh|Method for adaptation of catalyst system to internal combustion engine of e.g. passenger car, involves determining long-term adaptation factor based on deviation between actual and reference values of dosage amount|
    DE102010002620A1|2010-03-05|2011-09-08|Robert Bosch Gmbh|Method for managing selective catalytic reduction catalyst to postprocess exhaust gases in heat engine of motor vehicle to reduce nitrogen oxides in exhaust gases, involves increasing proportioning of reducing agent|
    US8276373B2|2010-07-01|2012-10-02|GM Global Technology Operations LLC|Adaptive control of SCR urea injection to compensate errors|DE102012221905A1|2012-11-29|2014-06-05|Robert Bosch Gmbh|A method of operating an exhaust aftertreatment system having at least one first SCR device and at least one second SCR device|
    US9291084B2|2013-08-15|2016-03-22|GM Global Technology Operations LLC|Vehicle and a method of updating efficiency of a selective catalytic reduction filter of an exhaust treatment system of the vehicle|
    US9739190B2|2015-11-12|2017-08-22|GM Global Technology Operations LLC|Method and apparatus to control reductant injection into an exhaust gas feedstream|
    DE102016209566A1|2016-06-01|2017-12-07|Ford Global Technologies, Llc|Controlling a nitrogen oxide emission in the exhaust gas of an internal combustion engine|
    AT521117A1|2018-04-06|2019-10-15|Avl List Gmbh|Method for functional testing of SCR catalysts of an SCR system|
    CN111335993B|2020-03-26|2021-06-25|安徽华菱汽车有限公司|Automobile and error reporting method and system for simulating low efficiency of SCR system thereof|
    法律状态:
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    ATA50330/2012A|AT512514B1|2012-08-21|2012-08-21|Method for model-based control of an SCR system having at least one SCR catalytic converter|ATA50330/2012A| AT512514B1|2012-08-21|2012-08-21|Method for model-based control of an SCR system having at least one SCR catalytic converter|
    DE102013108483.4A| DE102013108483A1|2012-08-21|2013-08-06|Method for model-based control of an SCR system having at least one SCR catalytic converter|
    US13/969,584| US20140056788A1|2012-08-21|2013-08-18|Method for the model-based feedback control of an scr system having at least one scr catalytic converter|
    [返回顶部]